Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:00 PM Feb 2016

Hillary's & the DNC's Greatest Fear: Hillary's Indictment

Last edited Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:27 PM - Edit history (1)

Like ducks shot over a pond, Hillary Clinton’s campaign is losing altitude and will inevitably bleed out. She won’t be president, in my view, and may not be nominated.

FBI Director James Comey will soon push for her indictment, whereupon U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch will either prosecute her or quash the recommendation.


Prominent analysts, including former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former U. S. Attorney Joseph di Genova, and others, claim evidence the Bureau has on her is irrefutable and damning.


If so, then not indicting Hillary could annihilate the trust that Americans must have in their government, rattle Democrats who fear their nominee being seen as having gotten special treatment and enable a GOP victory.
Violating federal law, jeopardizing national security, deceiving the FBI, lying under oath and working with major donors to the Clinton Foundation are among her legal troubles.
Comey is a fearless, apolitical “straight arrow” with unassailable integrity. As the deputy U.S. attorney general in the Bush administration, he threatened to resign and go public against his fellow Republicans over his concerns regarding warrantless wiretaps. Comey prevailed and earned tremendous bipartisan respect.
Hillary committed numerous crimes involving improper, negligent and illegal handling of classified information, according to former Deputy assistant Attorney General Victoria Toensing.

Toensing also says that State Department projects which transpired when Hillary was secretary of state improperly coincided with Clinton Foundation revenue from parties of interest, which she claims justifies “felony corruption” charges.
Over 20 of these emails are so sensitive that the State Department won’t even release them.


snip

Massive public outcry and the “civil unrest” that Clinton strategist James Carville said he fears could commence. Incriminating information would leak that could eviscerate Democratic candidates on all levels. Such leaks would do to Hillary’s campaign what the iceberg did to the Titanic, and Watergate did to Nixon.

If she is indicted after being nominated and wants to tough it out, the Democratic National Committee could still replace her. But by then, Hillary may have far bigger worries.


snip

Ask yourself: Did Obama install Comey at the FBI to help ensure the nomination for his vice president? By not interceding, he can look good, legacy-wise, by allowing justice to run its course and be legitimately meted out.


http://globegazette.com/news/opinion/columns/blodgett-hillary-s-greatest-fear-chance-of-indictment/article_cd4ffe17-bf95-5853-996d-bcdca2870788.html



Washington (CNN)—President Barack Obama's former top military intelligence official said Hillary Clinton should pull out of the presidential race while the FBI investigate her use of a private email server for official government communication while secretary of state.

Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the retired chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency, made the call in an interview with Jake Tapper on "The Lead."

"If it were me, I would have been out the door and probably in jail," said Flynn, who decried what he said was a "lack of accountability, frankly, in a person who should have been much more responsible in her actions as the secretary of state of the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/12/politics/hillary-clinton-michael-flynn-email-fbi-investigation/index.html



.
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary's & the DNC's Greatest Fear: Hillary's Indictment (Original Post) amborin Feb 2016 OP
This piece smells like... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #1
Except it's not. amborin Feb 2016 #2
It's just a regular Iowa newspaper, isn't it? Fawke Em Feb 2016 #5
I have problem with two of the sources. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #10
I don't believe a word Toensing says. She's a right wing tool. shraby Feb 2016 #14
But you trust what Hillary says? If so, you are in the minority. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #24
You can decry this all you want but a lot of people with good and great integrity are investigating roguevalley Feb 2016 #33
That's not what I said. shraby Feb 2016 #48
But the problem is that the left and "mainstream" aren't commenting on it at all. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #21
I agree on the fact that this needs to be resolved... Yurovsky Feb 2016 #34
"could possibly"? NO. Indictment = END of Hillary John Poet Feb 2016 #62
But it is! wildeyed Feb 2016 #55
Working in the cyber security industry, I have been told by analysts who hold top secret Fawke Em Feb 2016 #3
Absolutely correct Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #7
We even have secure rooms in my building - white rooms - for doing our forensics investigations Fawke Em Feb 2016 #23
Our facilities always had at least two secure access points just to enter Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #31
I would venture to guess that if it was hackable... Yurovsky Feb 2016 #36
If anyone knew it was there and knew who it belonged to Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #37
Except that Hillary is a prominent 1%er, so she doesn't go by the rules everyone else goes through AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #42
My guess is, even with the proof that classified documents were on her server Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #43
I hadn't seen this: Jarqui Feb 2016 #19
Yes. Thank you for posting this. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #22
Exactly amborin Feb 2016 #61
She is so Compromised. mikeysnot Feb 2016 #4
Author of this column? bornskeptic Feb 2016 #6
I support Bernie, but I think this is bullshit . . . fleur-de-lisa Feb 2016 #8
supposedly, this is one reason she is clinging to Obama amborin Feb 2016 #9
I support Bernie too... kenn3d Feb 2016 #11
That's such a surprise, RW going at someone with murky legal innuendo nolabels Feb 2016 #45
Thank you wryter2000 Feb 2016 #13
Nobody outside the FBI (or with security clearance to see their files) knows. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #27
It's a GOP hit piece. wildeyed Feb 2016 #56
If this is true, it will be legendary. JudyM Feb 2016 #12
making smart people do dumb things and good people say bad things is her forte MisterP Feb 2016 #28
Right wingers are desperate to take her out. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #15
the article may or may not be rw bullshit.but there are over 100 agents restorefreedom Feb 2016 #18
No, they are not. hifiguy Feb 2016 #47
And I think you really believe she shares 90% of her policies. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #50
I know so. hifiguy Feb 2016 #51
I know you believe that. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #52
Says the person who is nice enough to share Trumps words with us in GD:P cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #58
I don't think that she will be indicted, sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #16
Awwww zappaman Feb 2016 #17
Tom Thoma has been shilling for Sanders for almost a year Tarc Feb 2016 #20
Fine, but that doesn't negate the fact that there is an FBI investigation. eom Fawke Em Feb 2016 #25
The FBI investigated Fox News' big "OMG BLACK PANTHERS INTIMIDATION" in 2009, too Tarc Feb 2016 #32
This is a "guest columnist". wildeyed Feb 2016 #54
Not a Hillary supporter, but once you use Joe DiGenova's name in an article DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #26
I don't know what the globegazette is but Fuck This Shit. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #29
I might as well go over to freerepublic vdogg Feb 2016 #30
Well, that's a steaming ile of horseshit if I ever saw one. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #35
Just by Hillary running,I think this wendylaroux Feb 2016 #38
Kickin' Faux pas Feb 2016 #39
Oh goody mcar Feb 2016 #40
I read the article then looked up.. one_voice Feb 2016 #41
Why are you posting right wing drivel here? wryter2000 Feb 2016 #44
She will lose in any event if she is the nominee. hifiguy Feb 2016 #46
"Hillary for Prison!" or "Bernie's a Commie!"..which bumper sticker will we see.... tokenlib Feb 2016 #49
I've already seen Hillary for Prison t-shirts for sale. Beowulf Feb 2016 #57
Why did you post an opinion piece by this guy? wildeyed Feb 2016 #53
Welcome to the wacky world of Camp Sanders Tarc Feb 2016 #59
There used to be rules about posting wildeyed Feb 2016 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author napkinz Nov 2016 #63

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
5. It's just a regular Iowa newspaper, isn't it?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

By "regular," I mean that its more beholding to its community than to the right or the left.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
10. I have problem with two of the sources.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:32 PM
Feb 2016

Todd Blodgett and Toensing.

While I'm inclined to believe there was a lot of corruption involved in those Clinton Foundation deals, I'd like to have better sourcing than those two.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
24. But you trust what Hillary says? If so, you are in the minority.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:57 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2299


^snip^


Clinton has the lowest rating for honesty as American voters say 60 - 36 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.






roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
33. You can decry this all you want but a lot of people with good and great integrity are investigating
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:21 PM
Feb 2016

this shit and if there is smoke they will prosecute it. No one is above the law and if they did wrong they deserve it. I don't believe she will be the nominee and I hope that if it has to come, it comes sooner rather than later.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
21. But the problem is that the left and "mainstream" aren't commenting on it at all.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016

Like if they don't report on it, it isn't really happening.

Trust me, something IS happening. Whether what these folk believe is happening is true or not is one thing, but sticking our collective heads in the sand isn't helping.

The M$M needs to start reporting on this. Even if you're a Hillary supporter, and I'm definitely not, it should concern you if she'll be tainted with a nasty investigation in which the FBI starts fighting with Justice to get an indictment. That won't look good to the American voter.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
34. I agree on the fact that this needs to be resolved...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:26 PM
Feb 2016

I want Bernie to get the nomination, but worse than him losing would be Hillary being indicted after Hillary has enough delegates to sew up the nomination or after the convention. That could possibly foist a President Trump or Cruz on America... It pains me just to type that...

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
62. "could possibly"? NO. Indictment = END of Hillary
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:37 AM
Feb 2016

If the FBI even recommends indictment, that is THE END of any hope for Hillary winning a general election. If she's the nominee under those circumstances, she WILL LOSE.

The Democratic party should not be taking such a chance on her.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
55. But it is!
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:30 PM
Feb 2016

Straight up GOP hit piece.

Todd Blodgett served on the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and was a domestic policy advisers on the 1988 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush. He also worked for the Republican National Committee and the FBI.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
3. Working in the cyber security industry, I have been told by analysts who hold top secret
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:08 PM
Feb 2016

security clearances that if they did this, they would have already been charged and prosecuted.

I'm wondering, too, what the FBI is looking at regarding the Clinton Foundation. That's probably bigger than being utterly stupid about securing a computer server.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
7. Absolutely correct
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:21 PM
Feb 2016

If I had mishandled any classified material, I would have been punished swiftly and judiciously. If I had mishandled top secret material to the point where it could have fallen into the hands of someone not cleared or, at worst, an enemy of the state, I'd have spent a very long time in a prison cell.

If there was classified material on her server, she should have been swiftly punished. But, as we saw in the case of David Petraeus, security doesn't matter if you are one of the gang.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
23. We even have secure rooms in my building - white rooms - for doing our forensics investigations
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

so that no classified or sensitive information can be accidentally viewed by the average person in my company (i.e. those of us not holding security clearances).

From what I've read regarding her server, anyone with Internet access and a basic background in hacking techniques could have gotten in there and found all sorts of classified and/or sensitive information.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
31. Our facilities always had at least two secure access points just to enter
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

The last facility at which I worked had a badge checkpoint and an additional 3 places to swipe my badge, with pin number, just to get to work. This unsecured server was probably locked in a simple office from the sound of it and was connected to networks where it was hackable.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
36. I would venture to guess that if it was hackable...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:30 PM
Feb 2016

it was indeed hacked.

For crying out loud the Government has had secured servers hacked, I'm sure a non-secured server was an open door for Russia, China, Iran, and anyone else with the desire to uncover secure US Intel and the means to access it.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
37. If anyone knew it was there and knew who it belonged to
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

You can almost be assured it was hacked. The security necessary just was not in place.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
42. Except that Hillary is a prominent 1%er, so she doesn't go by the rules everyone else goes through
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

Not to mention a prominent political figure. They are probably delaying it as much as possible, though the Obama Administration is not like the Bush Administration and likely won't resort to going above the law to further delay it.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
43. My guess is, even with the proof that classified documents were on her server
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:24 PM
Feb 2016

She will not be charged. The Obama administration is not going to take the hit of having one of their former Secretaries of State charged for a crime. Odds are we will only find out that charges were indeed pushed by the FBI if there is a future leak. She falls under a separate set of rules from the rest of us.

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
19. I hadn't seen this:
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016
Clinton Foundation received subpoena from State Department investigators
Investigators with the State Department issued a subpoena to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation last fall seeking documents about the charity’s projects that may have required approval from the federal government during Hillary Clinton’s term as secretary of state, according to people familiar with the subpoena and written correspondence about it.

The subpoena also asked for records related to Huma Abedin, a longtime Clinton aide who for six months in 2012 was employed simultaneously by the State Department, the foundation, Clinton’s personal office, and a private consulting firm with ties to the Clintons.


I knew about about Huma's records. I didn't know the IG at the State Department had started looking at the Clinton Foundation for projects that might have had links to the state department under Hillary.

The IG is overwhelmed as it is. 30,000 deleted emails to go through. Plus this. So they can take their time. It may take them a long time to get through all of this.

That's why the House hasn't gone at this. It's already under investigation.

That's a pretty significant development because it curtails what the media can find out. The next question is "can they drag their feet until after November ? ... that might be what they're trying to do here.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
22. Yes. Thank you for posting this.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:51 PM
Feb 2016

I was referring to this article.

The FBI sent the subpoena in the fall, but I don't think that leaked out until earlier this year.

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
6. Author of this column?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:20 PM
Feb 2016

Todd Blodgett served on the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and was a domestic policy advisers on the 1988 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush. He also worked for the Republican National Committee and the FBI. He lives in Tyler, Texas, and in Clear Lake.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,627 posts)
8. I support Bernie, but I think this is bullshit . . .
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:23 PM
Feb 2016

I don't believe she will be indicted. Of course, the republicans are salivating over their fantasy that this will happen, but I don't believe it.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
45. That's such a surprise, RW going at someone with murky legal innuendo
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:35 PM
Feb 2016

and make double sure no real tangible issues are covered. Somehow, for some reason, that does sound familiar though

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
27. Nobody outside the FBI (or with security clearance to see their files) knows.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:00 PM
Feb 2016

You have the right to believe what you want.

I believe that I have no idea how this will shake out.









wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
56. It's a GOP hit piece.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:33 PM
Feb 2016

So yeah, they are salivating, but not gonna happen. Why it was posted here is another question.....

Todd Blodgett served on the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and was a domestic policy advisers on the 1988 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush. He also worked for the Republican National Committee and the FBI. He lives in Tyler, Texas, and in Clear Lake.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
12. If this is true, it will be legendary.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:33 PM
Feb 2016

How unbelievably stupid if this brilliant woman acted in such a way to warrant federal corruption charges.

If true, we can attribute her fall to having such narrow psychological framing that the almighty dollar and thirst for more power defined the course of her decisionmaking.

And it's 2 women who will be prosecuting it.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
15. Right wingers are desperate to take her out.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

Thanks for sharing what they are saying. Complete right wing bullshit. They have to count on things like this. They have nothing else.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
18. the article may or may not be rw bullshit.but there are over 100 agents
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:44 PM
Feb 2016

working on this. if there was no,legal there there, it would have come out in time to not put any taint on the primaries.

the fsct that there is even talk of indictment is a problem for someone running for pres.

they need to either indict or exonerate. we need to know how to move forward.

and anyone who even thinks biden will stick himself in this mess, well i have this nice wooded parcel,......

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
47. No, they are not.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:39 PM
Feb 2016

She shares 90% of their policies - neoliberal economics and neocon foreign policy. Wall Street made it abundantly clear they would be equally comfortable with either Herself or Jebthro; it was said months ago.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
16. I don't think that she will be indicted,
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

but has our party ever had a nominee, whose
actions led to an FBI investigation?

That in itself is a clear problem, which all
of us have to consider, because it would be
a serious issue in the GE campaign.

Perceptions matter a great deal!

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
32. The FBI investigated Fox News' big "OMG BLACK PANTHERS INTIMIDATION" in 2009, too
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:18 PM
Feb 2016

and, rightly, found that a single guy standing near a polling station wielding an off-the-shelf police baton does not indict an entire organization. An investigation is not a presumption of guilt, last I checked. We're not Putin's Russia here.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
54. This is a "guest columnist".
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:28 PM
Feb 2016

Straight up GOP hit piece designed to torpedo the probably nominee in a swing state. And people here can't rec this post up fast enough Total bullshit.

Todd Blodgett served on the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and was a domestic policy advisers on the 1988 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush. He also worked for the Republican National Committee and the FBI.
 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
26. Not a Hillary supporter, but once you use Joe DiGenova's name in an article
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:59 PM
Feb 2016

You're done. He has no integrity. Zero.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
29. I don't know what the globegazette is but Fuck This Shit.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

I hate to think I would say this but we are tired of these damn emails.

This may be a problem or an example of poor judgemtn but trying to turn it into misfeasance or even criminality is bizarre.

Lots of people mocked HRC for complaining about a vast, right wing conspiracy BUT she is totally on the mark. These people are out to get her, largely because of her political skills and also because she helped that white trash redneck guy since they married.

There is lots to criticize HRC for. I, like many others, have never hesitated to point out what I find lacking in her (I'm fairly confident she didn't lose any sleep over that) but this sort of crap should be labeled for what it is. Right wing crap and we, HRC and Sanders people alike, should be the first to label it as such.

Just saying...

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
30. I might as well go over to freerepublic
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:09 PM
Feb 2016

At least when they post right wing hit pieces they're up front about it and don't try to disguise it as "concern".

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
35. Well, that's a steaming ile of horseshit if I ever saw one.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:28 PM
Feb 2016

Pretty bad dropping such a right wing opinion hit piece on DU like that.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
41. I read the article then looked up..
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:58 PM
Feb 2016

the writer..

Todd Blodgett (born September 10, 1960) is an American conservative Republican political writer, who served as a member of the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and on the Bush/Quayle election committee. Following the 1988 presidential election, Blodgett, who was a protege of the late Lee Atwater, then served on the staff of the Republican National Committee, where he worked until 1991. He was a one-time co-owner and operator of Resistance Records, the world's largest neo-Nazi music label.[1][2][3] As has been reported by the Associated Press, The London Independent, Fox News, newspapers published by Lee Enterprises, Inc., Washington Post and in other media, Blodgett worked as a full-time, paid informant for the FBI. In this capacity, he was assigned to infiltrate/surveil neo-Nazis, KKK members, fascist Skinheads, professional anti-Semites, and Holocaust deniers in the United States, Europe, Canada, and the Caribbean.[4][5][6]

Todd Blodgett has worked with notable American far-right figures such as Dr. William Pierce, David Duke, Don Black, Dr. Ed Fields, Paul Hall, Jr., Chris Temple, Richard Butler, and the late Willis Carto.[4][4][7][8] Center He also worked with and employed Mark Cotterill, a British neo-fascist who founded the American Friends of the British National Party (BNP), and other European racists, including John Tyndall, Nick Griffin, Richard Barnbrook, and Steven Cartwright. From March, 2000, through November, 2002, Mr. Blodgett was retained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to supply information concerning organizations and individuals affiliated with the racist Far right. He regularly met with and reported to FBI and JTTF (the Joint Terrorism Task Force) agents and other officials, after attending gatherings hosted by Holocaust Deniers and White Supremacist groups, which featured racist, far-right extremists who were of interest to American anti-terrorism law enforcement officials and agencies



I'm not impressed. Before you ask, yes it makes a difference. If someone posted an article slamming the shit out of Bernie with that resume, all hell would break loose. Rightfully so.

wryter2000

(46,051 posts)
44. Why are you posting right wing drivel here?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:29 PM
Feb 2016

This isn't the only place where you've used obvious RW talking points against Hillary. If you want to go after her from the left, feel free, but RW attacks don't belong at a Democratic Underground.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
46. She will lose in any event if she is the nominee.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016

Unless the Repigs are crazy enough to let Cruz win the nomination.

And she will lose. BIG - Hindenburg style, taking the party down with her in flames - even if she is NOT indicted. She completely alienates the left/liberal base, has zero appeal to independents, and is good for at least 1-3 million additional votes for the Repigs nationally because they will do everything but come out of the grave to vote against her.

If she IS indicted before the election she won't get 35% of the national vote and the bloodbath would probably doom the Democratic Party. The corporatists in both parties would be most pleased with that result.

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
49. "Hillary for Prison!" or "Bernie's a Commie!"..which bumper sticker will we see....
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:05 PM
Feb 2016

It's up to us.... The crap will fly either way...

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
53. Why did you post an opinion piece by this guy?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:23 PM
Feb 2016


Todd Blodgett served on the White House staff of President Ronald Reagan and was a domestic policy advisers on the 1988 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush. He also worked for the Republican National Committee and the FBI.


Why do I care what Ronald Reagan's staff operative thinks about anything? And why do I have to read GOP hit pieces on a "progressive" website?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
59. Welcome to the wacky world of Camp Sanders
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:42 PM
Feb 2016

Where up is down, white is black, and Sanders trailing distantly in 10 of 12 Super Tuesday primaries doesn't matter when you can just trot out a handful of trendy "Bern" slogans.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
60. There used to be rules about posting
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:50 PM
Feb 2016

RW crap like this here

I can deal with the "bern" slogans and even the poorly written and fact free rhetorical romps. It is the silly season, after all. But RW hit pieces on posted as serious commentary cross a line.

Response to amborin (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's & the DNC's Gre...