2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie-Backing Liberal Group Apologizes For Saying Hillary “Won The Confederacy”
Under a barrage of criticism from Democrats, a progressive group supporting Bernie Sanders for president has retracted, and apologized for, describing Hillary Clintons victories in the South as winning the Confederacy..
But the Progressive Democrats of Americas attempt to apologize on Twitter ended with PDA getting more criticism and eventually publicly attacking some of those critics with, among other things, suggestions that Clinton supporters upset about the Confederacy line were hypocrites.
The controversy began when PDA, a small liberal group founded in 2004 out of the remnants of former Vermont Gov. Howard Deans and former Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinichs progressive insurgent presidential campaigns, wrote in an email that Hillary won the Confederacy, now the rest of the country is primed to go for Bernie.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/progressive-democrats-of-america-bro-out?utm_term=.otNgORB33&bftw=pol#.ttYeJlY11
I've seen this term used many times here and can't help but think its an angry jab at minority voters. Glad to see they got called out for it.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Anyone who refers to large swaths of AA voters as "The Confederacy" better apologize.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I can see why his grassroots felt so comfortable posting such harmful things about us all year.
Finally they decide to apologize. I hope they notice how their grassroots talks to and about us soon and we can get an apology for that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)You think he won't do it?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I just can't imagine why geniuses like this aren't helping his outreach to black voters.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)So this group needs a new moniker. I know its hard to keep track since his base seems to house every single hate group imaginable. Who would have thought that all these progressives were actually skinheads!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Or that black youths are child predators that need to be brought to heel?
Or that gays shouldn't have the right marry?
Or that children from Guatemala should be shipped back?
You're right...with our candidate having said these horrible things, it makes sense that we have no cultural competence...oh wait...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or like harassing John Lewis and Dolores Huerta and calling them sell outs?
Like putting a man who calls Obama niggerized as a spokesman?
Like saying he can help racism by giving poor kids jobs so they wont be hanging on stree corners?
Like telling at a black woman " I SAID BLACK FIFTY TIMES!"
Lije allowing his grassroots to harass us day in day out calling us ignorant and uninformed and saying we dont know bernie because we dont have the internet?
Like calling black hillary voters tools of the oligarchy and servant/master type stuff?
Like never once apologizing for any of it?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)derp?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Derp, the ancient language of the troll people.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Armstead
(47,803 posts)You know those right wing white racist bigots and born again fundies that people here used to criticize.
It is a bad stereotype too, but it's not a jibe at minorities.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I can't imagine why black voters would object to being dismissed as "The Confederacy" by some white hipster blogger, can you?
Kind of like how it's a mystery why they took offense to #mississippiberning.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I will be curious to see how DUers react if Clinton loses the south big time in the general
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)concerns of black Democratic voters.
Democratic losses in the south are not due to the votes of black Democratic voters.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)our primaries and general election southern voters,the major difference is the minority percentages. You'd have to be living in a cave not to notice this.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)And -- please pay attention again -- I said they said something stupid.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)from our subconscious without our intending it.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)People generally use the word Confederacy to refer to White Southern Consercvatives
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)I'm sitting here in Alabama knowing that the Republicans will take this state in the GE. They always do. Hell, everyone in the Democratic Party already knows that. It sucks living in Republican Land, Armstead, but we're down here, we know we live in a red state, and our votes still count.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)But it was not intended to be racist...Just the opposite.
And if you live there you know the people who carry the flag for the Confederacy
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)It just seems to me Democrats outside the South should be criticizing the Republican/money base down here, instead of focusing on their fellow Democrats. The politically negative aspects of the South aren't caused by the Democratic Party. We're actually the good guys in this whole mess.
Maybe elections bring out the worst in people. We start addressing each other like demographic blips that are not moving in our preferred direction, instead of talking and listening to real people with real concerns and priorities.
It's a big diverse nation. If Bernie's message doesn't resonate with Southern Democrats, maybe the problem is in the message, or the way that message is being delivered. That's not a knock on Bernie. It's just an issue he needed to overcome.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I think his message would resonate if there had been time to hone it, get it out, and get more surrogates who various "demographic groups" could relate to.
That was largely a matter of times and logistics.
I personally don't like to think of any group or region as "demographic blips." I prefer to think people are individuals with minds of their own instead of monolithic entities.
MY main point originally simply was that referring to the Confederacy was dumb, but not intended as racist.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)These primaries seem so annoyingly long, but once they start moving there's very little time to adjust. Clinton also had the advantage of having done this before... and watching her husband do it a couple of times, as well. I wish Bernie could have had a few practice runs, too. Peace
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Being black doesn't exempt them from criticism, and there's nothing wrong with stating that you think someone has voted against their own self interest. It's not like working class Republicans aren't criticized for doing exactly that all the time.
Of course, I feel that way about any working class person who votes for Republicans...or the Democratic Party version thereof. Race has precisely nothing to do with it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)about what is in their interest and how they are going about things the wrong way
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I repeat: being black doesn't make someone immune from criticism of their political actions. I'll criticize anyone I damn well please about their political choices.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to learn from black folks who disagree with you.
You obviously know what is best for them and if they had any sense they would just do as you tell them they should do.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)If you want to address anything I actually said or implied, let me know.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for voting for Hillary Clinton indicates you do not respect their decision and aren't terribly interested in their reasons.
Maybe some day you will realize why this is offputtng but probably not.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Goes hand-in-hand with being an American. They're in the same position to criticize my votes. I might argue with them, but I sure wouldn't resent it. Do you think you're in no position to criticize Republican voters? Somehow I doubt that.
You are, I should point out, completely wrong about my willingness to discuss this issue with black people. But I'm getting the feeling that anything I add to that will get me called a liar...and I'm trying real hard not to add any more to my suddenly-enormous Ignore list. You haven't been an asshole about this disagreement, and I appreciate that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)We as white people have no clue what their historical perspective is, why they might think about politics and candidates differently. We just can't.
That does not mean they are always voting for the right person. Just that they perceive interests, benefits, and risks differently.
Criticizing their decisions doesn't help your cause. At best it accomplishes nothing, with significant possible downsides.
if this Bernie thing is to become a genuine movement there has to be better outreach than what the campaign did. Has to be a lot better.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)In fact, I disagree strongly that we "can have no clue what their historical perspective is, why they might think about politics and candidates differently." (emphasis mine) I think that with a genuine attempt to understand that different perspective, through honest discussions and a bit of historical reading, we can get at least a grasp of that perspective, an admittedly very incomplete but useful understanding. In fact, I think anyone serious about advancing social justice has to make that effort.
I can't say I've been able to make that effort with black people to nearly the degree I have with Latinos. I've lived in either the Southwest or the Pacific Northwest all my life, save for my college years in New York. African-Americans are only the third-largest minority here in Portland (there are more Latinos and Asians). I've lived in neighborhoods in the SW that were majority Latino, etc...I've had a lot more opportunity learn about their experiences. But even with my lesser understanding of black experiences, the differences between those two demographic groups socio-political outlooks is pretty evident to me, a white female. I think you can get a pretty decent working take on others' perspectives that way, if you make the effort.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)In the case of the Sanders campaign, they've been having white politicians making unrealistic promises to them since 40 acres and a mule. Remember all that talk from Clinton about needing to make realistic promises that white progressives derided as "no we can't?"
It worked. Sanders never became able to convince them that he would deliver the goods. Nice guy, means well, believes what he's saying, but nothing beyond "revolution" as an explanation for how it would happen. White milennials ate it up, black voters had heard it all before.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And it's no surprise who makes up the lion's share of Bernie's fans. And yes, it was repeated here many, many times. Embarrassing for DU and Democrats in general.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Rep. John Conyers, Rep. Barbara Lee, Rep. Raul Grijalva, Rep. Keith Ellison. So it isn't about race no matter how desperately you want it to be MaggieD.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)LexVegas
(6,080 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts). Another Clinton ally, Mr. Mondale, the former vice president, credited Super Tuesday victories in Alabama and Georgia in 1984 with keeping him alive against Gary Hart, and he said he
believed that Mrs. Clintons strengths with minority voters and workingclass white Democrats would provide decisive advantages in the South for her.
If I hadnt won in the South, I think I would have lost the nomination,
and I think its the South that will be the key for Hillary, too, Mr. Mondale
said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-relying-on-southern-primaries-to-fend-off-rivals.html
And of course we know how well that one turned out in the general election.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)"Internet courage."
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)are something you need to ask yourself why would they support me? Crazy shit going on, I know HRC has nothing in common with racists. This is some funny shit when you read the reasoning..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-kkk_us_56e7373ae4b0b25c918304f2
http://www.chron.com/news/politics/article/Ku-Klux-Klan-leader-Will-Quigg-endorses-Hillary-6889761.php
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/12192975/The-KKK-leader-who-says-he-backs-Hillary-Clinton.html
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)What awful language these "progressives" use. This "revolution" doesnt seem very inclusive.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for their own shitty language
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Same thing. What a douche considering he represents Florida.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)I keep hearing that whole strategy talk of "the map gets better for Bernie after March 15" which is essentially, the map gets whiter for Bernie and we won't have those pesky Blacks to run up Hillary's numbers. Y'all ain't slick. When your strategy is to have to rely on the whiter states for your guy to win, thats not a good strategy when you are running as a Democrat. Now we can talk about why Hillary has the support of so many Black voters when arguably Bernie's message is better for them, but in terms of optics, its not a good look the way that Black voters have been discounted and looked down upon by many Bernie supporters for voting for Hillary Clinton.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)20%? 50%? 100%?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Who said, no wasn't me, I'd never be that insensitive.
Oops.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)little to no cultural sensitivity.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Go ahead and explain to them why they're wrong about how it offends black people.
Go ahead and tell them that dismissing black voters in the South (which is why Clinton won those states) as being associated with the people who enslaved and committed genocide against their ancestors isn't racially offensive.
I'm sure they'd appreciate you setting them straight.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)and especially anti-progressive. Their was no reason to take it as directed at any race, especially not the race that the Confederacy screwed over.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)even if this wasn't intentional, it most certainly was insensitive to African-Americans.
EVERYONE knows that Clinton swept the south because of black voters. Let's not play dumb.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)interpretation of the remark and so unjustifiably conclude that it was a jab at black voters.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)insensitive.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am just a watching you guys try to clean up that dispicable shit yall pulled and bout to kick some old threads to help you if you all have forgotten.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)can clean some of the filth that's been thrown around.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)There are distinct philosophical differences in basic assumptions about the role of government and power between that tradition and the Yankee democratic tradition.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)winning democratic primaries before? If so,when?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Some things you can agree are stupid.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It was a poor choice of words, but it was not racist. Just the opposite. It was aimed at white bigots. That's who identify with the Confederacy.
His camp has been making crazy comments for months.
I complained about that crap from his grassroot and all that happened was i was stfu. But they will pretend none of that stuff matters.
I remember his grassroots calling black folks race baiters day after day but now we should believe all was goodly intended
When yall gon own up to what happened?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)brooklynite
(94,657 posts)Just like the Clinton campaigns volunteer event maker, our system allows for any user to create an event and have it posted publicly on our website. We have a team of people who scan and delete any events that are deemed inappropriate. This event was removed immediately from our system after its discovery and the user has been banned.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/11/1500001/-Sanders-Campaign-Disavows-Bern-the-Witch
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)riversedge
(70,262 posts)spoke about it.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)This is the second time that Sanders had to speak to his supporters about their tactics. One would think that, if they honor the man, they might respect his requests.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Left me speechless.
Cha
(297,429 posts)Mahalo Su~