2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTop Democrat Storms Fox News And Blows Up Plot To Revive Clinton Email Scandal
Those who are pushing the NYPost --owned by Murdock-- email story here on Du should be ashamed of themselves. Sanders himself said enough!! I have listened to Schiff--He knows his stuff. Listen to him --a good Democrat and stop pushing smears.
Top Democrat Storms Fox News And Blows Up Plot To Revive Clinton Email Scandal
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/24/top-democrat-storms-fox-news-blows-plot-revive-clinton-email-scandal.html
By: Jason Easley
Sunday, January 24th, 2016, 2:53 pm
schiff-fox-clinton-emails
Top House Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (CA) went on Fox News Sunday and blew up their attempt to revive the Clinton email scandal by exposing Republican plot to bring down Hillary Clinton.
Video:
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
WALLACE: Congressman Schiff, I want to pick up on one thing that Senator Lankford said, the inspector general, Charles McCullough, who sent this information, and he wasnt offering it, he was simply reporting what the intelligence community was saying, appointed by Barack Obama, confirmed unanimously by a Democratic-controlled Senate. He hardly seems like the right person for a political hit job.
SCHIFF: Well, I would say this, Chris, youve got several Republican chairs who are actively campaigning against Hillary Clinton and doing investigations of her at the same time. One of which went to a
WALLACE: Charles McCullough isnt. He was a he was an Obama appointee.
SCHIFF: No, no, no. No, let me finish. One of which went to a Trump rally and said his purpose is to defeat Hillary Clinton. These are people who are conducting investigation in Congress of the secretary during the presidential campaign. So I think the inspector general has to be very careful not allow not to allow him to be used by one political party against another during the presidential race. And I think the inspector general had to know or should know that when you put an unclassified form letter, you have to reasonably expect its going to be leaked. And that letter, I have to say, was gratuitous in the information it included. It could have transmitted the information from the intelligence community without commentary in it. But by putting that commentary in it, knowing its going to be leaked, I think the inspector general does risk his reputation. And once you lose that as inspector general, youre not much good to anyone. So I think the inspector general has to be very careful here...........................
Gothmog
(145,307 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)But there's this pesky FBI investigation...
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)I don't leaking is the appropriate term.