Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:00 PM Feb 2016

Bernie Calls It: Hillary Clinton’s Support for Dismantling Welfare Created Rampant Poverty

Sanders: Hillary Clinton’s Support for Dismantling Welfare Created Rampant Poverty

Hugh Wharton | February 24, 2016


At a news conference on Wednesday in Columbia, South Carolina, Bernie Sanders criticized Hillary Clinton’s record on welfare reform, pointing to her support for a 1996 bill that he says was disastrous for poor families.

The bill dismantled the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program and replaced it with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The primary issues were that the new TANF program was not tied to inflation, had a five-year lifetime limit for recipients, and local governments could easily reallocate the funds for other state needs and ignore needy families.

Since the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) has been passed, the number of families in extreme poverty has doubled, according to Sanders — though some have claimed an increase as high as 150%.


As First Lady at the time, Clinton was instrumental in rounding up the votes to ensure the bill’s passage, which Bill Clinton signed into law.


Sanders also linked the subject of welfare reform and poverty to his fight for a higher minimum wage and his support for the $15 minimum wage. “What we are going to do in this country if I have anything to say about it is to say if somebody works 40 hours a week, that person is not going to live in poverty. Today the minimum wage of $7.25 is nothing less than a starvation wage,” he said.

In contrast, Hillary Clinton has repeatedly campaigned on only a $12 minimum wage increase, despite the $15 minimum wage being added as part of the official platform of the Democratic Party itself.


http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-sanders-hits-hillary-clinton-on-welfare-reform-record/

74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Calls It: Hillary Clinton’s Support for Dismantling Welfare Created Rampant Poverty (Original Post) amborin Feb 2016 OP
K&R libtodeath Feb 2016 #1
Good - I am so happy to see him finally doing more contrast & compare style campaigning. Over due! jillan Feb 2016 #2
Cut it out! Kittycat Feb 2016 #18
Slime Brock. 840high Feb 2016 #20
David Brock is like LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #39
if david brock fell through a sewer grate restorefreedom Feb 2016 #43
I don't think the passage of this CAUSED the extreme poverty, Chemisse Feb 2016 #3
REAL CHANGE charlespercydemocrat Feb 2016 #4
It's her record. She is answerable to it. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #5
Hillary answerable? haha, good one! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #9
LOL--what will they blame Michelle Obama for in MADem Feb 2016 #6
what will they blame Michelle Obama for in twenty years? AlbertCat Feb 2016 #12
I think they were both wonderful in the FLOTUS gig. MADem Feb 2016 #29
cauliflower shortage? floppyboo Feb 2016 #13
That's our fault--we like it roasted w/garlic, or MADem Feb 2016 #59
I take exception of your comparison of Michelle Obama with H. Clinton that is obviously rhett o rick Feb 2016 #27
Well, I'm betting that most people take exception to your exception taking. MADem Feb 2016 #30
Most people? I don't think so. This is a People's Movement against the control of our government rhett o rick Feb 2016 #42
I am not being rude. I am letting you know that I won't MADem Feb 2016 #49
I concider condesention as rude but that's just me. But I don't care. I have dealt rhett o rick Feb 2016 #55
I am not being condescending. MADem Feb 2016 #56
Of course you think that by siding with the Big Money you'll be on the winning side. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #69
I told you I wasn't going to take the bait, and I meant it. nt MADem Feb 2016 #70
You won't try to justify why you side with the rich instead of the poor? You don't think rhett o rick Feb 2016 #71
I doubt she'll invoke her time as First Lady as experience and morningfog Feb 2016 #64
We'll have to see if she runs in two decades, won't we? MADem Feb 2016 #66
I'd vote for her now if she jumped in! morningfog Feb 2016 #67
K&R CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #7
K&R kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #8
K&R PonyUp Feb 2016 #73
platform enid602 Feb 2016 #10
Absolutely true. nt zentrum Feb 2016 #11
Aid for families with dependent children dr60omg Feb 2016 #14
Bernie vigorously opposed Clinton's 1996 welfare reform bill. senz Feb 2016 #15
He'll make a Great President madokie Feb 2016 #26
He will but the whole system is against him and us. We must help him all we can. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #37
Not sure what took him so long, but he needs to call out Clinton Broward Feb 2016 #16
He's been way too nice in this campaign brentspeak Feb 2016 #25
K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #17
Wrong Clinton. ucrdem Feb 2016 #19
Nope, the right Clinton. senz Feb 2016 #21
From the esteemed journal "uncut"? ucrdem Feb 2016 #23
From the New York Times senz Feb 2016 #32
NYT: "it has been Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, who has put forward bold plans to create ucrdem Feb 2016 #35
That's a quote from Maya Harris, a senior policy adviser in Mrs. Clinton’s campaign senz Feb 2016 #40
Clinton's policy advisers know policy. Bernie's know comic books. ucrdem Feb 2016 #46
Ugly slam, but not surprising. Here's more senz Feb 2016 #48
I think I am in love with you, senz! Peace Patriot Feb 2016 #57
Well thank you so much, Peace Patriot, but senz Feb 2016 #58
and, Bill Moyers has a great interview with a sociologist who studied its effects: amborin Feb 2016 #68
"Uncut" is something else, isn't it? MADem Feb 2016 #51
Straight from Hillary's mouth... SMC22307 Feb 2016 #63
Giddy-up! Hillary admits her involvement in her book "Living History"... SMC22307 Feb 2016 #65
They're a team. noamnety Feb 2016 #74
K&R Thanks. Workfare, punishing and ciminalizing the poor. For shame. appalachiablue Feb 2016 #22
Telling The Truth - Painful - Especially For Those That Do Not Want To Hear It cantbeserious Feb 2016 #24
Add this to the reminder of what she did to the poor of Haiti. grasswire Feb 2016 #28
Before 1996 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #31
Everyone knows it's "Welfare Cadillac" not "Welfare Town Car" Fumesucker Feb 2016 #60
Not from Detroit, are you? 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #61
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #33
Amborin, the article is on the NYTimes also. senz Feb 2016 #34
It's simply reporting Bernie's bogus claim. Yes he said, yes he's wrong. nt ucrdem Feb 2016 #36
Can see why you'd think ALL politicians lie, but Bernie doesn't. senz Feb 2016 #45
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #38
That is a smear... nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #41
This post is entirely fair . . FairWinds Feb 2016 #44
K & R AzDar Feb 2016 #47
What a STINGY woman! Cobalt Violet Feb 2016 #50
I am getting nauseated to learn about so many bad things she had supported.... nt kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #52
Elizabeth Warren would agree with Bernie on this. senz Feb 2016 #53
It did far worse than that warrprayer Feb 2016 #54
Love Bernie but don't really agree with that. TheFarseer Feb 2016 #62
knr nt PonyUp Feb 2016 #72

jillan

(39,451 posts)
2. Good - I am so happy to see him finally doing more contrast & compare style campaigning. Over due!
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:03 PM
Feb 2016

He might even get another letter from David Brock tell him to knock it off

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
39. David Brock is like
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:33 PM
Feb 2016

Pond Scum after what he did to Anita Hill to protect the Sexual Harasser Clarence Thomas. Did he think folks would just forget the 1990's?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
43. if david brock fell through a sewer grate
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

they would not be able to find him, because he his environment would be indistinguishable.

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
3. I don't think the passage of this CAUSED the extreme poverty,
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

But it sure made it very hard for people to survive once they hit hard times.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
12. what will they blame Michelle Obama for in twenty years?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

Whatever she might have done.....

But she's no Hillary Clinton.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
29. I think they were both wonderful in the FLOTUS gig.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:15 PM
Feb 2016

If I compare them at all, I'd say they did way more than most in that job in service to their nation, without a paycheck and with a lot of criticism, too.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
27. I take exception of your comparison of Michelle Obama with H. Clinton that is obviously
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:12 PM
Feb 2016

obsessed with wealth and power. $50,000,000 and counting. She supported the decision to dismantle welfare because she believes that people should learn to take care of themselves unless they are big banks.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. Well, I'm betting that most people take exception to your exception taking.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:17 PM
Feb 2016

Have a nice day, now...!



 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
42. Most people? I don't think so. This is a People's Movement against the control of our government
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

by Big Money. I guess you side with Big Money. Most People in the world are uniting to fight the Oligarch run governments around the world. You can't continue to ignore the 16,000,000 American children living in poverty while HRC rakes in 50 million dollars from corporations and billionaires for services rendered or promised.

"Have a nice day, now...!" Really? You think being rude is cute? I see it as childish.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
49. I am not being rude. I am letting you know that I won't
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

respond to your goading/baiting and inventive descriptions.

If I were being rude, I wouldn't have encouraged you to have a nice day--I would have said something that was actually rude.

It's an encouragement, not an order, though--if you don't want to have a nice day, have a crappy one. Makes no difference to me.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
55. I concider condesention as rude but that's just me. But I don't care. I have dealt
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:02 PM
Feb 2016

with this all my life. You are not very good at it actually.

Sad that rudeness is all you have to try to distract from the fact that you are on the wrong side of this class war. If you think that the Goldman-Sachs god will trickle-down you, I think you are in for a shock. The Oligarchy doesn't love you.

Change sides, support the 50,000,000 Americans living in poverty in lieu of the Goldman-Sachs god.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
56. I am not being condescending.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:05 PM
Feb 2016

Your accusations toward me, though--repeatedly, as you're doing--they might be viewed as rude.

"The oligarchy doesn't love you." Real sweet of you to tell me! Good thing I wasn't looking for their love! LOL!

I like the side I'm on--it's looking like a winner from where I sit.

Have a nice evening!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
69. Of course you think that by siding with the Big Money you'll be on the winning side.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 01:35 AM
Feb 2016

Hate to tell you but the People will prevail.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
71. You won't try to justify why you side with the rich instead of the poor? You don't think
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 01:56 AM
Feb 2016

anyone believes that a Goldman-Sachs presidency will actually help the 50,000,000 Americans living in poverty.

So let's guess why you choose the Oligarchy. Maybe you are comfortable with the status quo, but afraid to admit it.
Maybe you actually think that the Oligarchy knows what's best for us peons. Or maybe you support the trickle-down theory.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
64. I doubt she'll invoke her time as First Lady as experience and
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 12:33 AM
Feb 2016

a qualification for presidency. But if she does, we'll examine what she supported openly.

You can't have it both ways.

dr60omg

(283 posts)
14. Aid for families with dependent children
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:38 PM
Feb 2016

He wants to make sure all Americans have access to health care as a right. He also wants to make sure that all Americans have access to child care (as in other countries) and that there is family leave time. Most of all he is demanding a living wage of 15 dollars an hour ... maybe people would not have suffered so horribly if the Clintons did not do what they did to poor families with children

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
15. Bernie vigorously opposed Clinton's 1996 welfare reform bill.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:40 PM
Feb 2016

He voted against it and called it “the grand slam of scapegoating legislation,” correctly noting that it “appeals to the frustrations and ignorance of the American people along a wide spectrum of prejudices.”

Bernie is nearly always on the right side of the issues.

He'd make a great president.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
37. He will but the whole system is against him and us. We must help him all we can.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:31 PM
Feb 2016

When he is elected our work will double. The Wealthy Fat Cats will throw everything at him. If one thinks that Obama got it hard from them it will be nothing like a real progressive.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
16. Not sure what took him so long, but he needs to call out Clinton
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:44 PM
Feb 2016

on all aspects of her terrible track record.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
25. He's been way too nice in this campaign
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:04 PM
Feb 2016

Finally showed some spine in the last debate by bringing up the topic of HRC's admiration of Kissinger. Needs to keep swinging some sharp elbows. Hillary's campaign certainly isn't holding anything back.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
21. Nope, the right Clinton.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:58 PM
Feb 2016

Didn't read the OP?

As First Lady at the time, Clinton was instrumental in rounding up the votes to ensure the bill’s passage, which Bill Clinton signed into law.


Now get on that horse and ride it.
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
32. From the New York Times
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:24 PM
Feb 2016

That's where uncut got it from.

Here, read it yourself:

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/24/bernie-sanders-ties-hillary-clinton-to-poverty-caused-by-welfare-reform/

Oh, I know: you'll say, "The NYTimes? That's no good, I won't listen to that." Right?

Well why don't you just accept reality? Y'all love to count Hill's 8 years as FLOTUS on her "resume." So take the good with the bad.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
35. NYT: "it has been Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, who has put forward bold plans to create
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016

good-paying jobs, dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline, and remove barriers to sustainable home ownership.”

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/24/bernie-sanders-ties-hillary-clinton-to-poverty-caused-by-welfare-reform/

Sounds like a strong endorsement.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
40. That's a quote from Maya Harris, a senior policy adviser in Mrs. Clinton’s campaign
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

trying to obfuscate the issue with a bunch of boilerplate Hill campaign verbiage.

And that's your "strong endorsement?"

Now don't be clutching at straws.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
48. Ugly slam, but not surprising. Here's more
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:43 PM
Feb 2016

for you:

President Bill Clinton proudly signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, which was based on legislation first proposed by Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich; Hillary, meanwhile, enthusiastically lobbied on behalf of the bill.


http://www.salon.com/2016/02/22/john_lewis_staunchly_opposed_the_clintons_gutting_of_welfare_in_1996_yet_now_endorses_hillary_and_slams_sanders/

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
57. I think I am in love with you, senz!
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:08 PM
Feb 2016

You and all the other DUers for Sanders who are so incredibly well-informed and so quick on the uptake when these muddle-headed Clinton supporters trip over their "talking points."

The difference is very telling!

Thank you for this particular exchange and for all your efforts to inform and educate!

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
58. Well thank you so much, Peace Patriot, but
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:17 PM
Feb 2016

I learned what little I know of verbal sparring from watching a great master, beam me up scottie.

But your kindness is very much appreciated.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
68. and, Bill Moyers has a great interview with a sociologist who studied its effects:
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 01:14 AM
Feb 2016
Holland: According to your study, just five years after the passage of the Welfare Reform Act, 63 percent of families in the least stringent programs were white and 11 percent were black, and in the most restrictive programs — that is, the ones with the toughest penalties and the most stringent requirements for eligibility – 63 percent were black and just 29 percent were white.


http://billmoyers.com/2014/05/12/how-bill-clintons-welfare-reform-created-a-system-rife-with-racial-biases/

would make a good OP to explain just how it so badly impacted black children

MADem

(135,425 posts)
51. "Uncut" is something else, isn't it?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:51 PM
Feb 2016

Blatantly partisan, and proud of it!

I wonder who thought that name was a good idea? It sounds a bit like a sex site catering to specific tastes, or something.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
63. Straight from Hillary's mouth...
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 12:31 AM
Feb 2016
The President eventually signed this third bill into law. Even with its flaws, it was a critical first step to reforming our nation's welfare system. I agreed that he should sign it and worked hard to round up votes for its passage--though he and the legislation were roundly criticized by some liberals, advocacy groups for immigrants and most people who worked with the welfare system.

Source: Living History, by Hillary Rodham Clinton, p. 368


You're welcome.




SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
65. Giddy-up! Hillary admits her involvement in her book "Living History"...
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 12:39 AM
Feb 2016

is Camp Weathervane *really* trying to deny that she was instrumental in getting the bill to pass? *Really*?

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
74. They're a team.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 06:31 PM
Feb 2016

"I’ve advocated tying the welfare payment to certain behavior about being a good parent. You couldn’t get your welfare check if your child wasn’t immunized. You couldn’t get your welfare check if you didn’t participate in a parenting program. You couldn’t get your check if you didn’t show up for student-teacher conferences."

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. Add this to the reminder of what she did to the poor of Haiti.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:15 PM
Feb 2016

Her state department would not support efforts to raise the Haitian minimum wage to 65 cents an hour, because of the giant corporations that use Haitian labor to manufacture goods for export.

Imagine that. But it gets worse.

The Clinton Foundation solicited hundreds of millions of dollars for Haiti relief for displaced people. What was done with that money? Well, $175 million of it built a luxury hotel.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
31. Before 1996
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:19 PM
Feb 2016

Everybody lived in mansions and drove around in Lincoln Town Cars.

Biggest problem anyone had was finding spaces to park those big babies when we went out to buy diamonds and caviar.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
60. Everyone knows it's "Welfare Cadillac" not "Welfare Town Car"
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:31 PM
Feb 2016

You really should get the talking points straight..

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
41. That is a smear...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

according to David Brock.

By the way, my ears did indeed perk up when I heard that... and I have not been feeling well

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
44. This post is entirely fair . .
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:37 PM
Feb 2016

and is what happens when Dems "triangulate" with the Third Way Koch Bros.
wing of what used to be the Democratic Party.

It is a fact that extreme poverty increased after "end welfare as we
know it" was enacted.

And yes, Bernie should do more of this.

The TPP is a really important issue in part because it is where
the left and right can agree. It is a wedge issue for us.

Bernie should be hammering on it as every opportunity.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
53. Elizabeth Warren would agree with Bernie on this.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 10:58 PM
Feb 2016

International Business Times, 7-28-14

Hillary Clinton vs. Elizabeth Warren: Big Differences, Despite Claims To The Contrary

Clinton was a prominent supporter of the 1996 welfare reform legislation that made it more difficult for poor families to receive government benefits. She stood by that support during her 2008 presidential campaign. With a new study from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities showing that law coincided with a rise in extreme childhood poverty, Clinton's position may open her up to criticism from Warren, who has positioned herself as a champion of the poor.


http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-vs-elizabeth-warren-big-differences-despite-claims-contrary-1640810

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
54. It did far worse than that
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:01 PM
Feb 2016

The suicide rate is off the charts.
In my city every so often you bear of homeless stepping in front of trains.

TheFarseer

(9,323 posts)
62. Love Bernie but don't really agree with that.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:46 PM
Feb 2016

We've got to 1. Get high paying jobs back in the country and to stop leaving. 2. Do something to make child care more affordable for people that want to work. I don't think the answer is to mandate that low skilled jobs are suddenly high paying jobs. I think minimum wage should be raised but to more than double it, I think, is a bad idea. Additionally, a safety net is completely necessary, but the true path to wealth is to get back in the work force eventually and get a good job.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Calls It: Hillary ...