Whoops! Looks like Hillary likely won the NV Hispanic vote after all...
One of Saturday’s biggest election surprises was the entrance and exit polling measuring Hispanic voters in the Nevada caucus. It found that Bernie Sanders defeated Hillary Clinton by eight percentage points among Hispanic voters, overturning months of conventional wisdom about Mrs. Clinton’s strength among nonwhites.
But there are a lot of reasons to question the findings from the polls. They have a small sample of precincts and voters, and they simply were not devised to provide precise estimates of the Hispanic vote.
The actual election returns in Las Vegas’s Clark County hint at a different story. Analyzed neighborhood by neighborhood, they suggest that Mrs. Clinton might have won the Hispanic vote by a comfortable margin. She won about 60 percent of delegates in heavily Hispanic areas, a result that calls the finding of the polling into question.
= new reply since forum marked as read
"Analysis of Clark county precincts w/ most Latinos Clinton won 61.5% to 38.5%."
We should instead look at entrance polls instead of actual results! 
No one is surprised really, but it was nice to see it typed out. Thanks. 
it's not about Bernie , bernie is just a name so as long as Clinton keeps attacking the voting public it's just gonna snowball 
in a bad way.
Apparently, you can't find your way on your own, so please allow me to help:
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/
Enjoy!!
That's a classic!! 
There was some damn near manic post screaming about how "Hillary's firewall was down" while the voting was still going on and with only about 35% of precincts reporting. I noted in that thread that the web site the person was quoting from looked like it was still being updated! It was no where near conclusive even then.
The desperation from these guys would have been funny if it hadn't been so damn sad too.
This is one of the most odious political experience I can remember. Damn near as bad as 2008 and that was horrifying, even after the election was over. I can't wait for all of this crap to be over.
Come hang out in AA. I think as a refutation of all of this crap we've been talking alot about comic books and superheroes. 
They're always the most accurate source of information.
?w=580
This is not an "opinion piece," it's a "polling analysis" piece. There's a lot of "there" there. Taking two paragraphs from this rather wide ranging article doesn't show the full picture.
See, here's two more paragraphs:
There is not much evidence, though, that Mrs. Clinton won Hispanic voters by the sort of landslide margin that she did eight years ago. That’s a good sign for Mr. Sanders, who needs to make up for the huge swing among black voters, who have gone from uniformly for President Obama to uniformly for Mrs. Clinton.
A little something for everyone, eh? Here's two more:
In the 76 precincts in Clark County where we believe that a plurality of registered Democrats are Hispanic, Mrs. Clinton defeated Mr. Sanders in the delegate count by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent. In the smaller number of majority Hispanic precincts, she seemed to win about 60 percent of the delegates, and she won perhaps 65 percent of the delegates in the precincts where Hispanics appeared to be a particularly large share of registered Democrats. (For details on the estimates, see my note at the end of the article.)
