Why has no one here questioned the non-paper primaries?

[PyaarRevolution]

I haven't heard one peep from people on here casting doubts on primary results in paperless ballot states.

[CdnExtraNational]

1. We don't want to give them any ideas.

Any speeches to DiBold?

[PyaarRevolution]

3. It's suspected that the machines in Chicago were tampered with...

to give the primary vote to Rahm. So what makes you think some of the voting machines have been effected only by Republicans?

[bkkyosemite]

2. Cheaters! In the past they have cheated with the machines, tabulators..

what makes anyone think that this election will be any different.

[PyaarRevolution]

5. Or the primary.

See my comment above about the Chicago primary of Rahm vs. Chuy.

[Lizzie Poppet]

4. That worry is usually reserved for elections in which there are GOP candidates.

The fear being that the very RW ownership at Diebold is rigging the machines for the Republican...

Would that happen for the corporate Democrat over the reformer, in a primary? Sounds like a lot of trouble and risk for a primary that I'm sure they assumed wasn't in doubt, back when they'd have had to start preparing an attempt at fraud.

[PyaarRevolution]

6. See my comment about the Chicago primary of Chuy vs. Rahm above.

[NorthCarolina]

7. I think they are using the "absentee ballot" route in the primary,

then will flex their Diebold muscles in the GE.

[MineralMan]

8. OK. Let's hear about those states from you, since

you appear to be concerned about it. You brought it up for Minnesota, which is a caucus state. Our caucus system uses paper ballots. Our regular elections do too. You didn't appear to know that. So, please list the states where paperless primary balloting has taken place and discuss how that affected the results in those states.

It's not enough just to raise an open-ended question, particularly when you don't even know how Minnesota votes. Let's see your work on this, in a state-by-state discussion. Which states that have had their primary events are paperless? Let's discuss those, please.