2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe bottom line regarding Iowa: Hillary blew a 30 point lead in just four* months.
Last edited Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:05 AM - Edit history (1)
If her followers wish to insist that her 0.2% precinct plurality constitutes a "win", and that nothing is wrong with the H.M.S. Hillarytanic, they do so at their peril.
I can't decide if the reason her support is sinking so fast is 1) how great Bernie's ideas are, or 2) how terrible a candidate Hillary is. Probably a bit of both.
*the number of months her support has been sliding is up for debate.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)all downhill for Hillary.....she is dropping in SC too.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Rubio life jackets FTW!
Logical
(22,457 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)23 delegates v 21 delegates.
awake
(3,226 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Clinton Leads Sanders in Ohio by 5 Points 51-46%
Posted on January 29, 2016
http://overtimepolitics.com/clinton-leads-sanders-in-ohio-by-5-points-51-46/
awake
(3,226 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)ejbr
(5,856 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)He's gonna have plenty more losses for them to celebrate.
CSStrowbridge
(267 posts)29 delegates to 21. That's a win.
Additionally, Bernie Sanders supporters have been acting like he would win by 8 or nine points.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)If Bernie wins more elected Delegates through actual voting/caucusing of The People, the appointed Supers will follow or risk destroying the Democratic Party.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)six out of six coin tosses went for Hillary? I think the bottom line is that Hillary's team lies.
And just the sort of arrogance which will likely bury Clinton.
Hillary went from about 75 percent support, to not quite 50 percent.
Sanders went from nine percent when he stepped in, to nearly 50 percent.
Do you understand the momentum?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Not quite enough though. Even in a state full of white liberals, still lost.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)campaigning. All of that changed in the last few months as Iowans began to pay more attention, the candidates campaigned all over the state, debated and aired ads.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)It will be interesting to see if Sanders' numbers go up elsewhere as he campaigns, debates, and airs ads.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I made no mention of a coronation in this thread...
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Its hard to keep talking points straight when youre spinning that fast
Wibly
(613 posts)Clinton has been the presumed nominee for a couple years now. Every media outlet in the country was saying it right up until recently, not just Sanders' supporters.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)After his result and speech last night (which many felt blew away Hillary), more folks are going to pay attention. So will the media. And his snowball of momentum gets bigger.
Do it hit a wall when he gets to minorities in the upcoming states?
Based on his policies and history, I doubt it. But that's what we're about to find out.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)She is dropping everywhere.
Perogie
(687 posts)polling for her until something better came along.....lol
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)a close race shaping up in Iowa. For instance the blue standard Des Moines Register had Hillary up by only 7 points in an August poll. Quinnipiac, a favorite pollster of Bernie supporters had Bernie up by 1 in roughly the same time period and CBS had Bernie up by 10 in an early September poll.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Instead of the Titanic analogy, maybe her campaign is more like a giant sandcastle, slowly getting washed away by the incoming tide...
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)jalan48
(13,877 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Upscale hairdressers everywhere must sending in their résumés.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)emphasis on income inequality, "affordable" health care, middle class in a world of hurt, peaceful solutions to conflict, etc., and no more "never evers." And it might be a good idea for her to take these ideas seriously since they seem to have struck a chord.
What her tone deaf advisors might consider is that should she become the nominee she's going to have to somehow persuade Bernie's progressive army that she's worth voting for. With her ties to Wall Street and baby steps in terms of change, she's not an easy sell.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)Wall Street to the core and always will be. If she ends up being the nominee, I'm sure as hell not gonna vote for her.*
*cue pro-Hillary poster replying with "You obviously want President Trump/Cruz/Rubio etc" in 3...2...1...
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)I watched part of a noon time speech by here and it was all about the economics of the lower classes. No mention that she only wants to start negotiations at $12/hr, but it was there.
She's lurching back to the left temporarily.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Namely, that last night was a bit of a clusterfuck for the Clinton campaign.
I mean, the Clintons themselves knew it- you could read it on their faces.
I'm not sure who these folks think they're convincing. No one is buying the act.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)anamnua
(1,118 posts)Hillary won a state she lost in 2008 and her husband lost in 1992. How can that be spun as anything other than a victory? Winston Churchill said: 'A majority of one is enough'. She got that hundreds of times over.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Sanders says: Nine months ago, we came to this beautiful state. We had no political organization, we had no money, we had no name recognition, and we were taking on the most powerful political organization in the United States of America. And tonight, while the results are still not known, it looks like we are in a virtual tie.
That history explains why Sanders emerged as the big winner of the night on the Democratic side.
Coming out of Iowas near-tie last night, his campaign looks stronger than ever. An uncompromising democratic socialist climbed up from single-digit Iowa poll numbers a year ago against one of the most powerful politicians in America to a draw. Even as strong a member of the media establishment as CNNs Wolf Blitzer couldnt call it any other way as the returns rolled in last night: Even if he comes in slightly, slightly second, this is a huge win for Bernie Sanders.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)simple . . .
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)I can hardly wait for the those explanations.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Not Sure
(735 posts)I've seen some of the same threads where the usual suspects have trumpeted Hillary's decisive and triumphant victory over Bernie. I'll acknowledge that a 0.2% margin is in fact a victory, but worthy of the "in your face!" threads? Umm, no.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)If it weren't so fucking laughable.
Don Draper
(187 posts)Most people find the prospect of voting for Hillary to be about as appealing as drinking a garlic milkshake. Polls show Bernie beating all of the republican candidates in hypothetical races. The American people (especially the millennials) are not inspired to vote for a woman who is a water girl for Wall Street. Bernie Sanders is our best chance at defeating the rethuglicans and lead our nation to a better future
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And I still do. Democrats should have groomed a better candidate.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)You are spot on!
Thank you for saying it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....to self-destruct.