2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSen. Elizabeth Warren: No 'Timeline' on Presidential Endorsement
Source: ABC News
By BENJAMIN SIEGEL
Mar 14, 2016, 1:26 PM ET
Sen. Elizabeth Warren has said she has no "timeline" for making an endorsement in the Democratic presidential race.
"The way I see it, Democrats are doing exactly what we should be doing," she told NECN in an interview. "I feel an enormous responsibility to make it clear what Democrats stand for."
The progressive Massachusetts Democrat, who has attracted a following in her party for her support of Wall Street regulation and student loan reform, has largely remained above the primary fray, dodging the national media spotlight as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders battle for the Democratic nomination. (Clinton defeated Sanders in Massachusetts' March 1 primary contest.)
Warren has supported elements of both candidates' campaigns surrounding her signature issues. In December, she praised Clinton's Wall Street reform plan. She later did the same for Sanders' speech on Wall Street regulation in January.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-elizabeth-warren-timeline-presidential-endorsement/story?id=37635974
merrily
(45,251 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)She's not displaying it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)JMO, and my apologies to her fans.
BTW, she is my Senator.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)and if she doesn't go for the candidate that I want her to, c'est la vie!
Endorsements are nice and sure, hers would be great to have, but it's not the be all, end all for a candidate.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Is leaving Senator Warren alone really a need we the people have?
JFKDem62
(383 posts)Which is as it should be.
LettuceSea
(337 posts)I would not want to be in her shoes. Lots of pressure, on both sides.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Believe me, she wouldn't want to be put in my shoes!
Harvard professor, acknowledged nationally as an expert on her subject, then senator, politician with a broad national base of followers, gets to fight for what she believes in instead of waiting tables, etc. I'm sure she enjoys her shoes and is very grateful for them.
So if you think she failed to do the right thing here - and I think she failed - it's okay to say it. It doesn't put unreasonable pressure on her. She is a public figure, a politician in a representative democracy.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Liberals built her up into some kind of superhero, not sure why, and then they felt let down when she wasn't everything they had imagined.
Guys there are no super heroes. Not even Bernie Sanders.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)My husband does enough of that for both of us.
I love my son and would die for my son in a NY nanosecond, but that doesn't mean I need to believe he is perfect or indulge his every whim and flaw.
djean111
(14,255 posts)I would have been just as happy if she had run for president, and - more importantly (to me) - her endorsement of Hillary would absolutely not get me to support Hillary. I would figure that Warren was doing what was good for her agenda in the Senate.
Funny - all those Senators and Representatives we have! - and Bernie and Liz are criticized for not being "leaders". As in, Hillary and Bill didn't fail to get better health care enacted - it was Super Bernie who should have been able to get 'er done!
Macattack1
(34 posts)..seems to me she is waiting for Bernie to either drop out, or to be so far behind that she comes out for Hillary, saying,.."I REALLY would have liked to support Bernie, but since he can't get the delegates, I am supporting Hillary"...kind of cowardly to me...she's trying not to disappoint anyone, by holding back.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Her endorsement of Bernie would be welcome, but it's immaterial to my choice.
Carlo Marx
(98 posts)Liberals from all over the country supported her, including financially. It's just disappointing to see her refuse to help the most progressive, liberal senator while he almost single handily fights the corporate wing of the party (95 percent). It's like watching a movie where the hero must fight hundreds or thousands of combatants with just a few friends. Warren could have at least addressed the Hillary nonsense over Glass Steagall, legislation she is passionate about.
mathewsleep
(857 posts)I seems so obvious that she would back Bernard over Hillary.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)In 2008, I was told by a longtime DUer , while Obama operatives approached activists and pols, they asked about which issues mattered to them.
Meanwhile, on the Clinton campaign side, operatives mainly adverted those who supported Obama should fear for their careers.
mathewsleep
(857 posts)I just returned when my state's primary was coming up.
And yes, I remember a lot of the same shit going on around here back then.
greymouse
(872 posts)Sorry, but that's what she looks like to me. I never have understood why people think she's Presidential material. What she does, she does well. There's a lot more to the Presidency than that.