Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:49 AM Feb 2016

Clinton barely survived Iowa. Top Democrats say she must learn from it.

Hillary Clinton appears to have eked out an incredibly tight victory in Iowa last night, leading Bernie Sanders by 49.9 to 49.5 with 99.9 percent of precincts counted. For purposes of the delegate count, her victory is not meaningful — as Sanders rightly put it, this was a “virtual tie.” The three main takeaways from the outcome:

1) Hillary Clinton is probably still the heavy favorite to win the nomination, given the demographics in upcoming states. That is to say, Sanders’s near-win probably does not shift the broader dynamics of the overall nominating contest in a very significant way.

2) Sanders’s showing is a genuine and significant achievement. Sanders has definitely tapped into something very real that Clinton — and Democrats — have a lot to learn from, not just for the primary contests to come, but for the general election as well, presuming Clinton ends up as the nominee. Sanders’s massive victory among young voters raises real questions about her ability to excite and engage them that will have to be seriously addressed.

3) Sanders’s stiff challenge to Clinton — and this will be true even if it drags on for a long time, which looks very possible — could have some positive effects, both for her and for the party overall. It’s immeasurably improved the quality of the Dem debate; forced Clinton out of her comfort zone and gotten her to embrace more ambitious economic proposals than her instincts might otherwise have dictated; may be engaging more young voters in the process; and could even ultimately impact the convention in a positive way for Democrats.

Top Democrats tell me that the closeness of the contest contains several lessons. One is that Sanders appears to be connecting more effectively than Clinton with how certain voter groups feel about the economy and the country’s future, whereas Clinton has been focused more on offering solutions rather than giving voice to their concerns.

<snip>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/02/02/hillary-clinton-barely-survived-iowa-top-democrats-say-she-must-learn-from-it/

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton barely survived Iowa. Top Democrats say she must learn from it. (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
This article says a lot of important things. Bread and Circus Feb 2016 #1
Are you kidding? From Hillary people? lol. morningfog Feb 2016 #6
They remind me of General William Westmoreland iin November 1967, saying KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #27
Hi! Welcome to DU. jeff47 Feb 2016 #8
no, I doubt her or the party will learn anything. They'll just keep moving to the right and antigop Feb 2016 #2
The article presupposes there is a *willingness* to learn anything dixiegrrrrl Feb 2016 #37
and I doubt there will be a "willingness" to learn. antigop Feb 2016 #39
Hillary NEVER learns... why Bernie will no doubt go on to victory. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #3
Allow me to correct you Mike__M Feb 2016 #31
lol... I stand corrected. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #36
Sanders' focus is an absolute godsend for her BeyondGeography Feb 2016 #4
"forced Clinton out of her comfort zone islandmkl Feb 2016 #5
Yep. n/t dixiegrrrrl Feb 2016 #38
David Axelrod's comments further down in the article are Priceless! KoKo Feb 2016 #7
Very interesting. H2O Man Feb 2016 #10
Yeah, very interesting cali Feb 2016 #11
Conversation means squat Robbins Feb 2016 #15
If that how it goes down, she will lose the GE. Avalux Feb 2016 #16
It will be I won now get in line if you don't want republican to win Robbins Feb 2016 #18
acknowledgement isn't enough JPnoodleman Feb 2016 #21
Oh yeah. Seen that happen with their ilk tons of times. closeupready Feb 2016 #30
Not expecting any learning. jeff47 Feb 2016 #9
Offering solutions? Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #12
That sentence jen63 Feb 2016 #20
Yeah, I'd like to see those on paper. Nt JudyM Feb 2016 #22
Well I've been all over her website and read all her pdf's etc. & basically it's just a lot of words Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #23
Thanks for saving me the trouble of doing the digging, Nanjeanne! Nt JudyM Feb 2016 #25
Well I believe in research - so check it out for yourself! Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #26
It's like a common argument loyalsister Feb 2016 #35
I have no doubt this will cause HRC to alter her approach to the CAMPAIGN Binkie The Clown Feb 2016 #13
I am going to threw cold water Robbins Feb 2016 #14
Do what? Bobbie Jo Feb 2016 #32
Solutions is in the eye of the beholder. mmonk Feb 2016 #17
People don't trust Clinton and there's nothing she, or anyone, can do Zorra Feb 2016 #19
Yeah... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #24
Top Democrats ... Trajan Feb 2016 #28
Wrong 49.8 to 49.6... .02 bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #29
Hillary is now the candidate of the .02 percent! John Poet Feb 2016 #34
There is one thing I wish Hillary would learn . . . how to give a speech without yelling. Vinca Feb 2016 #33

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
1. This article says a lot of important things.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:52 AM
Feb 2016

Hopefully a lot of the sneering triumphalist bullshit from Clinton supporters I read around here will go away.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
27. They remind me of General William Westmoreland iin November 1967, saying
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

they see a 'light at the end of the tunnel,' not realizing that the light they're seeing is that of a locomotive train bearing down upon them with full force and fury.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
8. Hi! Welcome to DU.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:47 AM
Feb 2016

As you spend more time here, you'll become more familiar with the people behind the various accounts.

( )

antigop

(12,778 posts)
2. no, I doubt her or the party will learn anything. They'll just keep moving to the right and
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:00 AM
Feb 2016

will be happy knowing that enough people will still vote for their agenda.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
37. The article presupposes there is a *willingness* to learn anything
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:57 AM
Feb 2016

beyond whatever is needed to win.
I do not expect the political/social/financial landscape to change for the better if Hillary wins.

The problem is, HER kind of thinking got us here, and we simply cannot afford it anymore.
We can't, the planet can't, our grandkids surely can't

antigop

(12,778 posts)
39. and I doubt there will be a "willingness" to learn.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 11:26 AM
Feb 2016

I agree we cannot afford their kind of thinking anymore.

Sadly, there are still too many people in our party that haven't figured this out yet.

Just look at the number of people in Iowa who supported HRC.

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
4. Sanders' focus is an absolute godsend for her
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

If she looks at it as a nuisance to be discarded so she can pivot to the center she will lose badly in Nov.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
5. "forced Clinton out of her comfort zone
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

and gotten her to embrace more ambitious economic proposals;"...

the WaPo left something off the end of this part of the comment:

"at least temporarily and as long as they are politically expedient for the primaries, possibly the general election, but not necessarily beyond;"

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. David Axelrod's comments further down in the article are Priceless!
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:20 AM
Feb 2016

From the article:

“Bernie may be able to go on to the convention with a lot of leverage,” Axelrod says. “That’s a good thing for the party. He’s speaking to something that is very real. He’s already influenced the debate and the discussion. There’s no debate within the Democratic Party over whether the playing field has been skewed against large numbers of Americans.”

A protracted Sanders challenge, Axelrod concludes, “is going to require that the party address in very direct terms the problems that we face as a country right now.”
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. Yeah, very interesting
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:52 AM
Feb 2016

He is now the most prominent Senator in the democratic senate caucus.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
15. Conversation means squat
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:38 PM
Feb 2016

if clinton wins bernie and his supporters will be ignored.Your crazy if you think you can change clinton.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
16. If that how it goes down, she will lose the GE.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:40 PM
Feb 2016

Without acknowledging the importance of what Sanders's supporters bring to the table she won't be able to count on them to vote for her, let alone work for her.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
18. It will be I won now get in line if you don't want republican to win
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:45 PM
Feb 2016

she will start to move to right after she would win.

Iowa has exposed the truth about clintons and democratic party and it isn't pretty.

Her problem is GOP governors can do to her what she and her cronies are trying to do to Bernie and his supporters.

JPnoodleman

(454 posts)
21. acknowledgement isn't enough
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016

If she is part and parcel basically a republican why not just vote republican?

She has, along with the elite DNC members basically said NO to Social Democracy or any policy like it. What good are they? Oh, we might keep Abortion legal for another 4 years. Gosh I hope I don't starve or end up homeless in that time, Gods know there will be no surviving programs left after Hillary gives so much away in compromises.

Nanjeanne

(4,974 posts)
12. Offering solutions?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:54 AM
Feb 2016

Seriously. While true that Sanders connects and gives voice to people's concerns, I have yet to hear clear cut "solutions" from Clinton. I do know what we can't get. But I have no idea what we can actually get with her.

Nanjeanne

(4,974 posts)
23. Well I've been all over her website and read all her pdf's etc. & basically it's just a lot of words
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:39 PM
Feb 2016

I know what she says she wants to do . . .

I haven't yet found out how she actually will do it.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
35. It's like a common argument
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

The one where you want to talk something out and just be heard and someone offers solutions.
Bernie is listening and people appreciate it.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
13. I have no doubt this will cause HRC to alter her approach to the CAMPAIGN
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:51 PM
Feb 2016

But I can't imagine it would alter her fundamental beliefs and her approach to governance should she be elected. Like everything else HRC any campaign strategy shifts would be cosmetic, skin deep, and would evaporate post-election.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
14. I am going to threw cold water
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

If bernie fails to win nomination then he and we have lost.

I call bullcrap on Clinton offering solutions than giving voice to concerns.Clinton could care less about anyone not part of top 1%
giving her money.

If clinton is able to steal nomination like she stole the tie In Iowa we will just be ignored and it's just business as usual for top 1% and foregin policy will go to right of obama and social safety net comes under danger.

I will continue each month to donate 5 or 10 dollars and i will vote for bernie In Missouri primary but clintons have exposed themselves to be just like Bushes.and I am done with them.

I will make a promise right here.If she is able to steal it I will be leaving DU since i will leave democratic party which i have been voting for since i turned 18 back In 1992 and I become an independent who hates both partys.

It isn't republican party that is in danger of collopse it is democratic party now that they have exposed the truth.they are no
different that republicans.both in pocket of wall street,and pro-war.dems play liberals for fools just like GOP plays relgious
conservatives for fools.Neither party cares about rights to vote.Iowa was Clintons version of florida.DWS is to clintons as was Katharine Harris to the bushes.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
19. People don't trust Clinton and there's nothing she, or anyone, can do
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

to change this.

Words mean little to people who base their evaluations of others on their actions and this is particularly true in politics.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
28. Top Democrats ...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:00 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:10 PM - Edit history (1)

The same Top Democrats who avoided any mention of income inequality and unequal application of the national tax burden for these last 20-30 years ...

Fuck'm

I'm with Bernie all the way ... If he is willing, I am also willing to continue funding his run to the bitter end ...

I am sure tens of millions of us will be more than willing to support this man and his message through the entire race ...

Enough IS enough ...

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
33. There is one thing I wish Hillary would learn . . . how to give a speech without yelling.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

I was listening to her around noontime and had to turn down the sound. That tone . . . it's grating.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton barely survived I...