Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sexism (Original Post) boston bean Feb 2016 OP
I don't see how? daleanime Feb 2016 #1
Every criticism about Hillary is "sexist" according to some. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #2
It is a very deep issue. One that involves a lot of "newcomers." NCTraveler Feb 2016 #3
And female senators are only saying this to get the queen boston bean Feb 2016 #6
"Those with the ability to think" -- yah, that's going to be a problem.... (nt) betsuni Feb 2016 #7
You have a way with words. Thank you ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #24
It IS an issue and her surrogates need to talk about it. n/t cosmicone Feb 2016 #4
They do. Non-stop. cali Feb 2016 #9
because it is so overplayed Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #5
Women are always crying wolf. It could not possibly be boston bean Feb 2016 #10
there is indeed sexism out there and it Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #13
You said the word "unraveling" was sexist the other day. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #21
Why dont you link to that and show all the bernie boston bean Feb 2016 #23
It doesn't matter if it was changed, that's not a sexist word. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #26
Why did so many people beg for the bernie supporter to change the title? boston bean Feb 2016 #27
Men are accused of unravelling too, look it up. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #32
Answer the actual question. boston bean Feb 2016 #34
I admit it. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #35
Well thanks for that at least. boston bean Feb 2016 #36
I don't see her saying, "don't vote for me because I'm a woman". Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #8
Very insightful. boston bean Feb 2016 #11
You're welcome. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #12
For what? boston bean Feb 2016 #29
I don't see Bernie saying "don't vote for me because I'm a man" Squinch Feb 2016 #38
There has been sexism towards Hillary. PyaarRevolution Feb 2016 #14
Can you be any more specific? Orsino Feb 2016 #15
It is, of course but no one is allowed to address it mcar Feb 2016 #16
Only for those who see it in everything (actually present or not) whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #17
Please excuse women living as women explaining their experiences. boston bean Feb 2016 #18
There is plenty of genuine sexism aimed at Hillary whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #20
I disagree in that it is mostly from the right. boston bean Feb 2016 #25
I wouldn't argue you haven't whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #31
Some of the posts here calling her a queen boston bean Feb 2016 #40
What is sexist about "Her Royal Highness"? JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #43
Right, people are harsh whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #44
You should know that the baggage boston bean Feb 2016 #46
I accept that whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #48
Are some criticisms of HRC sexist? Yes. Are all criticisms of HRC sexist? No. cyberswede Feb 2016 #19
You need to read Shasta Willistons excellent piece Arazi Feb 2016 #22
That was great. +1000. nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #37
They've moved beyond outward trappings. They've internalized feminism Arazi Feb 2016 #39
It may be an issue, but is it not THE issue with the rejection of Hillary hopeforchange2008 Feb 2016 #28
Well, yeah! HassleCat Feb 2016 #30
She's a woman. That doesn't make every attack or valid point raised "sexist". highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #33
Let's get this straight. longship Feb 2016 #41
An issue? Nnnnnnope. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #42
Yes. I would 840high Feb 2016 #45
I don't much care about genitalia. I care about solutions and honesty. Avalux Feb 2016 #47

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
2. Every criticism about Hillary is "sexist" according to some.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

Now there's a backlash, go figure.

When have we seen this before...

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
3. It is a very deep issue. One that involves a lot of "newcomers."
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:09 PM
Feb 2016

It was recently stated multiple times here that Clinton can't be at the end of sexist attacks because of her stature. I want to ask those same people if they think Obama can be at the receiving end of racist attacks. Those with the ability to think fully understand that Clinton can be attacked in a sexist manner and Obama can be attacked in a racist manner.

A couple of things were really made clear hear today.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
6. And female senators are only saying this to get the queen
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:13 PM
Feb 2016

elected. That's what I'm getting from it any how. And also how the blow back against them will teach them a lesson.

I am finding it all very illuminating.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
24. You have a way with words. Thank you ...
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:35 PM
Feb 2016

... for clearly stating your observations. I must wholeheartedly agree with you!

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
5. because it is so overplayed
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:10 PM
Feb 2016

Any disagreement even on a policy has been labeled sexist. Cry Wolf too many times and it surprises you? Of course as I have been called here a sexist and a racist, however that is fine.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
10. Women are always crying wolf. It could not possibly be
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

There is any merit to the claim.

Pretty much all I hear is THAT is not sexist. Its the standard response. Very rarely is there a conversation. Just a shut up you're wrong type of response.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
13. there is indeed sexism out there and it
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:18 PM
Feb 2016

Is wrong. But not every difference is based on sexism like some like to think.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
21. You said the word "unraveling" was sexist the other day.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:30 PM
Feb 2016

That is crying wolf.

Someone else said the word 'chicken' was sexist.

Again crying wolf.

Is there sexism directed at Hillary? Yes, but not in every corner like some people claim.

Boo! indeed.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
23. Why dont you link to that and show all the bernie
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:33 PM
Feb 2016

Supporters begging the OP change the title of the OP. Which is what my response was based upon. Prior to any edit.

You can be better than this.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
26. It doesn't matter if it was changed, that's not a sexist word.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:38 PM
Feb 2016

Why don't you link to all the responses calling you out for making such a ridiculous claim?

Well deserved too, imo. You do a disservice to real victims of sexism when you cry wolf.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
27. Why did so many people beg for the bernie supporter to change the title?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:40 PM
Feb 2016

Because they knew as well that stating Hillary Clinton herself is unraveling has sexist connotations.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. Men are accused of unravelling too, look it up.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

Posters objected because Bernie never said that, not because it was sexist.

Here's one:

he did not call Hillary "unraveling"
The headline is misleading.


Nice try but no cigar.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
34. Answer the actual question.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:45 PM
Feb 2016

You wont because that would force you to recognize I was not the only one who had the same reaction.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
35. I admit it.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:47 PM
Feb 2016

You're not the only one who cried wolf and claimed there was sexism where none existed.

You're welcome!

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
8. I don't see her saying, "don't vote for me because I'm a woman".
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:13 PM
Feb 2016

She expects to benefit from it, and that's fine with her, but at the same time complain that she's disadvantaged by it. WTF. Pick a side and stick with it.

Squinch

(50,993 posts)
38. I don't see Bernie saying "don't vote for me because I'm a man"
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:54 PM
Feb 2016

He does benefit from the fact that he is a man, because we all know there are plenty of people out there who will vote for a man over a woman because he is a man. And that is fine with him.

But at the same time, his supporters get all upset that Hillary doesn't tell people not to vote for her because she's a woman.

You can't have both sides either.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
14. There has been sexism towards Hillary.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:19 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think anyone will deny it.

That being said, I don't think most Bernie supporters here will stoop to such low actions. I've said my issues with Hillary and NONE of them have to do with her gender. I would rather have Cynthia McKinney or Elizabeth Warren as the nominee running against Bernie. Seriously, I feel Hillary thinks she's OWED this Presidency because she's checkmarked all the boxes...senator, first lady, sos, etc. She has also gathered many favors owed to her from those in the Democrat party as a senator and so they give her an endorsement and say nasty things about Bernie.

mcar

(42,372 posts)
16. It is, of course but no one is allowed to address it
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:21 PM
Feb 2016

Because gender card or something. I seem to recall hearing certain politicians being criticized for playing the race card too.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
17. Only for those who see it in everything (actually present or not)
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:22 PM
Feb 2016

Do the senators attribute women supporting Sanders to sexism?

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
18. Please excuse women living as women explaining their experiences.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:25 PM
Feb 2016

I don't assume women are lying about their experiences for some gain. But obviously many do.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
20. There is plenty of genuine sexism aimed at Hillary
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:30 PM
Feb 2016

but mostly from the right. If the senators believe this is why democrats are supporting Sanders, they're miles off mark.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
25. I disagree in that it is mostly from the right.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:37 PM
Feb 2016

Ive experienced plenty from the left. So have many women.

But maybe that's just certain women imagining it or making it up. I know that makes some feel better that than their group has way less of it but its pretty prevalent on the left as well.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
31. I wouldn't argue you haven't
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

That said, do you actually believe it's a significant factor in Bernie's popularity?

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
40. Some of the posts here calling her a queen
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:56 PM
Feb 2016

Posting unflattering images from rw sites
Her tone
Calling her Her Royal Highness
The posts about her clothing
The overall tone about her addressing sexism she faces is that she is a conniving woman who is playing a gender card.

This crap is posted on a day basis.

Women who have experienced consequences due to these attitudes recognize them for what they are.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
44. Right, people are harsh
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:23 PM
Feb 2016

but if similar slights are applied to men, and they are (I do it all the time), is that sexism or something different?

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
46. You should know that the baggage
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:50 PM
Feb 2016

these attitudes carry effect women in ways they do not men. It carries all sorts of negative outcomes based on sexist stereotypes. It manifests itself in real ways that cause disparity. It's not just the words, it is the attitude and how the acceptance of this in society harms women.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
48. I accept that
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 05:05 PM
Feb 2016

I guess the reason I challenge sexism being a significant factor in not supporting Hillary, is her gender is not an issue for me. I can't speak for anyone else, but it's easy to assume the positions and qualities that attract me to Bernie, resonate with others as well. I suspect that more than anything else is what's driving his popularity.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
22. You need to read Shasta Willistons excellent piece
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

Nobody's in a dither about "sexism".

It's that feminism has changed. That IS an issue but it's not the one HRC supporters want to have imo

http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2016/02/10/23553077/guest-editorial-young-women-dont-owe-clinton

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
39. They've moved beyond outward trappings. They've internalized feminism
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:55 PM
Feb 2016

Snip

But the world has changed. We've raised an entire generation in the worst economic crash since the Great Depression. They grew up under a surveillance state, with constant background war. They grew up within economic disparity so great it is literally unimaginable, almost indescribable. They grew up in a world where a large portion of their responsible elders have simply denied scientific facts ranging from evolution to climate change... and continued to win elections.

So they’re going to make up their own minds. They see the white, male, Democratic socialist sit down and listen to the BLM activists who interrupted him. They see him seeking out Native American counsel, and they see him paying his interns a fair wage. They see policies promising real potential for jobs and education and health care, and they think it's entirely fair that the very wealthiest should give back some of their spoils to pay for it.

Those young feminists who support Sanders are not naive or disloyal. They are building a new world, and they are demanding a new politics that invites everyone to play. They are, in fact, doing exactly what we feminists of a certain age once wished for our daughters: thinking for themselves, unburdened by gender.

Snip


Too many good lines in there
 

hopeforchange2008

(610 posts)
28. It may be an issue, but is it not THE issue with the rejection of Hillary
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

Anyone - male or female - who is as disingenuous as she is gets more people in a dither.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
30. Well, yeah!
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

Some people oppose her simply because she is a woman. Some people criticize her with stereotypes of women. We have these issues going back at least as far as JFK and his religion, and probably before that.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
33. She's a woman. That doesn't make every attack or valid point raised "sexist".
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:43 PM
Feb 2016

How do I know? Because I am just as tired of Bill Clinton and his brand of politics as I am of Hillary's. Is he also a woman now? Is that "sexist"?

longship

(40,416 posts)
41. Let's get this straight.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:01 PM
Feb 2016

This Democratic Party primary election is not about gender. Anybody who makes that claim is full of horseshit. Both candidates are equally positive on the issue.

So such claims need to be set aside, at least until there is a nominee, where women's rights will come into a vastly more clear focus no matter which candidate is the nominee.

I will support Bernie Sanders in the MI primary but will support and vote for whichever candidate obtains the nomination. I am a life-long Democrat and I support my party. Enthusiastically!

We have two great candidates. I have my preference, but both are head over heals better than any alternative offered by the GOP.

The Dem primary is not about gender equality.

Enough said?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
42. An issue? Nnnnnnope.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

Policies are issues, and on that count Hillary Clinton loses.

Past performance is an issue, and on that count Hillary Clinton loses.

Libya, Syria, and the IWR vote are issues, and on those counts Hillary Clinton loses.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
47. I don't much care about genitalia. I care about solutions and honesty.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:59 PM
Feb 2016

I want to vote for a person who doesn't bring it up their sex every 5 minutes and use it as a weapon in their campaign. I want to vote for a person who I know has my back.

That person isn't Hillary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sexism