Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton is at 96% to win the nomination, 62% to win the presidency at predictwise (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 OP
Those numbers have really moved Gothmog Feb 2016 #1
I am more impressed with the 62% figure. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #4
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #2
Only 62% to beat Trump, my lord that is scary krawhitham Feb 2016 #3
If Hillary won by 62% in the GE that would be an enormous landslide victory auntpurl Feb 2016 #5
Obama won by 3.9% and the betting odds were 70-30 krawhitham Feb 2016 #10
Apologies, I should have said Obama won 51% of the vote. nt auntpurl Feb 2016 #13
It is better than the 2% her Democratic opponent is showing. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #7
And there you have it! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #9
I fear if Dems aren't turning out Now fredamae Feb 2016 #6
In layman's terms these predictive markets are based on polls, voter expectations surveys... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #8
Sure the predictwise site is headed up by a RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #11
K & R Alfresco Feb 2016 #12

Gothmog

(145,496 posts)
1. Those numbers have really moved
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:21 AM
Feb 2016

Two weeks ago Clinton was at 80% to be the nominee. I wish that I purchased an option agreement at that pricing

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
5. If Hillary won by 62% in the GE that would be an enormous landslide victory
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:26 AM
Feb 2016

Obama won by 51% in 2012.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
7. It is better than the 2% her Democratic opponent is showing.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:27 AM
Feb 2016

But that 2% figure is unintentionally deceptive because it is based on the assumption that her opponent won't be the nominee, and be in position to win the presidency in the first place. It's actually how these markets work. They are predicting events that are predicated on other events occurring.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
6. I fear if Dems aren't turning out Now
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:27 AM
Feb 2016

for Either Sanders or HRC-that these polls are sorely underestimating the Angry electorate. I am assuming these Polls are Statistically Assuming a certain amount of voter turnout for HRC to win the GE.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
8. In layman's terms these predictive markets are based on polls, voter expectations surveys...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:29 AM
Feb 2016

In layman's terms these predictive markets are based on polls, voter expectations surveys, and gut , i.e., intuitive thinking.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
11. Sure the predictwise site is headed up by a
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:37 AM
Feb 2016

Microsoft economist. Think again, about these predictions, and how they are being bought by the corporatists. His name is David Rothschild. You know, as in the House of Rothschild... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
Show me another family that is not in the pocket of the corporations.
This "prediction" is therefore HIGHLY biased.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton is at 96%...