New Nevada Poll: Clinton +6

[MrWendel]

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/18/1487198/-New-Nevada-Poll-Clinton-6

Hillary 53/47

One America News Network, (“OAN”), commissioned Gravis Marketing, a nonpartisan research firm, to conduct a random survey of 1,366 registered, likely voters in Nevada. The poll was conducted from February 14th to the 15th and includes 687 Republican Caucus participants, 516 Democratic Caucus participants, and the remainder not planning on participating in a caucus, but are planning to vote in the regular elections. The poll has a margin of error of ± 3% [4% for Republican and Democratic caucuses]. The total may not round to 100% because of rounding. The polls were conducted using automated telephone calls (IVR technology) and weighted separately for each population in the question presented.
http://www.oann.com/pollnevada/

[floriduck]

1. Another dupe post. nm

[Chichiri]

2. But... but... Hillary is corrupt/a liar/unfriendly/cold/unfeeling/bllaaaaarghargbargarghargh!

She can't POSSIBLY be ahead! It must be a conspiracy!

[virtualobserver]

3. Gravis had Hillary up 53-42 in Iowa....so thanks for the good news for Bernie!

[cali]

9. As if any Bernie supporter would say she can't be ahead in Nevada.

And it's pitiful to see her running another shit campaign.

[casperthegm]

4. Let's just wait and see

Bottom line is it's gonna be close. I just hope there are no coin flips involved this time around...

[CoffeeCat]

7. It's not going to be coin flips; they'll be drawing cards.

Did you read about that?

When there are ties in the NV caucuses, the ties will be settled with people drawing cards. Aces high.

Yep, you read that right.

[Chichiri]

8. Oh fer godsake, are you still buying into that?

http://www.opb.org/news/article/npr-coin-toss-fact-check-no-coin-flips-did-not-win-iowa-for-hillary-clinton/

[BlueCaliDem]

11. Can't reason with a closed mind, Chichiri. You should know that by now.

[CoffeeCat]

5. Gravis had Clinton up by 11 in the Iowa caucuses, the day before the Iowa caucus

Gravis had Clinton beating Bernie by 11 in the Iowa caucuses--in their poll that was released on the eve of the Iowa caucuses.

Gravis was off by greater margins than any of the ten polls--when it came to the Iowa Caucuses.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-democratic/

[AtomicKitten]

10. Gravis polling has rendered itself ridiculous.

Expertly slapped upside the head by DU's own: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021579317

[DCBob]

6. This sounds better.

Whew!

[Motown_Johnny]

12. Keep raising those expectations. Thanks for posting. n/t

[MoonRiver]

13. Good political news on top of some good personal news!

It's a good day!

[mcar]

14. K&R

[oasis]

15. Keep on chirping Killer Mike. You're killing your candidate's numbers.

[Alfresco]

16. K&R

[Persondem]

17. Caucus results are tough to predict, but I'd rather Clinton be ahead than behind.

SC is looking better as well. K & R

[SheenaR]

18. IVR calling

and within MOE... woo hoo for nobody.