2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat kind of message would it send about Democrats to America if Hillary wins the nomination?
seaotter
(576 posts)ethics. It would send the message that privilege and dynasties are to be embraced, it would send the message that we are a brain dead electorate.
A brain dead electorate.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)It says we don't care about anything but winning. No soul.
earthside
(6,960 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)-Bircher party.
The question is where the Democrats of "yore" have gone to...
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Meh, meh,meh
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Response to BreakfastClub (Reply #5)
highprincipleswork This message was self-deleted by its author.
dynamo99
(48 posts)But that's not the only criterion. Not Maggie Thatcher.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)
Post removed
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)We want to build and expand off of it and believe Clinton is the best person to achieve that goal.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Though I'm sure some agree with the general sentiment.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Clinton to Sanders. That could be due to many different reasons. Some based on policy, some based on name recognition, some based on electability concerns, some based on gender, probably some based on an anti-Semitic bias, some based on the Clinton history in the party, some perhaps on not wanting a guy who has called the party ideologically bankrupt to lead the party, some based on Sanders relying on unreliable voters and not being able to make significant gains with minority groups or women (outside of younger voters).
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,010 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Exactly the message the oligarchs want to send.
Politicians? Democrats, Republicans... There all crooks. I don't waste my time with politics.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)And it sends a message that we already knew. They can talk a good game, the base doesn't matter. Nominating someone who has the high unfavorability and was generally considered dishonest by voters would normally be universally chastised. Not this time.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)But get used to this. Just had my first hide in ages for making fun of Bill Clinton's notorious philandering in a thread about his clearly illegal shenanigans yesterday. Thin skinned, that lot...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And for something utterly innocuous, which is hilarious, given how aggressive I've been in my posting of late.
I expect to be purged from this site if/when Hillary wins the nomination, as will a whole bunch of progressives. There won't even be a pretense of inclusion at that point. Might as well have some fun.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)inside their asses? Yup, that's about how this is beginning to feel!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)look in the mirror.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)than for Bernie Sanders And that we picked an experienced, qualified candidate.
A way more fun thread would be about what message Trump sends about the GOP.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And that we don't give a damn about the young or about stopping war.
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Might be time for you to go.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)The fact that President Obama and HRC have made their peace and supported one another, ever since doesn't matter.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Or left her out to dry on Libya.
You might be interested in checking out all the "team of Rivals" stuff that was going around when he offered her the gig along with jobs for several republicans .
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)oh, and the whole batch of "clean up her mess" stories that got floated out then too.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)and she was Sec of State.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)And from up here, they all look like ants.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Chayevsky was prescient.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Or, we like to be tied up and spanked.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,010 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)They'd see the corruption and scoff at the party from now on.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Who isn't afraid to make a call on the "kill shot"....
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)familiar.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)about the corruption that is in control of our country.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)Apparently it'll be around for the next two weeks.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)Let's get Judicial Watch involved. They'll certainly get to the bottom of these Clinton shenanigans, just like they did so well in the 90's.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)supports republicans over democrats in state races. THe Democratic minority leader calls for a republican to replace a republican on SCOTUS. The Democratic President put Social Security on the chopping block as a sacrificial offering to Republicans and gives us the Republican plan for Health insurance reform rather than single payer and then gives us TPP and the end of US sovereignty, the economy and the American Middle class. Etc, etc, etc.
The message of Hillary would be: Status Quo, Business as usual, no change. The completion of a 40 year march to Fascist Oligarchy.
The message would be We The People loose. And that the New Democratic Party has made the final turn and morphed into the Old Republican Party. And the Democratic Party that saved the Nation in the New Deal and brought Civil Rights and so much more for the People...The Democratic Party that did these things no longer exists.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)That's a very good message.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary's resume.
- Graduate of Yale Law School, where she was one of just 27 women in her graduating class.
- Young lawyer for the Childrens Defense Fund where she worked to help enact legislation to help children with disabilities in Massachusetts.
- Lawyer for the Congressional Committee investigating President Nixon.
- First Lady of Arkansas where she worked to improve educational standards and health care access for the people of Arkansas.
- First Lady of United States where she worked to reform our health care system and helped create the Children's Health Insurance Program. Here is where she learned what Republicans are capable of doing when faced with a strong intelligent aggressive woman.
- U.S. Senator for New York, probably the most diverse, complex and important state in the country.. economically, financially, politically, and diplomatically. While Senator she worked to secure funding to rebuild New York after 9/11 and fought to provide health care for first responders who were contaminated at Ground Zero. Also helped to expanded TRICARE so that members of the Reserves and National Guard and their families could get better access to health care.
- Ran for President in 2008 where she learned the hard way what it takes to win.
- Served as Secretary of State for 4 years. She was instrumental in starting to restore Americas standing in the world. She helped build a coalition for tough new sanctions against Iran that brought them to the negotiating table and brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that ended a war. She also was a forceful champion for human rights, internet freedom, and rights and opportunities for women and girls, LGBT people and young people all around the globe.
amborin
(16,631 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)bombs and welfare reform.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/15/the_worst_thing_hillary_clinton_has_ever_done/
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/7/24/childrens_defense_funds_marian_wright_edelman
".... AMY GOODMAN: Marian Wright Edelman, we just heard Hillary Rodham Clinton. She used to be the head of the board of the Childrens Defense Fund, of the organization that you founded. But you were extremely critical of the Clintons. I mean, when President Clinton signed off on the, well, so-called welfare reform bill, you said, "His signature on this pernicious bill makes a mockery of his pledge not to hurt children." So what are your hopes right now for these Democrats? And what are your thoughts about Hillary Rodham Clinton?
MARIAN WRIGHT EDELMAN: Well, you know, Hillary Clinton is an old friend, but they are not friends in politics. We have to build a constituency, and you dont and we profoundly disagreed with the forms of the welfare reform bill, and we said so. We were for welfare reform, I am for welfare reform, but we need good jobs, we need adequate work incentives, we need minimum wage to be decent wage and livable wage, we need healthcare, we need transportation, we need to invest preventively in all of our children to prevent them ever having to be on welfare.
And yet, you know, many years after that, when many people are pronouncing welfare reform a great success, you know, weve got growing child poverty, we have more children in poverty and in extreme poverty over the last six years than we had earlier in the year. When an economy is down, and the real test of welfare reform is what happens to the poor when the economy is not booming. Well, the poor are suffering, the gap between rich and poor widening. We have what I consider one of a growing national catastrophe of what we call the cradle-to-prison pipeline. A black boy today has a one-in-three chance of going to prison in his lifetime, a black girl a one-in-seventeen chance. A Latino boy whos born in 2001 has a one-in-six chance of going to prison. We are seeing more and more children go into our child welfare systems, go dropping out of school, going into juvenile justice detention facilities. Many children are sitting up 15,000, according to a recent congressional GAO study are sitting up in juvenile institutions solely because their parents could not get mental health and healthcare in their community. This is an abomination...."
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)make an omelet.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)if they dare think they can fill the shoes of men, but that Americans have finally progressed enough that theyll vote for a woman for President?
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)It's what we expect former first families to do.