Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:33 PM Oct 2012

Obama 51-46 in Ohio (PPP) leads 76-24 with 19% early voters!!!!

per their tweet--Good news. Previous poll in late September had Obama up by 4--so improvement. The state also picks Biden over Ryan in the debate--46-37 including a 12-point margin among Indies.

http://twitter.com/ppppolls

PublicPolicyPolling ‏@ppppolls
Ohio voters on who do you trust more on the issue of Libya: Obama 51, Romney 43

Expand Collapse Reply RetweetedRetweet
Delete
FavoritedFavorite
2m PublicPolicyPolling ‏@ppppolls
One of the reasons Ohio's particularly tough for Romney- looking back voters support the auto bailout 54/37

Expand Collapse Reply RetweetedRetweet
Delete
FavoritedFavorite
3m PublicPolicyPolling ‏@ppppolls
Ohio voters think Biden won the debate Thursday night 46-37, including 44-32 with independents

Expand Collapse Reply RetweetedRetweet
Delete
FavoritedFavorite
4m PublicPolicyPolling ‏@ppppolls
19% of Ohioans say they've already voted and Obama has a 76-24 advantage with them. Romney up 51-45 with folks who haven't voted yet

Expand Collapse Reply RetweetedRetweet
Delete
FavoritedFavorite
5m PublicPolicyPolling ‏@ppppolls
Barack Obama leads our new Ohio poll 51-46, not much different from 2 weeks ago when it was 49-45

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama 51-46 in Ohio (PPP) leads 76-24 with 19% early voters!!!! (Original Post) WI_DEM Oct 2012 OP
Very good news. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #1
Boom goes the dynamite. RedSpartan Oct 2012 #2
Ohio is a Obama firewall WI_DEM Oct 2012 #6
Am I wrong with this? RedSpartan Oct 2012 #21
good observation. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #28
If the dice roll exactly as the poll is showing then your math would be correct. titaniumsalute Oct 2012 #32
yes if the numbers hold. I think they will. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #58
I haven't voted yet (Ohio) CitizenLeft Oct 2012 #106
The key factor are the following: LiberalFighter Oct 2012 #108
Woot!! octoberlib Oct 2012 #3
i knew Ohio MFM008 Oct 2012 #4
fabulous! amborin Oct 2012 #5
But does this mean Romney appears to be leading in Ohio NOW? TroyD Oct 2012 #7
Obama's crushing him in the early vote Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #11
yes, if you read the tweets at the link WI_DEM Oct 2012 #12
My goodness! fugop Oct 2012 #13
Malarkey! TroyD Oct 2012 #16
Good question. Baitball Blogger Oct 2012 #15
2 out of 10 Ohio voters have voted and overwhelmingly for Obama WI_DEM Oct 2012 #19
'would probably mean that a majority of those who haven't voted may support Romney' TroyD Oct 2012 #39
Troy, the ANSWER is in the final numbers from PPP! Romney would have to win more than 56% writes3000 Oct 2012 #17
Thanks for the info TroyD Oct 2012 #35
Do we know if the 19% means likely or eligible voters? Applan Oct 2012 #45
It's probably somewhere in between Likely Voters percentages and Registered voters, right? writes3000 Oct 2012 #60
Since they already voted I imagine they are counted as likely voters. LisaL Oct 2012 #65
51-46 NOW treestar Oct 2012 #80
Oh shit Doctor Jack Oct 2012 #8
Good. Better than I expected. Blaukraut Oct 2012 #9
sweet news!! mgcgulfcoast Oct 2012 #10
you're welcome, and yes, very welcome news. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #14
Best polling news since... that poll with Obama leading Arizona! tarheelsunc Oct 2012 #18
I see Nate thinks that is an 'outliar' but I'm not so sure. Latinos are voting 77-10 for Obama in WI_DEM Oct 2012 #22
Nate...Nate...Nate... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #91
Thanks goodness teabaggersarestupid Oct 2012 #20
And this poll is an improvement for Obama since their last poll in late September WI_DEM Oct 2012 #24
Wonderful News! trayfoot Oct 2012 #23
Obama has never been Behind in Ohio has he ? JI7 Oct 2012 #25
Well teabaggersarestupid Oct 2012 #29
Yes, at least for this year, I believe, it has been a firewall state for him WI_DEM Oct 2012 #30
i think your righ MFM008 Oct 2012 #31
Here is the full breakdown of OH (excluding current PPP poll) teabaggersarestupid Oct 2012 #33
thanks, not surprisingly 'We Ask America', 'ARG' & 'Gravis' are the only ones for Romney WI_DEM Oct 2012 #37
Exactly teabaggersarestupid Oct 2012 #43
I agree if we get an 'on' President Obama it is possible that the campaign could WI_DEM Oct 2012 #46
And don't forget that Gravis was outed as a fraud by our own Grantcart Snarkoleptic Oct 2012 #93
Why is that I'm always wary of any polling organization....... Applan Oct 2012 #51
Auto Bailout Factor: TroyD Oct 2012 #26
Also I notice in the poll maryellen99 Oct 2012 #27
Note, too, that this PPP Ohio sample was +4 democratic compared to +8 Dem in '08 exit polls. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #34
Excellent! FBaggins Oct 2012 #36
The BOSS and First Lady in Cleveland on Monday Tribetime Oct 2012 #38
Very good, and then the President on Wednesday. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #40
Oh, and this time really: Fuck Nate Silver Blaukraut Oct 2012 #41
I'm not sure teabaggersarestupid Oct 2012 #47
Actually, I think that's a positive tweet from Nate writes3000 Oct 2012 #48
Ok, good point. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #50
His second tweet says he hasn't made up his mind about that yet. My point is... Blaukraut Oct 2012 #52
I don't get that sense at all. He's saying his numbers suggest Dem enthusiasm... writes3000 Oct 2012 #56
your right! MFM008 Oct 2012 #61
I've been questioning the LV models - see this from Florida Mutiny In Heaven Oct 2012 #62
I don't know why he is trying to pooh-pooh early voting polls, did he do that in 2008? WI_DEM Oct 2012 #49
writing for the NYT MFM008 Oct 2012 #53
I don't think it would be fair to question his doubts. FBaggins Oct 2012 #69
So Obama can still win OHIO by 5-6 points? TroyD Oct 2012 #42
If he could maintain his current level of support he would win by a much larger margine. LisaL Oct 2012 #66
Interesting result from PPP on the VP DEBATE: TroyD Oct 2012 #44
yes, I saw that. Very good. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #55
Biden is the man BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #68
Let Biden bounce begin! LisaL Oct 2012 #71
That'll cue Gravis Marketing to parachute in with their own poll so they can fuck with the averages bluestateguy Oct 2012 #54
I wouldn't doubt that! WI_DEM Oct 2012 #59
THIS JUST IN!!! regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #70
LOL! WI_DEM Oct 2012 #72
And, just so people don't misunderstand the "sarcasm" tag... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #73
Oh, geektragedy!!! You were sharing PPP's early warning everywhere.. writes3000 Oct 2012 #57
hehe n/t Blaukraut Oct 2012 #63
I wonder where Geek is? WI_DEM Oct 2012 #83
That's a huge lead with early voters! LisaL Oct 2012 #64
This is tragic for geek tragedy Cali_Democrat Oct 2012 #67
lol hrmjustin Oct 2012 #81
RCP has added the PPP poll to their OHIO average: TroyD Oct 2012 #74
Hey! I think we may be missing good news in here. FBaggins Oct 2012 #75
You might be right Blaukraut Oct 2012 #82
NBC/NYT/Marist showed practically the same findings. Jennicut Oct 2012 #102
for those who would like to read the results from PPP web site, they are now posted: WI_DEM Oct 2012 #76
It's great to read the whole thing. Thanks, WI_DEM! writes3000 Oct 2012 #85
you're welcome. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #105
This implies the Obama campaign's work in Ohio is paying off. Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #90
I think it definitely is WI_DEM Oct 2012 #94
PPP also shows Sherrod Brown +7 TroyD Oct 2012 #77
Thank you Mr. Biden. Finally a day where I haven't bitten my nails. Democratopia Oct 2012 #78
Yay! Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #79
This IS AN NATIONAL POLL! aaaaaa5a Oct 2012 #84
I, too, have felt that whoever wins Ohio wins the presidency. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #92
For our Republican friends questioning the poll. aaaaaa5a Oct 2012 #86
Repubs Are Not Motivated To Vote For Romney, Look At The Early Vote Numbers Skraxx Oct 2012 #87
Thank you.. dgraz007 Oct 2012 #88
excellent, we all need to stay positive. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #89
Okay, I can sleep this weekend. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #95
Downticket. Downticket. Downticket. onehandle Oct 2012 #96
Yes indeed. WI_DEM Oct 2012 #109
This is good news!!!! skeewee08 Oct 2012 #97
That's what I'm talking about!!! Ohio baby! budkin Oct 2012 #98
If Obama has 75% of those who voted early, and... demwing Oct 2012 #99
Just quick donated another $10. We must win! The alternative is terrifying. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2012 #100
tell that to the assholes at Reuters, who just put a story on Yahoo that ROmney is TIED with Obama progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #101
typical of the MSM WI_DEM Oct 2012 #103
The early voting numbers are great.. DCBob Oct 2012 #104
I agree WI_DEM Oct 2012 #107

RedSpartan

(1,693 posts)
21. Am I wrong with this?
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:51 PM
Oct 2012

(posted on another thread as well...)

Here's how I view it, and please, someone correct me if I'm totally off.

Let's pretend there are 100 votes in Ohio.

19%, or 19 votes, have been cast, and Obama leads with them 76%-24%. So Obama has 14.44 votes and Romney has 4.56 votes.

81%, or 81 votes, have yet to be cast, and Romney leads with them 51%-45%. So Romney will have 41.31 votes and Obama will have 36.45 votes.

Add them up, and Obama has 50.89 votes and Romney has 45.87 votes -- essentially the same 51%-46% that PPP is reporting in total.

So unless I am mistaken (and I admit I likely am), it seems to me that if these numbers hold, Ohio is very, very, unlikely to go for Romney unless he can get the 81% of people who have not voted yet to go for him by closer to a 56%+ level. I can't see that happening.

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
32. If the dice roll exactly as the poll is showing then your math would be correct.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:58 PM
Oct 2012

You are not mistaken. You paid good attention during your math classes. LOL.

I also wonder about people who have yet to vote. Will they be middle aged-white people who may just say fuck it on election day and not bother?

I used to vote (and live of course) in Ohio. I always did early voting when I could.

CitizenLeft

(2,791 posts)
106. I haven't voted yet (Ohio)
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 10:31 AM
Oct 2012

I will either this week or the next, depending on when I can get off of work early enough.

No one in my dept - which will go for Obama 15 to Romney's 3 - has voted yet.

So even though those numbers are high, they will get higher. At least 4 others will vote early this week.

I know that's only anecdotal - hopefully your numbers hold.

LiberalFighter

(50,928 posts)
108. The key factor are the following:
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 03:14 PM
Oct 2012

Voters that might decide not to vote on election day.
Voters because of a unforeseen incident preventing them from voting on election day.
Voters that might decide to leave before voting because the line is too long.

An unlikely scenario of a voter changing their mind after casting their ballot via early voting. Personally, I don't think this happens much if at all.

Those votes likely lock in more votes than normally would be cast if only allowing for election day voting. So that 19% might be a higher percentage.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
4. i knew Ohio
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:36 PM
Oct 2012

wouldnt let us down, O's gone up a point. If he does good in debate tuesday we all might make it through October semi-sane.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
7. But does this mean Romney appears to be leading in Ohio NOW?
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:40 PM
Oct 2012

Obama leads by a large margin with those already voted, which is good, but we have to get Romney's current Ohio numbers down, or he could end up catching up.

Am I reading that right?

Alekei_Firebird

(320 posts)
11. Obama's crushing him in the early vote
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:43 PM
Oct 2012

Which means that a lot of the Obama voters have already voted. I don't think Romney can make up such a huge deficit by only winning +5% of the remaining voters. If things hold still, Obama should carry Ohio.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
12. yes, if you read the tweets at the link
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:43 PM
Oct 2012

it does say that among those who haven't voted Romney is ahead. But what can you expect with 20% of voters already voting and Obama up by over 50-points among them? Now we need to keep banking our voters and converting some Romney voters.

fugop

(1,828 posts)
13. My goodness!
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:44 PM
Oct 2012

You really like to bring down a happy thread, don't you! Always finding the bad news in the good news.

Oh well. What can you do?

I'm enjoying these numbers, and today's been a good day for bringing up our spirits on DU. Certainly mine are up, anyway.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
16. Malarkey!
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:47 PM
Oct 2012

That's not what I'm doing. I'm the one who posted news about the PPP poll coming out with improved Saturday numbers. I simply asked the mathematical question that they are no doubt asking at Obama OHIO Headquarters! How do we find out whether there is a possibility mathematically of Romney catching up to Obama? Does Obama have enough votes banked in OHIO already, or does he need to bring down Romney's numbers?

I'm sure the Obama Campaign will make this Priority #1 this week.

Baitball Blogger

(46,709 posts)
15. Good question.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:44 PM
Oct 2012

Or, we may be back to the same problem in Arizona and the polls are not getting a good representation of the latino vote.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
19. 2 out of 10 Ohio voters have voted and overwhelmingly for Obama
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:49 PM
Oct 2012

so that would probably mean that a majority of those who haven't voted may support Romney. We need to keep banking our supporters including those who are not considered 'likely voters' and in the next three weeks with solid debates convert a few Romney supporters.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
39. 'would probably mean that a majority of those who haven't voted may support Romney'
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:01 PM
Oct 2012

Good point. I hadn't thought of that at first.

I was just concerned as to why Romney had a 5 point lead with current voters. But as you say, if it's the case that some of the Obama voters have already been removed from the remaining pool because they have already voted, that may explain it.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
17. Troy, the ANSWER is in the final numbers from PPP! Romney would have to win more than 56%
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:48 PM
Oct 2012

Of the remaining vote to win.

If things stay exactly the same, we win Ohio hands down! Romney won't win all undecideds. And even if he does, he still only gets 49%.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
35. Thanks for the info
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

I think the Obama Campaign, Nate Silver, and everyone else will be trying to crunch these numbers to determine the mathematical formula for Election Day that each side will need.

Applan

(693 posts)
45. Do we know if the 19% means likely or eligible voters?
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:08 PM
Oct 2012

If the 19% represents likely voters then Willard will need to carry the remainder of the votes at 56% to 44%

But if the 19% represents all eligible Ohio voters, and they get a 60% turnout as in 2008, then Romney would need to carry over 62% of the remaining votes.

Either way it's not looking too good for the rich git is it?

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
9. Good. Better than I expected.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:41 PM
Oct 2012

As long as Romney's advantage with people who haven't voted yet doesn't exceed the margin it is now, Obama has Ohio in the bag, and Romney has to do some serious acrobatic moves to get to 270.

tarheelsunc

(2,117 posts)
18. Best polling news since... that poll with Obama leading Arizona!
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:48 PM
Oct 2012

Hopefully this good day should calm things down around here. This is excellent news!

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
22. I see Nate thinks that is an 'outliar' but I'm not so sure. Latinos are voting 77-10 for Obama in
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:51 PM
Oct 2012

Arizona. Obama took Latinos in AZ by only 15-points in 2008. If they vote in good margins, Obama can win.

 
20. Thanks goodness
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:49 PM
Oct 2012

FINALLY some good news in the polls today. First the AZ poll w/ Obama up by 2. Then Nate Silver tweeting that Hispanics may be undersampled in more realistic states like CO, NV, and FL. Capped by this HUGE poll.

Still way too close for comfort but this is the first decent polling day for Obama since the debate.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
24. And this poll is an improvement for Obama since their last poll in late September
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:53 PM
Oct 2012

which was a time period when the president was riding very high. Good news with that, too.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
25. Obama has never been Behind in Ohio has he ?
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:54 PM
Oct 2012

even when Romney got that bounce and various polls had Romney leading in different places, nationally etc.

in Ohio Obama still always held the lead ?

 
29. Well
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:56 PM
Oct 2012

Romney has had 2 leads of 1 point I believe (after debate). But I know one or both polls were bull shit right leaning polls. One was gravis marketing which has been as right as any polling firm (more so than Rasmussen even).

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
31. i think your righ
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:57 PM
Oct 2012

i do not recall R/R ever being ahead. These good numbers today will have the MSM quite down.

 
33. Here is the full breakdown of OH (excluding current PPP poll)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:58 PM
Oct 2012

Rasmussen Reports

10/10 - 10/10

750 LV

4.0

48

47

Obama +1



NBC/WSJ/Marist

10/7 - 10/9

994 LV

3.1

51

45

Obama +6



Gravis Marketing

10/6 - 10/10

1313 LV

2.7

45

46

Romney +1



SurveyUSA

10/5 - 10/8

808 LV

3.5

45

44

Obama +1



CNN/Opinion Research

10/5 - 10/8

722 LV

3.5

51

47

Obama +4



ARG

10/5 - 10/8

600 LV

4.0

47

48

Romney +1



WeAskAmerica

10/4 - 10/4

1200 LV

3.0

46

47

Romney +1

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
37. thanks, not surprisingly 'We Ask America', 'ARG' & 'Gravis' are the only ones for Romney
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

and by the closest margin as well +1 each.

 
43. Exactly
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:06 PM
Oct 2012

And what I really like about the PPP tweet is that they said Saturday was a much better day for Obama than Friday night. Perhaps (please please please) the Romney bump will FINALLY recede and/or there is a bump from Biden.

Still need Obama to kick ass on Tuesday though.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
46. I agree if we get an 'on' President Obama it is possible that the campaign could
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:08 PM
Oct 2012

get back to where it was prior to the first debate. Some voters may just want reassurance from the president.

Applan

(693 posts)
51. Why is that I'm always wary of any polling organization.......
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:11 PM
Oct 2012

Why is that I'm always wary of any polling organization that has "America" or "American in their name?

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
26. Auto Bailout Factor:
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 07:54 PM
Oct 2012
One of the reasons Ohio's particularly tough for Romney- looking back voters support the auto bailout 54/37


https://twitter.com/ppppolls

Tribetime

(4,696 posts)
38. The BOSS and First Lady in Cleveland on Monday
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

It's good to see Springsteen back in Ohio. Let's keep hammering away and make sure they can't win here.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
41. Oh, and this time really: Fuck Nate Silver
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:03 PM
Oct 2012

He tweets: Having trouble reconciling polls claiming Obama doing well among early voters against those showing a huge likely voter gap.

and to "soften" the first tweet: Do not (yet) have an opinion on whether that should call the early voter or likely voter polls into question. But seems inconsistent.

Way to piss into everyone's cornflakes, Nate. Stick to number crunching and poll aggregates. He wasn't that fast on the trigger when it came to questioning Gravis and ARG.


 
47. I'm not sure
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:10 PM
Oct 2012

why you are so angry. He's not necessarily saying PPP is wrong. He's at least considering the possibility of the pro-Romney polls as being due to overexaggerating the enthusiasm gap. This would be good for Obama.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
48. Actually, I think that's a positive tweet from Nate
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:10 PM
Oct 2012

He's questioning the validity of all those who claim Dem enthusiasm is down.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
52. His second tweet says he hasn't made up his mind about that yet. My point is...
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:14 PM
Oct 2012

He should stick to crunching the numbers and delivering his results. It's almost as though he's upset at this poll upending his horse race narrative.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
56. I don't get that sense at all. He's saying his numbers suggest Dem enthusiasm...
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:18 PM
Oct 2012

Sure, it could be possible that these early numbers are a flash in the pan and Dem enthusiasm is shallow. But Dems seem to be flocking to early voting across the country where it's available.

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
69. I don't think it would be fair to question his doubts.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:45 PM
Oct 2012

The numbers looked a little funny to me too. Let me give you the most obvious example.

From what I've been able to find, the most recent official count of early votes cast in Ohio is 175,000... which is roughly 3% of the 2008 turnout (itself pretty high at a bit under 6mil). (The real number is higher as not all counties have comprehensive counts)... AND it's reasonable to think that someone who mailed in an absentee ballot yesterday would answer that she had already voted.

Then add that 29% voted early in 2008 with a large percentage of them voting in the last few days.

So I'm forced to ask myself... how likely is it that a random sampling would end up with 19% saying that they had already voted?

Obviously... I don't know the answer. I doubt anyone does (not enough history to go by). So Silver is reasonable to at least raise the question.

Remember that we got pretty excited by the reports of early voting successes in 2010... and out extrapolations turned out to be way off. It's possible that our party is just much more likely to vote early (though I can't imagine why that would be).

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
66. If he could maintain his current level of support he would win by a much larger margine.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:36 PM
Oct 2012

Early voters are heavily in his favor.
Of course no one expects he could win by that much.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
44. Interesting result from PPP on the VP DEBATE:
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:06 PM
Oct 2012
Ohio voters think Biden won the debate Thursday night 46-37, including 44-32 with independents


http://twitter.com/ppppolls

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
54. That'll cue Gravis Marketing to parachute in with their own poll so they can fuck with the averages
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:17 PM
Oct 2012

Just watch.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
70. THIS JUST IN!!!
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:46 PM
Oct 2012

We Ask America 10/12-10/13

1067 LV

Romney (R) 54%
Obama (D) 44%

Who won the vice-presidential debate?
Ryan (R) 51%
Biden (D) 23%
Neither 24%

Already voted?
Yes 46%
No 54%

Those voting early:
Romney (R) 63%
Obama (D) 35%

cc: Nate Silver




regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
73. And, just so people don't misunderstand the "sarcasm" tag...
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:48 PM
Oct 2012

...there is no such poll. But I wouldn't be surprised to see WeAskAmericARGravismussen conveniently generate one soon.



TroyD

(4,551 posts)
74. RCP has added the PPP poll to their OHIO average:
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:51 PM
Oct 2012

That makes the Ohio Graph begin to tick up:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/oh/ohio_romney_vs_obama-1860.html

And if it weren't for the 3 red polls in the OHIO average (Gravis, ARG & WeAskAmerica), Obama would be higher.

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
75. Hey! I think we may be missing good news in here.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:51 PM
Oct 2012

If they tweeted that their first day's polling showed the race "very close"... might we assume that this means a gap of 0-2 points?

Maybe the second day of polling (pulling that up to the 5% level) reflects our first real evidence of any VP debate bounce?

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
82. You might be right
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:00 PM
Oct 2012

Wasn't there another poll a couple of days ago that had the early vote comparable to the PPP early vote, but the remainder breaking much harder for Romney than the PPP? As it is, I try to ignore the early vote margin and concentrate on the bottom line. 51 to 46 for Obama. I'll take it.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
102. NBC/NYT/Marist showed practically the same findings.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:45 PM
Oct 2012

Plus 6 for Obama and him leading in the early voting.

CNN had Obama by 4 after the Presidential Debate as well.

PPP validates these polls.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
76. for those who would like to read the results from PPP web site, they are now posted:
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:52 PM
Oct 2012

PPP's newest Ohio poll finds Barack Obama leading 51-46, a 5 point lead not too different from our last poll two weeks ago when he led 49-45.

The key finding on this poll may be how the early voters are breaking out. 19% of people say they've already cast their ballots and they report having voted for Obama by a 76-24 margin. Romney has a 51-45 advantage with those who haven't voted yet, but the numbers make it clear that he already has a lot of ground to make up in the final three weeks before the election.

We've found a major improvement in Mitt Romney's image in most of the states that we've polled since the Presidential debate, but Ohio is an exception. His favorability now is a 45/51 spread, showing no improvement from his 45/49 breakdown two weeks ago. Obama meanwhile has seen a small spike in his approval rating, from 48/49 to 50/48.

The Vice Presidential debate may have given Obama at least a small boost as well. 46% of Ohio voters think Joe Biden won it to 37% who believe Paul Ryan was the victor. Biden's advantage is 44/32 with independents. 62% of both Democrats and Republicans say they're 'very excited' to vote this fall, reversing a trend we saw in some post-Presidential debate polling of GOP voters expressing more enthusiasm about the election this year.

One thing clear from our poll: Republican efforts to make a big deal out of Libya aren't succeeding. By a 51/43 margin, voters trust Obama more than Romney on dealing with that issue. Obama also has a 51/46 advantage on dealing with the economy that mirrors his overall lead.

One reason Romney might be struggling to get traction in Ohio even as he surges elsewhere is his record on the auto bailout. Voters in the state support it by a 54/37 margin, including 58/35 with independents. They think Obama would be better than Romney for the auto industry 50/43, and 79% of voters consider it to be an important issue including 42% who say it's 'very important.'

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/10/obama-leads-51-46-in-ohio.html

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
90. This implies the Obama campaign's work in Ohio is paying off.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:37 PM
Oct 2012

Which is great news. Both campaigns are dropping tons of money and volunteers in Ohio.

I'd like to think my small contribution of money and time are helping to win Ohio. Silly, I know. But it makes me feel good.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
84. This IS AN NATIONAL POLL!
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:11 PM
Oct 2012


If or should I say WHEN Obama wins Ohio he will only have to win Iowa or Nevada to secure a second term. EVEN IF he were to lose New Hampshire, he could still get there with victories in Iowa and Nevada assuming he holds Ohio.



NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.


As 2000 taught us all, the goal is 270! Not who is winning the popular vote in a daily national tracking poll.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
86. For our Republican friends questioning the poll.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:15 PM
Oct 2012



From PPP:

D+4 sample on our poll showing Obama up 5 in Ohio. 2008 exit poll was D+8

Skraxx

(2,977 posts)
87. Repubs Are Not Motivated To Vote For Romney, Look At The Early Vote Numbers
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:32 PM
Oct 2012

Why aren't they early voting? Either their is something in the demographic that says for some reason they are less likely to do so, or they are not motivated to vote for him. IMO, this indicates a real lack of motivation. That could change, but if I were Romney, I'd be worried about it.

dgraz007

(29 posts)
88. Thank you..
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

I suspect I will sleep better tonight. I am not as good at math, as some of you are; but when I see it explained here..it does makes sense. Staying positive.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
96. Downticket. Downticket. Downticket.
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:10 PM
Oct 2012

The President will be re-elected.

Downticket. Downticket. Downticket.

To make it real.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
99. If Obama has 75% of those who voted early, and...
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:14 PM
Oct 2012

45% of those remaining who did not vote early, that works out to 50.7% of all voters favor Obama.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
101. tell that to the assholes at Reuters, who just put a story on Yahoo that ROmney is TIED with Obama
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:18 PM
Oct 2012

AND that ROmney has SURGING CROWDS of THOUSANDS!!!!

I wanted to punch my computer. There was not ONE poll cited in the article.. just a puff piece about how ROmney is surging and winning in the polls in Ohio. Fuck them.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
104. The early voting numbers are great..
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:31 AM
Oct 2012

they are like money in the bank. No matter what happens between now and then they are counted votes.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama 51-46 in Ohio (PPP)...