Bernie Sanders Campaign Needs to Address Primary & Caucus Voting Manipulations NOW

[UglyGreed]

Is the Sane Progressive losing it or is she telling the truth??? Many links in her description on youtube..

[brooklynite]

1. I think the fact that Bernie Sanders continues to ignore this means there's no "there" there....

[UglyGreed]

2. It also may mean

he does not want to bring up such things since David Brock could and would turn it against him.

[Cheese Sandwich]

17. There are just limited resources so we have to focus forward and keep rolling

Michigan, Ohio, etc.

The critical thing is showing strength, at least, in some big states.

[UglyGreed]

21. Good point

[UglyGreed]

3. Let me ask you

was Bill Clinton campaigning in MA on Super Tuesday????

[Agschmid]

5. I'll answer... "yes"

[UglyGreed]

9. Thank you

for a honest reply even if it is in "quotations"

[Agschmid]

10. I can take those off if you want, I'm ambivalent about them.

[brooklynite]

13. Yes he was...I believe campaigning is legal in the State of Massachusetts

And in response to your likely next question, the campaigning he was doing didn't violate any rules, according to the Commonwealth Secretary's office.

[UglyGreed]

14. He was in the polling building

and just the sight of Bill Clinton the former POTUS is campaigning. If you can't wear a button then Bill can not hang around taking selfies

[Kip Humphrey]

28. "according to the Commonwealth Secretary's office." without any investigation or review of evidence.

[brooklynite]

31. You know the extent of the Secretary's review? Perhaps you should share

I'll settle for the fact that no complaints were filed, either by the campaign or any "suppressed" voters.

[Agschmid]

6. Yup.

[grossproffit]

7. Debbie the "sane" Progressive is obsessed with Hillary.

[Chelsea2032]

27. Clearing this up,

would be good for everyone.

[SheenaR]

4. It comes down to this

We knew what we were up against from the start. So did he. We dared to threaten her path to the White House. So nothing should be surprising and nothing should be expected to happen as the people who would make decisions on these things are connected to the Clintons.

We need to win and leave no doubt. That's the only way we were ever going to win this and still is

[NCTraveler]

8. 1) Love Love Love the Sande Progressive!!! SNL doesn't deliver skits as funny as hers.

2) Agree. He needs to come clean about his campaigns theft of Data. I want to see Uretskys emails. All of them. Really messed up that they haven't come clean in that respect.

[UglyGreed]

12. You always leave out Uretsky

was recommended by the DNC and NGP VAN but of course it may of slipped your mind.

[NCTraveler]

15. That's who he was working for when he stole campaign data?

Nice deflection.

[UglyGreed]

20. No deflection

it seems you are the one deflecting the fact that he was recommended by the DNC and NGP VAN and by some miracle he is the one who did the "breach" Oh by the way what has happened to the investigation????

[NCTraveler]

22. He stole campaign data and you have no interest in forcing....

The Sanders campaign to turn over his emails? This is known tampering. Known.

"what has happened to the investigation????"

The DNC sticks up for it's people. It provided cover for Sanders. Why in the world wouldn't you want to see the emails of someone who knowingly tampered with an opposing campaigns data against rules and possibly the law. I can't figure you why you have no interest in known wrongdoings by a campaign.

[UglyGreed]

23. Bernie asked

for an investigation what happened?????

[UglyGreed]

25. Why didn't the DNC

and NGP VAN fixed the problem when it was first reported months earlier. Oh and I recall this happened in 2008 also................



Always playing the victim...........

[NCTraveler]

26. Keep backing away from Uretskys emails.

There is zero reason you shouldn't want them seen. Zero. Are you saying when he was terminated very publically by the Sanders campaign that it was done in error?

[UglyGreed]

29. This all stems

from NGP VAN's inability to provide the service which they are paid to do... but they did provide Uretsky LMAO!!!!! Oh ties that bind once again..........




Stu Trevelyan is the CEO of the software company employed by the DNC who is at the center of the Sanders-Clinton feud. Stu Trevelyan worked for 1992 Clinton-Gore war-room campaign and then the Clinton White House. Why is this important? Because Stu Trevelyan is the CEO of NGP VAN the DNC software vendor that manages the master file for the DNC database. The Sanders campaign was accused of accessing Hillary Clinton’s proprietary information because of NGP VAN firewall went down. This lead to the DNC suspending the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign from access to its database of Democratic voter information.

Now, Stu Trevelyan ties to the Clinton’s, the Bernie Sanders campaign is crying foul and suing the DNC over the suspension. Trevelyan’s NGP VAN issued a software patch that briefly shut down the firewall and “briefly opened a window into proprietary information from other campaigns.”

It’s also no big secret that Stu Trevelyan is a big time support of this Clinton campaign as he was in 1992.

buh bye

[jillan]

11. It shouldn't come from Bernie. He's the candidate. It really should come from the DNC.

Oh wait ...

[Darb]

19. Uhhh, that Willie Nelson pic is a little disingenuous.

But yo9u probably knew that. Jussayin'.

[jillan]

24. Excuse me? Wtf are you even babbling about?

Why do you Hillarybots have to question everything? Is it some kind of insecurity?

[jsmirman]

32. I think darb means that Willie endorsed BOTH Bernie AND Hillary

unless that has changed and I'm unaware of it.

Just explaining what darb probably means.

[jillan]

33. This was taken in Vermont when Bernie was running for Senate. It would have taken him less

time to google it than write that accusatory comment.

[dana_b]

16. I watched her entire video

and if she has all of the screen shots, it does seem very suspicious. She has good reason to be angry. Why won't the Sanders campaign at least look at it?

[Darb]

18. Hold on a sec.......

Ok, please proceed.

[Faux pas]

30. Yes!

He should!