2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDamn voter turn out needs to be a concern.
With half the counties reporting, voter turn out is not rising above 30% in any individual county.
http://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/59277/160596/en/vt.html
This will have ramifications and not good ones if this type of pattern continues for Democrats.
doc03
(35,363 posts)Ohio early elections.
TM99
(8,352 posts)The GE is fast becoming the GOP's for the taking. Low voter turnout, disenfranchised youth, pissed off Independents, the Brock/Clinton Machine and it won't matter how many minorities vote, she will lose. 80% of 30% is about 24% and that will not win an election.
doc03
(35,363 posts)chance of being the next president. Sorry I can't give the link but that prediction has been right ever since 1996.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)If Trump takes the nomination, he will lose to Sanders and win against Clinton.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)nomination it will motivate Republicans more than Democrats to vote in the GE.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Their voter turn out was 2 to 1 that of the Dems.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)it may be because of Trump or since both sides are pushing Hillary she may very well be the reason. Thank God for Bernie's sake he did not run as an independent because now he can not be "Nadered" if Hillary loses.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)More republicans would stand in line to vote against Hillary then they would Sanders? So let me see if I have this straight, they hate Hillary so much although here she's called the Republican. But the athiest-socialist promising to raise their taxes and nationalized healthcare is cool with them? Are you serious?
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)But seriously, we truly only have one party in this country.
It's like a choice between Coke and Diet Coke. Most people will go with the real thing.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)All I used to hear was how Democrats win when more voters turn out. It seems like the party is going the opposite direction, hoping for lower voter turnout in Nov.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Not one GOTV drive yet where I am. In past presidential elections, they were a huge thing during the whole season, from primaries to the GE.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)not be crushed by the establishment Clinton/Brock Machine.
Since it is a movement, it will continue whether Sanders wins or not. Clinton's campaign will be over next fall when she loses the youth and Independent vote. Thankfully she will just disappear. We won't have to worry about another Clinton unless the establishment tries to groom Chelsea!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Keep em stupid and complacent. Win.
oasis
(49,401 posts)Independents will flock to her over the outrageous stall of SCOTUS nominees.
So, nothing for us to worry about.
It isn't going to turn out that way.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)Nope, no need to be concerned, nothing to see here, move along now.
msongs
(67,438 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)oh my!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)and that was with Hillary and Obama both in it. Dems will come out for the GE.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I'd love to the source for that.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Half the people who voted in the 08 GE, sat home for the primaries.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I suppose the stats are available on wikipedia, but of course it wouldn't be updated to report current turn outs I wouldn't imagine.
That would be interesting to track though as this thing progresses.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Sorry if I wasnt clear enough on my first post!
I am in serious need of dinner and not thinking too clearly!
Wikipedia does seem to be keeping up with it pretty well so far:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016
2banon
(7,321 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)2008 - 2012 - 2016
primary by primary
This link describes well enough the current stats.. I'd like to see a running (on-going) comparative analysis. If you know of any credible source, that would be great!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)wiki pages and sort of run the totals, but thats pretty tedious. If I find one I'll post it to GDP.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Contrary1
(12,629 posts)but, it does talk about a downward trend..
The following is referring to the 2012 Primary:
"This year, though, it is hard to find much enthusiasm in either party. Turnout for the presidential primaries, which approached 60 million in 2008, was roughly half that this year. The decline among Democrats from the high-voltage contest between Obama and Hillary Clinton four years ago (which drew nearly 37 million primary voters) to this years total of about 9 million is understandable given the absence of a Democratic race in 2012. But the Republican presidential primary vote also went down this time from nearly 21 million in 2008 to less than 19 million with only the primary in Utah June 26 remaining to be held..."
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/voter-turnout-heading-downward-in-2012/
Edit to add: Just found this one. My eyes aren't so good these days, so I don't know if it will be of help to you or not. It does go back several years on both the Primary and General election voter.
turnout http://www.electproject.org/home/voter-turnout/voter-turnout-data
2banon
(7,321 posts)28 million fewer!
Republicans also dropped but by only 4 million.
Sheesh.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)Goes back through all the elections from 1787-2012.
http://www.electproject.org/home/voter-turnout/voter-turnout-data
Bucky
(54,041 posts)The ugliness of the GOP contest is rubbing off on our side. People are giving up on America.
This is why I hate that "I'm leaving this country if Asshole X is elected"
2banon
(7,321 posts)is that info with the link?
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Obama had 14% in 2008
Sanders had 15%
2banon
(7,321 posts)Thank you!
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)was 62% black voters this time, only 55% in 2008.
2banon
(7,321 posts)which is interesting. Thanks!
TM99
(8,352 posts)So between 2008 and 2016 only a 5% increase in AA voters. Not good overall unless you are living in denial.
I suppose the Clinton campaign is not much concerned about that, S.C. is now done and over with, a notch under her belt regardless. and oh by the way, probably not going to see much of her there come G.E. campaign time, I wouldn't reckon.
TM99
(8,352 posts)It has been the DWS/Brock/Clinton Machine mantra since 2014.
2banon
(7,321 posts)All that work, it was indeed a lot of very hard work. It's beyond infuriating.
TM99
(8,352 posts)She and the Clinton Machine believe that establishment pundits & pols, the moneyed elite donors through SuperPACs, and Brock's Rovian smears are all that is needed to win.
Of course they may be right in the primary. But they are wrong in the General.
2banon
(7,321 posts)the only reason Dems lost elections is because they did not turn out the vote, which obviously affected a demolition of FDR's policies for generations, so the point was to reestablish our actual majorities vis a vis the election process state by state, precinct by precinct. But of course that strategy did not and will never benefit the establishment political class... and had to be demolished.
Although I cut the chord with M$M via cable and satellite and don't see cable "news" programs on my tv everyday, I have on occasion seen video clips of Howard Dean opining on this that and the other, and he just saddens me now. It's like he surrendered. I suppose he had to think of his retirement nest egg. I don't know.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)is there a reason one should expect to see either more or fewer black voters? Have the demographics of the state changed significantly in 8 years?
TM99
(8,352 posts)That was all.
You said 62%. I saw on MSNBC 60%. That number has also been in several pro Clinton threads.
Not that is not to say that there may indeed be fewer black voters.
2banon
(7,321 posts)As an ancillary matter to the stats as regards population, registered voters, party affiliation etc.
datguy_6
(176 posts)Maybe we need this...an epic ass kicking in order to bring about real change
beaglelover
(3,488 posts)in force in November to elect the first woman President, Hillary Clinton!!!! GO HILLARY!!!!!
I'm feeling the BURN!!!!!
Bernie will drop out in March after more ass whoopings, starting on Super Tuesday!!!!
GO HILLARY!!!!!!
TM99
(8,352 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:39 AM - Edit history (1)
No Sanders will not drop out. The pledged delegate count is around a 30 point difference right now. Sanders will pick up lots on Tuesday. He is not going any where.
But no this doesn't bode well.
Overall 10 to 30% turnout. Very small increase for Clinton with AA's and equally as small an increase for Sanders with Millennials.
18-29 year olds broke for Sanders as did independents. Clinton's Brockian scorched earth campaign will ensure neither of those demographics show up with the numbers need to help the 23% of registered Democratic voters win this fall.
Y'all will likely win the Democratic Party the nomination of Clinton, but y'all will lose the left the GE to President Trump come fall.
Thanks!
beaglelover
(3,488 posts)You salty tears on election night will be delicious!!!
TM99
(8,352 posts)It will be yours.
And sadly, the only tears I might shed then will be in rage at the idiocy of the left for pushing that narcissist yet again in a failed bid for the presidency.
Can you handle 8 years with Trump?
MannyG
(13 posts)He'll stay in, the rhetoric against Hillary will decrease, the focus on the dangers of a Trump presidency will increase.
TM99
(8,352 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Hillary has done nothing to earn my vote yet.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)President Trump has a plan for that.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)voter registration going on and rides arranged and help to get people to the polls.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Neoliberals win even if a Republican is elected. Free trade, insurance mandates, and corporate cash cows are loved by both parties these days!