Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 2008 Paul Krugman called Obama supporters venom spewing cult-like hero worshipers (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 OP
Hillary supporters are very tuned into the actions of her opponent's supporters. I'm noticing a Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #1
attacking your opponents strength is a tactic…. or something. Agony Jan 2016 #2
Sun Tzu? Fumesucker Jan 2016 #3
And the other tactic - don't know what to call it Matariki Jan 2016 #28
Psychological Projection--Sigmund Freud and others Proserpina Jan 2016 #34
But not unconscious. And done as a purposeful political tactic Matariki Jan 2016 #35
Ah! Scapegoating Proserpina Jan 2016 #38
Yeah it's weird. They attack the random average people who get involved with politics Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #9
And prof Krugman has joined the cult over the intervening years Doctor_J Jan 2016 #4
What's a word for someone who always sucks up to powerful people in hope of some awesome reward? Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #6
Sycophant. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #10
Suckophant. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #12
I was thinking ass-kisser but that works too Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #14
My dad came up with this word: Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2016 #43
Oops. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #5
Ouch. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #7
......psst..... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #23
LOL! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #27
Interesting!nt m-lekktor Jan 2016 #8
Looks like he needs a new schtick Oilwellian Jan 2016 #11
He was certainly defending Hillary in the piece linked. senz Jan 2016 #18
Krugman calls Obama-bots a cult now Krugman called BernieBros bunch of loons Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #13
#OBAMABROSOMEAN AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #31
I've been a pretty big fan of Krugman over the years... tex-wyo-dem Jan 2016 #33
Yeah, fuck this guy.. frylock Jan 2016 #15
Yeah. He's entitled to an opinion but there's such a thing as intellectual honesty Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #20
"Why can't the rabble just be SENSIBLE for once and vote for our preordained candidate?" reformist2 Jan 2016 #16
A cult member? I'd suggest Krugman look in the mirror. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #17
+1! tex-wyo-dem Jan 2016 #37
What is with the friggin non-stop temper tantrum, if Hillary isn't the nominee? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #19
It's not Hillary, they would be fine with O'Malley or any Republican or even Trump Fumesucker Jan 2016 #29
I think for some, like the power brokers, that is exactly true, Sanders alone is deeply threatening. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #41
Kicked for honesty kenfrequed Jan 2016 #21
Here's a clue: If you are a part of Sunday Talk then you are part of the establishment. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #22
Amen to that! SoapBox Jan 2016 #25
Shiny object! Shiny object! SoapBox Jan 2016 #24
Krugman will come around, just like he did on Obama fbc Jan 2016 #26
Obama is and was establishment, just ask Penny Pritzger, his billionare benefactor in Chicago. Fumesucker Jan 2016 #30
Good catch, Cheese Sandwich. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #32
.. Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #45
Then, as today, so much is driven by Hillary hate. Krugman was correct in noting pnwmom Jan 2016 #36
Well, at least Hillary still has the support of hard working white people Fumesucker Jan 2016 #39
With regards to policy, Hill and Obama... tex-wyo-dem Jan 2016 #40
What Bernie can accomplish will be restricted by Congress, pnwmom Jan 2016 #42
times up Mr. Krugman olddots Jan 2016 #44
derp Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #46

Agony

(2,605 posts)
2. attacking your opponents strength is a tactic…. or something.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:54 AM
Jan 2016

I'm trying to remember who it was that popularized that strategy…?

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
28. And the other tactic - don't know what to call it
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:33 AM
Jan 2016

where you try to pin your own short comings on your opponent. For instance trying to smear Sanders as someone who says one thing and does another


The essential points of the interview by Andrea Mitchell with Fallon are:

1. Sanders has not fared well in the spotlight; if you look at the tone he has been taking; quite disturbing, seen a pattern of Senator Sanders saying one thing and doing another; that he would shun the support of a SuperPac, now has one; said he wouldn’t attack Clinton, but now he has said that she was like Dick Cheney and third thing this debate next week, Sen Sanders said he would wanted to debate more, now he is not.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511079490
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
9. Yeah it's weird. They attack the random average people who get involved with politics
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:06 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:56 AM - Edit history (1)

I forgot how they tried that with Obama. Didn't work then and hopefully won't work now.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
43. My dad came up with this word:
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 03:35 AM
Jan 2016

Suckbutt. He was a union man and hated ass-kissers.

He said, "I figured I was doing the right thing anytime anybody called me a Communist."

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
18. He was certainly defending Hillary in the piece linked.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:41 AM
Jan 2016

Criticizing Obama supporters and defending Hillary.

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
13. Krugman calls Obama-bots a cult now Krugman called BernieBros bunch of loons
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:31 AM
Jan 2016

tell me again why I have to respect this man ?

Krugman needs to get down from his Ivory tower he is starting to sound like his colleague David Brooks

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
33. I've been a pretty big fan of Krugman over the years...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:50 AM
Jan 2016

Agreeing with him probably 80-85% of the time, but now that I see how he operates during open election season, I'm not so sure.

Seems he has a big cabinet post promised to him if Hill ever makes it to the WH.

I'll echo others...I'll take Stiglitz or Reich any day over Krugman.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
15. Yeah, fuck this guy..
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:39 AM
Jan 2016

Straight up limousine liberal. I'll take Reich or Stiglitz any day over this honk.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
20. Yeah. He's entitled to an opinion but there's such a thing as intellectual honesty
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:43 AM
Jan 2016

And I think he's really a political ass-kisser. A court flatterer.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
16. "Why can't the rabble just be SENSIBLE for once and vote for our preordained candidate?"
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:39 AM
Jan 2016

That's what he's got to be thinking.

It must confound the elite that with all their money and power and spin, they just can't seem to sway the people to submit to their rule.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
19. What is with the friggin non-stop temper tantrum, if Hillary isn't the nominee?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:42 AM
Jan 2016

I really don't understand it. It might be her, it might not. The sky will not fall if she doesn't cap her resume with this particular gig.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
29. It's not Hillary, they would be fine with O'Malley or any Republican or even Trump
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:34 AM
Jan 2016

Bernie is a bridge too far, we cannot have a left populist under any circumstances whatsoever, that would be calamity for the establishment.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
41. I think for some, like the power brokers, that is exactly true, Sanders alone is deeply threatening.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 03:07 AM
Jan 2016

But for other corners of the rank and file- especially certain demographic slices.. I just think there's this weird emotional over-identification with her; she represents something specific- her getting this deal is seen as vindication, or "payback" for some slight, real or imagined, in their own lives. She is "owed" it- or they are, by proxy- because ....

Hmmmmm.

I mean, how else to explain people who; at least, if their public posturing is to be believed- claim to be the most serious left of the serious left, "why we're so serious left we left the rest of the left left behind a long time ago, seriously" who nevertheless are all gaa-gaa gooey over someone who is undeniably a middle of the road, corporate and business-friendly status quo Democrat, and whose historical advocacy of things like "muscular" foreign policy is well-documented?

This is the champeen of these self-appointed leftier-than-thou brigades?


well, probably above my psychoanalytical pay grade. But it is interesting that, like, for the people who are admittedly voting for her because she's a woman; openly, so-- it really seems like whatever deeply buried itch Hillary scratches, a different woman (Say, Elizabeth Warren, who I think would have made a stellar candidate) apparently wouldn't cut the mustard either.

Nope. It's gotta be Hillary. Odd.

It's weird, and it's about something. I don't know exactly what, but it's pretty clear to me that some folks are working through their own personal stuff, with all this.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
36. Then, as today, so much is driven by Hillary hate. Krugman was correct in noting
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:55 AM
Jan 2016

that the actual policy differences between Obama and Hillary didn't justify the venom directed against her; just as they don't now.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
40. With regards to policy, Hill and Obama...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 03:06 AM
Jan 2016

We're/are like two peas in a pod. Any difference is like splitting hairs with a few exceptions.

Hillary vs Bernie there are considerable and obvious differences.

Unlike most all serious candidates for the last few decades, Bernie is not in bed with the rich and powerful establishment....and therein lies the serious and major departure from the status quo that the PTB has so carefully crafted.

In other words, the PTB is seriously freaking.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
42. What Bernie can accomplish will be restricted by Congress,
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 03:18 AM
Jan 2016

just as it was with Obama and would be Hillary. Krugman has talked about that, too. The fact that he's slightly more "hard core liberal" than she is (according to ontheissues.org, they're both in that category) doesn't mean he'll succeed in getting more progressive policies through Congress.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In 2008 Paul Krugman call...