2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Supporters should issue an ultimatum to Hillary: Apologize for your lies NOW, or else...
...or else, you know perfectly well what. We will withhold our support for you. Apologizing at the convention will be too late.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Svafa
(594 posts)Clinton knew fully Sanders supported the bailout as it was originally conceived, as just a bailout for the auto industry, but opposed it when it was rolled into the TARP, which bailed out the banks responsible for the economic collapse.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)The final bill which rescued the auto industry? Its a yes or no answer.
Sure, he supported an auto bailout, right up until he didnt.
Svafa
(594 posts)metroins
(2,550 posts)It's just like how GWB misrepresented the Iraq war.
You vote how you vote and Bernie's vote on the bill that ultimately funded the bailout was Nay.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Sometimes you gotta give and take for the greater good. So no, he didnt actually vote for the final bill that helped rescue the auto industry.
Svafa
(594 posts)by bailing out the banks. No, he did not vote for the final bill, but if the bank bullshit had no been added to it, there is no doubt that he would have supported the auto industry bailout. Clinton insinuating otherwise is disingenuous. But I guess that should come as a surprise to no one; that is how the Clintons roll.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Ya know, take responsibility.
Svafa
(594 posts)had nothing to do with the auto industry, as Clinton and her fans insinuate, and everything to do with the banks.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Both sides add amendments. Its called compromise, or ya know, representative democracy.
Svafa
(594 posts)when it comes to the Brady Bill?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)"Obama cut food stamps!"....yeah, because the alternative was a govt shutdown.
This highlights why someone who cant nuance shouldnt be president.
Presidents are handed choices based on legislation written by both parties and must choose the greater good. We live in a democracy, not a dictatorship.
Svafa
(594 posts)And you don't think that someone who has served in congress for decades understands the process and how things work?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)He is strictly an ideologue who doesnt do nuance. I thought thats why his fans liked him so much.
Svafa
(594 posts)nothing else.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)It's Bernie or bust.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)are unpopular, when there were enough votes for passage. You know that 'principle pious thingy'. No one wanted to bail out the banks but no one knew what would happen to our entire financial system had there not been a bail out. And no one had a lot of time to sit around for a year and debate it, like Congress usually does. I have more respect for those who take a stand on behalf of the nation and its people and are wrong than someone who stands on principle and is right, while risking nothing.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)He did not vote against a bill that specifically mentioned the auto bailout. The TARP money was a lump sum, and Obama allocated part of it to the auto industry. When Bernie voted against it, nothing in it mentioned bailing out the auto industry.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Its yes or no.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)was a blank check for the banks without conditions. Obama would later use some of the bailout money for the auto industry. So the answer is no.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)It is what she is, it is what she does.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Apologize for our imagined slights or we'll show you by tacitly electing president Trump... brilliant!
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)We would be issuing ultimatums hourly.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)They believe that the SD"s, the establishment elite, and a lot of SuperPAC money is all they need to win both the primary and the general. Well, that and a lot of Brockian rat-fucking too!
But they are in for a rude awakening I surely believe.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Ha that not going to win in the GE when you have Rove rat-fucking. Most of country though a guy who faught in Vietnam was more of coward then someone who road a desk in Texas during the war.
TM99
(8,352 posts)no one would do it.
Clinton through Brock has learned from the best.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)and if you refuse to vote for Hillary in the GE (if she wins the primary) and Trump (or any of the Republicans that are running- pick your poison), then I hope that you will be able to live with yourselves and everything that comes along with a harsh right-wing Presidency for (at least) the next 4 years.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Svafa
(594 posts)The only one Clinton can beat is Trump. If it's a Clinton/Cruz matchup, we are doomed.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Choose your poison. All of the Republicans are toxic but most people haven't gotten to know most of them well so far. That will change once the GE begins and our nominee starts digging their grave. Why exactly would people vote for Cruz over Hillary? Cruz is a religious zealot nutball. Hillary is sane and smart. Most people should be able to figure that out AT LEAST.
Svafa
(594 posts)My point was that, if Clinton is nominated, she fares ok up against Drumpf, but polls have her losing to any of the other candidates. I have no idea why anyone would vote for Cruz over anyone, but apparently there are people out there who would.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Once the nominees are selected, people will *really* get to know Cruz and IMHO they won't like him much (if they don't run for the hills). The only Republicans that I would be concerned about much going up against Hillary (or Bernie) would be somebody like Kasich or even maybe Rubio since they have a more "moderate" veneer even though we all know that they are just as bad ideologically as the rest of the crowd. At the moment, however, it doesn't appear that either of them are in danger of winning the GOP nomination. I'm not particularly worried about either candidate's chances against Cruz or Trump once the GE starts.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Good luck with that!
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)OP is threatening to refuse to vote if Hillary is the nominee, which make it easier for Trump, et. al to win in the GE. Anybody seriously want that?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)I'm not telling you how to vote in the primaries, however. I'll gladly vote for Bernie if he's the nominee. I'll be damned if my own personal actions/inaction lets a Republican into the WH. Some other people feel differently.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)staying away from DU in fear of getting banned.
Response to Proud Liberal Dem (Reply #10)
Marr This message was self-deleted by its author.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)The question is can you with supporting the weakest candidate in a general who will lose to a Republican.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)You (and others) believe that will happen after looking at a couple of hypothetical match up polls. That MAY happen but it also may not. Won't really get a good idea until we actually get to the GE.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)See how that works?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)So, where does that leave us?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Royally screwed.
DebDoo
(319 posts)If Hillary stopped her bullying, underhanded ways and won a fairly fought race we could stomach the idea of voting for her. Don't blame Bernie supporters for standing up for our principles, blame Hillary for having the wrong ones.
Besides, Hillary understands: "sometimes you gotta make tough choices". Now she has to learn that eventually you gotta live with the tough consequences
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)I think deep down they know that she can't win the general, but being perpetual victims is enticing to them, so they continue this suicidal mission.
JudyM
(29,250 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I wish Bernie would go to nuclear war with her but that's not in his personality.
randome
(34,845 posts)You can get all up in everyone's face about it but in the end it's a pretty mild statement from one campaign opponent to another.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)good Democrat that endorsed Clinton.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And it won't be worth a fart in a gale...
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)The final bill that saved the auto industry.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)The demand should have been for debates where Clinton doesn't lie.
But then there definitely would have been no debates added.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)No lie, he voted against the bailout funding. If he thought he'd be challenged on it, he should have come up with his answer for the debate.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Found out how popular that stance was with his constituents.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Meanwhile, both he and Wyden, who is also unhappy ARE Clinton 2016 endorsers. Uhm...make the endorsers with integrity.
Go on. I understand that it's just another ClintonSpin Day in America. I'm used to it.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)You could argue that the effort to slash funding for TARP in January 2009 was really just a protest vote against the design of the program, as other Democrats have said. And admittedly, TARP evolved over the months as federal officials moved away from the original idea of buying up bad bank assets and found more efficient, less costly ways to shore up the financial industry and ease the credit crunch.
But again, protest votes are easy. Coming up with workable policy is hard, and Congress didn't have the luxury of time in those days. Perhaps Sanders has forgotten how dire things were after Lehman Bros. failed and AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all cratered. The economy was sinking fast, dragged down by a financial sector that had lost its ability to price risk and lend money.
Candidates often get torn apart in campaigns for supporting this or that compromise, as their opponents invariably focus on the less savory elements of the package and ignore the overarching reasons to vote for the thing. Here, Clinton is blasting Sanders for the opposite reason: He opposed a compromise that included something widely viewed by Democrats as a good idea (the auto bailout) because other elements of the package were less savory to his anti-Wall Street worldview.
That was his choice. He can say he was for the auto bailout at one point, but that was before he was against it.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/la-ol-sanders-auto-bailout-20160307-story.html
Wilms
(26,795 posts)But others can in line and toe it. That's their choice.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)seekthetruth
(504 posts)Just can't support someone who has no problem with enabling humankind-induced earthquakes in Oklahoma by fracking the shit out of our Mother Earth.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)She's gone past the point of no return. She can apologize at the convention when she passes the torch on to our nominee, then retire gracefully.
Ino
(3,366 posts)She's just a civilian, a former this-n-that.
Peregrine Took
(7,414 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Apologize or else.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I laughed.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Threats and ultimatums are silly.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Man, more childishness. Petulance all around. Some of this is starting to make some of the louder PUMA members come across as reasonable.
hack89
(39,171 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts).... are perfectly OK with blackmail.
SamKnause
(13,107 posts)She has told too many lies.
Numerous videos show her telling lie after lie.
They have been posted repeatedly.
Her supporters on this site DO NOT CARE !!!
They are informed and they still DO NOT CARE !!!
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)All Bernie had to do is address the voters during the debate on why he did not vote for the auto bailout funds. It was true he did not vote for it when it counted to the millions who work in the American auto industry and it's supply chain.
Bernie flubbed it, he was not prepared. Hillary has been addressing that Politics is liking making sausage. You have to give and take.
Bernie rather stand on principle while jobs were in danger and the life of the American Auto industry hung in the balance.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Interesting thread, thanks. I recommended it for the Clinton supporters responses.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)And I'm going to enjoy watching it.
delrem
(9,688 posts)like that.
I won't accept that.