Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:16 AM Jan 2016

Ta-Nahesi Coates -- under the bus or not?

This might rip the fabric of the space-time continuum.

Last week, Ta-Nahesi Coates correctly criticized Bernie's campaign for going all-in with infeasible plans on economic issues, while "dismissing reparations specifically, and for offering up a series of moderate anti-racist solutions." And we all know what happens to people who commit that sort of thought-crime.

But the plot thickens. Recently he criticized Hillary, also correctly, for "retelling a racist—though popular—version of American history," with regards to the post-Civil War.

Upon reading this second article, the first instinct is obviously that the Most Excellent Order of the Bernie Empire should give Coates a knighthood. But he's already under the bus! Can you go from Hillary shill to Most Excellent Hero? How does this work?

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ta-Nahesi Coates -- under the bus or not? (Original Post) DanTex Jan 2016 OP
Non-factor. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #1
This OP's sole purpose is to be divisive. Punkingal Jan 2016 #2
Not at all. I'm interested in how the Bernie attack machine is going to deal with Coates. DanTex Jan 2016 #3
That you are not Arthur, and we are not Hobson? lol Babel_17 Jan 2016 #19
"Not at all." == the definition of disingenuousness. n/t ljm2002 Jan 2016 #29
Do you have an English-Bernista dictionary I can borrow? Seems like a strange language. DanTex Jan 2016 #30
Awww, how cute... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #32
LOL. "Cute." Kinda new to the internet, are we? DanTex Jan 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author ljm2002 Jan 2016 #35
What 'attack machine'? elias49 Jan 2016 #39
Same crap as last night and that one got locked farleftlib Jan 2016 #4
You just described 95% of the OP's in GDP Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #14
And that unites us! Babel_17 Jan 2016 #17
damn, I wish you Hillary people would retire that tired "under the bus" crap. m-lekktor Jan 2016 #5
What are your thoughts on the term "Camp Weathervane"? nt Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #9
"Camp Weathervane" is a sacred phrase. Don't be silly. DanTex Jan 2016 #13
It's a very common term. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #15
LOL! Damn that Obama for throwing people under the bus! Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #18
He should just endorse Jill Stein Lans Jan 2016 #6
Asking questions that St Bernie doesn't have canned answers for is verboten. baldguy Jan 2016 #7
If we're gonna talk about "canned answers" VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #20
Did you know it is possible to agree with people on some issues and disagree with them on others? Bjorn Against Jan 2016 #8
Which is why the favorite activity in Camp GDP is singing Kumbahyah & making s'mores. nt Hekate Jan 2016 #42
Who the hell is Ta-Nahesi Coates? NaturalHigh Jan 2016 #10
"The Bernie attach machine?" PatrickforO Jan 2016 #11
Ta-Nahesi Coates knows how to generate clicks to to his page Babel_17 Jan 2016 #12
Anyone willing to vote for more of the same, or advocate it 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #16
Preach. VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #21
+1 deutsey Jan 2016 #27
Sanders is going to be more of the same on issues, he's admitted it, he going under the bus too? uponit7771 Jan 2016 #40
As long as he is working for change no 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #46
So do you have one of these available? BumRushDaShow Jan 2016 #43
I will have to order some. N/t 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #45
Is he running for something? (nt) enough Jan 2016 #22
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service BumRushDaShow Jan 2016 #23
I'm a survivor! DanTex Jan 2016 #26
Hooray! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #28
LOL BumRushDaShow Jan 2016 #31
Man, I should have. The other one came to mind first, for some reason. DanTex Jan 2016 #33
Oh good. I love public transportation discussions, but one question for #4 Hekate Jan 2016 #44
Monday night CANNOT come soon enough for me. bullwinkle428 Jan 2016 #24
Nope and No Change. Hell of a campaign theme. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #25
Ta-Nahesi Coates. Irrelevant. Autumn Jan 2016 #36
I'm glad to see that TNC responded to Sanders' supporters and broadened his criticism to include HRC aikoaiko Jan 2016 #37
He should not be thrown under the bus Gothmog Jan 2016 #38
Flamebait heah! Get your flamebait! frylock Jan 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2016 #47
... DanTex Jan 2016 #48
Nope, he is right. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #49

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
3. Not at all. I'm interested in how the Bernie attack machine is going to deal with Coates.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jan 2016

What do you think?

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
19. That you are not Arthur, and we are not Hobson? lol
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jan 2016


Arthur: Oh, stay with me, Hobson. You know I hate to be alone.
Hobson: Yes, bathing is a lonely business.
Arthur: Except for fish.
Hobson: I beg your pardon? Did you say "except for fish"?
Arthur: Yes... fish all bathe together. Although they do tend to eat one another. I often think... fish must get awfully tired of seafood. What are you thoughts, Hobson?
Hobson: Pardon me...
<rises, removes Arthur's top hat and smacks him upside the head>

http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0016906/quotes

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
32. Awww, how cute...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jan 2016

...I guess you had a little trouble understanding my response. Here, let me help:

Another poster said you were being divisive with your OP (which is the simple truth, of course). You replied "Not at all". Hence my reply. For your edification, here are the relevant dictionary entries:

disingenuous, adjective

1. lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere


Related forms

disingenuously, adverb
disingenuousness, noun
nondisingenuous, adjective
nondisingenuously, adverb
nondisingenuousness, noun

Response to DanTex (Reply #34)

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
5. damn, I wish you Hillary people would retire that tired "under the bus" crap.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016

you need new lines, your collective schtick is getting as stale as your candidate.

Lans

(66 posts)
6. He should just endorse Jill Stein
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016

I strongly believe that she is the political nominee that aligns closes to his beliefs. Coates publicly endorsing Jill would be something I believe no one can hold against him.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
7. Asking questions that St Bernie doesn't have canned answers for is verboten.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jan 2016

As is pointing out his inconsistencies.

Of course he goes under the bus!

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
20. If we're gonna talk about "canned answers"
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jan 2016

shouldn't we be looking at Secretary Weathervane first and foremost? I'm certain she's got different labeled cans for every different direction that the winds of political change could blow.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
8. Did you know it is possible to agree with people on some issues and disagree with them on others?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jan 2016

Believe it or not it is even possible to disagree with someone without throwing them under the bus.

PatrickforO

(14,587 posts)
11. "The Bernie attach machine?"
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jan 2016

So...if someone posts something here with which I disagree and then I post my argument, does this make me part of the 'attack machine?' Just wondering.

As to Coates, I didn't particularly like what he said because it made me feel very uncomfortable as a white male. I went through all the arguments in my mind and then realized the guy is right. Sad thing is you're never gonna get that through. But he's right. I don't think I posted anything on that thread because I wasn't sure what to say and all my arguments would have been lame.

Now he's criticizing Clinton. Well, he's probably right there, too, even though THAT makes me feel uncomfortable as well.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
12. Ta-Nahesi Coates knows how to generate clicks to to his page
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jan 2016

He's probably smiling at how predictably easy it is.

I have to assume he has interesting things he could say, but there's the matter of credibility.

So, I passed then, I'll pass now.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
16. Anyone willing to vote for more of the same, or advocate it
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

Can crawl their asses under the bus as far as I' m concerned. After all, they put the non rich there first.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
46. As long as he is working for change no
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

He has already brought change by running. I know I won't agree with him on everything. His positions has decades of proof who he works for. If he goes corporate,, which he won't, I would throw him under there too.

BumRushDaShow

(129,426 posts)
23. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jan 2016

On Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:21 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Ta-Nahesi Coates -- under the bus or not?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511075218

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Same reason for alerting as the last "under the bus" thread.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:30 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Hard to tell which parts of this post are meant as sarcasm, and which are just knowingly wrong. Just leave it -- it's too self-consciously clever to be taken even half seriosly.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How about the alerter arguing why the assertion is not true?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Cripes, folks, lighten up. Not worth the alert.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Vote hide which has nothing to do with bus undercarriages, nor the message in the OP, but because "the Most Excellent Order of the Bernie Empire" is way OTT and a broad brushed insult towards many on DU.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I can see why people believe this poster is intentionally being divisive. To make his point in this manner is taking his chances with the jury. I opt to leave it based on the fact that this is GDP and I believe that the point to be made is that Bernie's political revolution is real.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing in the post content that is disruptful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. Perhaps the alerter could be more specific as in pointing out the offending passage(s).

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

(FYI... )

Hekate

(90,787 posts)
44. Oh good. I love public transportation discussions, but one question for #4
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

"i think that Hillary might have just crapped her drawers..." survived 0-7.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280102581

Have we got some standards for discourse here or what? Just makes my heart go pitty-pat.

aikoaiko

(34,183 posts)
37. I'm glad to see that TNC responded to Sanders' supporters and broadened his criticism to include HRC
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:36 PM
Jan 2016

Although it wasn't done as well.

I understand that he has very little interest in Bernie Sanders (as a white liberal) and less interest in lesser candidates ()HRC and Republicans) because they are all failing black people, but still the piece on Bernie went viral while his Clinton piece is not really getting much attention due to the way he framed the criticisms.

I find it difficult to understand why he doesn't even think it is in HRC's possibility to endorse reparations and yet says nothing about the vast support of African Americans for HRC.

I think such an analysis might even be too radical even for TNC.







Response to DanTex (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ta-Nahesi Coates -- under...