Wait, Tad Devine is running Sanders' campaign?

[bluestateguy]

um, ok,

[ChisolmTrailDem]

1. Thank for the content-free OP. nt

[Peregrine Took]

4. My thoughts, too. n/t

[EdwardBernays]

2. I know he's doesn't own a lobbying firm

that represents weapons manufacturers and Saudi Arabia....but he's doing OK.

[Dawson Leery]

3. In the slight chance that Berns wins the nod, please do not let

Tad anywhere near the campaign. He is a disaster.

[CorkySt.Clair]

10. Agreed

His Wikipedia page, no doubt written by someone in his office, boasts that he has won 10 presidential elections. Here's the rub: not a one of them were in this country.

Here he has been involved in the Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry campaigns. A very Shrumian track record.

[Renew Deal]

5. .

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511030770

[bluestateguy]

7. The New Bob Shrum

nt

[Bleacher Creature]

6. Sanders just joined the party a few months ago.

Before that, he was trashing it. Is it really a surprise that he's not exactly getting the cream of the crop in terms of Dem strategists?

[cali]

12. I lol. And yet here he is competitive with someone with all the advantages

[DefenseLawyer]

8. Clinton started with a 60 point lead in Iowa n/t

[cali]

9. No. He's a senior advisor

And considering the run Bernie's having, it's nuts to scoff at how his campaign is doing. I never expected Bernie to win Iowa, but I never expected him to do so well. He is running against someone who is closer to being an incumbent, as so many pundits have noted, than a regular candidate. With all her advantages, hill should win this by 20 points.

[ChimpersMcSmirkers]

11. Kiss of death

Gore 2000
Kerry 2004

Godspeed Berners.

[Trajan]

13. Sorry it took so long to get to you ...

I don't recall this kind of arrogant cynicism from you in the past ...

But hey, that's ok, because I am certainly not going to see any more of it from here on out ...