2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWell I made up my mind.. and its Hillary...
I was and am an all out O'Malley supporter and was one of his precinct captains in Iowa.. and when we lost.. I just thought I would sit on the sidelines, because being an Iowan.. we have no more say in anything.. Its kind of crazy.. we have to put up with everyone for months upon months..but we really have little to no say in anything..being first is just that.. being first.. the states down the line make the choices.
All that being said.. today when the Christie endorsed the Donald, and the two of them went on one of the most childish playground attacks against Rubio and then turned their fire on Clinton, I realized, she is going to be taking the majority of the attacks from the right..
So Hillary, you are not standing alone.. I will stand with you, and when family and friends call and we do discuss politics and what do I think since I have seen them so up and close for such a long time.. I am going to give my opinion, since there are only two left.... Hillary is who I would vote for now if I had the opportunity..
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)the poster attack Bernie.
But you are attacking the poster, why is that?
Beacool
(30,250 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)I don't even consider the other drummer to be a Democrat.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)He's sided with the dems when it mattered. Remember when Lieberman was a D? He was, but he wasn't.
Edit: dems not dens.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:32 PM - Edit history (1)
I have no bad feelings about him, but I don't want him as president. I prefer Hillary. If he does manage somehow to win the nomination, I of course would vote for him.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)You've never been hateful. And you're always honest and have integrity
Beacool
(30,250 posts)No one else ever gave me bankies.
Thank you for this one and for the compliments.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)That you and he had. It's one of my favorite early DU memories.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)I haven't seen him on DU for a long time. I miss his messages and bankies.
Thanks again for the lovely bankie.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)It's weird way that I connect you two together. But I love how people connect. Even on a message board.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)they would not have, you know, posted on a fucking political discussion board!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)politicians opponent, and name calling of that person is good and OK with you?
Says something about things, things I dont want to be associated with.
Where does a Bernie supporter who doesnt want to attack other Democrats go?
TM99
(8,352 posts)Everybody said they were joking. They were not attacking them.
The OP made a post. We are free to comment.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The derisive subject line doesn't acquit you well either
demwing
(16,916 posts)Primary season has filled my Ignore list to the brim. I'm sure I'm on many a list myself.
Let the After Party DU deal with itself when the time comes.
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)then there's making it personal. It was crappy and wrong to make fun of his user name.
Peacetrain - as much as I'm disappointed that you'll be voting for Hillary, it is YOUR vote.
TM99
(8,352 posts)A person with the username 'Peacetrain' endorses Clinton a day after Kagan of the PNAC formally endorses her. Clinton is not exactly a 'peace' candidate.
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)I'm no fan of Hillary's.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)H stating that the poor children of Honduras who came to the US seeking a future away from the war she helped get started, that these poor homeless kids be sent back. And the fact she voted to bomb the kids in Iraq.
But do you write about that? No. That is what is truly obnoxious.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)peacetrain did nothing. Making snide remarks about her username is juvenile.
Response to Codeine (Reply #60)
Post removed
Orrex
(63,216 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Because he'll vote for Bernie and then Trump if it's Hillary v. Trump (the husband is a republican)
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Some people's children. . .
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Primaries seem to magnify it.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)don't get confused by the name.. and this has nothing to do with being hawkish or anything else.. Can't stand the guy who wrote it since he joined in on calling for the death of Salman Rushdie..
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)user name erases my cognitive dissonance.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)He took the name Yusuf Islam when he converted. The name means Joseph Peace, in essence, with Joseph/Yusuf meaning God provides or God will increase. So, he's God will increase your peace--and he's fatwahing old Salman?
I couldn't help but notice the dissonance between his fancy Islamic name and that stupid stance of his.
His name--both Cat Stevens AND Yusuf Islam-- is used in the Middle East, particularly but not exclusively among reactionaries, as a joke-y term for a western, pampered, privileged white boy who "goes native" and becomes overly enthusiastic about All Things Muslim.
Remember GW Bush's distant relative, John Walker Lindh? He was a perfect example of a "Yusuf Islam."
It's never a compliment.
Brought to you by the Ministry for Useless Information!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)You know that, right?
MrChuck
(279 posts)No fly zone=World war 3
MADem
(135,425 posts)Those are facts, not beliefs.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)MrChuck
(279 posts)For diminishing these discussions this way.
We support the senator because of his consistency in promoting sound policy.
We criticize the former secretary because she falls short in matters of integrity and judgement.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)BFD.
MrChuck
(279 posts)I said you SHOULD be.
Wibly
(613 posts)Sanders has been very clear in his opposition to war, since his youth. He voted against Iraq, and has staunchly criticized both the wars and the military industrial complex.
Claiming otherwise makes you sound like you're not really paying attention, or something worse.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I was under the impression that they read memes, watched the first thirty seconds of campaign videos, and talked gleefully among themselves about how wonder Bernie is.
Suspicions confirmed.
Do yourself a big, big favor and get to know your candidate. Google this, and read the first link at feeltheBern.org: "sanders view on defeating isis"
H2O Man
(73,561 posts)my best friends. Although we support different candidates, I have nothing but years of respect for my good friend. There is no justification for the insults.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)although I am glad we are fielding a strong and experienced candidate. Although I am farther left, I feel good that she is a moderate liberal who can draw moderates from both sides. We must bring people together, and it does seem it is time. And I am also glad Bernie is here to remind us that there is more we eventually can and should aspire to. Capitalism as practiced is not sustainable and has run us into the ground. The future must bring big changes.
yardwork
(61,666 posts)H2O Man
(73,561 posts)for that is what brothers are for.
I am concerned that if Hillary is our nominee, the ugliness between the camps -- because it isn't just on DU:GDP -- will be very damaging. Same for if Bernie gets the nomination.
There are, I know, a group on each side on DU that likes to hurl insults at one another. If they could even keep it limited to themselves, those who favor hostility, that would be upsetting enough for me ....because I tend to like almost everyone on DU, including a few who I currently refuse to speak to. But there is no justification ....no excuse .....for insulting those who simply want to engage in civil discourse.
I wish I could blame this on "trolls." But I see friends engaging in it, too.
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)We should strive to be a better community (says the guy who hardly posts). Ripping on each other like petty children is not a good look.
H2O Man
(73,561 posts)My buddy Rubin taught me to listen closely to those who are usually quiet. He was right.
George II
(67,782 posts)H2O Man
(73,561 posts)I appreciate that. It upsets me, when I see one good friend insulting another good friend. I've been close with Peacetrain for many years. That doesn't change, simply because we currently support different candidates.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)You get a whole lot of bad news and every so often a story of goodness and hope. It is nice to see that there are ģood friends on opposite sides of the primaries who can differ and yet still have a civil discourse and remain friends. Kudos, gentlemen for being that beacon of light during these dark primary times. Cheers!
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Thanks for speaking up!
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)This is the 2nd thread I've looked at tonight where the first person posting said what I was going to say.
JI7
(89,252 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)It's comments like this that make many here on DU dislike the "radical" Bernie supporters. You should follow the example of the man you support.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)I guess you missed the instruction to leave your sense of humor at the door before you dare to post anything less than fawning about certain candidates/supporters.
As our sergeant said about people who can't take a joke...wait, no, I'd better not post that either.
sheshe2
(83,795 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)still_one
(92,251 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Welcome onboard the Hillary train.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)when it comes to the Bullies on the right.. so ugly.. they are unhinged..
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Hillary has taken the slings and arrows from both camps for years and she's still standing. She'll be a fine president.
MADem
(135,425 posts)This is probably the most embarrassing thread I've ever seen on DU--and the people who are making the ugly remarks are HUMILIATING themselves.
You don't deserve this treatment.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... how much you liked O'Malley.
I'll bet you're as eager as I am for this to be settled and over with so that we can start focusing all our energy working to defeat the GOP.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)she is going to need all the support she can get just to stand up to it.. they are absolutely crazy over there.. off the rails..
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)If you are going to back a war hawk, you should do so proudly.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I wish you'd delete your insult.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I can't wait until this ends.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)He was/is a good man on many issues.
You have always been a poster that I have enjoyed reading.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)and I hope he will come back the next time.. I think he will be a great President some day.. It was just not this time.. and I grieved let me tell you.. really grieved.. that was a tough caucus..but we just did not have the votes.. :0
artislife
(9,497 posts)It is like creating a great idea and working really hard but no one buys it. And you know that people need it.
Anyway, as a Latina and pretty sensitve how brown people are treated or ignored here, I really was very impressed with him. He showed such humanity.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and youthful Berniemania on the other. He'll be back, seasoned and ready for the fight. I suspect the day will come that I proudly mark the bubble next to his name in a general election.
angrychair
(8,704 posts)With O'Malley and that was his singular effort to get casino gambling into Maryland to shore up the state budget. I find lotteries and gambling crooked crutches for fixing budget gaps. It is an attempt to avoid the hard conversations that education cost money.
We've had lotteries for a couple of decades now and it hasn't fixed shit with funding public education. We keep adding more gambling and guess what? Still not fixed.
It's just another way to keep a hand in our pocket and make people like Adelson wealthier while they keep adding more gambling and increasing property taxes.
brer cat
(24,579 posts)He will be back. I'm sorry that many people felt the need to dump on this thread.
BillyDawg
(82 posts)Glad to have you
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)michaz
(1,352 posts)but because I believe in what he stands for.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Charming.
michaz
(1,352 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Silly me. What was I thinking?
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)positions and policies are best.
You are basically just saying that you don't want Trump to win. So you think that Clinton can stop Trump (that has thus far not been proven correct by current polls), and you are voting against someone instead of for someone.
No wonder the left and the Democratic Party are in such disarray.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Your post makes that unclear.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Then I am going right back to being an independent. If you haven't noticed, there are not enough registered Democrats to win the GE.
Why should it matter anyway. I am on the left in a fucked up two party system.
Your concern is duly noted. Thanks.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)who will you vote for in the general, or will you vote? Thanks in advance.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Who I vote for is my business, but I will give you a hint. It won't be a Clinton. I have never voted for one. Why break a good habit now?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Promise, promise, promise. What you'd expect from a career politician.
TM99
(8,352 posts)gcomeau
(5,764 posts)FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)is the D choice due to the independent vote.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Also, reasonable independents won't want Trump in the WH. They will vote for her
TM99
(8,352 posts)She already lost the Hispanic youth vote in Nevada. She is about to lose the AA youth vote in SC after that horrid BLM video has surfaced of her.
Muslims are not a sufficiently large enough voting bloc to count. LGBT's are split. Of course she will get the wealthy 1% Jews but not all others as a matter of course.
'Real' Christians are out-numbered by 'Born Again' Christians.
She only has the over 65 female vote at this point in time consistently.
You still fail to account for the independent vote. That is just math.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)double digits among Latinos. That Nevada thing? She won't in all heavily Latino precincts, so that ENTRANCE poll doesn't mean anything.
And, no, the AA youth vote in NC is hers. If they show up (In Nevada, the youth both was an anemic 18%
Your post is not "just math" Is Berniemath
TM99
(8,352 posts)LAS VEGAS Bernie Sanders won the Latino vote in Nevada, according to an analysis released on Monday by the widely-respected William C. Velasquez Institute.
The institutes detailed analysis was conducted after Hillary Clintons campaign disputed entrance poll numbers by discounting the impact of high turnout by younger Latino voters in Saturdays Nevada precinct caucuses.
We note that some analysts have said that Secretary Clintons victories in heavily Latino precincts proved that she won the Latino vote. However the methodology of using heavily Latino or barrio precincts to represent Latino voting behavior has been considered ineffective and discarded for more than 30 years due to non-barrio residential patterns common among Latino voters since the 1980s, said Antonio González, the president of the non-partisan organization whose purpose is to conduct research aimed at improving the level of political and economic participation in Latino and other communities.
Simply put there is no relevant statistical inconsistency between Edisons Entry Poll results for Latinos, Whites, and Blacks and the overall election results. Based on this fact WCVI concludes that there is no statistical basis to question the Latino vote breakdown between Secretary Clinton and Sen. Sanders.
The entrance polls were accurate.
You still keep ignoring independents. She will lose the GE period because of them. That is math.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I know you have struggled with this decision. Welcome aboard and don't forget the flame retardant!
Pisces
(5,599 posts)Lot's of wolves in sheep's clothing on this board this election cycle.
yardwork
(61,666 posts)yardwork
(61,666 posts)We will be hearing more from him. Good guy.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)and he will be back.. and I will be so proud to be his precinct captain again.. they may be rolling me in with a wheel chair.. but I will be there with my O'Malley T shirt..
yardwork
(61,666 posts)Thank you for contributing to our democracy. You are an inspiration.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Anyone see the irony of the guy who wrote peacetrain being on the terrorist no fly list?
Not a shot at yusef islam but it is a shot at the dhs.
yardwork
(61,666 posts)When he came out in favor of assassinating a novelist, that was it.
I liked his music, but I can't get over that.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)side.
"The choice is stark, keep living under corporate rule under Hillary and watch things get worse, or go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Because Clinton supporters are:
1. Fascists who want to see the US become a fascist state
or
2. Too stupid to know any better.
Which one is it, Rick?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6660544
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)you disagree with kicked off, you will be totally lost. But I am not taking your bait. I know that you are not here to discuss issues.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Oh, right, the troll who was finally banned.
Nah, I don't miss him.
And why won't you answer my simple question?
Are Clinton supporters:
1. Fascists who want to see the US become a fascist state
or
2. Too stupid to know any better.
Which one is it, Rick?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6660544
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)they might regret? I've been bullied all my life and won't fall for the bait.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)So I'm just wondering if you think Clinton supporters are:
1. Fascists who want to see the US become a fascist state
or
2. Too stupid to know any better
or
3. A different option that you would like to explain.
Why is this so hard for you, Rick?
How is it bullying to ask you to explain this incredible statement of yours?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)poverty more that seeing that the Wealthy get wealthier. I wonder just how bad things have to get before some here see that worshiping the Wealthy isn't the way. I worry about the millions that are incarcerated because the Prisons For Profit need more profits. But I know that there are other things more important to you.
I can see how some would be relieved to see Clinton nominated because then there wouldn't be any of those pesky attempts at discussing actual issues.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Hillary supporters want fascism according to you.
That's why you and me aren't Clinton supporters, right my friend?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The big corporations are gaining more and more power and the super-wealthy Clintons embrace that culture. Maybe you can help me with a question. Why would people that think they are Democrats support the Wealthy and ignore those living in poverty?
zappaman
(20,606 posts)"Vote for HRC and let the country slide right into fascism"?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)It must really important to you. By the way, was it you that wrote those nice things about me at your "hang out"? Kinda funny but also kinda creepy.
It seems to me that those that support Clinton are supporting the corrupt culture that has brought us wars, poverty, a crumbling infrastructure, the flight of jobs overseas, environmental destruction like fracking, etc. I guess bowing to the American Aristocracy is more important.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)On Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:52 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
LOL. What is this about the 7th time you've tried to put those words into my mouth?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1356356
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Personal attack. Accusing someone of being creepy somewhere else?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:57 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A stupid alert......
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This post is not a "personal attack." Instead of trying to hide the post, why not attempt to refute the uncomfortable truths being shared in it?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)but occasionally they get a 4- 3 Leave. It's a shame that we have to put up with this on a "politically liberal" message board.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)And everything I say regarding you is directly to you.
I can understand why you won't illuminate us more on your statement.
But it will be interesting to see if Hillary wins if you'll choose posting privileges over principles.
Be a shame to lose you.
But just as Seattle's loss was Boston's gain, so too would our loss here be some other websites lucky day!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)But I've gotten plenty of hides from your alerts, Rhett.
And sorry you can't answer a simple question regarding your own words.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)requiring familiarizing yourself with Clinton's actual positions on issues? https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/
I'm glad to hear you care about children living in poverty. Do you think that was also a major concern for Paul supporters in 2012?
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)7:17 PM
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:09 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Think carefully. There are two sides to this class war and the American Aristocracy isn't on our
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1347699
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
So now a vote for Hillary is a vote against democracy? Please hide this absolute garbage, Jurists.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:17 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: corporate rule *is* decimating our democracy !
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's really okay to have a differing opinion.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just another bit of primary season bloviating.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Speculating that Hillary is too beholden to corporate America is fair game in the primary. Leave this post alone.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Bernie is lookin' better than Hillary these days.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This alert deserves a hide
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Response to In_The_Wind (Reply #103)
840high This message was self-deleted by its author.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)"our" means what you think it does.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Welcome to the team!
O'Malley was a wonderful candidate. I could have easily switched to him had he gained traction, and became a real contender.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...Hillary Clinton refused to call the disastrous Libya War she'd advocated "a mistake."
She tried to imply that since there were elections in Libya, it was worth it.
With that attitude, she'll start another war if she's president.
All sides in the Libyan conflict are probably guilty of war crimes, including torturing, raping and executing prisoners, the UN has said, urging the world to do more to bring the perpetrators to justice.
A multitude of actors, both state and non-state, are accused of very serious violations and abuses that may, in many cases, amount to war crimes, said the UNs human rights chief, Zeid Raad Al Hussein.
...A power vacuum since the 2011 toppling ofMuammar Gaddafi has fostered the rise of Islamic State (Isis) in the country, which is headquartered in the former dictators hometown of Sirte, but control of Benghazi remains divided between a collection of militias."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/25/libya-conflict-un-says-all-sides-are-probably-guilty-of-war-crimes
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)We kept hoping, but knew that last week, it was a done deal.. but I was so proud to stand up for him at caucus.. He will be back in a few years..Hopefully better funded .. we did not even get one commerical on TV.. I wish we had a better online presence .. but lessons to be learned for the next time
Persondem
(1,936 posts)LexVegas
(6,072 posts)You can see why Sanders is getting blown out.
They reflect poorly on their candidate.
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...of Clinton supporters not knowing what Primaries are for?
Supporting her for a candidate because she's taking the most attacks? Defend her, sure, but in a Primary you are supposed to be deciding who *should be* the standard bearer of your policies and ideals in the general election, nut guessing who you think it probably will be then jumping on the bandwagon because the other side is getting ready to face off against them.
And yet again, I see no argument from policy or ideals or political principles in a post explaining why somebody is supporting Clinton. There is no possible way I can see that Clinton is a closer match to O'Malley on those than Sanders is. Just "She's taking the majority of the attacks!" Well, you realize that's only true as long as she's the presumed nominee? If the party started shifting to Bernie he'd be the one taking the majority of the attacks. So how is identifying the person currently taking the most attacks from the right a reason to pick a candidate? That's no better than "who's winning right now? I pick them! Get me on that bandwagon!"
ymetca
(1,182 posts).. attempting to make us believe there is more than a marginal difference between Trump and HRC. But they are both wholly owned subsidiaries of multinational conglomerates. They both "pal around" with the humanity's true terrorists --the people with all the money.
"Power --the ultimate aphrodisiac."
When everywhere you go everyone applauds you, fawning at your feet, it is a drug more powerful than heroin. Pretty soon you start believing you are actually as great as everyone says you are. You start to believe that only you can save the world.
Then you become president, and you are quickly spun into submission.
Fools following fools...
The nation-state must die. The corporation must die. The enemy of humanity is hierarchy.
Global Direct Democracy is the only way.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)No surprise that a certain contingent can't help themselves.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm glad you made up your mind, and glad you choose Hillary. It's not easy being a Hillary supporter on DU, I'm here if you need me.
Cha
(297,334 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)NNadir
(33,528 posts)Of course right here at DU I hear descriptions of her as the reincarnation of Ghenghis Khan.
Anyone who draws so much criticism from the far right and far left must be quite remarkable
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)by the Sanders fanatics.
You are a brave one!
Don't worry! I defend your right to support anyone you choose!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)There is so much wrong with a Hillary presidency .. from her warlike pronouncements to her willingness to sell out America's hard working families ...
Thanks to Hillary supporters, hard pressed families will still suffer wage stagnation, price gouging at the pharmacy and hospital, Keystone and TPP ...
All the bad that would come of your unbelievable support, will be a stain on your own legacy .... I still blame every one of you if innocent people suffer from a needlessly bellicose foreign AND domestic policy ...
The crazy train is here, and I refuse to board ... You're on your own ....
Gone
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Most of us can't stand anything about Hillary's shapeshifting ways and we see right through her. Most of us are also pretty disappointed that people who call themselves democrats are either more concerned with winning than the integrity of the person they think is going to win, or they're just completely oblivious. So when things like this get posted in GDP, they are met with backlash. To most of us she is a completely flawed candidate who doesn't truly represent our values.
MADem
(135,425 posts)where it belongs.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Look, you're going to have to start getting used to the reality that GDP won't always be All Bernie All The Time.
And until you own the board you don't have the right to decide which candidates are "acceptable" to talk about here, and which ones cause you upset. Trash the thread if you don't like it.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)But at the same time, this person shouldn't be surprised when a post like that is met with pushback. A majority of DU is made up of Bernie supporters and we see the difference between the two candidates as night and day. Clearly you can all post whatever you want within certain parameters in whatever forum you want, but don't be shocked when people react in a not so friendly way when you post a cheerlead piece in the general forum about one candidate that the majority of site goers can't stand.
MADem
(135,425 posts)For you or anyone else to mock her the way she's been dogged in this thread says PLENTY--and none of it good.
There's a difference between pushback against someone articulating a position; but this poster was talking about her personal journey after her candidate suspended. If she'd come down on Team Bernie, the HRC team wouldn't have shit on her the way she's been crapped on in this thread.
It says a LOT about the people who purport to support Sanders, who could pile on and insult a good DUer in that fashion.
A day of reckoning will come. This kind of conduct used to never be tolerated here. It's offensive and wrong.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Tension is high on both sides right now so it shouldn't be a surprise when this type of post is presented in the general forum. I don't condone the pushback but I'm not going to pretend to be surprised. It's like going to a fraternity party and telling everyone you're pledging the fraternity down the street that no one likes and is nothing but trouble and is likely to get kicked off campus for shenanigans.
MADem
(135,425 posts)not one, so it belongs right where it is.
Tension is high and you don't help it by trying to boss around a stand-up DUer who has always conducted herself civilly even under no small degree of pressure.
I mean, damn, can't ANYONE have an opinion that doesn't involve Feeling The Bern? These HIDE parties are getting obscene, and this kind of "Get off the street" attitude with regard to a post that is EXACTLY where it belongs isn't any better.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)forum. You were wrong to "advise" that person as well.
It's not for you to tell a Sanders, Clinton or O'Malley supporter where they are "allowed" to post their opinions. This is a DISCUSSION board--if a person wants to exchange ideas with all members of the board, this is where they do it.
If they post in a protected group, it limits the discussion to cheerleaders.
You're demanding that people limit their audience, and you have no right to make that demand.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)yardwork
(61,666 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)yardwork
(61,666 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Stop with the fake outrage. It's beyond ridiculous
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)If all you want to see is pro-Bernie.
This is GD-P, and there are 2 candidates in it.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)This Sanders supporter is ashamed of your unkind, divisive post.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Once it's out there in the general, it's just going to get pushback and irritate other people here.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I think despite the hyperbole going all around, most us on this side know that most on your side are good decent people. Hell, politics out of it most of us probably agree on 99% or more of things.
Besides, if he REALLY supported Senator Sanders, he wouldn't be that hateful. One thing Senator Sanders is not is a man who embraces hatred and bitterness.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)californiabernin
(421 posts)Particularly against a non-politician like Trump.
You have made a poor decision.
If Hillary is the nominee I expect Trump to be the next President of the United States.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)It's sad, but you will be excoriated for your choice here.
Response to Peacetrain (Original post)
Post removed
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)Ellen Forradalom
(16,160 posts)because I support everyone's sacred right to exercise their vote as they choose! Hop on over to the Hillary group any time.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)erlewyne
(1,115 posts)I will do my best to make sure you do not have that opportunity come November
because I am sure you will vote for Bernie if he is your option.
Peacetrain is a nice name.
mcar
(42,334 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)Wibly
(613 posts)Try the martyred diva routine and see how it works.
Sorry, I'll base my decision on quality of policy, and history of integrity, not on who the GOP want to slander this week.
And it won't be Clinton.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)get used to the haters.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Sorry. But thanks for your post.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)That was very well stated.
Too bad you had to suffer the derision of some of the earlier posters in the thread.
Sid
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)TPTB DO NOT CARE if Hillary or a Repuke win the GE. This is all kabuki theatre. Which big bigness interest has a problem with Hillary? Nada. What big bigness doesn't want is for Bernie to run a against a Repuke.
Bigness/oligarchs may prefer Repuke puppet but Hillary would be fine which is why so many are funding her.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I, personally, think you did make a great choice.
Of course, I'm not without bias there
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)on the major issues O'Malley and Bernie are fairly close. However many threat the election as a personality contest instead of the filling of an executive vacancy.
Response to Peacetrain (Original post)
Post removed
Mike Nelson
(9,960 posts)...he will be an ally for the next President.
JohnnyLib2
(11,212 posts)Nice to see this positive OP today.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I'm also in Iowa, and though we may not support the same candidate, I know you're thoughtful & fair, and always kind.
Ignore the asshats giving you shit in this thread.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Stand and Fight
(7,480 posts)It's important that no matter who the nominee is -- be it my preferred candidate (Clinton) or Senator Sanders -- there's no way I want the right wing loons to win the White House!
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)and is a reflection of the candidates themselves.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)always enjoyed reading your updates and opinions.
I'm still undecided. I still have a bit to go before I have to decide.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)It's nice here under the bus! You are in good company
Bucky
(54,027 posts)Neither of the candidates quite felt right, and it was a hard uneasy transition to eventually land on a comfort level with someone. I chose Bernie, but I totally respect the choice you made. It's important that we find our passion for our country and serve it as best we can.
The stakes haven't been this high in many election cycles, at least since 2000.
When, as I suspect, your candidate beats mine, I'll joyfully join whatever bandwagon the part prepares for us... all the way to November.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)He's closer to Bernie so I'm curious why you picked Clinton?
Lorien
(31,935 posts)Iraq
TPP
KXL
Pro arctic drilling
Pro for Profit Prisons
Pro Monsanto
Bankruptcy bill
Voting for a border fence
Saying child migrants should be sent home
Using her position as SoS to push fracking on the rest of the world
Wall Street donations
Six digit speaking fees
Taking money from weapons deals
Honduras
Comments about nuking Iran
Voted to raise credit card interest rates
NAFTA
DOMA
DADT
Opposing gay marriage in New York State
Brownbeck Amendments
Glass-Steagall
No living wage
No free college
No universal health care (ACA coverage gap....ACA will never provide UHC)
No medical Marijuana
Supports mandatory sentencing
Says that she's "proud of" the way Walmart does business
Libya
Yemen
Syria
Egypt
United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
Free trade - Oman agreement
Voted FOR Gitmo. --- Hillary voted against the Byrd ammendment and against a large majority of democrats to reduce Guatanamo funding by $36,000,000. She joined the republican majority against the majority of democrats in supporting Guantanamo.
Pro death penalty
Pro cluster bombing
Clinton policies lead to the largest mass incarceration of human beings in the history of the world
and the list goes on...
And a few of the other reasons why I won't vote for Hillary, but will vote for Bernie:
Hillary wants to attack Iran: http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484
Hillary pushed Fracking on the rest of the planet: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
Hillary and childhood poverty: http://www.salon.com/2015/10/15/the_worst_thing_hillary_clinton_has_ever_done/
What Hillary calls "feminism" : https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/03/hillary-clinton-womens-rights-feminism/
How women workers faired at Walmart when Hillary was on it's board:
Hillary's campaign had a gender pay gap: http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clintons-campaign-has-a-gender-pay-problem/
Hillary takes millions in campaign cash from her "enemies": http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/14/hillary-takes-millions-in-campaign-cash-from-enemies
Hillary on Gay marriage in 2004: &feature=youtu.be
Hillary open to raising the retirement age and reducing SS benefits: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/10/hillary-clinton-indicates-she-is-open-to-raising-the-retirement-age.html
Bernie has a MUCH better record of accomplishments as Senator than Hillary does: https://pplswar.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/fact-bernie-sanders-got-more-done-in-the-senate-than-hillary-clinton/
When you ask me to vote for Hillary: https://medium.com/@Lookingforrobyn/when-you-ask-me-to-vote-for-hillary-174becdb5ccc#.2ixs3cg5o
Hillary's legacy of pushing the party to the right: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/33869-hillary-clinton-s-ghosts-a-legacy-of-pushing-the-democratic-party-to-the-right
Chomsky: Democrats are now moderate Republicans:http://trofire.com/2015/09/23/noam-chomsky-dems-are-now-moderate-repugs-republicans-are-now-off-the-spectrum-of-reality/
The political compass finds Bernie to be the most centrist candidate, Hillary falls into the right wing Authoritarian spectrum:: http://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016
Bernie rejects big fundraising events: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-03-26/bernie-sanders-hates-money-in-politics-the-very-thing-he-ll-need-to-beat-clinton
Debunking the "Bernie has a Super PAC" lie: http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/debunking-the-big-bernie-sanders-has-a-superpac-lie/
Elizabeth Warren on Hillary Clinton: https://www.facebook.com/shaunking/videos/986305904741661/
A comparison of bills put forth by Bernie and Hillary: http://giphy.com/gifs/clinton-vs-sanders-bills-passed-according-to-congressgov-3o6gaQaIZcGAW7hCfu
Hillary helps a bank, which then funnels millions to the Clintons: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
Under Sanders, incomes and jobs would soar:http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/08/news/economy/sanders-income-jobs/
Electing Bernie would usher a wave of "Bernie Democrats" into Congress: https://newrepublic.com/article/129047/bernies-army-running-congress
Bernie vows to stop disastrous TPP deal: http://ecowatch.com/2015/10/05/sanders-stop-tpp-deal/
Bernie's foreign policy positions are solid and through: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-foreign-poicy-213619
Hillary's foreign policy record is dismal: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-ritter/hillary-clinton-foreign-policy-record_b_9221284.html
Bernie has plenty of foreign policy knowledge: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-foreign-poicy-213619
Hillary's foreign policy record is a disaster: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-ritter/hillary-clinton-foreign-policy-record_b_9221284.html
Top economist, UN advisor and climate activist: "Clinton is a danger to world peace" http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/15/1485382/-Top-economist-UN-advisor-and-climate-activist-Clinton-is-a-danger-to-world-peace
The pragmatic case for Bernie Sanders: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/the-pragmatic-case-for-bernie-sanders/462720/
Who could beat Trump? Bernie by a wide margin, while Hillary could lose against him: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/bernie-sanders-destroys-donald-trump-by-13-points-6-more-than-clinton-_b_8936840.html
Bernie Sanders would beat Donald Trump 51-38 in a general-election: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/poll-against-bernie-sanders-donald-trump-would-get-schlonged-20151223#ixzz3zvCwk44J
Poll shows that Hillary could easily lose to Trump in the General election: http://www.inquisitr.com/2667052/poll-shows-hillary-clinton-could-easily-lose-to-donald-trump-in-general-election/
In Europe, Sanders would be Center-Right: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-01-19/in-europe-sanders-would-be-center-right
I refuse to have the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people, and much of life on earth, on my hands dues to Hillary's pro-war/ anti-environment policies. I'm shocked that anyone who calls themselves "Peacetrain" would honestly be comfortable with such things. A bit like a vegan relaxing by clubbing a few baby seals. It just doesn't compute.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)and you think hillary is a good choice
peace - enjoy the train wreck
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)But I have SERIOUS reservations about her electability in the GE.
Califonz
(465 posts)Hillary the Unelectable.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)There are a couple of Sanders supporters with "peace" in their usernames and I knew it couldn't be you.
delrem
(9,688 posts)To me they seem very different.
O'Malley certainly doesn't have the hawkish tone. Nor does he have the incredibly tight corporate bonds, quid pro quo's.
In fact O'Malley is the opposite of Clinton in many very important ways, while yet being pro free enterprise.
I just gotta shake my head and wonder at your evolution, Peacetrain.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)Great decision. She will be formidable, and that is definitely the type of person we will need!
I just decided about a month ago...
Here's some of what I have written as to why I support Hillary -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110738887
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110744376
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511153695
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110741944
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118738275
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I am cool with folks supporting the candidate of their choice.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)DarthDem
(5,256 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)So very sorry your thoughtful, intelligent post has been crapped on by those who don't know what a toilet is for. It sounds like you've thought deeply about this decision. Get ready to expand your Ignore list, though!
Cary
(11,746 posts)I'm sorry you received it and I'm sorry for me that this place has descended into this stupid abyss.