2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNevada: Why they are trying to intimidate voters by threatening litigation.
Sanders is starting his day with a rally in sparsely populated Elko, Nevada. He says we are here to win. We hope to win. But he adds, I want democracy to flourish.
Sanders asked supporters to show the world that democracy is alive and well here in Nevada.
Elko County is heavily Republican and has fewer than 4,000 registered Democrats. But Sanders event drew several hundred people, a sign of his strategy to boost turnout throughout the state to offset Hillary Clintons strength around Las Vegas.
Let's see: 6 debates at first, then we added the town hall dog and pony shows to promote Clinton, the voter data was withheld, they refused a recount in Iowa..... You would think I was describing the Republican Party.
The Republicans are going to love to bring this up in the general election to piss off Bernie Supporters. Nothing like trying to terrorize voters. Way to go Democrats.
Update: My God. I forgot NV is a swing state. Way to give the Republicans ammunition for the GE. I bow down to your brilliance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/the-latest-sanders-says-killer-mike-fuss-overblown/2016/02/18/3c5b4776-d69c-11e5-a65b-587e721fb231_story.html
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)and Hillary was 8. That was just from an OP after the town hall.
hoosierlib
(710 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)can't you at least read the OP?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Can't you at least care about democracy?
.
hack89
(39,171 posts)this is not democracy. It is a cynical attempt to manipulate the Dem primary. Democracy means making a choice.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I'll give you this if you give me superdelgates.
.
hack89
(39,171 posts)even though you know they will be voting for a RW wing nut in the GE? Hell of a revolution you have going there.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I said I'd give you this if you give me superdelegates... that's a total sham, or are you happy with Lobbyists deciding which Dem to send to the GE?
.
hack89
(39,171 posts)because that is the only scenario where super delegates matter.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And if we're going to do math and stats here, how much of a difference will this issue of voting in Nevada make?
But are you saying you are fine with Lobbyists as superdelegates?
.
hack89
(39,171 posts)too many clueless people not understanding how thing really work.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)on the outcome.
Interesting tidbit, you are outraged about something that you perceive will hurt Hillary and not at all about something that could benefit Hillary, even though it shows how corrupt our party's primary process has become.
Not surprised.
.
hack89
(39,171 posts)have a good evening.
Can't wait for Super Tuesday when DU starts returning to normal.
frylock
(34,825 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)I just found it interesting that at least one Bernie supporter had no problem with repukes manipulating a Dem primary as long as Bernie benefited.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Maybe pay attention next time.
hack89
(39,171 posts)if they were truly Bernie supporters they would not be also voting in the repuke primary now would they?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Where's your evidence to back up that assertion?
hack89
(39,171 posts)it is clear that we are not talking about people genuinely switching parties.
Give it a fucking break- you are trying to hard to be offended.
frylock
(34,825 posts)It's nothing but pure fucking speculation from a campaign that is greasing the skids for another loss tomorrow. Zero evidence. None.
hack89
(39,171 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and similar fears, that quite frankly never really materialized.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/us/politics/03crossover.html
For example.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511276150
Do I think that is the reason for the threatened litigation? Hell no. It's just a cover.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)funny thing is, I blocked all these types well before the primary campaign started ...
mythology
(9,527 posts)Who are promoting voting for Sanders on Saturday and then switching back to vote in the Republican caucus a few days later. The example I saw was from the University of Nevada Reno.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Should Republicans not be able to change parties? Isn't that what Hill did?
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Maybe while you guys are changing this rule you can change the superdelegate rule too.
.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)are already closed.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)How do you know they are all going to vote for Bernie?
I'll trade you though, I'll give you this if you give me superdelegates.
.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)I've got nothing to say to you if that isn't a problem for you.
hack89
(39,171 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)It explains exactly what the repukes are up to.
panader0
(25,816 posts)got my ops mixed up. I was referring to the thread about how the repukes were going to manipulate the Dem primary. That is what the litigation is all about.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)of the caucus and Republicans would already have you signed up already, and are still happy to have you vote the following week. I suppose Dems could do it too. I had heard it happened in the past, so when they found people had voted in both, the Dems tossed them out. Not sure if the Republicans care to check, some are encouraging it saying it is legal- or you won't "get into trouble" for it. It's stupid, I think they should just do both caucuses the same time to prevent it.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Way to spread right wing memes.
.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)been trying to spread far and wide to give the Clinton campaign a preposterous excuse for tomorrow's thumping.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)to vote for Hillary?
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)is in relation to Trump in SC & your excerpt sure as shit doesn't explain your headline any better.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)It is the fault of Nevada for creating such a ridiculous loophole.
I don't think it's right, but no citizen is breaking Nevada law. It's just a dumb loophole.