2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDon't fall for Super Tuesday Meme Coming Out Of Hillary Camp
They have already started, but I'm pretty sure its going to get more intense as we get closer. She and her surrogates will try to argue Super Tuesday is going to be make/break for this primary. They will point to historical precedent (except 08 of course) that Super Tuesday basically decides the election and everything afterwards is an after thought. Here is why you shouldn't believe it.
1) Super Tuesday this year will have substantially less. States voting will only make up ~20% of the total delegates. 08 it was ~50% and had 22 states vs 11 this year.
2) These states are primarily in the South with heavy AA. If the pattern holds where Clinton loses Whites/Latinos, and Sanders loses AA votes heavily, than this 20% is his worst 20%. Outside of the momentum, it make strategic sense to have your worst states go first because it allows you to build your message to the most receptive voters.
3) The last 25% of the delegates is hugely favorable. You have bunch of rural and white states + the mammoth that is California. IMO he can make up the loses in the SEC states in these primaries.
The challenge is usually money. The Hillary campaign will try to demotivate Bernie supporters, and that didn't work when Sanders was @3%, and hopefully it won't work after Super Tuesday.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Super Tuesday will just be icing on the cake.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)dchill
(38,547 posts)I'm in a 2008 timewarp.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)it is from reality.
So you can pretty much assume everything else that they say makes just about as much sense.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)think
(11,641 posts)LonePirate
(13,431 posts)localroger
(3,631 posts)That is not a commanding lead. It is not even a significant lead at this point in the contest.
LonePirate
(13,431 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,650 posts)Do you really think Bernie's going to sweep the south?
I know he's up against the wife of the former governor of Arkansas and recent senator from NY, but he's a Jewish uber-liberal from New England. You might think people will weigh his views against prejudice, but the majority of Dixie wont have to flip a coin on that one. Plus, one of them has overwhelming party support.
California and the North West may be Sanders' last good stand.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)think
(11,641 posts)You are correct...
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)for much longer than that. Bernie's strongest states come after the first Super Tuesday. It's all uphill for him after that!
33taw
(2,448 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Unfortunately, they are both negative.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)It will still be close on Wednesday after.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Icing is also a penalty in hockey. I would refer to her winning the nomination as a penalty more than a flavorful treat. That's why I will do all I can to return the democratic party to the roots that Hillary and her supporters seem to currently deem as unworthy. Bernie may have never been a "democrat" but he damn sure has more of an FDR approach to governance than his opponent does. It is hard for me to fathom that people believe being pro business and pro management is the best way to build the party. Having Bill Clinton refer to half the voting block as the "left wing version of the tea party" was so insulting it will be hard for me to support who he endorses.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Funny... unity was not important in 2008. Well it don't matter for shit until the process has run its ENTIRE COURSE in 2016 either!
The voters are just now becoming acquainted with just "who" Hillary... REALLY is...
FSogol
(45,529 posts)wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)What pattern of losing Latinos?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The entrance polls in Nevada turned out to be incorrect.
Hillary won the areas in Nevada with large Latino populations.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Was pretty close. It had Sanders @46 to Clinton's @51 with 3% undecided.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)"Latino voters in Nevada are generally younger than whites or blacks in the state, and as we've seen in both national polls and exit polls so far, younger voters are perhaps more apt to back Sanders than any other group in the Democratic electorate."
Thanks for playing
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/22/politics/polls-nevada-caucuses-democrats-latinos/index.html
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I have not seen them. Just an opinion posted by someone that they "may" be wrong.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)We note that some analysts have said that Secretary Clinton's victories in heavily Latino precincts proved that she won the Latino vote. However the methodology of using heavily Latino or "barrio" precincts to represent Latino voting behavior has been considered ineffective and discarded for more than 30 years due to non-barrio residential patterns been common among Latino voters since the 1980's.
Lost is this controversy is the fact that the data shows a record high Latino vote share in the Democratic Caucuses with Latinos representing 19% of the vote compared to 13% in 2008.
WCVI is a non-profit, non-partisan Latino public policy and research organization founded in 1985 with offices in Los Angeles and San Antonio.
Posted by KCJohn below:
http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Who-Won-the-Nevada-Latino-Vote-.html?soid=1114208817960&aid=TUzlNNKZYHc
w4rma
(31,700 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)I'm finally getting Sandernista logic.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)Is the Hillary Campaign.
The other side is scientific poll of 1,000 actual voters. I'm not sure which I should believe.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)Convenient that we should believe polls except when it contradicts a Clinton talking point.
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/20/11079660/latinos-nevada-sanders
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/22/upshot/why-clinton-not-sanders-probably-won-the-hispanic-vote-in-nevada.html?_r=0
Convenient that we should believe polls except when it contradicts a Clinton talking point.
On the contrary - Clinton winning the latino vote is not a Clinton talking point. But those who believe otherwise only have the president of a polling outfit's word.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)But if you look at those articles they use "probably" and "unlikely".
Again I trust scientific vs the opinion of hacks at VOX/NYT who just get feed talking points.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)Latino voters in Nevada are generally younger than whites or blacks in the state, and as we've seen in both national polls and exit polls so far, younger voters are perhaps more apt to back Sanders than any other group in the Democratic electorate.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/22/politics/polls-nevada-caucuses-democrats-latinos/index.html
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)After hearing about disputes between the Sanders and Clinton over the Edison Entry Poll Survey results on the Latino vote in the Feb 20 Primary Caucuses WCVI undertook a review of the publicly disclosed data.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)onecaliberal
(32,902 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Mo need to be so vituperative....
Here's a big DU
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Bernie supporters are pretty fed up with all the tricks and won't fall for them.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Relying on one faulty Entrance/Exit poll I see.
The results of the Nevada caucus says otherwise as Clinton won Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods by 20 percentage points. Those are real numbers in the only poll that counts, the actual vote/caucus.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)We note that some analysts have said that Secretary Clinton's victories in heavily Latino precincts proved that she won the Latino vote. However the methodology of using heavily Latino or "barrio" precincts to represent Latino voting behavior has been considered ineffective and discarded for more than 30 years due to non-barrio residential patterns been common among Latino voters since the 1980's.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It doesn't matter how many times this is posted. They are not going to read it.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Aren't really Latino. It uses a general supposition to contradict specific voting and census data.
Whatever. The results will be known soon enough. If Bernie has the lock on the Latino vote you assume, then the SW state polling is all wrong and he should sweep those states next week.
I'm perfectly happy to wait until the actual results to come out. I don't need to prop myself up with speculative claims.
I do find it funny how every bit of data, polls, or anything tha doesn't promote the notion that Bernie is inherently superior and winning every state is a "meme." I've never seen such desperation to discount any and everything that doesn't promote the views of a vocal minority as the only and absolute source of all truth. It's sad actually.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)According to the Census Bureau, the Latino population in Nevada is 10 years younger than the national average.
Younger Latinos are in Bernie's camp. Older Latinos might be in Hillary's camp?
Oh, BTW, this IS census data.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)That really is the key point.
The quote above didn't site age, it said that there is a trend away from Latinos living in barrios. It used that assumption to counter actual vote results from Latino precincts. That claim doesn't prove those predicts aren't Latino.
I myself don't really care. I'm happy to wait for upcoming primary results to see what happens. I can also wait for a few years to see actual political science on the Nevada vote. I'm perfectly comfortable with saying we don't know enough at his particular point in time.
I do find the complete abandonment of logic and data disturbing, much as Krugman discussed in a column last week. But I have resigned myself to the sad reality that a number of self-described "progressives" have come to be as contemptuous of science and research standards as the right. Truth is now defined entirely in relation to what people want to believe, and it is that which will be our undoing.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But I have resigned myself to the sad reality that a number of self-described "progressives" have come to be as contemptuous of science and research standards as the right.
Nice Snark!
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)There are lots of delegates up for grabs and it will definitely effect the the trajectory of the race.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)and yet she won big in Latino neighborhoods.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...to win Nevada by 5.5 points.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Susan Saranden probably didn't help that.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Vermont, Minnesota, Colorado, Massachusetts. If he misses any of those he's in real trouble.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Or flak. Doesn't really leave or make an impression, as far as my enthusiasm and support for Bernie is concerned.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)on social media and keeping people informed so they don't get discouraged and give up.
appalachiablue
(41,177 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Progressive dog
(6,920 posts)are worried that it is downhill from here.
think
(11,641 posts)in Bernie's favor.
Progressive dog
(6,920 posts)HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Nope. Bernie's In It To WIN It!
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Go Bernie!!!
...have to come out and try to end it asap...
Every day that passes she is distrusted more...
eggplant
(3,913 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)...and this race was decided after Iowa. Bernie has demonstrated that, even with a laser-like focus on a given state, he cannot muster the resources necessary to carry the states he needs.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)
was in it until the convention.
Super Pacs are going to flood her with money. Absolutely flood.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)dflprincess
(28,082 posts)I've especially enjoyed their posts on FB where they whine that Bernie is being mean to them.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)what do they think Trump or the other Repubs would do to her? She better toughen up if she expects to get through the primaries and possibly the GE.
Arkansas Granny
(31,534 posts)what Republicans can do? She's been the focus of right wing attacks for over 40 years.
I think she has Trump's number, as well.
Toughen up, indeed.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She is terrified.of trump
Look at how.fast she dropped her sexism statements about him as soon as he threatened to drag her and bills history out and flog it publicly
Trump knows her secrets and she is terrified.by him.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Put a fork in him and let's move on.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)you have MONTHS and MONTHS to go with Bernie AND us - aren't you lucky??!!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Is that next Saturday or March 1st?
dana_b
(11,546 posts)but we'll be here until and through June 14th and then onto the convention where Bernie will be accepting his nomination. It will be GREAT to have you join us!!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But that's not going to happen.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)Will you feel the same way as she begins to slip-slide down. The democratic primaries are not winner-take-all. They will both accumulate delegates with each primary.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)That if Bernie wins I will vote for him and back him 100 %.
Republicans are the ultimate enemy not democrats.
That's hard to tell around here though
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)to continue all the way to the Convention!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Like SC he will be out of dough soon.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)He spent enough time in SC last fall at Liberty University, Charleston talking to the Victims of the shooting in the Baptist Church and in Columbia, Rock Hill and several other Colleges
It was time for him to move on. He made a great effort and I think he will get some votes from it by those who care what he is about and took the time to go see him at his events which were also (even back then) in the thousands.
It's up to the voters. He has other places to go and other voters who he can appeal to in the coming weeks and months.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Other Bernsters are saying he's still there so not sure now.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)the money keeps rolling in. Every smear campaign by the Hillary camp brings in lots more money.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)rocktivity
KoKo
(84,711 posts)since the Nevada Caucus!
Thanks for the Post!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)[center]
[/center][font size="1"]From Wikipedia Commons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eugène_Delacroix_-_La_liberté_guidant_le_peuple.jpg)
(Public Domain)
[/font]
dana_b
(11,546 posts)Vive la France et vive Bernie!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)Yep.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Sent Bernie money Saturday, and will after "super duper Tuesday"!
SCantiGOP
(13,874 posts)I don't tell you often enough how much I appreciate your telling me what to do.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)A tie in Iowa (wih much doubt cast on the process) was billed as a solid win. A steamrolling in NH was brushed away as not important. A 5% win in NV (with lots of controversy, and a narrower victory than in '08) is billed as Sander's death knell. This race is still a dead 51/51 heat, and still going. The media is for Clinton, and they are spinning hard.
Clinton's camp sound like those annoying kids at FNM who ask "is it my turn?" After every move you make.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)As one of Team Hill points out further up, this was supposed to be over in Iowa. A virtual tie spun as a resounding victory.
I heard they blew a lot of money for that tie...but 2 losses to start would have been devastating.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Everything Sanders is saying is being spun into him giving up, they wish the actual left wing of the party would give up. Some of us remember the nasty names we've been called (Rham and his comment, which he apologized to the disabled community for, but not the progressives).
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)If the party tries to make a choice on states we will lose in the GE it's gone way off the deep end.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)How...interesting.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Thanks for your OP. Now we'll be prepared.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and I agree with your post.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)just now giving pointers to Bernie and they were good ones. He said Bernie should be saying when she says she is with Obama how she is not with him on many issues. Also to tell historic stories instead of just the same talks change it up a little explaining our history and how he can help to change it.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I would never fall for it because it's just another campaign tactic. Easy to see through it like all of the other tactics that are tried here on DU.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)If Hillary continues to eke out tiny margins of victory in some states while Bernie stages blowouts in others, this will remain close.