Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:07 AM Jan 2016

Last Question for Clinton: "I can see why they gave you this question"

Did I hear that right? That young person just revealed that "they" gave him this question to ask Hillary. And that question was who was her favorite president... To which she had a canned answer. That's just wrong and horrible that CNN didn't take real questions for Hillary.

114 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Last Question for Clinton: "I can see why they gave you this question" (Original Post) berni_mccoy Jan 2016 OP
You heard it right... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #1
clip tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #55
I caught that too DVRacer Jan 2016 #2
+1 MissDeeds Jan 2016 #9
Its a conspiracy I tell you! hrmjustin Jan 2016 #3
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but what is the alternative explanation? n/t ram2008 Jan 2016 #15
Her husband was a former president as was her boss. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #18
Why did he say "I can see why they gave you this question" ram2008 Jan 2016 #20
You do understand they picked the questions and those who asked them? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #28
Do you understand that the questions were supposed to be from the audience? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #93
He submitted the question "for any candidate". One candidate would get the question. CNN decided. nt ieoeja Jan 2016 #114
But why would he say, "I can see why THEY GAVE YOU this question." JDPriestly Jan 2016 #62
Probably when they selected the people who would get to ask their questions, they also decided tblue37 Jan 2016 #79
The evening was set up to favor Hillary. But for me, she talked too much about herself and JDPriestly Jan 2016 #81
So, you make more crap up to contribute to this conspiray OP. Shame on you. riversedge Jan 2016 #85
In teaching older students for 40 years, this young man seems to have come in to - listen and DhhD Jan 2016 #111
He also called her Secretary Sanders... Agschmid Jan 2016 #4
Yeah, that's some real out there stuff thinking that they might load some questions for her. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #13
Maybe it was a Sanders supporter..... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #27
- draa Jan 2016 #32
I kept wondering if there would be a bulge under her jacket if she turned around... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #5
I know, right? n/t FourScore Jan 2016 #16
Wow.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #21
Woah...slow down... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #24
Oh....good.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #30
Honestly... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #31
Ace Ventura. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #35
I just really remember W's cod piece..... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #41
No, that's not how you leapt there. merrily Jan 2016 #108
Maybe at the next Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #110
And that is a totally nasty smear. murielm99 Jan 2016 #47
HA HA HA HA HA! "He gives the same speech over and over." Yes, he does. Whereas Hillary Clinton Gene Debs Jan 2016 #65
She has detailed plans. murielm99 Jan 2016 #66
and her details change too. As far as Sanders' plans—None are so blind as those Gene Debs Jan 2016 #67
As are Hillary's murielm99 Jan 2016 #70
Not only does Sanders give the same answers but he avoids the question asked politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2016 #76
Correct. murielm99 Jan 2016 #83
Calling someone sexist ridiculously is not a nasty smear? merrily Jan 2016 #105
DUzy... Agschmid Jan 2016 #39
Why, is Bill's now missing? LOL John Poet Jan 2016 #68
As if continuous accusations of sexism aren't nasty? merrily Jan 2016 #103
Really? W is a moron, whereas HRC is a brilliant woman with great command of the language. tblue37 Jan 2016 #80
Oh, she's definitely a gifted orator. VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #101
Being the DNC's chosen automatically gets you support from some. Oratory or not. merrily Jan 2016 #107
I heard it. Jaw dropping that we got to hear it. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #6
Who Gave Who The Question?..... global1 Jan 2016 #7
very well could be Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #10
I read that post. Most 840high Jan 2016 #69
I saw that too Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #8
He was called to ask the question he submitted. joshcryer Jan 2016 #11
Too late. Agschmid Jan 2016 #42
are you serious? nt retrowire Jan 2016 #63
Yes, that's how they almost always take questions. joshcryer Jan 2016 #64
the guy said retrowire Jan 2016 #71
He was referring to his question. joshcryer Jan 2016 #74
yes my wife found this out last night retrowire Jan 2016 #112
Why they gave YOU this (my) question whatthehey Jan 2016 #106
I noticed that as well oberliner Jan 2016 #12
I don't understand what happened there Renew Deal Jan 2016 #14
That question certainly raised questions. Broward Jan 2016 #17
I think it answered a few as well. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #19
+1 OrwellwasRight Jan 2016 #23
Lol, well done. draa Jan 2016 #36
Wow! I hope the media caught that CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #22
Obviously all the questions were pre-selected. Each questioner was introduced by name ecstatic Jan 2016 #25
Yep. That's how I look at it too. n/t Contrary1 Jan 2016 #77
Caught that as well. Sadly, we knew there would be plants and softballs for HRC. Jackilope Jan 2016 #26
Cause your brother said you were really a great athelete.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #33
That was a trap. This was canned. There's a difference berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #37
Yeah....cause the question about her being called dishonest.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #49
If she knew they were coming they were. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #51
That was a set up to talk about his age. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #94
What did the moderator say at the beginning? toshiba783 Jan 2016 #29
The person acted as if it was not his question. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #34
The person also adressed her as Senator Sanders... toshiba783 Jan 2016 #52
Yes, the questionners were introduced by name and school. --FOR ALL 3 CANDIIDATES. NO riversedge Jan 2016 #40
There is a story somewhere on DU, I read it earlier today about a girl being onecaliberal Jan 2016 #38
all 3 CANDIDATES QUESTIONS FOR AUDIANCE WERE INTRODUCED BY NAME AND SCHOOL riversedge Jan 2016 #43
I actually missed the opening. Rilgin Jan 2016 #48
I think the question we should be asking is... draa Jan 2016 #44
My guess? Chris Cuomo. Townhalls are a frickin farce these days -- it is all just optics. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #82
I caught this as well Rilgin Jan 2016 #45
Does anyone think... quickesst Jan 2016 #46
Could be... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #50
Maybe he meant the question to be for Bernie not Hillary and they had him switch oberliner Jan 2016 #53
Why would they have him switch? Maybe my clock is wrong but one thing I noticed on that last Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #56
CNN's post show discussion played Hillary up & ended with her. senz Jan 2016 #57
yeah the post show was all about Hillary. retrowire Jan 2016 #72
What do you think he meant by his remark? oberliner Jan 2016 #88
On the face of it this sounds like someone other than him selected the question, although Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #95
That might be. On the other hand one could say her answer was well prepared Matariki Jan 2016 #61
One other thing I noticed. Rilgin Jan 2016 #54
Good point. Very observant. senz Jan 2016 #58
OMGGGGOO>>>>>>>>>>>Another fricking Make up piece of crap by a Sanders fan that is bound to riversedge Jan 2016 #87
so busted Matariki Jan 2016 #59
I can understand why CNN would have varied questions lovemydog Jan 2016 #60
Damn,...nothing on but reruns. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #73
K & R AzDar Jan 2016 #75
Another stupid conspiracy theory debunked. Anyone think people will ever wise up? Hoyt Jan 2016 #78
Chuckle. 53 RECs. Sad for DU riversedge Jan 2016 #84
+1, LOL n/t FSogol Jan 2016 #86
Right, so they decided to have that question go to HRC oberliner Jan 2016 #89
They did not "write the question for him." That's implication. Clinton had a 1 out of 3 chance to Hoyt Jan 2016 #102
Agreed oberliner Jan 2016 #113
Who said it was a conspiracy? I stand by my observation. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #91
I predict a dozen more OPs about this mcar Jan 2016 #98
That does not debunk it. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #100
it's such a dumb fucking question-- no real person cares about that shit Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #90
Agreed. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #92
Yep. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #104
Seems glaringly obvious. 99Forever Jan 2016 #96
Looked to me like the young man was a Sanders supporter... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #97
At least it wasn't "Boxers or Briefs?". Buns_of_Fire Jan 2016 #99
I loved her answer CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #109
 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
9. +1
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:12 AM
Jan 2016

I caught that too. Wonder if the kid really goofed up or if he let that out of the bag on purpose...

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
18. Her husband was a former president as was her boss.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:14 AM
Jan 2016

She is a unique candidate and that made it interesting.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
93. Do you understand that the questions were supposed to be from the audience?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:08 AM
Jan 2016

How could "they" give her the question? Did the kid want to ask that of any candidate? Did "they" decide only she got to answer it? I thought the questions were supposed to be asked of specific candidates.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
114. He submitted the question "for any candidate". One candidate would get the question. CNN decided. nt
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jan 2016

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
62. But why would he say, "I can see why THEY GAVE YOU this question."
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:02 AM
Jan 2016

Who is the "they" that gave Hillary the question. How was the question selected? Was it really from the young man from Logan, Iowa (still a small town I bet after all these years, a town in which everybody knows everybody)?

Who gave the question?

tblue37

(65,477 posts)
79. Probably when they selected the people who would get to ask their questions, they also decided
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:54 AM
Jan 2016

which of the candidates the questions would go to.

Since Clinton is married to a former president, the boy might have been thinking the organizers wanted to put her on the spot in a humorous way: would she feel that she had to claim her husband was the most inspiring president, or would she feel obligated to say it was Obama, who had made her SoS and had essentially endorsed her in a recent interview?

Since neither of the other candidates has close personal ties to other living presidents, they would not feel put on the spot by such a question, so I imagine the boy was thinking that was why they chose his question for her.

I am a Bernie supporter, and I realize it could possibly have been a plant and a canned answer, but I think my more benign explanation is much more likely.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
81. The evening was set up to favor Hillary. But for me, she talked too much about herself and
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:36 AM
Jan 2016

her experience, much of it irrelevant. It just reminded me how little real political experience she has had compared to Bernie.

I did not hear all of her answers, but I thought she was weak.

Bernie was great!!!

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
111. In teaching older students for 40 years, this young man seems to have come in to - listen and
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

compare, Secretaries. He walked in on the Clinton side of the fence. Then he could see why they were controlling the questions. Clinton certainly wants to remain on her side of the fence, as moving Left lately, has not been good at all for her. Questions that she does not control, like at the debates and though another candidate's campaign, have caused anger and aggression that should not be happening for any politician who could have control of the red button at 2:00 AM. Instead of anger and aggression, Clinton should be providing real answers but instead she is telling the people that she asks the questions and answers them too in a Hillary Presidency. She is still angry about Democrats not electing her in the Primary of 2008. What is our punishment once she is in office? She scares the crap out of me. And this is the new crap that she is flinging.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
13. Yeah, that's some real out there stuff thinking that they might load some questions for her.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jan 2016

Crazypants cuckoo bird stuff. Must be off our rocker to think that could be the case.

Go on.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
27. Maybe it was a Sanders supporter.....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

Who got nervous, but is so inspired that he can't get Bernie out of his mind!

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
5. I kept wondering if there would be a bulge under her jacket if she turned around...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:11 AM
Jan 2016

like there was under W's.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
21. Wow....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jan 2016

Glad the candidates aren't nasty like some of their supporters!

Guess a woman who is assertive must have a penis, hey?

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
24. Woah...slow down...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

...the reference here is an earpiece and transmitter with someone feeding her questions and answers.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,362 posts)
110. Maybe at the next Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jan 2016

A lot of functionality can be installed in a package these days.

murielm99

(30,754 posts)
47. And that is a totally nasty smear.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:29 AM
Jan 2016

If anyone needs help, it is Sanders. He gives the same speech over and over, and canned answers. Does he even listen to the questions?

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
65. HA HA HA HA HA! "He gives the same speech over and over." Yes, he does. Whereas Hillary Clinton
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:09 AM
Jan 2016

has a different speech on every issue, depending on whatever focus group she's addressing.

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
67. and her details change too. As far as Sanders' plans—None are so blind as those
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jan 2016

who will not see. His plans are all laid out online for anyone who cares to actually look for them.

murielm99

(30,754 posts)
70. As are Hillary's
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:15 AM
Jan 2016

if you visit her website. And hers are better and more detailed.

He was asked many times for details on his health care plan. Right before the debate, he released an eight page rough draft.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
76. Not only does Sanders give the same answers but he avoids the question asked
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:29 AM
Jan 2016

and finds a way to work his canned answer into the original question and even work up that canned anger while doing so. The only thing new is that he's now trying to show that grouchy Uncle Bernie he has a sense of humor.

murielm99

(30,754 posts)
83. Correct.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 07:39 AM
Jan 2016

I noticed that during the debates.

Can you imagine him sitting down with Putin or the Iranians and doing that?

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
68. Why, is Bill's now missing? LOL
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:13 AM
Jan 2016

If Hillary finally gave him a 'Lorena Bobbitt',
she might pick up a couple million votes...


merrily

(45,251 posts)
103. As if continuous accusations of sexism aren't nasty?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:04 PM
Jan 2016

The post said nothing about "aggressive" and penises usually make bulges in trousers, not jackets, but you came up with accusing a poster of being sexist--ironically after making a crack about the nastiness of Sanders supporters.

tblue37

(65,477 posts)
80. Really? W is a moron, whereas HRC is a brilliant woman with great command of the language.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:57 AM
Jan 2016

I support Bernie, but it is simply absurd to suggest that Hillary can't speak circles around most people without help from someone offstage feeding her answers.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
101. Oh, she's definitely a gifted orator.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jan 2016

Given she can say lie about something she said back in 2004 yesterday and have people eat it up like she's the second coming of Christ...

global1

(25,263 posts)
7. Who Gave Who The Question?.....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:11 AM
Jan 2016

There was a post on DU earlier today where a female was given a question to ask Hillary by her campaign. They needed a college student. Is this the same thing happening here?

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
74. He was referring to his question.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:28 AM
Jan 2016

Brett Rosengren
‏@Brett_Rose1596

Brett Rosengren Retweeted Addy Cole

This was not completely random, but I was my own question directed to any candidate

https://twitter.com/Brett_Rose1596/status/691859242614157312

Addy Cole
‏@addycole

@qualityrkc @Brett_Rose1596 The staff at CNN. #demtownhall had a disclaimer that questions were screened and sorted.

https://twitter.com/addycole/status/691858868968751104

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
106. Why they gave YOU this (my) question
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jan 2016

Pretty simple really. Audience submits questions to organizers. Organiozers pick their favorite submissions and assign them to a candidate.


The "you" is the important bit. If he's been given the question it would have been "I can see why they gave ME this question FOR you."

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
12. I noticed that as well
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jan 2016

I thought it was a little strange.

Sort of a pointless question if you ask me.

Renew Deal

(81,869 posts)
14. I don't understand what happened there
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jan 2016

I don't get what he meant. Why would they give her that question? Was it his question?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
22. Wow! I hope the media caught that
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jan 2016

And asks him what he meant!

Wouldn't be that difficult to track him down.

If anyone did plant questions...oh boy.

ecstatic

(32,727 posts)
25. Obviously all the questions were pre-selected. Each questioner was introduced by name
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

and occupation/ school. I'm thinking the entire audience submitted questions and were either randomly (or not so randomly) selected from the audience. Like that show the Price is Right.

Jackilope

(819 posts)
26. Caught that as well. Sadly, we knew there would be plants and softballs for HRC.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

The illusion isn't really working when the acting is so blatant and bad.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
33. Cause your brother said you were really a great athelete....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:21 AM
Jan 2016

Do you agree?

was a real hard question!

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
49. Yeah....cause the question about her being called dishonest....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jan 2016

and that why is there a lack of enthusiasm in your campaign?

And why are young people not supporting you?

Yep, soooo soft!

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
94. That was a set up to talk about his age.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:12 AM
Jan 2016

Hell, even Cuomo admitted that when he said he didn't care about Bernie's athleticism.

toshiba783

(74 posts)
29. What did the moderator say at the beginning?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

Didn't the audience submit questions and then CNN screened/selected them?

toshiba783

(74 posts)
52. The person also adressed her as Senator Sanders...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:40 AM
Jan 2016

So how he appeared to you isn't indicative of the truth.

It's possible that he submitted this as a potential question for any of the candidates, and just prefaced the question with an acknowledgment of it's awkward nature since it was chosen for her - or perhaps he submitted multiple questions.


onecaliberal

(32,882 posts)
38. There is a story somewhere on DU, I read it earlier today about a girl being
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jan 2016

Approached by the Clinton campaign to ask a scripted question. She said they had several scripted questions and she wasn't the only 1 to be approached. It was ALL scripted for Clinton. Time warner owns her did anyone think it was going to be fair. I have to say it was worse than I thought it would be.

riversedge

(70,273 posts)
43. all 3 CANDIDATES QUESTIONS FOR AUDIANCE WERE INTRODUCED BY NAME AND SCHOOL
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:26 AM
Jan 2016

DID YOU NOTICE THAT? DID YOU LISTEN TO THE OPENING STATEMENT BY THE MODERATOR??

Rilgin

(787 posts)
48. I actually missed the opening.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:31 AM
Jan 2016

Can you please inform us of how the questions and questioners were selected by CNN. It seems from your post that the Moderator addressed this in his opening statement. I missed it and in fact missed all of the Bernie section although I heard MOM and Hillary.

It was a strange statement to say in a Town Meeting. Your information may clear it all up.

draa

(975 posts)
44. I think the question we should be asking is...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:27 AM
Jan 2016

If the questions were prescreened, which I'm sure they were, who picked the questions to be asked to each candidate. I don't believe it was a planted question but I think it's fair to ask who choose them in the first place.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
45. I caught this as well
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016

It clearly means that he alone did not select this question to ask Hillary. There is no other explanation of this opening.

I can think of some reasonably innocent explanations such as the question was actually his but CNN determined either randomly or by selection that it would be addressed to Hillary. In this case, this was not what we normally think of as a Town Meeting where the audience determines who they will question and about what.

This clearly demands some explanation from CNN as to how the questions and questioners were determined.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
46. Does anyone think...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016

... that those people who asked questions were the only ones who were permitted to submit a question?
Better question is why did they schedule this town hall meeting on the very night that the magicians premiered on the sci-fi channel? Huh? Huh? I'm pretty sure DWS had something to do with that. Ok, gotta stop now. Hard to type while you're rolling on the floor

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
50. Could be...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:35 AM
Jan 2016

Hard to tell if it was an ad-lib. Frankly, I think the looks on the younger voters faces gave much away. Their bullshit meters are pretty rock solid.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
53. Maybe he meant the question to be for Bernie not Hillary and they had him switch
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:53 AM
Jan 2016

That would explain why he called Hillary "Secretary Sanders" initially and then made the comment.

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
56. Why would they have him switch? Maybe my clock is wrong but one thing I noticed on that last
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:59 AM
Jan 2016

question it was four minutes past the hour when the Town Hall should have ended.

I do believe that question was meant as a closing subliminal image tying Hillary to President Lincoln.

It was a gift by CNN.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
57. CNN's post show discussion played Hillary up & ended with her.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:09 AM
Jan 2016

Interesting that the two panel members who stood up most strongly for Sanders were Van Jones and Donna Brazil.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
88. What do you think he meant by his remark?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:34 AM
Jan 2016

I am trying to figure out what the "I see why they gave you this question" comment means.

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
95. On the face of it this sounds like someone other than him selected the question, although
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:10 AM
Jan 2016

it's not a total lock, it's possible he just worded it badly and was just referring to CNN allowing him to issue that particular question to Hillary.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
54. One other thing I noticed.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:58 AM
Jan 2016

When Hillary was answering questions from the audience, the moderator left the entire stage to her. When MOM and Bernie were answering, he stayed on the stage.

I do not want to make too much of this but the impression it leaves is that she is the headliner and that the early questions were over and it would become a Hillary event rather than a moderated town hall event. This was the case even when Bernie was walking the stage. The moderator was on stage although off to the side.

When she was addressing the audiance, he was off stage She was left to engage directly with the audience by herself.

riversedge

(70,273 posts)
87. OMGGGGOO>>>>>>>>>>>Another fricking Make up piece of crap by a Sanders fan that is bound to
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:33 AM
Jan 2016

circulate and become the 'truth" You learn well from the RW conspirators

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
60. I can understand why CNN would have varied questions
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:22 AM
Jan 2016

that are vetted somewhat beforehand. I think CNN should explain how they come up with questions and how they're assigned.

All the candidates do lots of town halls. Some are on c-span. Some of the questions can get pretty whacky.

I don't want to watch a town hall shortly before the first caucus where the questions are 'Who do you think will win the Super Bowl?' or 'What's your favorite beer?'

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
89. Right, so they decided to have that question go to HRC
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:36 AM
Jan 2016

But the questioner had not intended it for her necessarily - so the remark expresses that it made sense that they would choose to have him direct the question to her since her husband is a former president.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
102. They did not "write the question for him." That's implication. Clinton had a 1 out of 3 chance to
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:03 PM
Jan 2016

get any question at random.

I suspect CNN decided when they saw the kid's question, hey this would be a cool question for someone whose husband was Prez, let's see how she handles it.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
113. Agreed
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jan 2016

The young man wrote and submitted the question (directed it towards any candidate). CNN decided to have it asked to HRC, probably because her husband had been POTUS. The questioner realized this and made his comment.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
91. Who said it was a conspiracy? I stand by my observation.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:51 AM
Jan 2016

The young man said what he said. It was most certainly a canned question. And her answer was clearly prepared. Nothing in my OP is debunked by what you linked.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
90. it's such a dumb fucking question-- no real person cares about that shit
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:46 AM
Jan 2016

"what president do you admire most?"

massive eye-roll.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
96. Seems glaringly obvious.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:13 AM
Jan 2016

Hillary can't compete unless the game is rigged. Unfortunately, in matters of State, that doesn't work.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
97. Looked to me like the young man was a Sanders supporter...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

...hence the initial slip when he started to say "Secretary Sanders" then corrected himself. Also it implies he may have rehearsed his question as going to Senator Sanders. Then when he says "I can see why they gave you this question" that would tend to imply that those running the town hall decided that his question should go to Secretary Clinton instead.

That's my take. If that's what happened then it would be interesting to know how many questions were redirected to other candidates?

And yes I admit I could be wrong. That's just how it struck me.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,188 posts)
99. At least it wasn't "Boxers or Briefs?".
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jan 2016

Who's your favorite president? For all candidates, Washington or Lincoln is always a safe bet. For Democrats, FDR and Kennedy are pretty safe. For republicans, naturally, St. Reagan is the ultimate go-to. Any candidate who would answer "Millard Fillmore" would probably be dragged off stage.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Last Question for Clinton...