Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:14 PM Feb 2016

We cannot win a general election with a candidate who is widely distrusted and disliked











We Democrats like Hillary (well, at least the Democrats over 50 like her), but that's it. Outside of over-50-year-old Democrats, Hillary is disliked and disbelieved. Maybe Hillary can win the nomination with the support of over-50-year-old Democrats, but that is not a demographic that will win a general election.
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We cannot win a general election with a candidate who is widely distrusted and disliked (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 OP
And this 58 yo lifelong democratic woman is supporting Bernie! peacebird Feb 2016 #1
I'm a female over 50 who supports Bernie MissDeeds Feb 2016 #10
I'm a female over 75 who supports Bernie and my friends, 65 to 80 do as well. Cleita Feb 2016 #22
and here: female 57 and husband 65... For BERNIE AmBlue Feb 2016 #64
66 year old for Bernie here, bvar22 Feb 2016 #68
63 Male exCPA Veteran small business owner...... tommcc99 Feb 2016 #41
Oh please. leftofcool Feb 2016 #2
Many is such a fuzzy term. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #4
Many=6. dchill Feb 2016 #67
you keep posting the same tired ole lines all the time. Cobalt Violet Feb 2016 #26
You just cannot overcome that much negativity in one election campaign. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #3
agreed! Vote2016 Feb 2016 #5
+1 MissDeeds Feb 2016 #13
I've done it many times before but I refuse to do it again... SciDude Feb 2016 #35
History says you are very wrong jmowreader Feb 2016 #6
I agree that Clinton is Nixonian, but I'm otherwise unpersuaded Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #7
Her campaigns have certainly been straight out of the Nixon playbook. hifiguy Feb 2016 #9
She's perfected their tactics. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #18
Well said... chapdrum Feb 2016 #37
The whole Clinton clan certainly likes rubbing elbows with hifiguy Feb 2016 #40
LOL! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #16
Right down to her transcripts. It really is incredible. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #62
Indeed! Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #66
I find this amusing angrychair Feb 2016 #11
That's really not a winning argument - TBF Feb 2016 #29
I also know how it began jmowreader Feb 2016 #32
And if we're lucky, chapdrum Feb 2016 #33
No, if we're REALLY lucky we can see your candidate lose 49 states in the general election jmowreader Feb 2016 #39
And you really think we can't say the same about your candidate? TBF Feb 2016 #43
Not sure how many times the GOP plans to investigate this jmowreader Feb 2016 #45
Old News Politicalboi Feb 2016 #57
You really want to talk about Chelsea's First Class Flights - TBF Feb 2016 #65
I'm hep. You WANT to meet my Ignore list. jmowreader Feb 2016 #69
It's probably for the best TBF Feb 2016 #70
LOL! Politicalboi Feb 2016 #56
Comparing her to Nixon Politicalboi Feb 2016 #55
I agree. hifiguy Feb 2016 #8
Nailed it MissDeeds Feb 2016 #14
I actually think a few zombies nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #23
Mine too. I can vote my conscience. hifiguy Feb 2016 #24
I think only dyed in the wool, beltway Democrats like Hillary. PyaarRevolution Feb 2016 #12
But they will give her the nomination anyway warrprayer Feb 2016 #15
Holy shiite - she's 4 pts. over Trump for dishonesty! Vinca Feb 2016 #17
if they win they have the power: if they lose they can blame us and further exclude us: win-win MisterP Feb 2016 #19
Agreed. Let's vote Hillary. MariaThinks Feb 2016 #20
Well, she can always cheat to win in the General Election Right? Dragonfli Feb 2016 #21
Thank you for the post, but let's dispense with the facts shall we? debunction.junction Feb 2016 #25
Oops! I thought this was a thread about Ted Cruz. procon Feb 2016 #27
You're thinking of General Discussion, not General Discussion: Primaries. Plus Cruz does 15% better Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #28
Politicians aren't synonymous with "trust". procon Feb 2016 #42
What, All The Republican Voters Are Going To Vote For Trump? Vogon_Glory Feb 2016 #30
So we bet the whole election on the Republicans choosing Trump over Rubio? Sanders beats them both, Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #34
I Disagree: Club Pachyderm Is Going To Nominate Trump Vogon_Glory Feb 2016 #46
I hope you are right Vote2016 Feb 2016 #48
K & R Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #31
Modern "moderate" Democrats are status-quo and pro-oligarchy and they are perfectly willing to SciDude Feb 2016 #36
Good post. Welcome to DU! Avalux Feb 2016 #44
Do you mean like Nixon? Sancho Feb 2016 #38
Fucking Nixon created OSHA, the EPA, the Clean Water and Air Acts - don't sully his accomplishments Vote2016 Feb 2016 #47
I met Nixon after he was VP. Sancho Feb 2016 #60
We Cannot Win The Election With An 70 Year Old Socialist Corey_Baker08 Feb 2016 #49
If his age is an issue, then we agree Hillary should take a one-term pledge? Polls say voters trust Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #50
The Key Word Is Socialist Corey_Baker08 Feb 2016 #51
So the 70 year old part was just an ageist slur? Gotcha. You know the difference between a socialist Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #53
I Do But A Majority Of Americans Don't Know The Difference Corey_Baker08 Feb 2016 #59
Some want to defy reality Politicalboi Feb 2016 #52
Only Sanders can defeat Trump and Rubio. Clinton cannot beat either (and Clinton vs. Rubio wouldn't Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #54
I'm 70 and support Bernie williesgirl Feb 2016 #58
I love the part where Calista241 Feb 2016 #61
you do realize that Trump and Hillary's numbers in your poll ericson00 Feb 2016 #63
kick n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #71

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. And this 58 yo lifelong democratic woman is supporting Bernie!
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:19 PM
Feb 2016

So even the over 50 demographic is not solid for Hillary

AmBlue

(3,117 posts)
64. and here: female 57 and husband 65... For BERNIE
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:49 AM
Feb 2016

Neither of us think Hillarry is trustworthy either.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
68. 66 year old for Bernie here,
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:48 PM
Feb 2016

and I'm influential among my neighbors. Turing others to support Bernie is easy.
I just tell them to look around and see how badly they have been getting screwed.
Then I tell them to vote with their wallet and empty bank accounts.

It is amazing how effective this approach is.
The RICH need to start paying their fair share.

tommcc99

(48 posts)
41. 63 Male exCPA Veteran small business owner......
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:28 PM
Feb 2016

The demographic experts would say that I'm supposed to hate everyone, be selfish and love T-Rump.

I have always been a liberal / progressive.

But I'm not and I don't. My grandparents lived in tents but survived the Great Depression because of WPA jobs. I went to college and bought my first house through the GI bill. Social security is a an important part of my retirement (whats left of it after Wall Street f%^ked us over - that's another topic) Democratic socialism is what and who we are and I am proud to part of a country with that tradition - tarnished though it is.

Bernie's values and positions are the fundamental American values of hard work, opportunity, a level playing field, equality, respect and taking care of your neighbor that I grew up with.

Bernie is trustworthy. He has earned it.

Hillary is untrustworthy. She has earned it.

Peace

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
2. Oh please.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:20 PM
Feb 2016

Many people under 50 like her, as well as Indies and extremely liberal folks. Get over it already!

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
4. Many is such a fuzzy term.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:26 PM
Feb 2016

"Many" won't be enough to win the election with negatives as high as hers.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
3. You just cannot overcome that much negativity in one election campaign.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:24 PM
Feb 2016

Our only hope, if Hillary is the nominee, is to be easily able to show the repug candidate is far worse.

We know there is no question the repug will be far worse. But we are Democrats. it is the independent voters that have to be convinced. And they have to be so convinced that they are motivated to go out and vote for Hillary. That will be a problem.

 

SciDude

(79 posts)
35. I've done it many times before but I refuse to do it again...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:14 PM
Feb 2016

I cannot in good conscience vote for a conservative oligarch like Clinton and I no longer believe in voting for "the lesser of two evils" because it simply perpetuates evil.

Democrats are in trouble if something doesn't shake up this race.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
6. History says you are very wrong
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:47 PM
Feb 2016

1968:



Nixon received 301 electoral votes and won 32 states

1972:

Nixon was even LESS popular in his reelection campaign than he was when he ran the first two times...

520 electoral votes, 49 states won

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
9. Her campaigns have certainly been straight out of the Nixon playbook.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:53 PM
Feb 2016

Spiced up with a bit of Atwater and Rove just to keep up with the times.

TIME TO PANIC

(1,894 posts)
18. She's perfected their tactics.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:05 PM
Feb 2016

She's fooled intelligent voters. Rove and Atwater picked the low hanging fruit.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
37. Well said...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

When day is done, all of the Clintons are quite comfortable with keeping of the company of proven winners (as Atwater and Rove).

The Clinton Global Initiative receives funding from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation (proof found on its website), which has as one of its many noble goals, the privatization of Social Security. Chelsea makes speeches on its behalf.

Petey was Sec. of Commerce under Ronzo.





 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
40. The whole Clinton clan certainly likes rubbing elbows with
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:24 PM
Feb 2016

some of the vilest people on earth: Kissinger, Peterson, the Bush Crime Family (into which they have been adopted, per Whistle Ass himself), Blankfein, Dimon, Murdoch and even Trump himself.

My parents told me that I would be judged by the company I kept. Guess no one ever told the Clintons that.

angrychair

(8,733 posts)
11. I find this amusing
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:59 PM
Feb 2016

Your post both concedes that the majority of people don't trust or like your candidate and that she is similar to Nixon at the same time.

It is also awkward that while conceding this you also state you don't care and that winning is all that matters.

"Winning at any cost" is no way to win.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
32. I also know how it began
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:12 PM
Feb 2016

And how it began was Nixon running against two decent, honorable men - Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern - and beating them both.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
33. And if we're lucky,
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:13 PM
Feb 2016

we'll get to hold our noses and vote, yet again, for the lesser of two evils - as is the case, over and over again.

The Wall St. candidate vs. The Mussolini Wannabe.

Got it.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
39. No, if we're REALLY lucky we can see your candidate lose 49 states in the general election
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:24 PM
Feb 2016

Give the GOP two weeks to work on Bernie Sanders, and not even you will like him.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
56. LOL!
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:13 AM
Feb 2016

They need more than 2 weeks, and even then they wouldn't find ANYTHING! Did Bernie's wife have affairs? Because the GOP IS going there too.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
55. Comparing her to Nixon
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:10 AM
Feb 2016


I think the word Reelection is the key there. She is NOT being reelected, or elected for that matter.
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
8. I agree.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:51 PM
Feb 2016

Her trustworthiness/honesty numbers have been seen before - they look like Richard Nixon's after the Saturday Night Massacre.

She's the kiss of death in the GE, and I have been saying it for a while. Why? Simple.

Herself completely alienates the left//liberal base who are already sick to fucking death of voting for the lesser of two evils. Has zero appeal to independents and the disaffected. On top of that, the Repig cave-orc base will do everything short of coming out of graves just to vote against her. She's worth an additional 2-3 million votes for Repigs nationwide.

Hindenburg/Titanic scale disaster awaits with Herself at the top of the ticket. And when she goes down in flames, the left will be blamed and the party winched ever further to the right by the billionaires, banksters, and the MIC.

Make book on it.

Bernie or Bust.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
23. I actually think a few zombies
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:28 PM
Feb 2016

will walk though hell fire to vote against her. I'd better carry the camera over to the cemetery... (I halk kid)

the sentiment against her among republicans and indies is not nice.

that said my state will go blue regardless

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
12. I think only dyed in the wool, beltway Democrats like Hillary.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 06:02 PM
Feb 2016

Or mostly. My parents don't like her at all and they gave me the impression they didn't even like her with Bill. My parents have been Democrats for a long, long time.

I think everyone is sick and tired as well of the media fawning over her as well.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
21. Well, she can always cheat to win in the General Election Right?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:20 PM
Feb 2016

It worked well for her in some (that just happened to be photoed) precincts in the caucuses. I am sure in the places not caught on camera every one was a straight up honest deal!

I also believe my dog wont eat my sandwich when I'm not looking.................... Oh shit!, I went to the bathroom, and it's gone! A unicorn must have stolen what was left of my half eaten grilled cheese!. (I don't have a picture of it this time, so this time I know my doggie was a perfect angel. )


I believe a person or dog acts in a way that comes natural to them.


Hillary needs private server Diebold machines pronto!

procon

(15,805 posts)
27. Oops! I thought this was a thread about Ted Cruz.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

It is DU, afterall, a place where I come to support Democrats... all of 'em.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
28. You're thinking of General Discussion, not General Discussion: Primaries. Plus Cruz does 15% better
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

than Clinton in terms of voters finding him honest, which is a disgusting fact because Cruz is as odious a person as has ever walked the earth and STILL he is better trusted than the person we are considering nominating to lead our Democratic Party into a popularity contest decided by the same folks who pick the winners on American Idol.

procon

(15,805 posts)
42. Politicians aren't synonymous with "trust".
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016

There are few professions that I would list in that column; not religion, medicine, or even history, which is always written by the victors.

Color me skeptical, it's my favorite hat, but when I look back at the eight presidents I have voted for, with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter -- who wasn't especially effective -- none of them were anywhere close to being trustworthy characters. Our most memorable and powerfully effective past American Presidents were a devil's brew of arrogant, cunning, treacherous, merciless and scheming sovereign rulers who would -- and frequently did -- the most despicable and horrendous deeds under the guise of safeguarding our national interests.

For good or naught, does Hillary Clinton fall into that audacious group, oh,yes, indeed. Bernie Sanders, much like the well respected and admired Jimmy Carter, is a kindly gentleman, a good and decent man, but I don't think he has the same brazen chops to deal with the world-class villains we're facing.

Vogon_Glory

(9,132 posts)
30. What, All The Republican Voters Are Going To Vote For Trump?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

What, all the Republicans who have ( and ought to) reservations about Trump's economic and foreign policy proposals are going to dutifully line up and vote for him?

And The majority of AA and Latino voters are going to become Trimpsters too, especially as the racist dog whistles go audible?

Sorry, I don't buy that.

The right-wing hate machine was already active before the fall 2008 campaign started. I doubt anything close to a plurality of the folks who listen to RW talk radio or read Breibart would vote for Team Donkey even if Bernie Sanders got annointed in public by G*d's holy angels and Old Testament prophets.

I think Hillary has a shot of capturing a lot of the Republican vote, that portion that is eclipsed in GOP primaries by the nutcases but still has tangential connections with sanity.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
34. So we bet the whole election on the Republicans choosing Trump over Rubio? Sanders beats them both,
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:13 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton vs. Trump is a close race and Clinton vs. Rubio is a Democratic loss of epic proportions.

{{SPOILER ALERT -- They are going to nominate Rubio}}}

Vogon_Glory

(9,132 posts)
46. I Disagree: Club Pachyderm Is Going To Nominate Trump
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:57 PM
Feb 2016

I think that the Repuds are going to nominate Trump. The average Repud votes with their "lizard brain" these days instead of making thoughtful, informed decisions. The Donald does a much better job of appealing to the Repud brain than Rubio does. The Repuds have shown a penchant for voting against the "other" these last 20 years. With the exception of a Bobby Jingles here (I got the nick-name from a stupid, vicious RW troll on another forum), a Nikki Haley there, and maybe an Allan West over yonder, Repuds vote against the "other." Marco Rubio is too "other" for Repuds' "lizard brains."

 

SciDude

(79 posts)
36. Modern "moderate" Democrats are status-quo and pro-oligarchy and they are perfectly willing to
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

accept a thoroughly corrupt leader like Clinton. In fact, they view it as a positive as they are falsely under the impression that it makes her a better rock-em-sock-em robot to take on the Republicans.

Little do they know, of course, that oligarchs are all on the same team and only kick around political footballs for the distraction of the "moderate" masses.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
47. Fucking Nixon created OSHA, the EPA, the Clean Water and Air Acts - don't sully his accomplishments
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:03 AM
Feb 2016

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
50. If his age is an issue, then we agree Hillary should take a one-term pledge? Polls say voters trust
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:54 AM
Feb 2016

an honest social democrat over a dishonest third way centrist.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
53. So the 70 year old part was just an ageist slur? Gotcha. You know the difference between a socialist
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:07 AM
Feb 2016

and a democratic socialist, right?

Corey_Baker08

(2,157 posts)
59. I Do But A Majority Of Americans Don't Know The Difference
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:33 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton Is 68 This Has Nothing To Do With Age...

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
54. Only Sanders can defeat Trump and Rubio. Clinton cannot beat either (and Clinton vs. Rubio wouldn't
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:09 AM
Feb 2016

even be close).

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
61. I love the part where
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:12 AM
Feb 2016

"Capable of being President / Qualified" is tied with "Criminal / Crooked / Thief / Belongs in jail."

I just don't see how someone like that drives the turnout required to win a General Election.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
63. you do realize that Trump and Hillary's numbers in your poll
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:19 AM
Feb 2016

are nearly identical, if not statistically identical given the MoE?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We cannot win a general e...