Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I heard on MSNBC that 42% of Iowa Democrats, also, ... (Original Post) 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 OP
That's true and... JaneyVee Feb 2016 #1
Fail? Sanders came from a huge deficit to basically tie dead even rurallib Feb 2016 #5
And he lost, in a state tailor made for him to win. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #8
uh - ok rurallib Feb 2016 #13
Hillary's victory, based on a coin toss, is a devastating loss... Human101948 Feb 2016 #14
Only in the bubble induced Sanders fans minds riversedge Feb 2016 #21
Oh, you've caught me...I realize that this is a tsunami of support for Hillary... Human101948 Feb 2016 #22
too funny jham123 Feb 2016 #41
It was a Hillary victory SO HUGE John Poet Feb 2016 #44
Tailor made in what way? blackspade Feb 2016 #58
+1 NurseJackie Feb 2016 #6
They are okay with it...they didn't say they were voting for Bernie...your argument is faulty Human101948 Feb 2016 #17
Caucus goers self identify and that was in relation to whether they are "capitalists" Arazi Feb 2016 #2
Page 15, 43% firebrand80 Feb 2016 #3
Thanks Gothmog Feb 2016 #52
43% self-identify as socialists, rather than capitalists, not 'social democrats' rather than Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #4
Right. Iowa and Minnesota were big progressive states. I know that from my family history. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #12
I wonder what the number would be if the question was framed like this: Vinca Feb 2016 #7
I see - push polling. brooklynite Feb 2016 #10
Bernie does not mean public ownership of the means of production when he speaks of JDPriestly Feb 2016 #15
I know it not what HE means...but he doesn't get to change the definition of words brooklynite Feb 2016 #19
Thank you. I've been saying the same thing since that last DNC Town Hall Meeting when Bernie politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2016 #49
I see - deception. Vinca Feb 2016 #18
I am a capitalist-socialist. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #33
Whatever - I don't really care. I just wish you'd stop red baiting. Vinca Feb 2016 #36
If you can one example of me red biting I would appreciate it if you could cite it. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #37
Sorry - I thought I was posting a response to another poster. Vinca Feb 2016 #38
I would tell you what you can do with your ad hominem DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #40
Follow your own advice. Vinca Feb 2016 #42
I made an innocuous remark DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #45
If you considered what I said an attack, you are a tender flower. Vinca Feb 2016 #46
It has nothing... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #47
I feel like a dog chasing its tail. End of discussion. Vinca Feb 2016 #50
Have a nice day. It never hurts to be polite and civil./nt DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #51
Guess you better check on what socialism means in places where it really exists... Human101948 Feb 2016 #20
"the finest countries for capitalism" brooklynite Feb 2016 #24
Do you understand that those countries are democratic socialist? Human101948 Feb 2016 #28
No, they're Social Democracies brooklynite Feb 2016 #30
Workable systems from other countries will never work here... Human101948 Feb 2016 #32
Nobody objects to expanding the social safety net brooklynite Feb 2016 #34
Duly noted. Human101948 Feb 2016 #35
Meh...wait until we get to a state where there are actually some minorities voting. LexVegas Feb 2016 #9
Hillary started out way ahead in Iowa. She gradually lost support. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #16
Don't forget about HRC's doing better with ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #25
Lowering expectations... joshcryer Feb 2016 #11
We moved here 14 years ago Bettie Feb 2016 #23
OMalley got his ass handed to him AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #26
I have two words for you ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #27
And more ... What does that have to do with they question I asked? eom 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #39
thought that was referring to university students, not the general electorate amborin Feb 2016 #29
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #31
I live in the south. I assure you that this is not true in the south. yardwork Feb 2016 #43
I suspect it's not true for many/any other states/regions in America. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #48
Vermont. yardwork Feb 2016 #53
Yeah? ... Then, where? 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #54
Maybe New Hampshire. yardwork Feb 2016 #55
Is this ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #56
I just found that! Yes, that's it! yardwork Feb 2016 #57
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
1. That's true and...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 08:58 AM
Feb 2016

68% of Iowa Dems say they're ok with a Dem Socialist president. This state was tailor made for Bernie to win: FAIL.

rurallib

(62,433 posts)
5. Fail? Sanders came from a huge deficit to basically tie dead even
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:08 AM
Feb 2016

O'Malley had the same deficit and went nowhere.
Sanders almost did the impossible here. It was amazing.

What should be of concern is that a candidate could fall so far to end in a dead heat.
Clinton walked in the door with a huge lead, money, name recognition and organization and came within an eyelash of losing to a little known senator from a small state.

This will be a major concern if Clinton is the party nominee.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
14. Hillary's victory, based on a coin toss, is a devastating loss...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:22 AM
Feb 2016

With all her experience and political capital, it shows that, while the establishment is behind her, support among actual voters is very, very shaky.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
22. Oh, you've caught me...I realize that this is a tsunami of support for Hillary...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:03 AM
Feb 2016

Overwhelming win...Sanders must concede the nomination right now!

jham123

(278 posts)
41. too funny
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:59 PM
Feb 2016

Some will never understand what is right in front of their face.

The Clinton Campaign machine bested by the Curmudgeon from the East.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
17. They are okay with it...they didn't say they were voting for Bernie...your argument is faulty
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:25 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary should have wiped the floor with Bernie, instead she squeaked by on a coin toss. Shows what a gamble she will be as the Democratic nominee.

P.S.--We already have a Kenyan socialist in the White House.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
3. Page 15, 43%
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:04 AM
Feb 2016
http://media.bloomberg.com/bb/avfile/rgsikEKtNf30

IMO, All it really tells you is that they responded favorably to the word socialist. It's not like that many people are walking around using that term every day.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. 43% self-identify as socialists, rather than capitalists, not 'social democrats' rather than
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:07 AM
Feb 2016

'democrats'.

They're big on co-ops. That's a strong strategy in agricultural circles for small farmers to compete against the corporate agri-businesses, letting them compete against the corps rather than each other.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
12. Right. Iowa and Minnesota were big progressive states. I know that from my family history.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:19 AM
Feb 2016

My grandfather was a farmer. He went to high school. That was not some little trifling accomplishment for Iowa farmers at the time. He listened to the radio and read journals on farming and was trusted as a resource for all kinds of information by other farmers, his neighbors. I remember visiting and having one of the farmers from a neighboring farm come to his door and ask for advice about if I remember correctly (it has been a long, long, long time) when to harvest.

The farmers at that time and probably still were a community. At harvest time, they had to decide who would get the harvest machinery (the combine?? Am I right that that is what it was called?) to come to their farm. They had to cooperate on the schedule. Farming at least then was not just a competitive thing although it certainly was a competitive business in some respects. Neighbors had to help each other. It was all about community as well as about working very hard for yourself and doing your best. My grandfather was great with animals and used to help neighbors with lots of things including taking care of sick animals.

It does not surprise me that farmers would understand the advantages of a community working together toward some goals. On the other hand, farmers are individualists because farming demands a lot of work and determination. It is very, very difficult, and the individual is responsible for the outcome in the end.

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
7. I wonder what the number would be if the question was framed like this:
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:14 AM
Feb 2016

"Keeping in mind that Social Security and Medicare are socialist programs, would you consider yourself a socialist?" For the most part, people don't know one "ist" from another, but they know they love programs which have been created by everyone to help everyone.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
10. I see - push polling.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:18 AM
Feb 2016

The are social programs. Unless they involve the public ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. Bernie does not mean public ownership of the means of production when he speaks of
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:22 AM
Feb 2016

democratic socialism. You are thinking of Marxism. That is not the same as democratic socialism. Not at all. Democratic socialism is what you have in many countries in Europe. It is also called a mixed economy. IKEA was originally a Swedish company if I remember correctly. Sweden is a democratic socialist country. IKEA is not owned by the Swedish government.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
19. I know it not what HE means...but he doesn't get to change the definition of words
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:28 AM
Feb 2016
Socialism is a political ideology and movement which has proposed a set of social and economic measures, policies and systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production.


Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis, originating from the mid-to-late 19th century works of German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, that analyzes class relations and societal conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development and a dialectical view of social transformation.


Social democracy is a political ideology that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a capitalist economy, and a policy regime involving welfare state provisions, collective bargaining arrangements, regulation of the economy in the general interest, measures for income redistribution, and a commitment to representative democracy.Social democracy thus aims to create the conditions for capitalism to lead to greater egalitarian, democratic and solidaristic outcomes; and is often associated with the set of socioeconomic policies that became prominent in Western and Northern Europe—particularly the Nordic model in the Nordic countries—during the latter half of the 20th century

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
49. Thank you. I've been saying the same thing since that last DNC Town Hall Meeting when Bernie
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:39 PM
Feb 2016

gave his definition of what "he" defined as a "Democratic Socialist". Bernie doesn't get to redefine the term to suit his candidacy. There are political groups out there that consider themselves "Democratic Socialists" and there is a definitive definition of what Democratic Socialism is. So it is disingenuous of Bernie to try and re-define himself based on a definition that exists only in his mind and what he chooses it to mean.

Here's Bernie's response was at the DNC Town Hall Meeting when asked how he defined "Democratic Socialist" to clear up the confusion.

QUESTION: Yes, Senator, some of your detractors have called you a socialist on occasions, and you don't seem too troubled by that, and sometimes embrace it. I wondered if you could elaborate on that...

SANDERS: ... Sure...

QUESTION: ... And just to show us what the comfort level you have your definition of it so that it doesn't concern the rest of us citizens.

SANDERS: Well, what Democratic Socialism means, to me, is that economic rights, the right to economic security is - should exist in the United States of America. It means to me that there's something wrong when we have millions of senior citizens today trying to get by on $11, $12,000 a year Social Security. It means there's something wrong when the rich get richer, and almost everybody else gets poorer. It means there is something wrong, and government should play a role in making sure that all of our kids, regardless of their income, are able to get a higher education.
Which is why I'm calling for free tuition at public colleges and universities, and why we have to deal with this horrendous level of student debt that people are having.

Now, what's going on in countries around the world, in Scandinavia, and in Germany. The ideas that I am talking about are not radical ideas. So, what Democratic Socialism means to me in its essence is that we cannot continue to have a government dominated by the billionaire class, and a congress that continues to work for the interest of the people on top while ignoring working families.

What this campaign is about, and what I believe, is creating a government that works for all of us, not just a handful of people on the top. That's my definition of Democratic Socialism.


http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2016/01/26/cnn-iowa-democratic-presidential-town-hall-rush-transcript/

For Bernie to mislead his supporters with his "tailor-made" definition of what Democratic Socialism is, is wrong on so many levels. The fact that he has the youth vote doesn't surprise me, because he is talking about things in tangible terms that they are the ones who stand to benefit the most from with the policies he is proposing. Unfortunately, Bernie is preying on their naivete as he's only telling them good things that they want to hear. He's not being realistic about the costs, the impact on our debt, and the ability to actually get those policies to become a reality in the current political climate.

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
18. I see - deception.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016

You want to give the impression that it's all a Commie plot. Those are socialist programs. Other socialist programs include the military and the Interstate highway system.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
33. I am a capitalist-socialist.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

I want to use the profits capitalism generates to ameliorate social ills but it is disingenuous to argue supporting public roads makes one a socialist. By that loose definition Adam Smith was a socialist.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
37. If you can one example of me red biting I would appreciate it if you could cite it.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:37 PM
Feb 2016

Thank you in advance.

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
38. Sorry - I thought I was posting a response to another poster.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

You sound more like a fan of trickle down economics. Wrong site?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
40. I would tell you what you can do with your ad hominem
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:57 PM
Feb 2016
Sorry - I thought I was posting a response to another poster.
You sound more like a fan of trickle down economics. Wrong site




I would tell you what you can do with your ad hominem attack but I don't want a hide. As it is I will leave it to your fertile imagination.

Using an anonymous medium to disrespect random strangers is neither cute nor clever.

Your turn.


DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
45. I made an innocuous remark
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:13 PM
Feb 2016

I made an innocuous remark. You then accused me of saying something I didn't say. I had the temerity to point it out and then you doubled down and made an ad hominem attack on me. Maybe that works with other posters but it doesn't work with me.



Your turn.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
47. It has nothing...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:20 PM
Feb 2016

it has nothing to do with being a "tender flower" and everything to do with the fact I made an innocuous comment and your response was to bear false witness against me. When I had the temerity to point it out you refused to do the civil thing and apologize and instead made an ad hominem attack on me.

Oh, almost forgot, we are now on your third attack on me.




 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
20. Guess you better check on what socialism means in places where it really exists...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:31 AM
Feb 2016

Forbes (The Capitalist Tool) says--

Looking for a land of opportunity? The Old World beckons. Despite a sluggish economy, Europe dominates the top of FORBES’ annual ranking of the finest countries for capitalism—with Scandinavia as a particular stand-out. European countries represent two-thirds of the top 25 with Denmark repeating in the lead position of the Best Countries for Business.

The picture isn’t as bright for the U.S., which slides four spots to No. 22.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2015/12/16/the-best-countries-for-business-2015/#d1ab59d7364c
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
28. Do you understand that those countries are democratic socialist?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:05 PM
Feb 2016

I suspect you are not dim witted, just obstinate and feigning stupidity.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
30. No, they're Social Democracies
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:11 PM
Feb 2016
No, Bernie Sanders, Scandinavia is not a socialist utopia

WHEN BERNIE SANDERS was asked during CNN’s Democratic presidential debate how a self-proclaimed socialist could hope to be elected to the White House, he gave the answer he usually gives: Socialism has been wonderful for the countries of Scandinavia, and America should emulate their example.

...snip...

Such paeans may inspire Clinton’s love and Sanders’ faith in America’s socialist future. As with most urban legends, however, the reality of Scandinavia’s welfare-state utopia doesn’t match the hype.

To begin with, explains Swedish scholar Nima Sanandaji, the affluence and cultural norms upon which Scandinavia’s social-democratic policies rest are not the product of socialism. In “Scandinavian Unexceptionalism,” a penetrating new book published by the Institute of Economic Affairs, Sanandaji shows that the Nordic nations’ prosperity “developed during periods characterized by free-market policies, low or moderate taxes, and limited state involvement in the economy.”

...snip...

The real key to Scandinavia’s unique successes isn’t socialism, it’s culture. Social trust and cohesion, a broad egalitarian ethic, a strong emphasis on work and responsibility, commitment to the rule of law — these are healthy attributes of a Nordic culture that was ingrained over centuries. In the region’s small and homogeneous countries (overwhelmingly white, Protestant, and native-born), those norms took deep root. The good outcomes and high living standards they produced antedated the socialist nostrums of the 1970s. Scandinavia’s quality of life didn’t spring from leftist policies. It survived them.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/10/15/bernie-sanders-scandinavia-not-socialist-utopia/lUk9N7dZotJRbvn8PosoIN/story.html
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
32. Workable systems from other countries will never work here...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:25 PM
Feb 2016

So we just have to accept the current clusterfuck.

Republican hogwash all the way.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
34. Nobody objects to expanding the social safety net
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:30 PM
Feb 2016

It's this insistence on calling it "socialism" (modified or not) that I can't accept, because it presents huge risks in the General Election.

LexVegas

(6,088 posts)
9. Meh...wait until we get to a state where there are actually some minorities voting.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:16 AM
Feb 2016

People will see how shallow the support for Sanders really is.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
16. Hillary started out way ahead in Iowa. She gradually lost support.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

Bernie will do well across the country. He does well with independents. Look at the caucus exit poll results. They are broken down by all kinds of demographics. Hillary does better with people who have higher incomes and live in suburbs. Bernie does better with the young, with people with lower incomes and people who do not live in the suburbs.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
25. Don't forget about HRC's doing better with ...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:13 AM
Feb 2016

Latinos and African-Americans and large segments of women voters and large segments of the LGBT voters.

Though I really would like to see the segmentation of those demographics to see how Bernie fairs among the young among lower-incomed and urban, Latinos, African-Americans, and LGBT (I have seen the female demographic segmented out) ... just to see how Bernie fairs.

Bettie

(16,118 posts)
23. We moved here 14 years ago
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:10 AM
Feb 2016

and I quickly learned two things.

1. Iowa liberals tend, overall to be VERY liberal.

2. Iowa conservatives tend, overall to be VERY conservative.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
27. I have two words for you ...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:47 AM
Feb 2016

but will not give you the satisfaction of allowing you to bait me into using them so you can skip to the alert button.

I'll just say ... Keep up the classy discourse.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I heard on MSNBC that 42%...