2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton is at 96% to win the nomination, 62% to win the presidency at predictwise
http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-winnerGothmog
(145,496 posts)Two weeks ago Clinton was at 80% to be the nominee. I wish that I purchased an option agreement at that pricing
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)I suspect it holds throughout the conventions.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)krawhitham
(4,647 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Obama won by 51% in 2012.
krawhitham
(4,647 posts)51.1-47.2 is winning by 3.9% not 51%
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)But that 2% figure is unintentionally deceptive because it is based on the assumption that her opponent won't be the nominee, and be in position to win the presidency in the first place. It's actually how these markets work. They are predicting events that are predicated on other events occurring.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)for Either Sanders or HRC-that these polls are sorely underestimating the Angry electorate. I am assuming these Polls are Statistically Assuming a certain amount of voter turnout for HRC to win the GE.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)In layman's terms these predictive markets are based on polls, voter expectations surveys, and gut , i.e., intuitive thinking.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Microsoft economist. Think again, about these predictions, and how they are being bought by the corporatists. His name is David Rothschild. You know, as in the House of Rothschild... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
Show me another family that is not in the pocket of the corporations.
This "prediction" is therefore HIGHLY biased.