Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
139 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders speech on the 1994 crime bill "Incarcerating a Country" (Original Post) Uncle Joe Feb 2016 OP
This is what Bernie believed while Hillary was talking about superpredators. libtodeath Feb 2016 #1
Their perceptions are as night and day. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #2
In this 1991 speech Bernie coming from a 90+% white state, mentions disproportionately Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #3
The man's message has never changed..... smiley Feb 2016 #8
It was my pleasure, smiley. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #10
Peace to you too Uncle Joe! smiley Feb 2016 #11
How any liberal/progressive could pass up the opportunity to vote for this man, is beyond me. n/t TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #13
+1 Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #102
And then he voted for it. Did anyone really listen to Hillary's discussion of the bill and why she Jitter65 Feb 2016 #4
This is why Bernie voted for it and what Hillary thought of the people. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #5
He likes to play both sides of the fence itsrobert Feb 2016 #6
Hillary just played one side, the dog whistle side, Bernie tried repeatedly to improve the bill and Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #7
Nice try, but Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2016 #16
He would not have had to have chosen TM99 Feb 2016 #9
of course nothing is ever st bernie of vermont's fault dsc Feb 2016 #26
More of the religious cult bullshit, I see. TM99 Feb 2016 #28
Technically a representative, but he was more elite as the at-large Rep. than the 2 senators :) JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #97
I corrected it - thanks. TM99 Feb 2016 #105
Bernie tried six time to improve the bill but he was only 1 Congressperson in a House of 435. Bernie Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #29
I listened to how she helped sell it.... daleanime Feb 2016 #108
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #12
"Only one Bernie" Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #14
Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #116
Thanks for the kind words, Jenny, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #128
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #15
And then he voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #17
This is why Bernie voted for it and what Hillary thought of the people. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #18
A "yea" vote is a "yea" vote. Agschmid Feb 2016 #19
I'm happy to hear you don't fault Bernie for it but do you fault Hillary for using racist Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #20
I fault you for your stance here, both our leaders failed us. Agschmid Feb 2016 #22
You just stated that you don't fault Bernie, now you're trying to have it both ways by not Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #23
I don't fault him, he voted for the VWA. Agschmid Feb 2016 #24
There was a major difference in MOTIVATION and PROMOTION. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #25
... And then he voted for it. Agschmid Feb 2016 #27
Bernie reluctantly voted for it because the bill protected women, and banned assault weapons, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #30
He voted for it. Agschmid Feb 2016 #31
Bernie couldn't do better he was only 1 of 435 members in Congress, Hillary could have done better Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #32
He could have voted "nay"... Agschmid Feb 2016 #33
Had Bernie voted nay after trying six times to improve the bill, people here would be condemning him Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #34
A "yea" vote is support for a bill, the FULL bill. Agschmid Feb 2016 #35
Bernie did the best he could, Hillary did the worst and you couldn't be more wrong Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #36
Thanks for the personal insult. Agschmid Feb 2016 #37
That wasn't an insult, I said you're smarter than that and you just changed your text. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #38
I didn't change my text, no edits were made and it was a personal insult. Agschmid Feb 2016 #39
Yes you did change your text, post #35 Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #40
The words mean exactly the same thing. Agschmid Feb 2016 #41
No they don't and you know better, SUPPORT for every aspect of a bill is not the same as voting Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #42
He clearly was willing to vote it. He voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #43
Because it protected women and banned assault weapons, he tried to improve it six times but Bernie Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #44
Yes they both failed us here. Agschmid Feb 2016 #45
Bernie didn't, Hillary did, from your post #19 "I don't fault him for it, but it happened." do you Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #46
Bernie didn't? He voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #47
Bernie tried to improve the bill six times and his message was opposite of Hillary's race based Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #50
He tried to improve the bill... Agschmid Feb 2016 #53
Do you believe Bernie should've voted against the the assault weapons ban and the Violence Against Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #54
I believe Bernie could have introduced them as a separate bill. Agschmid Feb 2016 #56
there was no assault weapons ban one_voice Feb 2016 #121
I believe that's incorrect. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #127
According to the article.. one_voice Feb 2016 #130
I agree with your last sentence. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #132
Shall we continue? Agschmid Feb 2016 #48
All night if need be, I have a full pot of coffee. n/t Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #51
So a "nay" vote would then be a rejection of the entire bill, Beowulf Feb 2016 #58
Bernie voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #59
Hillary SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill and Bernie didn't. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #60
Yes I agree about Hillary. Agschmid Feb 2016 #61
You agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #64
I agree that her support of the bill was misguided. Agschmid Feb 2016 #65
That wasn't my question. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #67
... and still Bernie voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #70
You still haven't answered my question. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #71
... And Bernie still voted "yea"... Agschmid Feb 2016 #73
"Yea" what? You agree with my question? Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #75
No "yea" as in Bernie's vote for the bill... Agschmid Feb 2016 #77
The question wasn't about vote it was about support. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #80
I've answered it several times. Agschmid Feb 2016 #83
No you haven't Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #85
Since we're making demands... Agschmid Feb 2016 #87
You answer my question first and I will answer yours. n/t Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #89
I don't respond well to demands. Agschmid Feb 2016 #91
It wasn't a demand, it was a question which I have presented to you multiple times on this thread Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #96
Yah I don't do those either... Agschmid Feb 2016 #98
You don't do complexity well, do you? Beowulf Feb 2016 #62
And another personal insult. Agschmid Feb 2016 #63
There is really no comparison. Clinton was way behind Bernie on this issue. That is obvious. Vattel Feb 2016 #68
And yet he voted "yea". Agschmid Feb 2016 #69
To quote forjusticethunders: Vattel Feb 2016 #72
Yes both our candidates made the wrong decision here. Agschmid Feb 2016 #74
yeah, I get the routine Vattel Feb 2016 #78
It's not a routine... Agschmid Feb 2016 #79
chuckle Vattel Feb 2016 #81
"Yea"... That was the recorded vote. Agschmid Feb 2016 #82
Sanders was a leader on that issue. He argued against mass incarceration. Vattel Feb 2016 #133
A leader who voted "yea" for the whole bill. Agschmid Feb 2016 #135
exactly Vattel Feb 2016 #136
Kick & Rec.. think Feb 2016 #21
recommended. H2O Man Feb 2016 #49
Thank you, H2O Man. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #52
Another kick and a reminder why Bernie eventually voted for it: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #55
Thanks for the addition, beam me up scottie. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #57
It was known back then. trillion Feb 2016 #66
+1 Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #129
basic ethics seem like supernatural powers of autonomous Feb 2016 #76
I know. Agschmid Feb 2016 #84
That's not true, Bernie tried to improve it, Hillary embraced it. n/t Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #86
Bernie voted "yea" on the bill. Agschmid Feb 2016 #90
From my post#18 to you Bernie did try to improve it. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #93
And then he voted "yea" on a flawed bill. Agschmid Feb 2016 #95
To save women's lives: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #99
So he compromised. Agschmid Feb 2016 #101
No, one WHOLEHEARTEDLY supported, promoted and SOLD it. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #106
The other... Agschmid Feb 2016 #110
The crime bill, welfare reform, DOMA, the Iraq war, death penalty, war on drugs. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #113
It's clear where you stand... Agschmid Feb 2016 #115
Of course you are, that's easier than answering the question. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #117
Yup that's it. You caught me, I'm going to go to bed to avoid a very productive debate. Agschmid Feb 2016 #119
You were the one who said they were flawed now you don't want to discuss degrees. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #120
"Run away" aka go to bed. Agschmid Feb 2016 #123
All you have to do is answer the question. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #125
So whats your plan, suck it up and lie about how awesome the bill was? autonomous Feb 2016 #114
And another personal attack (calling me a liar). Agschmid Feb 2016 #118
I don't want to get into political science 101 but a President carries much more influence, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #100
It does. (And another personal insult...) Agschmid Feb 2016 #103
Trump can't do anything until and unless he becomes elected, it does scare the shit out of me and Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #107
Hillary wants to expand the drug war, not end it. And her buddy DWS wants more pot smokers in prison Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #88
If you mean this war on drugs... Agschmid Feb 2016 #92
Leaving aside the fact that every time someone asks her about marijuana legalization in the debates Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #122
Good response, thanks. Agschmid Feb 2016 #124
What a beautiful heart Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #94
Bernie does have beautiful heart. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #109
Thank you uncle Joe Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #131
K&R! Thanks, Uncle Joe! dchill Feb 2016 #104
Thank you, dchill. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #111
You're welcome! dchill Feb 2016 #112
Kick! nt LiberalElite Feb 2016 #126
Bernie is spot on with this madokie Feb 2016 #134
Bernie's lifetime of work has Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #139
Funny how that works. Octafish Feb 2016 #137
It was my pleasure, Octafish. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #138

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
2. Their perceptions are as night and day.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 08:51 PM
Feb 2016

Whether it was this issue or waging war in Iraq just to mention another.

Peace to you, libtodeath.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
3. In this 1991 speech Bernie coming from a 90+% white state, mentions disproportionately
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

punishing blacks, one has to ask how much political gain was that for him in Vermont, a predominately white state?



 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
4. And then he voted for it. Did anyone really listen to Hillary's discussion of the bill and why she
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 09:10 PM
Feb 2016

supported the bill? I guess not.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
5. This is why Bernie voted for it and what Hillary thought of the people.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 09:14 PM
Feb 2016

Thanks to californiabernin




PRESS RELEASE
Sanders Voted for 1994 Crime Bill to Support Assault Weapons Ban, Violence Against Women Provisions
FEBRUARY 25, 2016

FLINT, Mich. – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager on Thursday reiterated the senator’s reasoning for voting in favor of the Clinton administration’s 1994 Crime Bill despite serious reservations. The House version of the bill included a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons. Sanders had supported the ban since 1988. The conference committee version included not only the assault weapons ban but also the Violence Against Women Act provisions. Sanders supported these efforts to protect women.

In Sanders’ statement at the time, he criticized the mass incarceration and death penalty provisions in the bill, saying:

“…it is also my view that through the neglect of our Government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence.

And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world, will not make that situation right. We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails.

Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance.”

During consideration of the bill, Sanders voted six times to weaken or eliminate the death penalty provisions and voted separately against creating new mandatory minimums. Then-First Lady Hillary Clinton spoke strongly in favor of increased incarceration, labeling at risk youth as “super-predators” who had to be “brought to heel.”


“When this so-called crime bill was being considered, Bernie Sanders criticized its harsh incarceration and death penalty provisions,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager. “Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, resorted to dog whistle politics and dehumanizing language. Bernie was right then and he’s right now. We need to invest in those communities that have been neglected in this country. Poor communities – more often than not, communities of color – deserve the same opportunities and education that other communities have. Bernie Sanders has always known jails and incarceration are not the answer. Nor is heated rhetoric against young people of any race. You can’t throw vulnerable people under the bus just because it’s politically expedient.”

https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-voted-for-1994-crime-bill-to-support-assault-weapons-ban-violence-against-women-provisions/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511339700

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
7. Hillary just played one side, the dog whistle side, Bernie tried repeatedly to improve the bill and
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 09:22 PM
Feb 2016

voted for it reluctantly because it had a couple of needed provisions as I just posted up-thread above your post.

Bernie's long distinguished history in the Congress has been consistent as in the 1991 speech which I also posted on this thread, but he was only one Congressperson in a house of 435.



 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
9. He would not have had to have chosen
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016

to support and vote for an omnibus bill with good and horrid provisions in it if it wasn't for the triangulation of the New Dems trying to appeal to the right with their racism, love of punishment, and fear of drugs and the left with cursory support for women through the VAWA.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
28. More of the religious cult bullshit, I see.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:12 PM - Edit history (1)

No actual arguments or justifications of the fact that one was the fucking President of the god damn United States and the other was a fucking Rep from a small New England state.

Yeah, I didn't think so. Next.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
105. I corrected it - thanks.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:12 PM
Feb 2016

Yes, he held unimaginable power in 1994. I am surprised more did not worship St. Bernard then as they do now.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
29. Bernie tried six time to improve the bill but he was only 1 Congressperson in a House of 435. Bernie
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

isn't a Saint, but he is enlightened.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
108. I listened to how she helped sell it....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
Feb 2016

it that different then how she discusses it? And if so why?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
18. This is why Bernie voted for it and what Hillary thought of the people.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:23 PM
Feb 2016


PRESS RELEASE
Sanders Voted for 1994 Crime Bill to Support Assault Weapons Ban, Violence Against Women Provisions
FEBRUARY 25, 2016

FLINT, Mich. – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager on Thursday reiterated the senator’s reasoning for voting in favor of the Clinton administration’s 1994 Crime Bill despite serious reservations. The House version of the bill included a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons. Sanders had supported the ban since 1988. The conference committee version included not only the assault weapons ban but also the Violence Against Women Act provisions. Sanders supported these efforts to protect women.

In Sanders’ statement at the time, he criticized the mass incarceration and death penalty provisions in the bill, saying:

“…it is also my view that through the neglect of our Government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence.

And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world, will not make that situation right. We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails.

Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance.”

During consideration of the bill, Sanders voted six times to weaken or eliminate the death penalty provisions and voted separately against creating new mandatory minimums. Then-First Lady Hillary Clinton spoke strongly in favor of increased incarceration, labeling at risk youth as “super-predators” who had to be “brought to heel.”


“When this so-called crime bill was being considered, Bernie Sanders criticized its harsh incarceration and death penalty provisions,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager. “Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, resorted to dog whistle politics and dehumanizing language. Bernie was right then and he’s right now. We need to invest in those communities that have been neglected in this country. Poor communities – more often than not, communities of color – deserve the same opportunities and education that other communities have. Bernie Sanders has always known jails and incarceration are not the answer. Nor is heated rhetoric against young people of any race. You can’t throw vulnerable people under the bus just because it’s politically expedient.”

https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-voted-for-1994-crime-bill-to-support-assault-weapons-ban-violence-against-women-provisions/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511339700



There is a major difference in motivation and promotion.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
20. I'm happy to hear you don't fault Bernie for it but do you fault Hillary for using racist
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:32 PM
Feb 2016

dog whistle language in promoting it?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
23. You just stated that you don't fault Bernie, now you're trying to have it both ways by not
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:06 PM
Feb 2016

answering my question "do you fault Hillary for using racist dog whistle language?"

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
24. I don't fault him, he voted for the VWA.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:30 PM
Feb 2016

I do think both of them should not have supported the bill, they both did.

It is what it is.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
25. There was a major difference in MOTIVATION and PROMOTION.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:42 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie (coming from white state Vermont) was citing the dangers of this race based incarceration mindset even in 1991 and Hillary in her promotion of the 1994 crime bill validated Bernie's message as to what we should be against.



That is what it is.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
27. ... And then he voted for it.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

So cool speech, but apparently it didn't matter.

Both our candidates could have done better here, they didn't.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
30. Bernie reluctantly voted for it because the bill protected women, and banned assault weapons,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:52 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary promoted racist dog whistle language, that's a major difference whether you wish to acknowledge it or not.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
32. Bernie couldn't do better he was only 1 of 435 members in Congress, Hillary could have done better
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

by not playing on the most base and ignorant fears of the people subliminally promoting racism.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
33. He could have voted "nay"...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:58 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie... And Hillary could have done much better.

I can do this all day... There is no "good" stand here. 1 vote matters, even out of 435.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
34. Had Bernie voted nay after trying six times to improve the bill, people here would be condemning him
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016

for not protecting women or not banning assault weapons.

Bernie unlike Hillary never played on racist fears, he cited the primary causes for and the best solution to crime, poverty, lack of education and opportunity, neglect of our government, despair, Bernie was promoting with his words that our nation should focus more on addressing those critical issues and others rather than building more prisons, that's light years away from Hillary's message.

I honestly have to wonder if you listened to the video in the OP?

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
35. A "yea" vote is support for a bill, the FULL bill.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

Video or not, the vote matters.

Again, they both could have done better.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
36. Bernie did the best he could, Hillary did the worst and you couldn't be more wrong
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:14 PM
Feb 2016

a yea vote for a bill is NOT support for the FULL bill, to believe otherwise shows a lack of understanding on how our legislative process works.

I know, you're smarter than that.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
37. Thanks for the personal insult.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

And a "yea" vote is a vote for the full bill.

There is no way around it... You vote "yea" you voted that way for the whole bill.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
38. That wasn't an insult, I said you're smarter than that and you just changed your text.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:25 PM
Feb 2016

This is what you posted.



A "yea" vote is support for a bill, the FULL bill.



That's simply not the case, throughout our history Congresspeople have voted for bills wherein they didn't entirely support every bit of it or the FULL bill and you know that.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
39. I didn't change my text, no edits were made and it was a personal insult.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

And yes throughout our history people have not supported all parts of a bill, but the minute they vote "yea" on the bill they are singing off on the full bill.

The whole thing.

The entire bill.

All of it.

That's it, it's that simple.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
40. Yes you did change your text, post #35
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:37 PM
Feb 2016


A "yea" vote is support for a bill, the FULL bill.



Post #37



And a "yea" vote is a vote for the full bill.



Voting for or signing off on a bill is NOT the same as supporting every aspect of the bill which very likely will have parts the Congressperson agrees with and parts they don't.

It's not a De Facto statement in totality of what that Congressperson believes, as I stated above the House has 435 members and compromise on one aspect or another is a given fact of life in our legislative process.

It's that simple.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
41. The words mean exactly the same thing.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:38 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie voted "yea".

That's the end of it.

Yes that vote was 1/435, but the vote mattered.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
42. No they don't and you know better, SUPPORT for every aspect of a bill is not the same as voting
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:42 PM
Feb 2016

for a bill.

The former means you agree with everything in it, the latter means you voted for it because the good may outweigh the bad but it wasn't your ideal bill.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
44. Because it protected women and banned assault weapons, he tried to improve it six times but Bernie
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:54 PM
Feb 2016

didn't use racist dog whistle language in promoting the bill and his long track record which I have posted some of on this thread is testimony to what he believed, that we needed to chart an entirely different course than the message Hillary; was proclaiming, "super predators," "bring them to heel," "more prisons" etc. etc.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
46. Bernie didn't, Hillary did, from your post #19 "I don't fault him for it, but it happened." do you
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

fault Hillary for using racist dog whistle language?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
50. Bernie tried to improve the bill six times and his message was opposite of Hillary's race based
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

dog whistle message and proposals.

It seems that now you do disagree with Hillary's racist dog whistle message.

How could Bernie have done better?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
54. Do you believe Bernie should've voted against the the assault weapons ban and the Violence Against
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

Women Act provisions?

Bernie supported these efforts to protect women.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
56. I believe Bernie could have introduced them as a separate bill.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:29 PM
Feb 2016

He didn't, as far as I know.

And if he did, he was unable to get any traction on them.

So he threw in the towel and voted "yea" on the bill, the whole thing.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
121. there was no assault weapons ban
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

in the bill..

Sanders Campaign Says He Voted For Crime Bill Due To Weapons Ban That Wasn’t There

The Sanders campaign says he voted for the 1994 crime bill because it contained a ban on assault weapons — but that ban wasn’t in the version of the bill he initially supported.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/christophermassie/sanders-campaign-says-he-voted-for-crime-bill-due-to-weapons?utm_term=.htmkGbO5m#.cn82mO1jY


Just posting new info.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
127. I believe that's incorrect.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016


Efforts to create restrictions on assault weapons at the federal government level intensified in 1989 after 34 children and a teacher were shot and five children killed in Stockton, Calif. using a semi-automatic copy of an AK-47 assault rifle.[1][2][3] The July 1993 101 California Street shooting also contributed to passage of the ban. The shooter killed eight people and wounded six. Two of the three firearms he used were TEC-9 semi-automatic handguns with Hellfire triggers.[4] The ban tried to address public concerns about mass shootings by restricting firearms that met the criteria for what it defined as a "semiautomatic assault weapon," as well as magazines that met the criteria for what it defined as a "large capacity ammunition feeding device."[5]:1–2

In November 1993, the proposed legislation passed the U.S. Senate. The bill's author, Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and other advocates said that it was a weakened version of the original proposal.[6] In May 1994, former presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan, wrote to the U.S. House of Representatives in support of banning "semi-automatic assault guns." They cited a 1993 CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll that found 77 percent of Americans supported a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of such weapons.[7]

Rep. Jack Brooks (D-TX), then chair of the House Judiciary Committee, tried unsuccessfully to remove the assault weapons ban section from the crime bill.[8] The National Rifle Association (NRA) opposed the ban.
In November 1993, NRA spokesman Bill McIntyre said that assault weapons "are used in only 1 percent of all crimes".[9] The low usage statistic was supported in a 1999 Department of Justice brief.[5]

The legislation passed in September 1994 with the assault weapon ban section expiring in 2004 due to its sunset provision.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
130. According to the article..
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:54 PM
Feb 2016
The House version of the bill, which passed the House that April and which Sanders has been criticized for voting for when he was a representative from Vermont, did not include an assault weapons ban.


The ban was after he voted:

The ban was in the version of the bill that passed the Senate. Sanders ultimately did vote for the bill with the ban in it, and President Bill Clinton signed it into law


I only saw this today. It popped up on social media. I don't think it is or will be a big deal.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/christophermassie/sanders-campaign-says-he-voted-for-crime-bill-due-to-weapons?utm_term=.htmkGbO5m#.cn82mO1jY

Beowulf

(761 posts)
58. So a "nay" vote would then be a rejection of the entire bill,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:58 PM
Feb 2016

a rejection of the weapons ban and laws addressing violence against women?

At the time of his vote, he explained his views on the individual portions of the bill. He was clear he was troubled by the mass incarceration and death penalty provision but to vote no risked losing two things he cared deeply about, so he voted yes and then worked to weaken and eliminate the the troubling provisions. Hillary supported the entire bill and as far as I can tell still does. For Bernie this was a morally complex matter, for Hillary, not at all. To conflate their situations is wrong. Bernie was put in a situation by Democratic leadership. The Clintons made the choice to create that situation. Bernie showed he has a conscience, the Clintons, not so much.

Thoughtfulness v. cynicism.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
59. Bernie voted "yea".
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:02 PM
Feb 2016

That "yea" vote was on the whole bill.

Bernie is/was an independent how did the "democratic leadership" put him into a situation...

So let me get this straight, Bernie pushes for something, doesn't get it, then Bernie voted for it anyway. All because he was pressured by the democrats, as an independent... And we expect him to lead when he caved to pressure from a party he wasn't even part of? Is that what we are going with?

Both our candidates are bad on this issue, Hillary should have never supported the bill, Bernie should have never voted for it.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
61. Yes I agree about Hillary.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:17 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie voted "yea"...

In other words regardless of his speech he supported the bill.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
64. You agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:26 PM
Feb 2016

and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
67. That wasn't my question.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016


"You agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill, and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?"



Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
71. You still haven't answered my question.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:40 PM
Feb 2016


Do you agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill, and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?


Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
73. ... And Bernie still voted "yea"...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

For a bill he knew was flawed, he even gave a speech on how flawed it was.

...

"Yea"

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
75. "Yea" what? You agree with my question?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:43 PM
Feb 2016


You agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill,

and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?


Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
80. The question wasn't about vote it was about support.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:46 PM
Feb 2016


You agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill,

and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
85. No you haven't
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:59 PM
Feb 2016


Do you agree that Hillary used racist dog whistle language and that she SUPPORTED the ENTIRE bill, and Bernie reluctantly VOTED for it because of the good aspects; Violence Against Women Act and banning of assault weapons but he didn't SUPPORT the entire bill?



A simple yes or no will do.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
87. Since we're making demands...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:01 PM
Feb 2016

Do you agree that Bernie should have stood up, fought for a clean bill, rather than just voting "yea" on a bill he denounced.

All talk... No real action.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
96. It wasn't a demand, it was a question which I have presented to you multiple times on this thread
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:07 PM
Feb 2016

I just offered a Quid pro quo.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
69. And yet he voted "yea".
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

In a bill he knew was bad.

Really a principled stand... Both our candidates failed us here.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
72. To quote forjusticethunders:
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

"Bernie Sanders voted AGAINST a 1991 Crime Bill that was mostly focused on mass incarceration and get tough policies.
He repeatedly spoke about the danger of focusing on get tough policy aimed at African Americans, and appealed over and over that government focus on rebuilding urban communities.
In 1994, the bill he voted against came back up for a vote, THIS TIME bundled with the Assault Weapons Ban and the Violence Against Women Act. Essentially a poison pill and Bernie swallowed with reservations. You can criticize him for that, and I think that's fair.

What he DIDNT do, is uncritically stump for the same bill, using language that would have made Nixon blush."

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
74. Yes both our candidates made the wrong decision here.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:42 PM
Feb 2016

That's what I've been saying this whole time...

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
79. It's not a routine...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:45 PM
Feb 2016

It's a recorded congressional vote, and a recorded speech in favor of a flawed bill.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
82. "Yea"... That was the recorded vote.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:56 PM
Feb 2016

And her speech was also bull.

So again, both our candidates aren't leaders on this issue.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
133. Sanders was a leader on that issue. He argued against mass incarceration.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:07 AM
Feb 2016

He voted for the bill because of the good things that were in it and in spite of the bad things that were in it. So the difference between him and Clinton on that issue is huge.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
66. It was known back then.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016

There's a lot written on how the laws were changed to help the for profit prisions and continue to be.

I will never believe it's an accident that Bill put in this law and Hillary spoke for it in the face of all kinds of criticism, and then she had for profit prisons in her super pac - the lobbyist for the biggest ones. She's continued to speak for laws helping mass incarcerations up until she started campaigning and she didn't drop the GEO group(big prision lobbyists) until she had to after the Huffington post exposed her in October 2015.



Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
90. Bernie voted "yea" on the bill.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:02 PM
Feb 2016

That doesn't sound like trying to improve it.

He denounced it, and then voted "yea".

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
93. From my post#18 to you Bernie did try to improve it.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:05 PM
Feb 2016



PRESS RELEASE
Sanders Voted for 1994 Crime Bill to Support Assault Weapons Ban, Violence Against Women Provisions
FEBRUARY 25, 2016

FLINT, Mich. – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager on Thursday reiterated the senator’s reasoning for voting in favor of the Clinton administration’s 1994 Crime Bill despite serious reservations. The House version of the bill included a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons. Sanders had supported the ban since 1988. The conference committee version included not only the assault weapons ban but also the Violence Against Women Act provisions. Sanders supported these efforts to protect women.

In Sanders’ statement at the time, he criticized the mass incarceration and death penalty provisions in the bill, saying:

“…it is also my view that through the neglect of our Government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence.

And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world, will not make that situation right. We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails.

Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance.”

During consideration of the bill, Sanders voted six times to weaken or eliminate the death penalty provisions and voted separately against creating new mandatory minimums. Then-First Lady Hillary Clinton spoke strongly in favor of increased incarceration, labeling at risk youth as “super-predators” who had to be “brought to heel.”


“When this so-called crime bill was being considered, Bernie Sanders criticized its harsh incarceration and death penalty provisions,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager. “Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, resorted to dog whistle politics and dehumanizing language. Bernie was right then and he’s right now. We need to invest in those communities that have been neglected in this country. Poor communities – more often than not, communities of color – deserve the same opportunities and education that other communities have. Bernie Sanders has always known jails and incarceration are not the answer. Nor is heated rhetoric against young people of any race. You can’t throw vulnerable people under the bus just because it’s politically expedient.”

https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-voted-for-1994-crime-bill-to-support-assault-weapons-ban-violence-against-women-provisions/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511339700

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
95. And then he voted "yea" on a flawed bill.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:07 PM
Feb 2016

He was unable to improve it... Not sure that bodes well for how he will be able to improve all the things he wants...

Who knows, hard to predict.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
99. To save women's lives:
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:09 PM
Feb 2016


Sorry I realize you don't want to admit it but his DECADES of speaking out against the criminal justice system do MATTER.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
106. No, one WHOLEHEARTEDLY supported, promoted and SOLD it.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:14 PM
Feb 2016

The other fought, tried to change and then only voted for it to save lives.

BIG difference.

Sort of like how Hillary supported, promoted and sold welfare reform, the Defense of Marriage Act and the Iraq war.

Face it, she's consistently been on the wrong side of history time and time again.

And she's still on the wrong side when to comes to the "war" on drugs and death penalty.

I support the progressive.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
110. The other...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:16 PM
Feb 2016

Denounced it, fought the flawed sections... But then voted for the whole thing anyway.

Both are flawed.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
113. The crime bill, welfare reform, DOMA, the Iraq war, death penalty, war on drugs.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:18 PM
Feb 2016

Which one is MORE flawed for supporting all of those?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
117. Of course you are, that's easier than answering the question.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:19 PM
Feb 2016

One candidate is a progressive and the other is a moderate at best.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
119. Yup that's it. You caught me, I'm going to go to bed to avoid a very productive debate.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:21 PM
Feb 2016

Where we agree on nothing, and then go away angry, and still supporting the same candidates.

...

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
120. You were the one who said they were flawed now you don't want to discuss degrees.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

Like I said, it's easier to run away than face the fact that Bernie was right about this bill and the other issues I mentioned.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
125. All you have to do is answer the question.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:29 PM
Feb 2016

And this has always been DU, we do nuance here and we back up our opinions - that is if they're worth backing up.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
118. And another personal attack (calling me a liar).
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:20 PM
Feb 2016

Read the subthread I've mentioned several times the bill is/was flawed. And both our candidates were flawed for their respective level of support.

So... There is that.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
100. I don't want to get into political science 101 but a President carries much more influence,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:10 PM
Feb 2016

power and sway than being 1 out of 435 members of the House of Representatives.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
103. It does. (And another personal insult...)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

And right now the most influential politician running is Trump. Huge rallies, big endorsement, turning out republicans right and left, brining in new young voters to the Republican Party.

That should be scaring the shit out of us right now.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
107. Trump can't do anything until and unless he becomes elected, it does scare the shit out of me and
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
Feb 2016

that's just another reason to support Bernie, because he stands the best chance of defeating Trump in the G.E.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
122. Leaving aside the fact that every time someone asks her about marijuana legalization in the debates
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:26 PM
Feb 2016

- not exactly a non-issue, given the numbers of states that have or are likely to legalize- she clumsily "pivots" to heroin addiction, pretty deliberately conflating the two;

let's unpack this thing for a minute. Part and parcel of this expanded "war on opiates" is increased pressure on prescribers NOT to prescribe pain medication; you know, telling the person screaming in pain from bone cancer to try yoga or meditation (cheaper, too!), that sort of thing...

it's taken as a given that making pain meds harder to obtain is a good idea, even though doctors already live in fear of the DEA and as such under-prescribe in many cases. But what all this ignores is that fact- statistically documented- that part of what drives the increase in street opiate use, like heroin, is when prescription pain meds are made more, not less, difficult to obtain.

So you have pain patients- and abusers, to be sure- turning to unregulated street drugs when they can't get prescription meds.

I don't know exactly what the answer is, but I do know that if the choice is between someone somewhere catching an unauthorized buzz or people with legitimate pain needs being forced to suffer "because addicts", I'll side with the pain patients, myself.

I think the answer to addiction and overdoses are treatment on demand through a harm reduction model, preferably, as opposed to the current punitive law enforcement regime we have now.

I recognize that Hillary's plan includes money for treatment, and that's a good thing, although I think it would be better if we focused public moneys more on scientific or secular treatment modalities, as opposed to the faith-based 12 step stuff which overwhelmingly dominates the treatment landscape today.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
134. Bernie is spot on with this
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:19 AM
Feb 2016

never in my lifetime have we had a person of his caliber in government office. The man knows of what he speaks. I like that about him. No one tells Bernie what to say or do

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
137. Funny how that works.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016

Show the guy telling the truth and people disregard what their own ears and eyes tell them.

Thank you for the excellent OP and thread, Uncle Joe!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders speech on ...