2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFBI Said to Prepare to Interview Clinton Aides About E-Mai
"FBI agents are planning to seek interviews with former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons aides in coming weeks as an investigation into her use of private e-mail for official business enters a new phase, according to two people familiar with the inquiry.
Investigators would also like to interview the Democratic presidential front-runner herself as part of the inquiry, the people said. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is striving to complete its probe by May or June and pass its findings along to prosecutors for potential action, the people said."
Entering a new phase?
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-04/fbi-said-to-prepare-to-interview-clinton-aides-in-e-mail-inquiry
DCBob
(24,689 posts)They are simply trying to do this investigation as thorough and complete as possible to ensure they have dotted all the i's and crossed all the t's and also to make sure they leave no room to be criticized.. especially considering how high profile this case is.
I am convinced nothing will come of this once its all said and done.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)It was still another poor decision on her part and the republicans will keep this alive for over a year, I'll bet.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)We will see soon enough
Qutzupalotl
(14,313 posts)But nothing to see here, everything's fine...
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)To much baggage 💼
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)I want Bernie because he is a class act. I'm not allowed to say what Hillary is.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)And let the courts handle this. This will be a big test for Obama.
demwing
(16,916 posts)There you go, I said it for you.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)1) receipt of allegation/mandate to investigate
2) preliminary investigation, securing of sources of evidence
3) assessment of need to proceed, planning for investigation
4) execution of complete investigation
5) reporting
I don't think the above are formal categories but rather 'typical' phases that an investigation moves through.
It seems that 1 and 2, are completed and the investigation is proceeding. Providing immunity to Pagliano allows collection of evidence that can help frame inquiries and assessment of responses.
It seems as though the investigation has moved to 3 and perhaps back to 2 with the help of Pagliano, which will lead to planning in preparation of completing the investigation through questioning of Clinton and others who handeled information that ended up on the Clintons' server.
Sounds like step 4 is going to happen in the next few months with step 5 being reached in early summer.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It's generally a quid pro quo and not given without a profer that the person receiving immunity has information that is worth the loss of a target to prosecute.
Was it like that this time? Who would be the possible bigger fish??? I don't think we know
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)not only get pertinent information, but it's also getting quite close to HRC, herself. I thought they'd go for Abedin...she was the one getting paid on two payrolls simultaneously, and she's been almost her personal aide...I almost wrote maid....LOL
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)She was the close aide of HRC at State, she was on salary at Clinton Foundation. She also operated a consulting/advising business that seems to have existed to mostly to facilitate people making contact with the Clintons.
I think Abedin is a person 'within the zone of the investigation' as a recent paper referred to persons of interest. Several of the released emails suggest Abedin helped Clinton with technology issues. It's not difficult hard to imagine that Abedin may have assisted with consideration of how to solve a variety of office problems for her boss. Migration of sensitive information between secure and insecure email systems seems to be the office problem in which the FBI is chiefly interested.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)It appears Abedin functions as one of her closest assistants, if not her closest.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)angrychair
(8,699 posts)we should not allow very precious oxygen to be sucked out of the room and derail the very important things we want done as Democrats.
If tRump doesn't release his taxes or goes to jail himself for the federal crimes he may have committed, then we need a candidate that can actually beat a Cruz or Rubio.
As recently as a speech I heard yesterday Clinton was talking about love and unity and making the country whole again.
If she really means that than withdraw now with dignity, on your own terms, and give this issue the attention it deserves. Have your day in court and be well. The country will be in good hands with Bernie.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Comey needs to go.
840high
(17,196 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)The only people clinging to this fantasy that she will be indicted for some faux scandal are the GOP and sadly, Bernie supporters.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Besides that would give 🔥 to the Republicans regardless of the Democratic nominee. My thoughts on the email situation is known but still... I just want this over just like you do.
My last post for tonight so have a good one!
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Pretty simple. IRS, Benghazi, Whitewater, whatever. That Dems throw in with that shit is beyond the pale.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I won't OP anymore about this emails unless an indictment happens. OK?
Response to MaggieD (Reply #16)
Post removed
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)They call that "trolling" around here.
An interesting feature of socialism that is well featured in history books is that they tend to float a lot of unproven propaganda while simultaneously trying to discredit actual facts. Fascinating stuff. I love history.
andrewv1
(168 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)You really should apologize to her.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)... that the same Sanders supporters who rail against superdelegates because they make the process less democratic (I agree with that point btw) are desperately hoping that the choice people will make for a nominee will be superseded by a legal issue that for the most part no-one would care about otherwise. All about being more democratic until it becomes evident that their guy wont be the one getting more votes.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Ones a matter of law and the other is a set of arbitrary rules.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It would be like a Dodgers fan hoping Matt Harvey, Jacob deGrom, Noah Syndergaard, Steven Matz, and Bartolo Colon break their arms.
Pathetic.
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)That IT guy's lawyer insisted on it for legal reasons under criminal law.
After all this time, the FBI, etc cut a deal with him for a reason. They must be going for bigger fish.
If there was no criminal or national security concern here, the FBI would have been gone long ago. It's hard for me to believe they would have hundreds of FBI and Intelligence Community agents and two Inspector Generals work on this for months when absolutely no crime was broken while national security was not at risk. The FBI have been involved for months for a serious reason.
If you get a bunch of them pleading the 5th, it would not surprise me while the stench of this goes way up.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)"according to two people familiar with the inquiry."
Who are these two people? Unconfirmed information pretending to be news, apparently.
This story has no credibility without named sources.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Let Hillary put this behind her. Whatever happens, it's better not to have this hanging on and on.