Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

babylonsister

(171,070 posts) Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:06 PM Oct 2012

Romney's "Zingers"

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Romney's "Zingers" (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2012 OP

We'll know for sure when Mitt's "funny" zingers are inserted into his remarks when: northoftheborder Oct 2012 #1

I got him with a jab a zinger! I'm a comedy porcupine! Rambis Oct 2012 #2

thanks! shared on FB diane in sf Oct 2012 #3

Why is Reagan's "there you go again" mentioned in the media as a model zinger? aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 #4

northoftheborder

(7,572 posts)

1. We'll know for sure when Mitt's "funny" zingers are inserted into his remarks when:

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:14 PM

Oct 2012

He follows up with the 2 cackle laugh.

Rambis

(7,774 posts)

2. I got him with a jab a zinger! I'm a comedy porcupine!

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:16 PM

Oct 2012

diane in sf

(3,914 posts)

3. thanks! shared on FB

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:19 PM

Oct 2012

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)

4. Why is Reagan's "there you go again" mentioned in the media as a model zinger?

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:23 PM

Oct 2012

They talk about "there you go again" as some kind of magical incantation of the Bible invoking the secret name of God, the enchanted words that can change lead into gold, the type of zinger that would put Romney back in the race. "There you go again" sounds like something a blithering idiot would say when he doesn't have an answer.

Reply to this discussion