Hmm I wonder who Goldman Sachs and Citigroup are endorsing?
I guess we won't be getting campaign finance reform anytime soon under this candidate.
Hillary Clinton Top Contributors
https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00000019&cycle=Career
Clintons's $200,000 an Hour Pay From Goldman Sachs is Nothing to Laugh At
01/25/2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/clintonss-200000-an-hour_b_9069720.html
Goldman Sachs -- the investment bank that was so instrumental in causing the greatest economic collapse since the Great Depression -- pays Hillary Clinton $200,000 an hour or more to speak to their executives and investors. (The median income for an American family is $52,259 a year.)
What do Hillary and the Wall Street bank discuss that's worth over $200,000 an hour? And what does Goldman Sachs, and other Wall Street firms who have paid Hillary $2.5 million in the past two years, expect in return?
...Democratic voters, who are concerned about the undue power of Wall Street over the economy and the government, might think twice about how seriously to take Clinton's campaign promises to reign in Wall Street, particularly in light of her opposition to Elizabeth Warren's bill to reinstate a modern-day Glass Steagall Act, after it was repealed by Bill Clinton.
...(They might also wonder whether Hillary's increasingly belligerent attacks against replacing private insurance with Medicare-For-All -- not just in short-term grounds of political feasibility but on long-term grounds that it's not right for America -- has anything to do with the $5 million in speaking fees she and Bill have received from the medical-industrial complex over the past two years.)
= new reply since forum marked as read
...you're certainly entitled. 
...but that's not the point. The point is the Clinton's are in bed with people and organizations that don't give away huge amounts of money with no intention of quid pro quo, period.
And your comment about Goldman Sachs employees being hard workin' almost blue collar? Well, the janitorial, clerical and security staffs possibly. But those are all outsourced, right? Then again, maybe it is hard work peddling CDOs while shorting the mortgage market. Churning client accounts to maximize commissions. Focusing clients on investments, while proprietary funds are going the opposite direction. And there's that whole getting Greece in the EU deal. They make ungodly amounts of money simply moving money from left pocket to right pocket, while the benefit to society is virtual nil. They don't contribute. They invest and purchase. Right now, they have a sizable position in HRC.....oh,sorry...political "contributions." Yea, right. Uh huh.
Completely stumped here?
...of course not! What was I thinking?! And the Clinton's certainly don't trade in the only real commodity they own. Of course not. Gargantuan amounts of money change hands with absolutely no strings attached. You go right on believing that, if it makes you feel good.
Democratic or Republican. That's whats destroying our democracy. It's called buying influence at the expense of what our political leadership is SUPPOSED TO BE FUCKING DOING!!! Jesus H., freaking Christ! I can't believe an actual Democrat is happy about the huge amounts of corporate money in politics, because it's mainly going to buy Democrats. 
Is a long way from, happy about the huge amounts of corporate money in politics.
...as long as they're buying Democratic politicians. That's absolutely, fucking insane. No wonder you support Hill.
.