Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We have two candidates who are great on racial and gender issues. But racism and sexism are.... (Original Post) Armstead Feb 2016 OP
Most people aren't falling for it. Vattel Feb 2016 #1
Racism is not important? Or sexism either? bravenak Feb 2016 #2
It's certainly a valid issue...But not as a wedge issue in this primary Armstead Feb 2016 #4
We need to talk about it all the time apparently bravenak Feb 2016 #5
You run whatever program you like. And I'll say whatever I like... Armstead Feb 2016 #6
I'm not sick of it. I was sick of it being swept under the rug bravenak Feb 2016 #7
You can be sick of what you are sick of...And can be tired of what I am tred of Armstead Feb 2016 #9
Get used to discussing these wedge issues during primaries bravenak Feb 2016 #11
I sorta figured that out a while ago Armstead Feb 2016 #12
I know bravenak Feb 2016 #14
Mostly because certain people like to stir shit EmperorHasNoClothes Feb 2016 #3
It is sickening. The big issues affect all of us and we need to see that. Avalux Feb 2016 #8
Exactly Armstead Feb 2016 #10
So racism is not a BIG ISSUE? bravenak Feb 2016 #13
It is a societal cancer that won't be solved on the campaign trail. Avalux Feb 2016 #16
And it won't be solved by not bringing it up either bravenak Feb 2016 #19
They should be discussed during the primaries. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #15
Not when it's used in a phony opportunistic way to stir the pot for votes Armstead Feb 2016 #22
I agree, and I thought that's what you were getting at. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #23
Bill Clinton was right. SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #17
I disagree slightly nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #18
You have a point in one sense Armstead Feb 2016 #20
Well I know that at a more higher level story nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #21
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
2. Racism is not important? Or sexism either?
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:08 AM
Feb 2016

Just a 'wedge' issue you say?
Hey y'all!! We are just WEDGE issues!!!

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
4. It's certainly a valid issue...But not as a wedge issue in this primary
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:15 AM
Feb 2016

You want to talk about race in the general Election against some Republican who wants to cut the safety net, disenfranchise black voters, push a "law and order" agenda, keep out and track Muslims, cut off all programs intended to advance minority rights, deport immigrants and deny the path to citizenship, etc. I'm with you.

But in this primary with these candidates? No. Their differences are not over those issues.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
5. We need to talk about it all the time apparently
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:18 AM
Feb 2016

Giving a free pass to ignore the issue in the primaries does not help US one bit at all. We should never stop bringing it up every day, it exists everyday, it effects us everyday, it harms us everyday, so f that we gon discuss it in primaries. Y'all don't make up the rules for us. Thats too easy.

Then we gon talk about in the general too. We ROP. We run our own program.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
6. You run whatever program you like. And I'll say whatever I like...
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:20 AM
Feb 2016

and I'm getting damn sick of it being used as a divisive issue in this particular primary.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
9. You can be sick of what you are sick of...And can be tired of what I am tred of
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:23 AM
Feb 2016

that's called democracy

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
11. Get used to discussing these wedge issues during primaries
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:26 AM
Feb 2016

Cause If I'm alive, it WILL COME UP

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
8. It is sickening. The big issues affect all of us and we need to see that.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:22 AM
Feb 2016

These wedge issues are just that - wedges - to drive us apart so that the powerful can maintain their power.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
16. It is a societal cancer that won't be solved on the campaign trail.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:34 AM
Feb 2016

It won't be solved by the next president either. Racism is woven into the fabric of our society and must be driven out by all of us over time. Not any single one person can fix it, there's no panacea no matter what Hillary tells you.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
19. And it won't be solved by not bringing it up either
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:44 AM
Feb 2016

And hillary tells me nothing. But the fact that folks want us to shut up about it and minimize it as not important tells me that they are not the side who will ever even try to do anything

TIME TO PANIC

(1,894 posts)
15. They should be discussed during the primaries.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:33 AM
Feb 2016

Sure, some people use racism and sexism to be divisive, but we can't ignore the differences between our own candidates on these issues. How will things ever improve, if we brush these issues under the rug?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
18. I disagree slightly
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:41 AM
Feb 2016

forgive me but after doing a shit load of reading into things like 1996 Welfare Act, if one side insists in using it as a wedge, it is time to point out the damage that has done to single AA women, and their children and the growth of poverty. And how fundamentally that was a way to reduce the rolls from people who were traditionally denied access to welfare.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
20. You have a point in one sense
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 01:03 AM
Feb 2016

Punches require counterpunches.

I am just sickened by the whole dynamic of it all being casyt in those terms....Much as I get worked up about the arguments about "socialism" and stuff, they at least are valid points of dispute.

In regards to 1996 Welfare Deform, for example, while it may have had that effect disproportionately, it had a larger impact, and typified the gutting of the social safety net and the shrinking of opportunities for anyone to get ahead.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. Well I know that at a more higher level story
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 01:07 AM
Feb 2016

this election is about 1996, and the Crime Control Act of 1994... as well as Reagan and even both Bushes.

This is a battle for the soul of the nation. (Why I am working on that hard reading) I need to get my ducks (data) on a row as it were.

But I think that we are getting to the point that if that is the road some want to hoe... well somebody will have to answer and it will not be nice.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We have two candidates wh...