Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The last few days on DU have caused me to seriously reconsider a lot of things if Sanders wins the (Original Post) still_one Mar 2016 OP
We're all sure those things are fascinating. gcomeau Mar 2016 #1
Like how you wouldn't have to spend, potentially, the next 8 years... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author NurseJackie Mar 2016 #3
Leaving the country? PonyUp Mar 2016 #4
Does this mean both sides are done with loyalty oaths? nt noamnety Mar 2016 #5
What things? nt cyberswede Mar 2016 #6
they are still 'considering' roguevalley Mar 2016 #25
I prefer my threats veiled and/or ambiguous. Orsino Mar 2016 #7
You won't have to. BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #8
Saw this same Gwhittey Mar 2016 #12
Bullshit. yardwork Mar 2016 #18
This is something I really do get, I just can't get there myself right now. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #9
I agree completely and I will go a step further. yardwork Mar 2016 #13
+1 nt. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #15
You're one of the good guys, NCTraveler. yardwork Mar 2016 #19
Extremely kind and the thought is mutual. nt. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #21
I get that, but.... LisaM Mar 2016 #27
"Why is he attracting some of these people?" NCTraveler Mar 2016 #29
Yes, I know someone who loves Sanders but previously supported Ron Paul LisaM Mar 2016 #33
Maybe we need a new thread section: "Pointless General Discussion Threads" nt Jarqui Mar 2016 #10
We already have that. It's under "Democrats". cui bono Mar 2016 #14
No worries. Cha Mar 2016 #11
It must be Springtime in Camp Hillary if the PUMAs are in bloom Vote2016 Mar 2016 #16
Blocking has been on the upswing. oldandhappy Mar 2016 #17
Nice shoes DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #20
Is this another "poor Hillary" OP? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #22
Substitute the names, revrese the positions and it's the same old threat plus irony: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #23
Drama bigwillq Mar 2016 #24
Please offer a side of hash browns when serving up nonsense yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #26
huh VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #28
The first thing you might reconsider is one sentence posts. Vinca Mar 2016 #30
And that is your right Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #31
I don't want to be embarrassed by a presidency rocked by constant scandal. alarimer Mar 2016 #32
It went from bad to worse after Hillary won South Carolina. grossproffit Mar 2016 #34
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
1. We're all sure those things are fascinating.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

We can't say for sure of course, since you didn't list any. But we're sure they are.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
2. Like how you wouldn't have to spend, potentially, the next 8 years...
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

...defending Hillary from constant scandals?

Seriously, just say what you want to say.

Response to still_one (Original post)

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
8. You won't have to.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:28 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary is still well on track to win. If anything, the levels of toxicity that have been seen on DU in recent days have caused quite a few fence-sitters to jump into the HRC camp. Karma is indeed a b****! Backlash was inevitable and that backlash is growing, although that "revolution" will likely be silent on DU for various reasons.

No matter how obnoxiously some behave here and no matter how frequent and inaccurate their posts, I will NEVER EVER NOT vote for the Dem candidate in the GE.

Anyone who even hesitates to do so needs to remember exactly what the alternative is. It's too awful even to contemplate.

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
12. Saw this same
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

thing back in 2008 primaries talking about how Obama was going to lose because some supposed group of black Obama supporters where on the internet saying if don't vote Obama you are racist. Odd how that same type of message is being shoved down our face now but it is now Bernie supporters. Odd how both primaries have same candidate running? At least she learned from 2008 to switch that meme around and get a well know supporters to say it. Special place in hell indeed.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
9. This is something I really do get, I just can't get there myself right now.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:32 PM
Mar 2016

Many of Sanders supporters do not represent him. They aren't even close to him ideologically. Try to keep your eyes on what Sanders himself is saying. Including him understanding his supporters are currently his worst enemy. I have a lot of issues with Sanders himself that I have highlighted here. He is worlds better than any of the republicans.

Don't let the hate, anger, and deception being brought here daily sway your thoughts on the bigger picture. They are a side note.

Still, I get you point and it's real.

Clinton currently has the momentum and I don't think you will have to concern yourself with this anyway. We are looking really good and it is becoming clear that Clinton is the people's progressive choice.

yardwork

(61,622 posts)
13. I agree completely and I will go a step further.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

I think it's important for the progressives on this and other boards to bond together against internet bullies who seek to divide us.

There are many legitimate reasons to disagree with both Democratic candidates, and plenty of space to argue in good faith. I'm down with that.

When I see bullying, racism, and bigotry, I know that the people behind it are not on the side of progressivism. I'm gonna call them trolls. And I'm not going to let them influence me or my vote.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
27. I get that, but....
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:37 PM
Mar 2016

Why is he attracting some of these people? However, one of my main issues is that he has spent decades trashing the Democratic party and now he wants to use all our good work, our infrastructure, many of the things we've worked for, to advance his cause. He could have won in Vermont running as a Democrat, but didn't. He's even turned down Democratic nominations a couple of times. When his supporters were caught stealing data, his first instinct was to sue the DNC. Now, my one vote may not count for much, but if someone was looking for ways to deliberately push my buttons, he's found a few of them (not to mention being lectured at about feminism and how I can't possibly be a feminist just by voting for the female candidate).

Of course I would vote for Sanders, I'd have no qualms about it ideologically, but I wouldn't expect a very effective presidency from someone who seems to be setting out to alienate people like me.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
29. "Why is he attracting some of these people?"
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:43 PM
Mar 2016

Million dollar question and I believe it has multiple answers. Many Paul supporters, like H A Goodman, care about economics only. They believe Sanders will not have any impact in many areas but do believe he will create chaos. They believe that is necessary for them to get traction. They know Sanders will have zero success with his healthcare plans so simply aren't worried about them. A founding thought of current libertarian economic ideas is that they stand no chance without destruction of the current system.

I believe their are other small groups that believe we must go down in order to be built up in their eyes. They wrongly see Sanders as a way to get to their means. Most groups that are more fringe feel this way. That everyone will simply recognize their brilliance once it all collapses. They couldn't be more wrong but when you are an outlier in the country it is about all you can hang your hat on.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
33. Yes, I know someone who loves Sanders but previously supported Ron Paul
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:52 PM
Mar 2016

I'd also guess that in the San Juan Islands of Washington State, where I spend a lot of time, they'll go for Bernie Sanders. They also, respectively, went for Nader, Ross Perot, and, I think, John Anderson (a forgotten culprit in the Reagan debacle). So of course there is that element, but I'm also thinking of the young tech workers who love him so much. I seriously believe their concept of income equality means the difference between working long hours for a salary of $120,000 and what Bill Gates is worth. But they lecture me, who will never earn that much.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
14. We already have that. It's under "Democrats".
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

Actually, there's two of them. But one of them should be called "PoliTiger Beat".

.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
17. Blocking has been on the upswing.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:40 PM
Mar 2016

Understand you are being careful. But what on earth are you saying???!!!

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Substitute the names, revrese the positions and it's the same old threat plus irony:
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

"I won't vote for mccain or Hillary if she gets the nomination she lost my respect the momement she brought mccain into the picture. I see very little difference between Hillary and Lieberman" still_one Mar-06-08
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4938403

It's just sort of funny that last contested cycle it was Hillary you just would not vote for, line in the sand. Now you adore her and draw that same line for Bernie. Template style politics.

At any rate, every cycle you are thinking about not casting a vote for the nominee if it is Hillary of if it isn't, depending. What could I possibly derive from that other than you have a 'take my ball and go' theme that repeats?

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
26. Please offer a side of hash browns when serving up nonsense
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:36 PM
Mar 2016

I will bring the ketchup and butter and syrup and pepper and salt

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
30. The first thing you might reconsider is one sentence posts.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

No one has a clue what you're talking about.

Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
31. And that is your right
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:47 PM
Mar 2016

....to vote as you see fit. I'm not a fan of loyalty oaths and your vote is your vote.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
32. I don't want to be embarrassed by a presidency rocked by constant scandal.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:51 PM
Mar 2016

And I think the status quo is not nearly good enough.

But if Hillary manages to win (unlikely), nothing much will change.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The last few days on DU h...