2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDoes a Sanders supporter want to explain this?
Harrah's casino site- Bernie supporters chant "English-only" to stop civil rights leader @DoloresHuerta from providing Spanish translation.
regarding @AmericaFerrera tweet from earlier: I have confirmed that it happened from a source knowledgable
stonecutter357
(12,698 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)brooklynite
(94,792 posts)...that said, I generally find people don't make up things that are easy to challenge.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)casperthegm
(643 posts)Nothing remotely close to "speak english" contained within that video. If something like that was said and doesn't make it through the audio, then so be it, those people should certainly be ashamed of themselves. As a Bernie supporter I denounce any such talk. And we all know that Bernie would denounce it as well. He is a good man with a long history of speaking out against just that kind of prejudice.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)people, etc.
And yes, I require solid documentary evidence. Way too much water under that bridge.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)as nurses
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)They wore shirts marked with the Hillary Clinton logo...
Are you suggesting that only Sanders has the right to wear red shirts?
Or are you suggesting that the Sanders voters were too stupid to figure out which people were on their team?
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)Awaiting your explanation.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)And it was impossible to determine just what she was screaming. She was immediately removed from the room.
In other words, it's ridiculous to portray this as something representative of anything or anyone other than herself.
Perogie
(687 posts)Why can't you hear that? It was clear that is what she said. Why are you saying she said something she didn't?
jfern
(5,204 posts)That ain't it. Try again.
beedle
(1,235 posts)When I see a video of Hillary calling out and condemning the "That's not Bernie/Bernie wasn't there" smears (not by some random audience member, but by high profile Clinton supporters and media reps with family connections to the Clinton machine) then maybe I'll consider joining a call for Bernie to call out some random supporter with no known ties to Bernie other than maybe a supporter.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Social media isn't going to change this election?
Are we walking that back now?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)the Twitter story about red shirts
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Sorry.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)LexVegas
(6,115 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,020 posts)Because that's just wrong
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I expect Sanders will appear at some point to condemn this bullshit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Shandris
(3,447 posts)No video? In 2016?
"T-trust me, a source said so!"
In God I trust. All others must provide evidence. Evidence of Bernie support and evidence of Nevada residence will be first on my list of requirements.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)It is clear that is what was being said.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)This scene is nothing at all like it's being portrayed. But because of the way it's flying around the web,i suspect this was an opportunity againstBernie After all, Hillary needs to get Latino voters back. Bernie did much to well with them for her team to avoid.
enid602
(8,659 posts)My GOD. Don't they know who she is?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Not a big fan of passing on hearsay and Twitter is infamous for being well named.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)And politics brings out the worst in a lot of people.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Your little ole keyboard!
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)My guess is that they were afraid that she wouldn't translate properly.
villager
(26,001 posts)Whether it's Bernie supporters, GOP crossover caucusers, etc...
Larkspur
(12,804 posts)It's not a directive from the Sanders' campaign.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
H2O Man
(73,637 posts)I'll be glad to take a stab at it.
First, this is an OP on DU:GDP, by a dedicated, honorable Hillary supporter, one that I have a lot of respect for.
In the OP, the DU community member provides two small quips from another Hillary supporter. I am unfamiliar with that source, and hence take it with a tiny grain of salt. Did the person making the claim actually hear it? Was it one person? Was that person a "rat-fucker"? A real Bernie supporter?
Obviously, we do not know the answers to those questions. Hence, at very worst, it may indicate that Bernie has one jackass supporting him.
In summation, it is an attempt by a DU community member to advocate for the candidate of choice. Nothing more, nothing less.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Bernie's message is damn clear on race and immigration, and the importance of the Latino vote in NV is equally clear. No supporter that isn't mentally off the rails would be this stupid.
too bad it gets air time here
Broward
(1,976 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)There is video on Twitter.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I was making a point.
The OP can no more explain that video, than anyone here can explain why someone said something they did there. It raises a cause for concern. Difference being, a rouge person speaking out vs individual instructing others to proceed in to caucus without registering, and overriding people at the door.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Nah. In addition, Hillary is too well known for dirty tricks for me to take this seriously - the twitter, or the people shouting, if that is the case, being Bernie supporters. Nothing like this concerning Hillary is believable for me. Shrug.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)What do you want us to explain?
dubyadiprecession
(5,725 posts)trueblue2007
(17,242 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)Were they outside agitators or bona fide Bernie supporters? I suspect the former. That sort of behavior is totally contrary to what Bernie stands for. And most Hispanics understand that. Hence Bernie won the Hispanic vote in the Nevada caucuses.
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 10:44 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511290075lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Is that true?
srobert
(81 posts)I went to the caucus today and I saw intelligent, well-educated, people supporting both candidates. I also saw ignorant, ill-mannered people supporting both candidates. That's all the explanation that's required.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I just watched the video in which no such thing occurred.
As more and more of these outrageous claims are shot down, HRC supporters lose what little credibility they have left.
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)Why not be clear?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I haven't yet heard this lie from Dolores Huerta.
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)LAS VEGAS, NV Longtime labor leader and Hillary Clinton supporter Dolores Huerta told ThinkProgress that supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders prevented her from providing Spanish interpretation at a caucus this morning at Harrahs casino on the Las Vegas Strip.
The fellow that was running the caucus said that the first person to come up to the stage could translate, so I went up. Nobody else did, she said. Then the Bernie people started yelling no, no, no. One of their people came up, and I suggested we both translate. But the moderator decided we would have no translation. So the Bernie people preferred we would have no translation just because I was going to do the translating. Its ridiculous, because if I had said something that wasnt accurate, Im sure somebody would have corrected me.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/20/3751830/dolores-huerta-interview/
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)It is eminently reasonable that the translations ought to be from a neutral party.
So it never happened. Thanks for clearing that up.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)in your post starting this thread in the interview.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)They were shouting for a neutral interpreter since Huerta is obviously biased for HRC
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511290075
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Not much else to say.
bigtree
(86,008 posts)@BernieSanders Shame on your supporters for depriving Spanish speaking caucus goers of info they need for full participation! #NVcaucus
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)even if not present at the event. Because, after all, we are all exactly the same.
brooklynite
(94,792 posts)...which is what they're doing here.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)All I heard on the video was ''Neutral'' and it sounded like a Hispanic female voice or two. If so, it is also possible they were objecting to have a Clinton surrogate readinbg the translation instead of a neutral party.
I
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Even her apparently respectable supporters.
As it turns out.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Confusion at a large raucous gathering of human beings.
http://www.snopes.com/sanders-english-only-huerta/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511291321
Susan Sarandon @SusanSarandon 1h1 hour ago
.@AmericaFerrera I was there. Nobody frm Bernie's side said English only. Moderator did when no neutral translator was found@DoloresHuerta
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/civil-rights-activist-dolores-huerta-sanders-backers-shut-me-down-for-offering-spanish-translation/
What happened is the person who was running the caucus said we need a translator and he said the first person that comes to the stage can be the translator, she said. So I walked up to the front and then some of the organizers, the Bernie organizers, decided to shout no, no, no. Then a Bernie person stood up and said, I can also do translation. So then the person running the caucus said we wont have a translator.
snip
"A video posted online on Saturday purports to show Huerta being shouted down by Sanders supporters, but no English-only chants are distinguishable, although one person can be heard yelling, Neutral. Another person can be heard saying Pero necesitamos Español (But we need Spanish) from behind the camera, as well as, Its Dolores Huerta, my goodness. The video can be seen below."
snip
"However, another attendee at the event has challenged Huertas statements. Erin Cruz told the fact-checking site Snopes that she was at the event along with members of a nurses union as well as actresses Gabby Hoffman and Susan Sarandon, and said that it was the moderator who asked for English-only during the event, and not any Sanders supporter. "
SNOPES:
Flickr
CLAIM: Supporters of Bernie Sanders shouted "English only" at civil rights activist Dolores Huerta during one Nevada caucus event, ostensibly objecting to a translation of remarks into Spanish.
FALSE
EXAMPLE: [Collected via Twitter, February 2016]
ORIGIN:On 20 February 2016, the Nevada Democratic caucuses ended in a victory for Hillary Clinton. Not long after that, actress America Ferrera tweeted that that supporters of Bernie Sanders shouted "English only!" at longtime civil rights activist Dolores Huerta (who had apparently offered to translate from English to Spanish at an event at Harrah's casino on the Las Vegas strip), objecting to a translation of remarks from English to Spanish:
Shortly thereafter, Huerta tweeted:
Huerta initially didn't specify how she identified the chanters as Sanders supporters. We spoke to Erin Cruz, who was present at the rally with a nurses' union to support Sanders:
Cruz told us she was accompanied by ten other nurses and actors Susan Sarandon and Gabby Hoffman. Cruz said she was unaware of any recording during the disputed chanting:
@KimLaCapria @brooklynmarie I don't know that anyone was recording, but I would gladly give a statement along with all the other nurses. Erin Cruz (@neuroticnurse75) February 20, 2016
A video of Huerta speaking surfaced not long afterward:
Huerta has been extremely outspoken in her support for Hillary Clinton in recent weeks, and in fact was at the Nevada event to stump for her.
Later on 18 February 2016, Huerta told ThinkProgress that she was able to identify Sanders' supporters as the "room was divided with the Hillary people on one side and the Bernie people on the other." Huerta also elaborated upon the "English only" claim:
The fellow that was running the caucus said that the first person to come up to the stage could translate, so I went up. Nobody else did, she said. Then the Bernie people started yelling no, no, no. One of their people came up, and I suggested we both translate. But the moderator decided we would have no translation. So the Bernie people preferred we would have no translation just because I was going to do the translating. Its ridiculous, because if I had said something that wasnt accurate, Im sure somebody would have corrected me.
mcar
(42,403 posts)besides attack Hillary about this.
jillan
(39,451 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)No they'll just double down. It's the Clinton way.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Go to the 40 second mark. At one minute or so he says we are going to move forward with English only.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Lick your wounds and move on to the next meme.
Then donate $2,700 to Bernie, since you apparently can afford it.
Marr
(20,317 posts)they've been debunked.
It's a mark of low character.
aikoaiko
(34,185 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The hillarians should try to be less despicable than their candidate
George II
(67,782 posts)On Sun Feb 21, 2016, 04:00 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Does a Sanders supporter want to explain this?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511286855
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
every one of these false OPs has been juried
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 21, 2016, 04:18 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The alert appears accurate. As a Hillary supporter I vote to hide it. I sincerely wish that those that are on juries would not rule on the basis of personal bias, and that comment is directed at all sides
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Pretty lame stated reason for the alert, plus this OP (not sure about all the others) is true. Alerting because one doesn't agree with the content, is pointless.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given