2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders at a Crossroads: Attack Hillary Clinton or Stay Positive?
Bernie has not stayed positive for last month? He has been negative on the stump and on Sunday news show.
Bernie Sanders at a Crossroads: Attack Hillary Clinton or Stay Positive?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/us/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-iowa.html
By JASON HOROWITZ and YAMICHE ALCINDORJAN. 27, 2016
Photo
Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont at a campaign event on Monday at Grinnell College in Iowa. Credit Max Whittaker for The New York Times
DES MOINES Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and his top advisers will gather on Wednesday to confront a decision that will have lasting consequences for his presidential campaign and his political image: whether to open a new, tougher line of advertising against his rival Hillary Clinton in the closing days of the race for Iowa.
The meeting comes as both campaigns acknowledge that Mrs. Clinton has pulled slightly ahead in polling for the Iowa caucuses on Monday. Some advisers to Mr. Sanders believe he can win here only by drawing sharper contrasts with her, especially by emphasizing her ties to Wall Street.
The senator has prided himself on running an inspiring, issue-oriented campaign, and he speaks often of how he is not interested in tearing Mrs. Clinton down.
Continue reading the main story
But the decision he is now grappling with echoes questions voiced by his supporters as Mr. Sanders finds himself within striking distance of Mrs. Clinton in Iowa: Does he have the stomach to directly attack her, and potentially defeat her, or will he be satisfied having injected important issues into the race and preserving his well-earned reputation for eschewing negative campaigning?
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)riversedge
(70,296 posts)Left to do a short shift just after I posted it. Should have looked better.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Despite what a bunch of establishment hacks think.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Pointing out Hillary's record is not going "negative", if you want to see what negative really looks like check out her 2008 campaign.
Hillary's 3am commercial, her mailer on Obama and guns, her refusal to state he wasn't a Muslim, racist dog whistles, etc.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)from Sach's, Wall Street and other elites..not an attack ...but a fact!
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)If the above is accurate, Hillary won't be able to say much without getting clobbered by charges of hypocrisy (on top of all the falsely negative stuff she's done the last few weeks)
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)The horror, the horror.....two candidates battling it out with Clintonian negativity.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Note to Jury: I haven't said what he'll choose, or what he should choose. I'm merely assessing the situation and the choices he has before him, and wondering what his choice will be. This is not an attack on any particular candidate or the candidate's supporters.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Soon we'll get the Woman Card, I just know it. Bernie and his Bros, beating up on an elderly woman and her entourage. (It's not ageist...we're the same age, HRC and I, that is)
New definition: attack or hating: bringing up anything uncomfortable or in direct opposition to today's views.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)he tells the truth about his records and his opponents. if that seems negative, then maybe that is because his opponents record sucks.
thats on her.
frylock
(34,825 posts)FSogol
(45,524 posts)They like their candidate because he's never run a negative ad, but want him to run negative ads against HRC.