Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:38 PM Feb 2016

Another game of connect the dots, starring Bill and Hillary Clinton

Last edited Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:28 PM - Edit history (1)

Clinton Foundation funded companies benefitting major donor’s construction project

When Pacific Infrastructure, a company connected to Clinton Foundation mega-donor Frank Giustra, needed $150 million to build a port and pipeline along the northern Colombian coast, it went to the International Finance Corporation for funding.

There was one major obstacle. The project, according to a review by the International Finance Corporation, was deemed “Category A.” That meant it would likely have “significant adverse social and/or environmental impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented” on the local community.


As a condition of the investment, Pacific Infrastructure agreed to fund social programs to alleviate some of the damage. It said that it would launch job-training centers for Afro-Colombians and indigenous peoples in Cartagena, where the local economy would be negatively affected by the project. The company also said it would support the local fishing and farming industries.

Within the next few months, two for-profit companies were created in Cartagena. One was a job-training center to teach locals how to work at the port. The other was a food supplier that helped support fishers and farmers by selling their products to hotels and supermarkets.

Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra launched both companies using funding from the Clinton Foundation’s Colombia-based private investment fund, Fondo Acceso.


By the end of 2013, the International Finance Corporation agreed to invest $150 million in the port construction, despite reservations about the environmental and social effects. The IFC’s U.S. funding is linked to State Department appropriations.


Ethics watchdogs questioned the timing of the projects, noting that they appeared to benefit the donors’ financial interests. Giustra, a close friend of Clinton’s since 2005, co-owned Blue Pacific, which was a primary investor in the Pacific Infrastructure port project at the time.

Ken Boehm, director of the National Legal and Policy Center, said it appeared that “Guistra’s financial interests addressed the serious questions about his project’s significant adverse effects by promising benefits through companies funded by the Clinton Foundation’s secretive Colombian so-called private investment fund.”

“This looks a lot more like a sweetheart deal for Guistra rather than anything resembling a legitimate charity,” said Boehm.


So let's recap:

Guistra, who Clinton also helped secure a massive uranium deal with a repressive dictator - the outcome of which was the transfer of a huge percentage of US uranium to a Russian company, and hundreds of millions to the Clinton "Foundation" and hundreds of thousands to the Clintons directly via speaking fees - Guistra wanted to build a massive oil pipeline. He needed to get the money to do that, and he needed to alleviate some of the damage the pipeline would cause o the local economy.

So.

He and Clinton spin up a few for profit companies - paid for by the Clinton "foundation" and in exchange, the IFC agrees to pay for the project, bearing in mind that the IFC gets it's US capital via the State Department.

In order to build the pipeline, Pacific Infrastructure also said it would have to take over property owned by locals—potentially by force, if the owners were unwilling to sell.

The International Finance Corporation published the Pacific Infrastructure proposal for board comment on Jan. 13, 2013. The next day, a temporary employment agency in Colombia called Gente Estrategica received a grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development to fund a job-training program for ethnic minorities.

That spring, the Clinton Foundation and Gente Estrategica opened up a joint job-training program for indigenous peoples and Afro-Colombians in Cartagena, with support from USAID.


Job Training... ? Training to do WHAT exactly?

The “Acceso Training Center at Gente Estrategica” was co-sponsored by Giustra, and funded by the Clinton Foundation’s equity fund, Fondo Acceso. A Clinton Foundation official said it trained workers to operate the Pacific Infrastructure port.

“[T]he Training Center offers training in different trades related to ports operation
, which has helped hundreds of employees and potential employees of the Port Society Puerto Bahía (owned by Pacific Infrastructure),” said the Clinton Foundation official, who asked not to be named.

Pacific Rubiales, an oil company founded by Giustra that he says he no longer owns shares in, provided some of the funding for the training center. The Acceso Training Center also partnered with the Puerto Bahia Foundation, a non-profit group run by Pacific Infrastructure.

“USAID, in partnership with the Acceso Training Center and the [Colombia] Ministry of Labor, aims to implement a training program [for the] population of African descent and indigent victims of armed conflict in Cartagena,” said the Acceso Training Center website.

By the end of 2013, Gente Estrategica had received nearly $2 million from USAID for its job-training program.


Yes, you read that right. The US government is paying millions to train workers to work at a private business owned by one of the largest Clinton Foundation donors. That deal was also cemented with help from the Clinton Foundation, which also created to for profit companies along the way.

Surely though this is all above board??

USAID declined to comment and said it would only answer questions about the grant through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The agency, whose budget is controlled by the State Department, also declined to answer questions about Gente Estrategica’s labor rights record.


That's weird... huh?

Gente Estrategica is a subcontracting company that supplies employees to corporate clients on a contractual basis. The U.S. government and human rights activists have criticized the subcontracting industry in Colombia, saying the indirect hiring system leaves workers with few rights or protections.

Gente Estrategica supplied workers for another company in Giustra’s orbit, Pacific Coal, in 2012. The employees went on strike for over 20 days, protesting what they referred to as excessive working hours and low pay. Pacific Coal called in Colombian authorities to break up the picket line, and Gente Estrategica reportedly fired the protesting workers, claiming that the strike was illegal.

Gente Estrategica did not respond to request for comment.


Nice and progressive.

So what the hell is going on here?

Well it's a little thing called crony capitalism. the Clintons help their MAJOR DONOR get all of his start up costs paid for by the US government.

It might be worth remembering that that's the same government which can't - according to the Clintons - afford to give every American healthcare or a university education.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/friends-in-high-places-3/

I'd HIGHLY recommend googling: Clinton Giustra

But only on an empty stomach.

Links verifying the information in this story:

http://ceo.ca/2013/04/02/colombia-giustra-iacono/

https://ifcndd.ifc.org/ifcext/spiwebsite1.nsf/DocsByUNIDForPrint/6B17F0C8861F3E2F85257AF200568B49?opendocument

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/main/news-and-media/press-releases-and-statements/press-release-fondo-acceso-sas-announces-first-investment-in-colombia.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Finance_Corporation

https://ifcndd.ifc.org/ifcext/spiwebsite1.nsf/78e3b305216fcdba85257a8b0075079d/6b17f0c8861f3e2f85257af200568b49?opendocument

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/our-work/clinton-giustra-enterprise-partnership/programs/acceso-training-center-enterprise

EDIT:

There's more on Billary and Giustra in Columbia here:

http://www.ibtimes.com/colombian-oil-money-flowed-clintons-state-department-took-no-action-prevent-labor-1874464

Their role in helping Giustra get a massive Uranium deal here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/five-questions-about-the-clintons-and-a-uranium-company

More on Clinton Guistra here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-clintons-a-luxury-jet-and-their-100-million-donor/2015/05/03/688051d0-ecef-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html

You can also find evidence, EASILY, of the two of them lying to the press about meeting with the energy minister from Kazakhstan - only admitting after being told a photo existed. Even though the meeting took place in Bills house.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another game of connect the dots, starring Bill and Hillary Clinton (Original Post) EdwardBernays Feb 2016 OP
The Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Feb 2016 #1
Please EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #2
The WaPo makes shit up, but the Free Beacon is just fine... SidDithers Feb 2016 #4
like I said EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #19
Just to be clear, you're defending the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Feb 2016 #22
Sid, did you google Clinton Guistra? panader0 Feb 2016 #32
Better to use UglyGreed Feb 2016 #3
Better to not use the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Feb 2016 #5
Yes I agree UglyGreed Feb 2016 #8
I don't EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #21
Some sites I would not use, UglyGreed Feb 2016 #25
honestly EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #27
I understand your point UglyGreed Feb 2016 #30
I gotta say sid--Chairman Mao? Really? You're going there? panader0 Feb 2016 #36
I'm looking forward Merryland Feb 2016 #6
It could just be a facade..... Skwmom Feb 2016 #14
Any and all of this would be used against her in the GE. She should bow out. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #7
Washington Post: Bad. Washington Free Beacon: Good NCTraveler Feb 2016 #9
"Billary" from the Fee Beacon... SidDithers Feb 2016 #16
I want this to be seen. I did it in a manner in which no traffic would go directly to the other site NCTraveler Feb 2016 #26
What WON'T be for sale with Hillary as POTUS? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #10
Who the fuck is Billary Clinton? nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #11
THAT'S IT! jham123 Feb 2016 #15
A picture: panader0 Feb 2016 #34
Nice post jham123 Feb 2016 #12
The personal aspect aside, it reflects the approach of the Oligarchs Armstead Feb 2016 #13
I'd HIGHLY recommend googling: freebeacon JTFrog Feb 2016 #17
Nailed it...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #23
again EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #28
I don't play the clickbait game. Finding the vilest right wing crap ever vomitted into cyberspace JTFrog Feb 2016 #37
gimme a break EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #38
Trust me. It says far more about you than it does Hillary. n/t JTFrog Feb 2016 #39
"Billlary" too. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #33
K N R Faux pas Feb 2016 #18
I remembered this ... polly7 Feb 2016 #20
no one to the left of Ted Cruz reads the Free Beacon or uses language like "Billary" nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #24
gimme a break EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #29
after you provide a credible source for your claim. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #31
such a fantastically ridiculous thing to say EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #35

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
1. The Washington Free Beacon...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:40 PM
Feb 2016

Any port in a storm, eh?

You were complaining about the WaPo a couple days ago, and now you're using the Free Beacon as a source?



Sid

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
2. Please
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:41 PM
Feb 2016

point out any part of the story that's incorrect?

I say that, because I'm sure you have some valid criticism, and aren't just playing some political game.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
19. like I said
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

please point out what part of it is factually incorrect?

Or is this just more Clinton mud flinging...

I would note that the story fully links off to sources for it's claims... unlike the WaPo. Which still has this BS on their website:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/02/11/stop-sending-around-this-photo-of-bernie-sanders/

panader0

(25,816 posts)
32. Sid, did you google Clinton Guistra?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:18 PM
Feb 2016

There are countless sources of the shenanigans of the Clintons.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
8. Yes I agree
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Feb 2016

but lets not pretend that many on both sides do use any port in these types of storms......

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
21. I don't
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

agree, because the FB story is sourced, and Sid won't even tell anyone what he thinks is wrong with it, just that he doesn't like the URL it came from.

If all he has is shooting the messenger then he doesn't have anything.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
25. Some sites I would not use,
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016

because I don't trust them at all. Besides IMO it just causes distractions and underhanded attacks. Look what happened with the attacks and slander I was under for posting an Inside Edition clip which I do not even watch on TV and found on Reddit.......

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
27. honestly
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:07 PM
Feb 2016

I don't really think there's ANY website that story could've come from where Sid wouldn't immediately make up an excuse to criticise it.

I know what you mean, but... the info is correct and verifiable... getting hung up on much more past that is just political games and I ain't playin'.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
30. I understand your point
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

tell you the truth if I see a post that contains a website that is not credible I just go on to the next post. But with all the attacks here as of late I find myself returning the favor and calling out the hypocrisy. I'm only human and sometimes I lead with my heart.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
36. I gotta say sid--Chairman Mao? Really? You're going there?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016

When Bernie talks about a revolution, I believe you truly know what he means.
When you equate that with Chairman Mao, you are sinking into paranoia and red-baiting.
Very unbecoming...
During the American Revolution, you would have been a Tory.

jham123

(278 posts)
15. THAT'S IT!
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016

After the scathing article of international crony capitalism that at the same time RAPES the locals of their natural resources AND threatens their pristine ecological system......all you can do is cry about the term "Billary Clinton"

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
13. The personal aspect aside, it reflects the approach of the Oligarchs
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016

Do things that will fuck up the lives of local people, then use the smokescreen of "charitable good works" and "idevelopment strategies" and "education and training" as a figleaf.

Same shit the centrist Oligarchs do in the US. "We're gonna decimate your town by pulling out all reasonable employment and jobs, but we';ll train you for shit jobs that won't really exist anyway."

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
17. I'd HIGHLY recommend googling: freebeacon
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:53 PM
Feb 2016

But only on an empty stomach.




And I just left a thread that swears the only right wing attacks here are the attacks on Bernie. Such bullshit.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
28. again
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:09 PM
Feb 2016

I'll say to you what I said to Sid:

the article is sourced, and unless you can tell me what's FACTUALLY WRONG with it, complaining about the URL is just playing politics.

So please, tell me what is factual incorrect in the article.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
37. I don't play the clickbait game. Finding the vilest right wing crap ever vomitted into cyberspace
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

and then repeating said vomit only benefits right wingers. And when you use the vilest of right wing terminology like Billary in your subject line, you are already outed as doing nothing but hoping to slime a Democratic candidate.

That's just a really disgusting road to go down.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
38. gimme a break
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

so you don't KNOW if it's true... and suddenly Billary is "the vilest of right wing terminology"... too funny...

It's also funny how massive corruption, you got no problems with... "Billary" though... and watch out... super offended. lol.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
20. I remembered this ...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:58 PM
Feb 2016
http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/27/the-clinton-foundation-is-wrong-canadian-law-doesnt-prohibit-donor-id/

(about a third of the way down).

This 2008 story from the New York Times (“After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton“) details a fairly standard way that crony capitalism corrupts markets and foreign policy.

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

Wait. Giustra sounds familiar doesn’t it. Could it be that Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra is related to this big Giustra Enterprise Partnership operation run by the Clinton Foundation? Indeed it could. It is! So Bill Clinton vouched to Kazakhstan strongman President Nursultan Nazarbayev for Giustra. And just by chance, the strongman guy who just days ago was reelected by a wide margin (it’s not that he’s quashed political dissent, he’s just a really effective campaigner, I’m sure) received Bill Clinton’s enthusiastic support for his bid to head a group that monitors elections. But seriously, just today Nazarbayev gave the best defense of his 97.7% claim of the vote:

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
29. gimme a break
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

That's just an idiotic thing to say.

And please, point to something factually wrong in the article.

I'll be waiting.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
31. after you provide a credible source for your claim.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

Free Beacon is not a credible source, and nothing it publishes is entitled to be presumed accurate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Another game of connect t...