2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOur nominee is a disaster:
Time may be running out, but Democrats will come to rue Clinton over SandersWhy there's no chance in hell I'm voting for Hillary and you shouldn't either
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/16/our_nominee_is_a_disaster_time_may_be_running_out_but_democrats_will_come_to_rue_clinton_over_sanders/
Bernie Sanders is the only Democrat not linked to an FBI investigation. If this doesnt mean anything to you, then youre too terrified of Trumps rallies to realize that Clinton could get indicted. Also, if you cant fathom the possibility of Donald Trump winning, then keep in mind that most Americans dont trust or like Hillary Clinton. A general election isnt a popularity contest among Democrats. In 10 out of 10 national polls regarding favorability, Hillary Clinton has negative favorability ratings nationally in all 10.
Be very careful what you wish for, because most Americans have an unfavorable view of Clinton and Bernie Sanders already beats Trump by a wider margin. Im only voting for Bernie Sanders in 2016 and I explain why in this YouTube segment. Most importantly, Democrats should remember that 33% of Bernie Sanders voters will refuse to vote for Clinton in November, if she becomes nominee.
As stated by The Wall Street Journal, there are a great many Bernie Sanders supporters like myself:A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicates one third of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders supporters cannot see themselves voting for Hillary Clinton in November. This could spell trouble for Clinton who will likely need Sanders backers in order to win the White House.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)...one of their last hopes for a miracle. Fear, superdelegates, false accusations, etc. Everything bad is now good. The very definition of desperation. What some desire is to drag this out for as long as is possible in order to revel in their role of revolutionary, despite the "revolution's" failure. Is this an attack on all of Bernie's supporters? No. It is a simple observation based on my opinion of a certain minority of Bernie's supporters.
merrily
(45,251 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Usually, there's a big gathering some place. Greek columns lately, even. (Even as a 2008 Obama supporter, those embarrassed me.)
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Gee, even in Boston, it's usually warmer than this by June 7!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)It's so noisy!
June 7 2016 really snuck up on me, though.
Luckily, I keep a supply of belated birthday cards on hand for just such an occasion--and one of them actually says, "Your birthday snuck up on me."
My sister is really not much on people missing her birthday, though.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i am not huge into birthdays either. i mean, it was my mom who did all the hard work, i just showed up.
war on christmas lol
gee i hope we don't sleep through the convention, too!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Oh, wait. I don't think it works that way.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Even MSNBC is all Trump, all the time.
There is very little enthusiasm surrounding her campaign.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And losing to all the rest
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and Ted Cruz has better numbers than Trump for the same reason Sanders has better numbers than Clinton--no one other than primary partisans are paying attention to him.
merrily
(45,251 posts)all the people who already have voted for him voting for him, but they did.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)than Hillary Clinton.
Politically she is a moderate, like Obama there is absolutely nothing about her that is extreme in either direction.
I dont know how much has to do with gender, but some for sure.
For some reason a corporate friendly politician is bad but if it is Hillary then she is to be hated and to be considered the worst politician of all time.
Crazy stuff.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)17% say no. For Bernie. 72% could see themselves supporting Bernie, 26% say no.
hmmmm
http://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/16139NBCWSJMarchPOLLRelease.pdf
Page 9
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Touting surveys from propagandist sites?
I find it nothing short of horrifying that any Democrats support someone like Hi11ary, and then have the unmitigated gall to accuse Bernie supporters for Trump's likely win!
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)But, that's not been my experience with many of those DUers who support Hi11ary. I find it disheartening, to say the least.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)It's not a good source, regardless of the info they share.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Which is saddening, but predictable with how much the media is pushing Trump.
If we're going to lose either way, I'd rather lose with the non-Democrat espousing Democratic values than the Democrat espousing moderate Republican values.
LonePirate
(13,427 posts)They should put their country ahead of their egos.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)And that Bernie would crush her on Super Tuesday.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Old H.A. sure knows what hes spewing about eh?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)You think Repubs are going to just let his questionable rape essays, draft dodging, taxing the middle class, and calling himself a socialist just slide?
Theres a reason they want him to be the nominee: he hasnt been vetted.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)hear the spell binding orator Hillary.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)That's progress, of a sort.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)then yes. She's a disaster that her supporters, and that the Democratic Party, will be choking on for years to come.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)The reason "to keep Trump out" just isn't good enough. Hillary is a liar and I have no way of knowing if she really would be better. What in her history tells me she keeps her word?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)IKR?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He isn't voting for Sanders either. He is ratfucking and making money at the same time. His writing is simply painful to read.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)For truth!
I wonder how much Trump/Rove is paying that shill?
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)You can't be a democrat, progressive or liberal and be supporting trump...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)TO PROTECT THE LIFE CYCLE
NowSam
(1,252 posts)Let the voters decide.
Bernie. California. For the win.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We will hear lots of that from Trump, I suspect.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...the article, regardless of its author, makes a very good point: a significant percentage of Bernie's supporters will never, ever vote for a candidate like Hillary Clinton. Her positions on too many matters of critical importance to these voters are deal-breakers. Leftist independents and progressive Democrats not blinded by inane brand loyalty are always going to reject a Republican Lite.
Unless a near-miracle occurs and Bernie gets the nod, November is going to be a bloodbath. Hillary will drag the downballot down with her...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)it's entirely relevant to bring up the fact that the Nostradumbass who wrote the article has a spectacular record of being wrong about the primary.
Poisoning the well would be saying something like "he's wrong about this, he's a child molester", something that has absolutely no bearing on his credibility.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)They're mostly just simple ad hominems, not critiques of his credibility.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)He has the political acumen of a palm tree.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Well, here's a theory in search of reality, ergo:
The peer reviewed research suggests asking voters who they think will win is the best predictor of electoral success, ergo:
Simple surveys that ask people who they expect to win are among the most
accurate methods for forecasting U.S. presidential elections
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
Studies of prediction market accuracy for election forecasting commonly compare the
daily market forecasts to results from polls published the same day. These studies generally find
that prediction markets yield more accurate forecasts than single polls.
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
Hillary Clinton is a nearly 1/3 favorite at the offshore betting sites and the VT senator is nearly a 30-1 underdog
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner
The efficacy of polls nine months out in predicting a general election winner is essentially null:
intend to vote if the election were held today. That is, polls do not provide predictions; they
provide snapshots of public opinion at a certain point in time. However, this is not how the
media commonly treat polls. Polling results are routinely interpreted as forecasts of what will
happen on Election Day (Hillygus 2011). This can result in poor predictions, in particular if the
election is still far away, because public opinion can be difficult to measure and fragile over the
course of a campaign. However, researchers found ways to deal with these problems and to
increase the accuracy of poll-based predictions
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)And she'll never be mine.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)a single % makes a huge difference in the general. Democrats are playing with fire, but then again, maybe it's time for the DNC to have a major overhaul. Anybody who doesn't believe that is just blind.