Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voters should ask themselves, if I got offered $600,000 to give a speech (Original Post) closeupready Feb 2016 OP
It would depend on if I was planning to run for POTUS, and on what platform re Wall St. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #1
Exactly. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #15
I have nodoubt she told them exactly hifiguy Feb 2016 #22
The essence of it was "That crash was not your fault, so no worries". 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #25
Ugh. Unbelievable. hifiguy Feb 2016 #26
Correct... She Was/IS... Their Agent For Preservation of The Status Quo Because... CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #31
Opening paragraph: Ron Green Feb 2016 #2
I think Old Codger Feb 2016 #8
Only if I could make it public. eom. Bad Thoughts Feb 2016 #3
More importantly what I would do for them after the speech FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #4
Looks like Hillary was much too cheap. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #5
Yes, she only made $225,000 per speech. subterranean Feb 2016 #9
Good for her, it is called knowing your worth. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #10
No, it is called "appearance of impropriety". Look it up. closeupready Feb 2016 #13
Nah, its 1/124th of her net worth... its pocket change the Clintons... she undercharged uponit7771 Feb 2016 #19
Since you have decided it is "appearance of impropriety" explain exactly Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #24
If you see no ethical conflict, we're done here. closeupready Feb 2016 #28
Ethical? She was not elected to any office at the time of the speeches. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #29
Scalia couldn't have said it any better. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #32
+1... she no doubt should have charged more. It was a total of 1/30th of one year of her salary uponit7771 Feb 2016 #18
I *might* speak to it, but only to lecture them. I would make the transcript public. reformist2 Feb 2016 #6
First none of us are running for POTUS. She gave these speeches knowing she would be. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #7
I was kind of hoping the context would be understood. closeupready Feb 2016 #12
She said she didn't know. Republicans don't trust Hillary Clinton uponit7771 Feb 2016 #20
Neither do many, maybe most, Democrats. morningfog Feb 2016 #30
What's the price for passing their legislation? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #11
I would tell them UglyGreed Feb 2016 #14
You would say what they're paying you to say to their people. Avalux Feb 2016 #16
If it was 1/124th of my net worth or 1/30th of my yearly salary yes I would and it would be uponit7771 Feb 2016 #17
Whether in exact words or not "how can I help you" would probably be an opening line. libtodeath Feb 2016 #21
I would want the money in small unmarked bills up front olddots Feb 2016 #23
I like your style! DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #27
I'm a voter JustAnotherGen Feb 2016 #33
Sure, I'd accept it. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #34
Before or after I tell them they can either go to prison, or leave the country and Zorra Feb 2016 #35
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. It would depend on if I was planning to run for POTUS, and on what platform re Wall St.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:11 PM
Feb 2016

Your question is sort of a non-starter .. like "duh .. wouldn't you take $600,000 for a speech?"

Hillary Clinton was not just anyone.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
22. I have nodoubt she told them exactly
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:01 PM
Feb 2016

what they wanted to hear. You don't bite the hand that writes the checks. Ever.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
31. Correct... She Was/IS... Their Agent For Preservation of The Status Quo Because...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:42 AM
Feb 2016
The Status Quo works for them...

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
2. Opening paragraph:
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:11 PM
Feb 2016

"I'm here to understand you clearly."

Body of the speech:
"Here's are the kinds of things I can get done."

Closing:
"What can I do for you?"

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
8. I think
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

The here are the kind of things I can do came before the offer of reimbursement, the next line would be what is it worth to you and then the what can I do for YOU?...

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
24. Since you have decided it is "appearance of impropriety" explain exactly
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:32 PM
Feb 2016

where is the appearance of impropriety.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
18. +1... she no doubt should have charged more. It was a total of 1/30th of one year of her salary
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:58 PM
Feb 2016

... so ... she was given them a break

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
12. I was kind of hoping the context would be understood.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:45 PM
Feb 2016

Obviously, with controversy comes strong advocacy for all kinds of interpretations, as to the context, the implications, etc.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
11. What's the price for passing their legislation?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:11 PM
Feb 2016

If you could only get the money in exchange for advocating bills they wrote as is, wouldn't you do it? Come on, it's a lot of money! Be honest! Of course you would!

What about for dancing any time they ordered you to dance? Half a million dollars, you're telling me you wouldn't? Don't be lying now!

Hypocrites! Only losers wouldn't take the Wall Street money! Clinton is a winner!

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
16. You would say what they're paying you to say to their people.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:54 PM
Feb 2016

You would talk about how wonderful the bank is, and what a wonderful stroke of luck it is to work there, and how good the bank is to the employees. Cheerleader type stuff.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
17. If it was 1/124th of my net worth or 1/30th of my yearly salary yes I would and it would be
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:56 PM
Feb 2016

... covering why the revolution would start in the DNC with the DNC power brokers in the electorate sharing power with the marginalized then how that revolution is going to spread throughout the country and the end of conservatism

in all its myriad ways

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
23. I would want the money in small unmarked bills up front
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

then I'd stiff the bastards and shit in their punch bowl .

DUbeornot2be

(367 posts)
27. I like your style!
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:09 PM
Feb 2016

It's been reported that she said something along the lines of what a big miss they've made and they'll need to work together to straighten things up.

Translated that means "keep taking people's homes so you can pay me a quarter million an hour to tell you how the taxpayers will bail you out again..."

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
33. I'm a voter
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:56 AM
Feb 2016

Yes I would.

My speech would be to tell them that a bunch of bankers on wall street do not know jack shit about telecom and they need to get off our ovaries and testicles.

And it would be the same if I was running for President.

And it would still hurt my campaign with the anti corporate America crowd because - Snowden!

600K - I could do a lot with that money. Imagine the back to school bags for kids in Camden, Atlantic City, Newark, Elizabeth? Winter coats, hats, mittens, and boots? Sending them home with food on the weekend?

I'd do it!

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
34. Sure, I'd accept it.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:00 AM
Feb 2016

And spend a good two or three hours roasting them for fucking the American people, shaming them for accepting the bailout, and telling them they're lucky they own enough politicians to not be rotting in a fuckin' cell.

Now cut the check.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voters should ask themsel...