2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC just said
on Hardball that "the billionaires are running so many ads against me because they know what I would do to them." Have there been many, or any, negative ads by billionaires against HRC?
Edited to change her/she to I/me
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)the monies they have provided her.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And it'll be even MORE effective this time!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)That phrase would simply be rendered "double-plus-good".
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)jkbRN
(850 posts)Oh yeah, because she did the opposite while she held elected office *oops*
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)tickle them with a feather until they weep with laughter
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Ya know Triangles are dangerous when they spin THIS fast
See, THIS is why I don't trust her.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)again.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)a mental whiplash.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)1000 Pinocchios and a hardy roll on the carpet.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)negative one on Bernie, paid by a Repug billionaire.
She is using that for her purposes.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)Not a real hard to understand is it?
cali
(114,904 posts)Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)And I'm not a billionaire.
cali
(114,904 posts)Haim Saban alone has donated over 2 million to her various SuperPacs. Not to mention ten mil to the Clinton Foundation.
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)"wicked" might be right but "smart"? No. I don't buy that.
Being a policy wonk doesn't mean you're "smart". Trying to pull stuff like this isn't going to fool many people. It's not smart because it can backfire - like some of the other disingenuous crap she spewed about Bernie recently.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...SHAMELESS.