2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC has essentially been running for president since 1992.
Bernie had never even considered running until probably at least 2014. His campaign was in many respects a last-minute effort.
Any shortcomings in relationship-building anywhere are simply a result of that timetable.
The Sanders campaign never worked from the assumption that we didn't NEED POC. Nobody running for president on the Democratic ticket would think that.
It's just that this campaign got a very late start, and essentially HAD to come into existence because, once Warren ruled herself out, we were looking at a race in which no progressive candidates were going to seek the Democratic presidential nomination at all. We were looking at a primary campaign that would have been utterly meaningless, in which nothing would have been said and no commitments to any meaningful program of change would have been offered.
As a result, when it started, Bernie didn't have national relationships built with any group or any community.
So can we please put to rest this bogus idea that the Sanders campaign didn't care about POC and somehow intentionally excluded POC?
Any shortcomings on that were nothing but inadvertent oversights...all of which the campaign has worked tirelessly to correct from day one.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)...which he repeated over and over and over.
But he didn't have the time to develop a racial justice message...until BLM called him out?
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)size of her entourage back then, I believed she had every intention in that regard.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...and pave the way, she would follow. She really does believe it is her turn!
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)...she had her "Tara" moment and vowed to come back fightin'... and wearin' curtains...
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)..."just doing God's work"
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Bernie was unprepared. He had no allies, no down ballot democratic socialists, no relationships with the base. I admire Bernie but it takes more than just changing from socialist to democratic socialist to garner the kind of numbers he needs. Hopefully he will continue his quest. He is a good man.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)That gave him one "relationship with the base."
Ideally, he'd have done more national outreach before announcing his presidential candidacy.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)>>>So can we please put to rest this bogus idea that the Sanders campaign didn't care about POC and somehow intentionally excluded POC? >>>
msongs
(67,406 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Is not a revolution. He has no significant national allies - no down ballot democratic socialists. I like Bernie and I admire him in many ways. If Bernie had spent years building toward this it might have worked. If he somehow won his term would be plagued by the same things that have plagued his campaign. Kind of spur of the moment. It will be interesting to see if he continues his quest if he doesn't win the nomination. Hopefully he will.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)We will see to it.
He has national relationships now. And by virtue of his honesty and integrity are growing stronger everyday.
It would take two years of this before he could match the Clinton's national reach.
The campaign is ;plagued' only by lack of understanding and knowledge of who Bernie is. That is changing daily.
Were he given a level playing field and not beat down by the press and the establishment, Clinton would be retiring right about now.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)Because she is gregarious and was ever increasing her range and activity.
Bernie has been camped out in Vermont.
That's fine, but if you haven't ventured out of Vermont for 30 years or so, you probably wouldn't have met as many people as someone who thinks and acts outward.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Don't kid yourself.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)had he never met Hillary Rodham?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:53 AM - Edit history (2)
...not to mention many, many $250,000 checks.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Accusing a female Democratic candidate of being witch ("covens" is over-the-top and inappropriate.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:33 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I was going to hide it but after thinking of other names or terms being thrown around, like BernieBros etc I opted to leave it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "coven" is not a hideable term
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: ...really? FFS.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Definition of coven can mean 'a secret or close-knit group of associates'. Furthermore, there were male witches.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Raster
(20,998 posts)my post stands as-is.
but, thank you.
Hatchling
(2,323 posts)I would have complained that you malign those of us in covens and who are pagans and witches.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...and I see nothing wrong with my usage, which implies NOTHING OF RELIGION OR FAITH:
cov·en
ˈkəvən/Submit
noun
a group or gathering of witches who meet regularly. (NOT THIS DEFINITION)
-derogatory
a secret or close-knit group of associates. (THIS DEFINITION)
"covens of militants within the party"