2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSenator Sanders is the ONLY candidate that does NOT equivocate on women's reproductive rights
A candidate that, when explaining their position on women's reproductive rights uses the tag line, "abortion should be rare", is suggesting a lack of trust of women to control their own bodies.
Bernie unequivocally states that he trusts women to control their own body.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)So he is not the ONLY candidate that does NOT do the bad thing.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)But thank you for kicking the thread
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)who has lost the democratic primary and is swinging at windmills, burning supporters' money and making his family, Ted Devine and Jeff Weaver rich.
...on all counts. Just silly
TM99
(8,352 posts)These constant bullshit posts attacking Sanders & his supporters when there are still 50% of the delegates outstanding is just stupid and inappropriate.
Do you think you are funny? Or cute? Do you expect your chums to come in a pat you on the pack for your wit? Do you think this constant berating is going to mend any fences and unburn any bridges?
People just like you are why I will de-register from the Democratic Party next week after voting for Sanders in the primary. You are part of the very thing that I have fought against for nearly 30 years. The last time I voted in a Democratic Primary was for Jesse Jackson.
And y'all are apparently too blind to see that you need the independent leftist vote to win the GE. There are not enough minorities registered as Democrats to win it without our votes.
I doubt you give a flying fuck, and likely you will just mouth off yet again in reply to me.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I'll bet you $1000 that he doesn't win the nomination.
TM99
(8,352 posts)You are not worth the bytes.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)PP and NARAL endorsed Hillary for good reason.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Because, according to you. A member of the legislature deserves a 100% approval rating from these esteemed organizations for doing nothing.
Am I right? Are both organizations ignorant and just hand out 100% approval ratings to Democratic Socialists for doing nothing?
Or are both organizations intelligent for handing our 100% approval ratings to a Democratic Socialist because he did something?
angrychair
(8,727 posts)Of the two candidates Bernie Sanders has rated 100% with PP and NARAL, EVERY YEAR, since 1993
Clinton's is a 100% since 1996.
To claim that he has had "zero interest" is disingenuous bullshit and you should be ashamed of yourself for hate-mongering against Sanders like that. He has obviously been very vocal for decades.
Sanders:
https://votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/27110/bernie-sanders/66#.VuopPZp-yJI
Clinton: https://votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/55463/hillary-clinton/75#.VuonBpp-yJI
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)Its true, Hillary doesn't trust women.