The shameful Bernie race smear: Hillary supporters have played a dirty, dangerous game

[NWCorona]

"One key aspect that has been bubbling for a while now, spun off from the BernieBro label and not discussed like it needs to be, is the opponents or most acerbic critics of Sanders, intentionally or unintentionally, implying that his supporters have no noticeable racial diversity or that his campaign doesn’t appeal to minority voters.

What’s so troubling about this enduring narrative is the disturbing insistence on completely ignoring or aggressively dismissing any of Bernie’s minority supporters who aren’t famous. It’s a focused and determined echo on painting Sanders as truly representing only young or old white liberals, and that Sanders and his backers are unable to acknowledge or express white systemic privilege. And in either their strong support for Clinton or their unwillingness to fully analyze Sanders fairly or comprehensively on race, one of this election’s deleterious aspects on the left can no longer be dismissed.

The toxicity of the “Bernie is white and for whites only” drive has become even more glaring over the last month, with cleverly crafted smears at Sanders hitting exactly the sustained narrative they wanted to hit and fueled by Clinton’s legacy domination of the black vote."

Hillary and her surrogates sure know how to divide people.

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/12/the_shameful_bernie_race_smear_hillary_supporters_have_played_a_dirty_dangerous_game/

[Metric System]

1. That's the opinion of a Sanders supporter on a pro Sanders website.

[NWCorona]

2. And?

[Metric System]

5. He's entitled to his opinion.

[daleanime]

28. Once he's been properly belittled of course....

[merrily]

10. Perfect response. Every OP that criticizes Hillary is dismissed for one reason or another, often

via pointless source shaming.

Opinion pieces that praise her are great; opinion pieces that don't praise her are dismissed. Typical double standards and deflection. Avoids the need to discuss substance.

[NWCorona]

13. Agreed!

[marew]

54. Exactly!!! n/t

[Paper Roses]

70. Agree! n/t

[Lizzie Poppet]

15. "poisoning the well"

Look it up...

[noretreatnosurrender]

48. Not only Salon magazine

Andrew Jones's work has been published by Talking Points Memo, The Guardian, The Intercept, The Raw Story, Ebony Magazine and The Grio, among other publications

[pdsimdars]

58. And that's a typical Hillary and GOP tactic == attack the messenger, don't address the issue

They have NO answers, only attacking messengers.
EMPTY.

[Lorien]

112. Independent left leaning website= "pro Sanders Website"

OK, and maybe you'll acknowledge that the corporate media is entirely "Pro-Clinton"?

[Warren DeMontague]

115. As opposed to objective sources like "dailynewsbin", amirite?

Berniebroooooooooooooos!!!!

[Buzz Clik]

3. More phony shock and outrage.

[NWCorona]

6. Phony from who?

I doubt you even took the time to read it lol

[Buzz Clik]

7. I read what you posted. I didn't click the link.

What you posted in the OP had a fiber of truth and a lot of extrapolation, hyperbole, and conjured outrage.

[NWCorona]

8. A fiber of truth?

There's a lot more than that.

[Buzz Clik]

9. Nope. Only a small minority of HRC voters fit the type the OP cast.

This is what Limbaugh does. He finds some oddity, pretends it's a universal truth, and spends three hours going on and on.

[NWCorona]

11. We will have to disagree on that

I was around in 2008 and remember the pumas well

[merrily]

19. And Bernie's supporters fit the type the Clintons and their media shills have been fabricating?

[Buzz Clik]

39. That needs a bit of editing to be readable. But about Bernie's "supporter fit"....

... is he now endorsing athletic underwear?

[merrily]

40. You really couldn't read my post because of an "s" missing from the end of supporter?" Says a lot.

Your post however lacks a lot more than one letter.

[mac56]

51. How are things in junior high?

[Buzz Clik]

57. You tell me.

[mac56]

74. Thanks for proving my point for me.

I know you are, but what am I?

[Buzz Clik]

76. Not one to key in on irony, are you?

[mac56]

78. If I'd seen any irony, I would have.

Jockstrap jokes are straight out of the seventh grade schoolyard.

[Buzz Clik]

80. As I was saying...

[mac56]

83. ...

[stevenleser]

20. Well said and an appropriate analogy. nt

[merrily]

47. For a certain puerile elementary school grade level, it's downright stunning!

[daleanime]

29. But it's not Hillary's voters that we're worried about....

it's Hillary.

[Buzz Clik]

37. Oh, then please carry on calling her a liar, rape enabler, comparing her to Nixon and Kissinger...

... and then read the OP again.

[daleanime]

65. I'm so tired of asking questions that never get answered....

1-If you don't want her to be called a liar, give me a better word for describing some one who dances around the truth rather then acknowledging it.

2-Rape enabler? Where the hell did that come from?

3-Same for Nixon...

4-She's the one who talks about her respect for Dr. Killing....I mean Dr. Kissinger. I thought that you wanted us to accept her words, how confusing.



So like I've had to ask repeatedly since the primary began, you honestly can't image a single reason a democratic voter might not want to vote for Hillary?

[Buzz Clik]

72. That's your question?

"you honestly can't image a single reason a democratic voter might not want to vote for Hillary?"

You're kidding.

The Sander's crowd tosses up threads several times a day: "Reasons why I would never vote for Hillary Clinton." It's always the same stuff, so, yeah -- I recognize that HRC is not the choice of every DUer.

As for comments 2 and 3:

Rape enabler:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025126067
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017331306
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251871297

Comparison to Nixon:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280111976#post7
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511207084#post19

That was without even trying.

Okay. I answered your questions. Have the last word.

[MADem]

85. And then, they play those sea lion games!

It's just a huge stew of hate up in here.

Poor admins. Their site is burning to the ground before their eyes....

[Loki]

87. ^Amen^

New pejoratives are added every day, and I know exactly where they get them.

[Kalidurga]

45. NOT GOOD ENOUGH, BERNIE

That theme has been going on here since day one. Please keep pretending it isn't the constant drum beat at Camp Weather-vane.

[Buzz Clik]

56. Hells bells! Look at the demographics of Bernie's support!

The Sanders crowd at DU cheers every time the primaries move out of the South because he might not get anihilated and might actually pull off a tie.

Not good enough? Damned straight not good enough!

[Kalidurga]

59. You surely think you have made a point.

Whilst proving mine.

[Buzz Clik]

63. Of course I was proving your point because I was agreeing with most of it:

In the context of the OP (at least a tiny part of the opening premise), Sanders's ability to resonate with Black and other minority voters is close to zero. If you think that's a good thing, then Holy Crap!

If you disagree, then you're sleeping through this primary season.

[Kalidurga]

66. Sanders does fine not great but fine with POC in Northern States.

He wasn't too far off in a lot of areas in Michigan that are predominately POC areas, like Wayne and Geneosee counties. In Minnesota there was no difference at all between the Twin Cities area and the out state areas in how people voted. This gap will be non existent when California comes along.

[noiretextatique]

101. And he might do even better

In areas where people remember the Black Panthers served breakfast, and where Clinton's superpredator advocacy did a lot of damage. Chicago, Oakland, Seattle, New York, like Detriot are nothing like the South.

[Kalidurga]

106. I know

I have met a lot of people in my urban area. Some from the South and I have noticed a different kind of attitude. That being said after I was explained the differences I don't blame em for wanting to go back home even though the South is very hard on people all people, but especially POC. They say people in general are better mannered (it is true in Tennessee anyways, I know first hand), the weather is a lot better (true as well) the food is better (yep). But, the trade off is to me anyway that it's a lot harder to fight the system. It's harder to organize. It's harder to be an activist. I have no idea why that is really, I just know where I was there wasn't a whole lot of activism that I could see. But, in Minneapolis it would be harder to not run into activists.

[Warren DeMontague]

117. It may come as a shock to you, but most of this country doesnt live in the south.

Hillary's beltway hobnobs have no clue how to compete in the west, for instance.

50 million people live on the west coast and most of them support legal, regulated and taxed cannabis, and Hillary's answer to that has been "New Hampshire has a terrible heroin problem, I know"

[Buzz Clik]

120. I guess if legal weed is the #1 issue for the entire West

...then HRC may have a challenge.

[Warren DeMontague]

121. har har har har har laff it up

this condescension bullshit has been working so well so far, like with Millennials.

There are 34 Million people in California, FYI, in case you've never made it across this great land any further west than New Jersey.

Legalization is strongly supported by craaaaazy hippies like Lt. Governor Newsom. Senators like Oregon's Jeff Merkeley. A majority of Americans.

They all must be high, derp.

Also, Colorado is a crucial electoral college swing state. Perhaps you've heard of those?

[noiretextatique]

98. As I said from the beginning: it orginated there

I still believe that to be true.

[Kalidurga]

99. Yes it did

and Hill supporters still keep saying "We aren't accusing Bernie of being racist, he just doesn't get race issues like Hillary does."

[noiretextatique]

100. They also claim they are not

Clinton supporters, but you find them in every "Bernie is tonedeaf" thread. Another stupid trick we are not supposed to notice.

[Kalidurga]

102. LOL yeah tone deaf like when Bernie said he was only going to talk to white people....

Oh wait sorry my bad, that was Hillary.

[noiretextatique]

105. Lol...just like that eom

[Armstead]

16. You have no credibility if you don't bother to read

I know you love hit and run posts, but the writer provided several examples to explain what they were referring to.

Disagreement is one thing but mindless sniping....not so much.

[pdsimdars]

61. You're obviously describing all of the Clinton smears on Bernie

[grossproffit]

110. Results of Jury

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Personal insults, continues on for many posts, a pure troll who's only motive is to disrupt DU.

The review was completed at Sat Mar 12, 2016, 05:58 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Ridiculous alert. Some can dish it out, but then cry foul when another dares to disagree with them.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The post is rude, but not worthy of a hide.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a personal insult to not read a link? Or agree with a post?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There are no personal insults here. There are comments about the post, but no insults about any person.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I might as well change my sig line to "Ugly, but not hideable."
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

[merrily]

12. Like your Post 3?

Are you still claiming to be undecided or neutral or whatever it was that you claimed?

[Buzz Clik]

14. No. I see no parallel at all. Please explain, and try to keep it civil.

[merrily]

17. Poster, please. My post contained nothing uncivil.

[Buzz Clik]

18. Ok. No explanation, no surprise.

[merrily]

21. What was I supposed to explain again? BTW, what do your posts explain?

[Buzz Clik]

35. Just keep doing what you do best.

I removed you, begrudgingly, from my ignore list.

You'll be back on soon.

[merrily]

46. Back at you. I find posting about who is on one's (gasp!) ignore list amusing.

It's almost as though people don't realize they can put people on ignore without some childish announcement.

Especially when being on the ignore list of certain posters is a badge of honor.

[pdsimdars]

62. Big threat OOOOOooooooooooo

[Buzz Clik]

64. It wasn't a threat. She's already back on my ignore list.

I see you're shadowing me again today.

How are you? Having a good weekend so far? Enjoying my posts?

[NWCorona]

68. Taking all of this mess out of it

I can't understand the knee-jerk reaction of blocking people. It's not that serious... Unless someone calls you out of your name or something.

[Buzz Clik]

73. Very clever.

No, she follows me around throwing out insults and nothing more. I don't need the annoyance, so I block her.

[NWCorona]

82. Then I can understand that

I didn't say under no circumstances. Just that people here do it for very little reason. I had someone say they are blocking me because she thinks I don't take constructive criticism well and she wasn't even in the convo. Just said that out of the blue.


So what was clever?

[Buzz Clik]

84. My ignore list has two members, as of ten minutes ago. It's an elite list.

[NWCorona]

86. Fair enough

Also please remember that I wasn't calling you out particularly. Your post was just a catalyst for the point I was making.

[thereismore]

94. Bye now. nt

[noiretextatique]

97. I see you never replied to me in the faux ghettogate post

Which was nothing but faux outrage over a non-issue.

[Warren DeMontague]

116. Yes, heaven forfend anyone respond to 8 months of phony shock and ourtage with more of the same.

Camp Weathervane seems to think they have a patent on the stuff.

[MrMickeysMom]

4. All one needs to do is go to C-SPAN online or cable network to see Sander's followers...

They are excited, engaged, very loud after Bernie's applause lines, and more diverse in the range of ages (9 to 90, as I've seen)... And, every day as momentum grows, mostly among the young, they remind each other that love trumps hate.

To smear Bernie supporters is a bit of a joke. I have it from the best Hillary supporters that they are also the hardest working volunteers you will find in the Democratic party. There is room for everyone, and smears make us take heart as to WHY there are smears.

Where are these minority supporters the media mentions?

[merrily]

31. .

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=104497 (Bernie Supporters are the worst human beings in the USA, if not the world. STOP IT.)


http://jackpineradicals.org/showthread.php?3326-IGNORANT-Bernie-Bros-must-END-their-name-calling!!!&highlight=boston+Globe (The artist formerly known as MannyGoldstein)

[MrMickeysMom]

38. Ah Hah!! Yes, yes, yes, yes...

Haven't we been described nicely by the little round, brown dookies in the astroturf?

Merrily, I don't know what other tricks these phantom people have up their sleeves to shape what a vast number of Americans look like who want a future we can believe in... but, it will not stop the real political revolution that is growing.

Love Trumps Hate!

[daleanime]

33. +1

[ibegurpard]

22. it was deliberate

And they started pushing it almost immediately after Sanders announced to poison the well.

[Zorra]

113. Yes, and posts made by Bernie supporters citing facts that

exposed the deliberate smearing got their posts hidden for citing those facts.

[vintx]

23. His message is getting out despite the 'artful smears'

[Jenny_92808]

27. Beautiful and Touching

Message

[vintx]

69. Isn't it?

And it's true. We need to unite against those at the top who are exploiting all our differences to keep us from uniting against them.

[RufusTFirefly]

24. Good article, but Jones gets a key fact wrong

Not only has the Congressional Black Caucus NOT endorsed Hillary Clinton, it WON'T endorse her. It won't endorse ANY candidate. Here's CBC PAC chair Rep. Gregory Meeks' explanation.

Yes, the Congressional Black Caucus does not ever endorse in any race at any time, because it is a composite group that can include and does include Republicans as well as Democrats. And it is a nonpolitical entity that just focuses on legislation. The political wing of the Congressional Black Caucus is a—is the Congressional Black Caucus political action committee.

Moreover, I'm not even sure that Bernie would WANT an endorsement from the CBC's PAC, which comprises not only members of Congress, but also some lobbyists for some infamous businesses. Here's journalist Lee Fang's explanation:

Members of the CBC PAC board include Daron Watts, a lobbyist for Purdue Pharma, the maker of the highly addictive opioid OxyContin; Mike Mckay and Chaka Burgess, both lobbyists for Navient, the student loan giant that was spun off of Sallie Mae; former [Rep. Albert] Wynn, D-Md., a lobbyist who represents a range of clients, including work last year on behalf of Lorillard Tobacco, the maker of Newport cigarettes; and William A. Kirk, who lobbies for a cigar industry trade group on a range of tobacco regulations.

And a significant percentage of the $7,000 raised this cycle by the CBC PAC [...] was donated by white lobbyists, including Vic Fazio, who represents Philip Morris and served for years as a lobbyist to Corrections Corporation of America, and David Adams, a former Clinton aide who now lobbies for Wal-Mart, the largest gun distributor in America.

[NWCorona]

26. Yeah, when this first came up

I didn't realize the distinction between the two groups either.

[RufusTFirefly]

32. I don't think many people understood the distinction

And you can be sure that the Clinton campaign had no incentive to clarify.

[Jenny_92808]

25. I am very disappointed in

the Hillary team choosing to do a LIE AGENDA.

[NWCorona]

30. Me too!

She's using the same tactics that she used against Obama. It's just that Bernie is white this time.

[Kip Humphrey]

36. Same tactics seemingly down to the order of events and their timetable. Do you think Hilary

realizes that she lost using these tactics last time? Reminds me of non-native language users speaking in their own tongue SLOWLY and LOUDLY to communicate.

[mikehiggins]

103. disappointed but in no way surprised. At 70 not a lot surprises me. n/t

[merrily]

34. The irony of this in light of her 2008 primary campaign against Obama just screams

Ditto the difference, in the 2016 primary, between Bernie and BLM and Hillary and BLM.

[Buzz Clik]

41. I have no credibility because I won't click on an opinion piece from Salon?

Sure.

I stand by my words. If you disagree, fine. Perhaps it's because you have no credibility.

[NWCorona]

44. I never said that but I do think you should read it

Before commenting.

[Bluenorthwest]

49. I think the credibility suffers not from refusing to read it but from then insisting to be an

authoritative voice on the very thing you can't know anything about because you refused to read it. You wish to both announce you have not read it and present yourself as the voice of reason about it. And that is simply not credible.

[HereSince1628]

42. Ya, but, it WORKED. Ergo, it was pragmatic.

To say it is unethical, is to judge it from outside of the culture that produced it.

[stupidicus]

43. Bernie is a racist like Hillary is a fountain of truth

she struggles with truth telling like Bill did with keeping himself to her. It appears to be compulsive

http://grist.org/climate-energy/how-clinton-used-my-reporting-to-make-a-bogus-attack-on-sanders/

[heaven05]

50. with the insistence

by a certain campaign that economics is at the bottom of the racial animus in america, it seems like the same old "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" meme and forgetting about not being hired precisely because of the color of ones skin. Hillary and her connection to the mass incarceration/free labor pool doesn't make her a 'gem' either. It's coming down to the lesser of two evils vote again, for me

[NurseJackie]

52. It's not working. Time's running out. Tick-tock!

The next round of voting is nearly here!

[NWCorona]

60. Come on now NJ

I've been very respectful to you. There's no need to be dismissive.

That said. Even though I would like Bernie to have a higher delegate count. I'm very confident that Bernie will win.

Good luck!

[pdsimdars]

67. dismissive and smug is all there ever seems to be

[NWCorona]

71. I've seen her rise above the fray before.

But you are right. There's to much of that going around.

[Bluenorthwest]

96. Dismissive and smug, but with lots of emoticons.....

very sparkly smugness...

[noiretextatique]

107. No...it doesn't play as well

In urban areas outsidd the South.

[Scootaloo]

53. It's no different than her overtly racist campaign in 2008

Only this time instead of a white lady launching negrophobia and islamophobia at a black man, it's a WASP calling a Jew a racist who only cares about money. Apparently the latter "catches" better among some democrats.

[pdsimdars]

55. She's just like Trump - smears, lies, divisiveness and a war monger

[noamnety]

75. jury results

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

It is disruptive and over-the-top to say that either of our candidates is 'just like Trump." Posts like this do not belong on DU.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:35 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Just blatant nonsense that adds nothing to any cause besides ignorance
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Trump is an asshole. But he never voted for the Iraq war. Hillary did. Truth hurts.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Wow and that post sounds just like something Hannity would say. I quess if this stands Bernie is just like Fidel would be OK too.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No she isn´t like Trump. But politics is a contact sport. This isn't Aunt Mary´s tea party.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't agree with the wording - neither of our candidates is "just like trump." I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they meant to phrase it like this: "She's similar to Trump in that she uses smears, lies, divisiveness and is a war monger." I don't want to hide it because of imprecise language, though - I'm going to assume they misspoke.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not disruptive or over the top if it's true.

[Fumesucker]

104. To be entirely fair, Trump has never voted for a war

[ThePhilosopher04]

77. Only way she can win is to divide, which is a trait

Of right wingers. She is a right winger. It's also why she's not very popular. Only way she can win is to muddy the water. That's a major reason why I will not vote for her under any circumstances. Zero chance.

[cyberpj]

122. Probably tricks she learned by joining the Bush family dynasty when Bill did.

Doesn't anyone remember Bill and Hillary being taken under the wing of The Bush Family under the guise of bi-partisanship?

Wake up. The Clintons have become the new Bushes.

In fact, "W" calls Hillary his sister-in-law and he has called Bill his "brother from another mother" several times.

I'm sure plenty of good stuff has been passed on through THAT connection.

[liberalhistorian]

79. And such a smear is especially

rich coming from a former first lady who touted the 1994 crime bill that has destroyed a generation of young black men by calling young blacks "super predators" that we "need to bring to heel." The younger generation is very much aware of that whether she wants to even acknowledge that or not.

[noiretextatique]

108. I scream this from the rafters

To my friends and family on Facebook. The Clintons cynically manipulate race as it suits their purposes.

[Skwmom]

81. Remember the law of unintended consequences. And it's not only Bernie they have tried to smear.

[FlatBaroque]

88. When I become angry reading about this horrid woman and her ambition

I can only take comfort in the fact that she will never, ever come close to being the President of this country.

[SoapBox]

89. "white systematic priveledge"

The Clinton Family personified.

[liberal N proud]

91. And Donald Trump is a victim

[Nitram]

92. "Some" Hillary supporters?

Broad generalizations have a way of being completely wrong.

[Maedhros]

93. The way that the Clinton campaign has purposely driven a racial wedge between Democrats,

and the large numbers of Democrats who are OK with that, simply validates my decision to sever ties with the Party.

I'm sure I'm not alone in this regard.

[noiretextatique]

109. You are not...it is infuriating

But I am happy to see more and more black people posting support for Bernie on Facebook. African Americans for Bernie is quite active there. I am having some success with my family and friends too. Her comments about Reagan, her condescension towards black activists, and now exposing her cynical race-baiting...it is all having an effect.

[kcr]

95. But is it Hillary supporters who are doing this?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511476906

And if you don't see what's wrong with the picture there, you might be part of the problem.

[Warren DeMontague]

118. Yeah, for the past 8 months here? Absolutely.

"Berniebroosss!" derp

[SMC22307]

123. Yes. "Useless white supremacist liberals" from DU's resident loudmouth...

who is, yet again, on timeout. Fun was had about lily-white Vermont, but there aren't any optics problems in Michigan. Or Chicago. And that heinous "Not good enough, Bernie" OP is coming back to bite all of them in the ass.

I am LOVING this race.

[snowy owl]

114. But Bernie isn't doing that

He needs to intentionally articulate that his vision of America is a united people representing all races and genders. He doesn't get that himself. When Latinos and others see hiim, what they see is a white Jew from Vermont. I've been talking about that for several weeks and even sent a letter to Devine. It isn't pandering but saying it straight and inviting all people to join the revolution which will benefit all people. He has to actually say it. Make it visible. Every time he's asked what he will do for black Americans, he should respond we are all Americans and I'm going to create an economy that will create jobs for everyone. Blacks, whites, Latinos, Asians, young people old people. People need to hear him say it. Latinos and blacks often feel left out of "America" and during his Florida debate I could feel the lack of engagement because they didn't think he was talking to them.

He's not artificial. But right now he's a little naive and too intellectual. Someone in his campaign needs to increase his understanding of inclusiveness.

Hillary is rehearsed from yin to yang. He needs to up his level of connection to people. Too many respond emotionally. Hillary gets that group phony as her emotional rhetoric is. And she gets all the media with her phony words.

[Onlooker]

119. It's an election, a tough fight

The Bernie people try to make Hillary out to be a warmonger, a corporate shill, a homophobe, etc., and the Hillary people try to make Sanders campaign out to be a white youth campaign. It's all part of the game. The same thing is going on with the Republicans. The real question is the degree to which the loser will work to unite the Party. Hillary set a great example in 2008, and we can expect the same from her or Bernie when the time comes.

[Cheese Sandwich]

124. I notice the writer of this just tweeted out that #BernieMadeMeWhite

https://twitter.com/sluggahjells

Good read. Thanks.