Capehart's new defense. He asserts the picture is not him.

[Rilgin]

Of course he is not referring to the Sanders picture. He is instead referring to the Twitter and Washington Post picture alleged to be the Journalist Jonathan Capehart in the profile for the Jonathan Capehart twitter account.

In his new article, he alleges that the Capehart making this fuss is an imposter. He claims that "some other dude" actually wrote and published the articles in question that challenged the Photographs of Bernie Sanders.

His article goes on to explain that the imposter's name is WRapAHarbor and that any actions or malicious claims not be held against Jonathon Capehart as he proceeds without interruption in his career.

[beam me up scottie]

1. Wait, wut?

This is sarcasm, no?

[Rilgin]

2. Yes was intended as pure sarcasm. Must be bad if not obvious. Sorry (NT)

[beam me up scottie]

4. No, actually it's good satire if it's indistinguishable from reality.

Ya got me! You should put this out in the twittersphere!

[TDale313]

3. "Left my computer on and my kid brother wrote this stuff!!!"

The troll's equivalent of "the dog ate my homework.

[PonyUp]

5. This is great! Lately it's been hard to tell satire from truth around here. n/t