2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow much of a factor should experience be in electing a President.
The argument has been made that Hillary Clinton should be President because she has more experience.
Does experience translate into being a good/effective President?
President Obama was a one term US Senator and one term Sate Senator before running for President. No foreign policy experience at all. Yet President Obama hasnt done a bad job especially on Foreign policy.
I know, you say Sanders is not Barack Obama. Im not saying he is. This is an exercise in discussing experience.
If we are to believe experience makes a candidate a better choice, then George W H Bush should have been an awesome President. He was member of Congress, Ambassador to the United Nations, Envoy to China, Director of CIA, Vice President. Thats a pretty impressive resume. Yet few would say he was a great or even good President.
John F Kennedy had only one term in the US House and one as a US Senator. Nixon had a lot more experience.
Yet Kennedy did pretty well if I remember.
Lincoln had two terms in the US House. Not a lot of experience but he did an excellent job. In fact he has been ranked as the #1 President by a 2015 poll, administered by the American Political Science Association among political scientists specializing in the American presidency.
So there must be something else and experience doesnt determine if a person will be a good or great President.
Character? Integrity?
It's certainly something other than experience.
PatrickforO
(14,599 posts)positions they've had. Vision and integrity are the key to success. That's why I am for Bernie. His vision is clear and his integrity is obvious, there for all to see.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)With Clinton, we feel we have an idea of what she would do in various circumstances, and that makes people happy. It doesn't please me, because I believe her foreign policy will be overly aggressive, and there's a good chance we will attack Iran. But it's reassuring to many.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Pretty sure no one wants him running.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)I think tha once the voting public determines that a candidate is "ready" they look at other factors. I doubt that many people vote based on "degrees of readiness."
On the other hand, if people think a candidate is "not ready" I think they will unlikely give their vote to that candidate no matter what the other issues are.