Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,289 posts)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:47 PM Feb 2016

There is a revolution happening and it's being led by Hillary Clinton.

Bernie claimed high voter turnout and new voters will propel his Revolution. Not happening.






Ryan J. Davis ‏@RyanNewYork 13h13 hours ago Cuauhtémoc, Distrito Federal

There is a revolution happening and it's being led by Hillary Clinton. #ImWithHer


124 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is a revolution happening and it's being led by Hillary Clinton. (Original Post) riversedge Feb 2016 OP
DU rec...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #1
Thank you! kristopher Feb 2016 #120
Revolution? noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #2
I dunno if it counts as revolution VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #4
She has claimed many of Bernie's true Progressive positions (insincerely I will add), Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #6
Judging by South Carolina spyker29 Feb 2016 #32
she won a state where she and her husband have been historically popular. No revolution there. roguevalley Feb 2016 #37
Yep. And which is deeply conservative and will certainly go red in November. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #70
Right! Hillary won one of the reddest states in the union... kind of a dubious distinction. Bubzer Feb 2016 #108
Other than Charleston, South Carolina is the cradle of stupid. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #96
She won a state that has not gone Democratic in 80 years. BFD. Vincardog Feb 2016 #104
Yup. She talks a good game. NM DataDrivenFP Feb 2016 #116
Yeah meet the new Boss UglyGreed Feb 2016 #15
where do you get 16 years? 6chars Feb 2016 #98
Bill Clinton and Obama are Thirdway and twice elected. Phlem Feb 2016 #105
Ah. You skipped over Bush 6chars Feb 2016 #117
I think the original concern was over Dems, Bush Phlem Feb 2016 #119
Happy to k and r! cwydro Feb 2016 #3
1 riversedge Feb 2016 #19
Of course Depaysement Feb 2016 #5
That is correct! She's going to make history lunamagica Feb 2016 #7
@HillaryClinton is the first woman to EVER win a South Carolina primar--Herstory being made.... riversedge Feb 2016 #8
That expression... where have I seen it before? bvf Feb 2016 #12
Great pic of Hillary/nt davidthegnome Feb 2016 #75
I knew it was familiar. Thanks! Duval Feb 2016 #87
Great pic of Hillary. oasis Feb 2016 #20
Agreed! peggysue2 Feb 2016 #58
Great pic of Hillary. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #73
But the latest in a long line of conservatives. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #24
Iowa too! Iliyah Feb 2016 #30
I am not surprised, since S.C. has a FEMALE Governor. Duval Feb 2016 #88
Join Hillary's counter-revolution. Help stamp out dissent against the economic royalists. (nt) w4rma Feb 2016 #9
THE WALL STREET REVOLUTION HAS FOUND THEIR LEADER. Her name is Hillary. Indepatriot Feb 2016 #10
global financial/corporate governance revolution tk2kewl Feb 2016 #13
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #11
So low voter turn-out is your goal? swilton Feb 2016 #14
She got her base out. Codeine Feb 2016 #18
In a state that has voted for the Democrat in the GE once since 1964 jeff47 Feb 2016 #28
Which has exactly fuck-all to do with the democrats in that state. Codeine Feb 2016 #34
Actually, it has a ton to do with the Democrats in that state. jeff47 Feb 2016 #43
A revolution to maintain the status quo? TheFarseer Feb 2016 #16
needed to be said bigtree Feb 2016 #17
K&R mcar Feb 2016 #21
Yep: the revolution that began with Citizens United. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #22
Women too! MaggieD Feb 2016 #23
Argentina beat us to that. retrowire Feb 2016 #46
Rather a revolution led by the M$M, with white masses for Trump, Ron Green Feb 2016 #25
LOL! Politicalboi Feb 2016 #26
Now they think they have a revolution. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #78
And Clinton is PAYING David Brock for this? Hahahahaha.. JimDandy Feb 2016 #102
I see this more as a hostile takeover of the Democratic party by the Third Way people Samantha Feb 2016 #27
+1 Duval Feb 2016 #89
Isn't it Sanders who should be ashamed MyNameGoesHere Feb 2016 #110
Not at all -- he has declared himself as a Democratic Socialist for years Samantha Feb 2016 #118
This will be like that Revolution* Brand Toothpaste Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #29
By Hillary Clinton..and Wall Street, the MIC, and other corrupt politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #31
Hillary's even trying to steal this? mindwalker_i Feb 2016 #33
She is making history. Get used to it. riversedge Feb 2016 #35
What kind of unrelated platitude crap is this? mindwalker_i Feb 2016 #41
As first woman president? Nah. retrowire Feb 2016 #42
History repeats itself. bvf Feb 2016 #80
since theres no higher turnout and hillary = more of the same... retrowire Feb 2016 #36
The Wall Street revolution is happening! Woo Hoo! Get on board baby! jalan48 Feb 2016 #38
Hillary winning with a 12% turnout, just like winning a baseball game because the other team litlbilly Feb 2016 #39
Then show up. Codeine Feb 2016 #45
really? that's your answer? easy ignore on you, bye bye litlbilly Feb 2016 #48
Why do you think people didn't show up for Sanders? YCHDT Feb 2016 #51
Because theyve been knocked down for so long, and the low info, its not surpising at all. Most of litlbilly Feb 2016 #54
Is there anything that's been posted as a reason Sanders turnout was low? Thanks YCHDT Feb 2016 #63
annnnnnd igore, idiotic post litlbilly Feb 2016 #65
It's a re-MOTS-solution!!! KansDem Feb 2016 #40
The Goldman Sachs Revolution ! Impedimentus Feb 2016 #44
There it is then YCHDT Feb 2016 #47
Turn out was down. GreatGazoo Feb 2016 #49
The Status Quo Revoluton? nt. malletgirl02 Feb 2016 #50
The NO WE CAN'T Revolution Impedimentus Feb 2016 #52
Revolution? The Midway Rebel Feb 2016 #53
Oops. I'm sorry, but your OP is misleading. liberalnarb Feb 2016 #55
That's adorable Mufaddal Feb 2016 #56
President Hillary Clinton. I like that! Nice ring, right? Laser102 Feb 2016 #57
NO WAY! n/t RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #60
On Wall Street. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #66
BULLSHIT! RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #59
Progressive Democrats aren't conservative... Progressives voted on Saturday YCHDT Feb 2016 #67
No way are they progressive. RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #71
So your saying if they voted for Hillary they're not progressives? YCHDT Feb 2016 #77
No, I am saying that they have been duped RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #81
How so? Politicub Feb 2016 #91
They go with who they are familiar with RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #92
True. Bernie DID get some votes. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #72
Give us a break....12.2% of Democrats truned out to vote in SC INdemo Feb 2016 #61
That tweet is crap. Simply not true. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #62
It's not a revolution if you're doing what you always do OnlinePoker Feb 2016 #64
Agree. Revolution is destructive. Evolution is far more appropriate. Hortensis Feb 2016 #85
high voter turnout and new voters AlbertCat Feb 2016 #68
This is really amusing to me. Avalux Feb 2016 #69
K&R ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #74
She is just a follower. raygun started the revolution she is jwirr Feb 2016 #76
Voting for an Establishment zentrum Feb 2016 #79
Not exactly so, it was led by Bill Clinton, it is only being continued by Hillary. Why not jump Todays_Illusion Feb 2016 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #83
hahahahah, privatizing social security, more prisons and wall street deregulation whereisjustice Feb 2016 #84
Meh...a "revolution" of the status quo... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #86
I love LOVE that the AA community is flexing its political muscle Politicub Feb 2016 #90
Is your goal to elect President Trump? Not a good use of political muscle. (nt) w4rma Feb 2016 #123
Status quo does not a revolution make. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #93
Bernie Sanders was not even mentioned a year ago and now Hillary is bragging about beating him. erlewyne Feb 2016 #94
A revolution by oligarchs for oligarchs? Too funny. Broward Feb 2016 #95
Excellent point, riversedge! SunSeeker Feb 2016 #97
"Also rans" do not create revolution. They are politicians first and foremost. Vinca Feb 2016 #99
The "Me too!" Candidate. bvf Feb 2016 #100
Her only revolution is to add even more wealth to the 0.01% oligarchs SciDude Feb 2016 #101
Too Much Kool Aid Wibly Feb 2016 #103
Make history? Yes. Revolution? Please convince me. mwooldri Feb 2016 #106
Yes, she is leading a third-way revolution to take over FDR's party (and that sucks) Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #107
You are embarrassing yourself with this ridiculous statement. JimDandy Feb 2016 #109
Yeah, a revolution for the status quo! jpb33 Feb 2016 #111
Thanks for the Laff silenttigersong Feb 2016 #112
An oxymoron Geronimoe Feb 2016 #113
All you Clinton rationalizers should realize that those numbers will never win you the GE. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #114
Stupid Bumper Sticker Nonsense jpb33 Feb 2016 #115
THE FUTURE NEVER HAPPENED Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #121
you are right Hillary is leading the low turnout revolution! Cobalt Violet Feb 2016 #122
I would have taken 10-1 odds SCantiGOP Feb 2016 #124

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
4. I dunno if it counts as revolution
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:50 PM
Feb 2016

when it looks like the same tripe we've been forced to shovel down for the past 16 years.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
6. She has claimed many of Bernie's true Progressive positions (insincerely I will add),
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:59 PM
Feb 2016

now his revolution? Yea right! Go ahead and vote for Wall Street's candidate, but it, by definition cannot be a revolution because Wall Street is already in power. She is protecting the Establishment government of corporate America, not trying to restore Representative Democracy. They began to take power under Reagan, and Hillary and her husband cemented their revolution in the 90's.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
96. Other than Charleston, South Carolina is the cradle of stupid.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:21 PM
Feb 2016

Always has been. I've spent too much time in that shithole.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
105. Bill Clinton and Obama are Thirdway and twice elected.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:36 PM
Feb 2016

is my guess, and I completely agree, Hillary is more thirdway bullshit.

I'm sure you've heard "Do you want a Republican for President!?"

We're past that fear mongering.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
117. Ah. You skipped over Bush
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:00 PM
Feb 2016

that confused me. I think it's fair to expect that if Hillary ends up president, she will have a similar approach to policy to that of Bill and Barack.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
119. I think the original concern was over Dems, Bush
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:52 PM
Feb 2016

was basically the Republican establishment and how bad it's gotten.

So two terms for two Presidents = 16 years.

We haven't had traditional Democratic representation for almost 24 years and everyone wonders why we're so effed up.



riversedge

(70,289 posts)
8. @HillaryClinton is the first woman to EVER win a South Carolina primar--Herstory being made....
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:07 PM
Feb 2016



@HillaryClinton is the first woman to EVER win a South Carolina primar--Herstory being made....





Adam J. Smith ‏@AdamSmith_USA 16h16 hours ago

.@HillaryClinton is the first woman to EVER win a South Carolina primary. Proud to be on team @HFA. #ImWithHer pic.twitter.com/JnFzvbuXmn

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
28. In a state that has voted for the Democrat in the GE once since 1964
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

Nixon stink on Ford was just too much. Otherwise, they've voted for the Republican since the Civil Rights Act.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
34. Which has exactly fuck-all to do with the democrats in that state.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:22 PM
Feb 2016

Bring out your base or stop crying. Simple as that. Get your guy nominated and we'll all back him in the GE. But if you can't win the playoffs you don't make the championship.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
43. Actually, it has a ton to do with the Democrats in that state.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:29 PM
Feb 2016

The formula for delegates takes in to account past election results, and reliably "red" states get fewer delegates. Democrats in SC literally count less to the DNC.

But if you can't win the playoffs you don't make the championship.

These aren't the playoffs. These are out-of-conference games.

Clinton did very well, but this is going to be a long primary.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
46. Argentina beat us to that.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:32 PM
Feb 2016

But if having a woman in power is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING, then knock yourself out.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
25. Rather a revolution led by the M$M, with white masses for Trump,
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

Black masses for Clinton, and the PTB ready to sweep her into the WH with a mandate for "sanity" or "experience" or some such.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
78. Now they think they have a revolution.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:52 PM
Feb 2016

They'll co-opt anything Sanders came up with 1st..... for the primary anyway....


Have you ever seen a campaign with such a dearth of ideas????

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
27. I see this more as a hostile takeover of the Democratic party by the Third Way people
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:01 PM
Feb 2016

Not quite a real revolution when it is being done so undercover. A true revolution is one where people show their faces, speak their words to the public and do not have an alternative program running in the background that voters cannot see.

Hillary Clinton should be embarrassed to keep purloining words and policies promoted by Bernie Sanders. She should be authentic enough to come up with her own material.

Sam

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
110. Isn't it Sanders who should be ashamed
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

by taking socialist ideas and then becoming a traitor to that cause , and then pretending he is some kind of "democratic socialist"?

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
118. Not at all -- he has declared himself as a Democratic Socialist for years
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:16 PM
Feb 2016

When he entered Congress, there was no classification of Democratic Socialists for him to join. He was classified as an Independent but caucused with the Dems forever. Sanders doesn't embrace the pure socialist label, which is why socialists in Vermont had to debate whether or not to support him.

He has been called a socialist in public by the MSM because they believe that word alone will repel many voters. To the contrary, when people are asked today if they support socialism, which is the basis for, for instance, social security, unemployment, Medicare and many other of our FDR programs, they say yes.

Sanders is that rare politician who tells people how things really are, no I see zero reason for him to be embarrassed about anything. As he has often explained it, a Democratic Socialist is basically one who embraces the Democratic party platform, but goes a step further to incorporate the government working for all of the people, instead of corporations and the super wealthy.

Sam

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
29. This will be like that Revolution* Brand Toothpaste
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

Makes your gums bleed.

Revolution means taking power from the billionaire class. Hillary is not it.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
33. Hillary's even trying to steal this?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:17 PM
Feb 2016

Jesus H Fucking Christ! Hillary is as status quo as one can possibly get. And her supporters eat it up like it's divine jizz.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
42. As first woman president? Nah.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:28 PM
Feb 2016

Argentina beat the US to that as well.

"In 1960 Sirivamo Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka became the world's first female elected Premier Minister and in 1974 Isabel Perón of Argentina became the first woman President - one woman had been Acting Head of Government and two women Acting Heads of State before that."

Looks like America is always behind the curve when it comes to being progressive. And centrist Hillary, though she may become our first woman president, will continue that status quo.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
36. since theres no higher turnout and hillary = more of the same...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:26 PM
Feb 2016

that's a pathetic looking revolution.

 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
39. Hillary winning with a 12% turnout, just like winning a baseball game because the other team
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:27 PM
Feb 2016

didn't bother to show up. Something a repub would be proud of. You have to be kidding with this nonsense op.

 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
54. Because theyve been knocked down for so long, and the low info, its not surpising at all. Most of
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

red states are like that. You cant even blame Bernie for the bullshit showing last night. If you want to hold onto that meme, then your are a big part of the problem

Impedimentus

(898 posts)
44. The Goldman Sachs Revolution !
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

One of the leaders would be Lloyd Blankfein. He would claim he's doing God's work.
 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
55. Oops. I'm sorry, but your OP is misleading.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:39 PM
Feb 2016
Low voter turnout for South Carolina's first-in-the-South Democratic primary
Turnout for the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday was expected to be much lighter than last week's GOP primary vote, when a record 740,000 people cast ballots.

Democratic party leaders expected about half that number for their primary.

However, according to the SC Election Commission, South Carolina had a record number of absentee ballots returned.

So far, 54,000 absentee ballots have been returned which is up from 35,000 returned in 2008.

Most polls showed Hillary Clinton had a big lead heading into the vote, but Vermont Senator
Bernie Sanders still has his passionate fans.


 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
59. BULLSHIT!
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:41 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton is NOT a revolutionary. She is an establishment corporatist.
Where you got the idea that she is a revolutionary, especially after she won one of the most CONservative states in the Union, is beyond me.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
71. No way are they progressive.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

Not if they want the status quo that Hillary shall yield.
They may have been mesmerized by her promises, which she has been forced to voice, but in no way do I believe that she intends to keep ANY of her promises to the middle class. This is how she has been in the past, it is how she is now, it is how she shall be in the future.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
81. No, I am saying that they have been duped
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

Like many of her supporters, they actually believe that she works for them, when her actions tell us otherwise.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
92. They go with who they are familiar with
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

Not who is correct. Clinton parrots everything that Bernie states, only two weeks later. Her past actions prove to me that she shall not make good on ANY of these promises.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
72. True. Bernie DID get some votes.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

It's just that progressives are pretty thin on the ground in SC...

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
61. Give us a break....12.2% of Democrats truned out to vote in SC
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:42 PM
Feb 2016

If there is a revolution lead by Hillary Clinton,it would be to end all banking regulations,no fines or punishment for those Too Big to fail banks that swindle consumers,give the military Industrial Complex more capacity to build up our War machine.

Subsidies to the Private Prison Complex

Removing restrictions on individual campaign donations....

Stronger Demands for Countries like Iran and Syria to conform to demands or else

That would be just a small part of Hillary's revolution.

OnlinePoker

(5,725 posts)
64. It's not a revolution if you're doing what you always do
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

Voting for the corporate stooge and expect things to get better for you. A revolution means actually trying something different for a real change.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
69. This is really amusing to me.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:46 PM
Feb 2016

You tout the results in South Carolina as a "revolution". A revolution of what?

All it tells me is that POC voters in South Carolina bought her "I care about you" schtick hook line and sinker. Name recognition and relentless pandering worked. All the results show is that 1) South Carolina is in no way progressive, and 2) it's a state that means absolutely nothing in the GE.

Go ahead and keep trying to frame it as you wish, if it makes you feel better.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
79. Voting for an Establishment
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:56 PM
Feb 2016

Well known, insider politician is a revolution—how?

Locking up more poor urban people that ever before—which criminalized poverty and it's victims—is a revolution for, oh, I know—the usual power brokers.

Must be a third way definition of the meaning of Revolution.


Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
82. Not exactly so, it was led by Bill Clinton, it is only being continued by Hillary. Why not jump
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:00 PM
Feb 2016

ship while there is a tiny chance because if Hillary is the nominee it will be the same as if you elect any Republican.

The money behind H.C. is the same money behind all the Republican candidates.

Response to riversedge (Original post)

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
84. hahahahah, privatizing social security, more prisons and wall street deregulation
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

isn't really very revolutionary. Clinton the revolutionary, oh my gawd




Politicub

(12,165 posts)
90. I love LOVE that the AA community is flexing its political muscle
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:12 PM
Feb 2016

When Obama got elected I don't believe I was alone in feeling so much pride in my country. It seemed like everything was possible in America again. I still feel that way - more than ever before.

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
94. Bernie Sanders was not even mentioned a year ago and now Hillary is bragging about beating him.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:18 PM
Feb 2016

The times are changing!

I am voting for BERNIE SANDERS !!!

Vinca

(50,303 posts)
99. "Also rans" do not create revolution. They are politicians first and foremost.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:27 PM
Feb 2016

Any "revolution" on Hillary's part has been created by adopting Bernie's talking points.

 

SciDude

(79 posts)
101. Her only revolution is to add even more wealth to the 0.01% oligarchs
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:34 PM
Feb 2016

and if that is considered a revolution I suppose she is revolutionary.

Of course it won't matter because she probably won't beat Trump with her abysmal negative trust numbers.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
106. Make history? Yes. Revolution? Please convince me.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:37 PM
Feb 2016

I've yet to hear anything real game changing from her campaign. All the Republicans want to roll back Obama's incremental changes. ... Hillary seems to me to want to continue incremental change.... not have a stated goal and then work towards that.

So, please sell me on Hillary so I can determine whether or not she is revolutionary. Evolutionary would be the best word I can use to describe her policies.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
109. You are embarrassing yourself with this ridiculous statement.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

Grab a cup of caffeine to clear your head before you start posting. Things that sound clever in the first five seconds, often don't stand up to logic and the test of even a little time. Maintaining the status quo, promoting fascism and an oligarchy, and a 12% turnout does not a Revolution make.

jpb33

(141 posts)
111. Yeah, a revolution for the status quo!
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:47 PM
Feb 2016

Yeah, a revolution for the status quo! Not even tiny, itty bitty, small incremental steps, but the status quo. That incremental step nonsense was nothing but a campaign tactic to counter Bernie's great vision. Hillary is for and only for the status quo. Unless, it is foreign policy and the drug war where she will double down and get America more involved in foreign wars and aggression.

Once (if) she is elected she will quickly revert to supporting and passing trade deals and placing her Wall Street cronies to her cabinet.

And the Hillary sycophants will still make excuses for her. I will not vote for Hillary in the Fall and it will be the Hillary faction of the party that will be at fault when Donald is elected president because they backed a corrupt candidate.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
113. An oxymoron
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

A status quo revolution.

It is like of saying change you can believe in, when putting a new diaper on your baby.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
114. All you Clinton rationalizers should realize that those numbers will never win you the GE.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

I'm one of those who think PoC are voting drastically against their own best interests. What makes me think this? So many things Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have done and said.

I am not interested in telling anyone how to vote. Everyone needs to make their own choice. However, the snide derision that we get when trying to point out essential facts in the biographies of Bill and Hillary Clinton is just astounding.

Laughing over things like that, including the likely watering down of basic Social Services like Medicare, Social Security and who knows what else, all because 'we just simply have to do it - face facts" - the thought of that is simply intolerable and likely to wipe the smile off the faces of just about everybody here.

Also, whether there is a "revolution" of Black votes for Hillary or not, that will not be enough to make up for the rest of the lack of enthusiasm and lack of sponsorship from other groups.

It's a sad day when the Democratic Party once again puts forth such a weakened, unProgressive candidate, and I feel sure that whether Bernie can or will win or not, someday soon we are going to do better. The numbers of people who adamantly support him, across the entire political spectrum, lead me to that conclusion.

Thank God! I just wish it could be now.

SCantiGOP

(13,873 posts)
124. I would have taken 10-1 odds
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:37 AM
Feb 2016

that this would not have happened. Unless you were here in SC you can't realize the enthusiasm and support for the Clinton campaign. If all of your info comes from the postings on DU you are getting a very biased depiction of reality.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is a revolution hap...