Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

berniepdx420

(1,784 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:52 PM Feb 2016

Can someone answer why they expect the Clintons to help balance the wealth distribution in our

country ?... Haven't they been a part of the power structure that ushered in this insane concentration of wealth at the top??

Do all of us see the imminent danger to our Democracy from this concentration of wealth at the top ?

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone answer why they expect the Clintons to help balance the wealth distribution in our (Original Post) berniepdx420 Feb 2016 OP
no one expects them to; they are members of the elite power structure and disdain the very thought amborin Feb 2016 #1
Seeing how they have collected millions in the last 15 years I expect nothing from them. libtodeath Feb 2016 #2
Yep, like the trade agreements that screw over most Americans. It will be the SOS! Big buck people RKP5637 Feb 2016 #3
I have no such expectations dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #4
Recently I was in Portland. onehandle Feb 2016 #5
What a wonderful reply UglyGreed Feb 2016 #9
I had a limburger panini while I was there. onehandle Feb 2016 #10
Well I would look into UglyGreed Feb 2016 #11
I've never been to Portland mcar Feb 2016 #15
Yeah, but it seemed familiar. onehandle Feb 2016 #16
I've been to Portland 23 times in my life. I couldn't wait to return. George II Feb 2016 #21
Stop at 23. onehandle Feb 2016 #22
The Clinton economic philosophy is rooted completely and blindly ... SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #6
As a Bernie supporter TeddyR Feb 2016 #7
We can return to a realistic tax on the top incomes close corporate tax loopholes and return to an Vincardog Feb 2016 #12
Not for very much longer Hydra Feb 2016 #13
That's a great question... well except for the last part..here's the answer for you.... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #14
Everyone, regardless of income TeddyR Feb 2016 #18
I don't mean any disrespect but may I ask how old you are Teddy ? berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #19
Who was the last person to do it? A very rich man who no one would have guessed would care about Hoyt Feb 2016 #8
I'm so discouraged about our rigged Government I can hardly function. ladjf Feb 2016 #17
They'll get everyone a job giving speeches to big banks Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #20

amborin

(16,631 posts)
1. no one expects them to; they are members of the elite power structure and disdain the very thought
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:54 PM
Feb 2016

of any changes that might threaten this hegemonic power

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
3. Yep, like the trade agreements that screw over most Americans. It will be the SOS! Big buck people
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:57 PM
Feb 2016

will do well, the rest will be forgotten.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. Recently I was in Portland.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:00 PM
Feb 2016

I think it was around the 23rd of the month.

Wait... I've lost my train of thought.

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
6. The Clinton economic philosophy is rooted completely and blindly ...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:00 PM
Feb 2016

in the failed trickle down Chicago school of thought.

Nothing she says or does indicates that she has any understanding or even knowledge of any other options. Two generations of economist and business men/women are infused with these destructive ideas. They heap scorn on dissenters like the church did when it was faced with the idea that the earth revolves around the sun. Forty years of declining prospects for the American people has done nothing to shake the unfailing worship of Chicago school philosophy.

One of the more insidious pillars of this philosophy is that unemployment is necessary. Let that sink in. Unemployment is necessary.

For me, supporting a system or supporting the advocates of a system that ensures many millions of people must scramble and struggle to survive is abhorrent.

Full employment, a high minimum wage and income security changes everything.

Everything.

And that is what this fight is about. Far too many of the comfortable among us fear change and they will blindly fight against the ideas that they do not understand or care about.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
7. As a Bernie supporter
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:01 PM
Feb 2016

What exactly do you expect to happen that will "balance wealth distribution"? We have and will continue to have an economy based on capitalism.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
12. We can return to a realistic tax on the top incomes close corporate tax loopholes and return to an
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

America first trade policy.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
13. Not for very much longer
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:27 PM
Feb 2016

Capitalism can't handle climate change- look at all the damage last summer(Nearly $1 Bill for fighting wildfires) and this winter. Who is going to pay for all of that? Who is going to pay for the full clean energy transition we needed more than 20 years ago?

We just had massive power outages due to a severe winter storm today. Shouldn't we be replacing all of that outdated infrastructure? Who will pay for that too?

We're going to a better system, or we're going to crash and burn. There are no other outcomes possible now.

berniepdx420

(1,784 posts)
14. That's a great question... well except for the last part..here's the answer for you....
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016
The main goal of Bernie Sanders’ decades-long career in politics has been to address the root causes of economic inequality because, as he has stated, “The middle class of this country, over the last forty years, has been disappearing.”

In order to address this, Bernie advocates policies that get at the root causes of these inequities. He calls for expanding the social safety net, creating more well-paying jobs, and reforming systems that perpetuate inequality such as our broken criminal justice system.

The other side of the coin is that the super-rich and multinational corporations have not been paying their fair share in taxes. Bernie proposes removing tax loopholes and tax breaks that only benefit the rich and multinational corporations, as well as raising the rates for the wealthiest Americans. With a tax system reformed in these ways, the financial burden for expanded social safety net programs would be placed on those with extraordinary means.


much more here..
http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-economic-inequality/
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
18. Everyone, regardless of income
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:55 PM
Feb 2016

Should pay the same amount of income in taxes. I'm ok with progressive taxes but not taxes like they have in Europe that take vast amounts of income from the wealthy. Despite what some on DU think, there are rich people who actually worked for and earned their wealth (and I'm not talking about the billionaires). What does a supposedly "broken" justice system have to do with income inequality? What makes it broken? How does fixing the justice system fix income inequality? I don't care who the politician is, I prefer answers rooted in facts, not platitudes.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
8. Who was the last person to do it? A very rich man who no one would have guessed would care about
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016

the poor - - FDR. LBJ helped with Medicare and Civil Rights Act.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
17. I'm so discouraged about our rigged Government I can hardly function.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:45 PM
Feb 2016

Fortunately, Bernie and most of his supporters still have the courage and energy to keep up the good fight.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can someone answer why th...