Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:26 PM Mar 2016

Reminder: Lobbyists for Monsanto, Exxon Raise Money for Hillary Clinton

Lobbyists for Monsanto, ExxonMobil Raise Money for Hillary Clinton

By BenBrody - July 17, 2015 — 3:50 AM CDT

The former secretary of state raised more than $2 million from 40 "bundlers"—fundraisers who get their contacts to give to campaigns—who were also lobbyists, according to financial forms released Wednesday by the Federal Election Commission. In all, the Clinton campaign raised $46.7 million between the beginning of April and the end of June.

Bundlers, who are often wealthy or well-connected individuals, do more than donate to campaigns. They put their social networks to work for favorite candidates, persuading (often equally wealthy and well-connected) family members, friends, colleagues, and other contacts to donate as well, effectively bringing in far more money than they could under the current legal donation limits. Individuals can contribute $2,700 to candidate committees (as opposed to super PACS) for the primary election and the same amount for the general election, for a total of $5,400 in a campaign cycle. Campaigns don't have to disclose their bundlers—unless those bundlers are also lobbyists.

Clinton's bundlers include some familiar names: Jerry Crawford, an outside lobbyist to Monsanto and Iowa kingmaker, put together another $35,000 or so. Tony Podesta, a mega-lobbyist who co-founded the Podesta Group and is the brother of Clinton's campaign chair John, bundled almost $75,000.

John Podesta himself previewed the open-for-lobbying-donations strategy back in April, telling PBS' Charlie Rose show, "I think that our judgment was we will take money if it's legal, obviously" because of how much opponents were raising. "So, we're going to raise the resources that are necessary," he said....

Read more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-17/lobbyists-for-monsanto-exxon-mobile-raise-money-for-hillary-clinton

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
2. LOL. This silliness didn't work when it was first posted last July.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

I don't get it, is it like some kind of religious devotion to Hillary-bashing? Do you expect these smears to accomplish anything?

 

think

(11,641 posts)
4. Is Bloomberg lying about these lobbyists raising money for Hillary? Doesn't it bother you to have
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:53 PM
Mar 2016

huge corporations that spend millions upon millions of dollars to influence our govt are actively working to raise money for your candidate?

And these corporations are among the most corrupt corporations out there.....

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/05/exxon-chevron-oil-fixers-silverstein

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/13/politics_are_so_sick_jon_stewart_blasts_chris_christie_bob_menendez_and_corruption_in_politics/

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/10/20/3713761/exxon-climate-denial/

etc etc etc.....

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
5. I doubt it. Individuals can donate to whoever they want, and records are kept, so I'm confident
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:55 PM
Mar 2016

it's accurate. Claiming that corporationsare raising money for her is dishonest. Corporations, as I'm sure you know, can't donate to campaigns.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
7. The company lobbyists are RAISING the money. Why do you think Bloomberg published the article?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:01 PM
Mar 2016

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
8. As individuals, they can contribute to whoever they want. Bloomberg published the article
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

to get clicks.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
6. Of course it doesn't bother them
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

they are either lying to themselves or they are neo-cons 'third way' democrats

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
15. Why would they do that? Aren't they aware that she has "never changed her vote...."
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:35 PM
Mar 2016

"Time and time again, by innuendo, by insinuation, there is this attack that he is putting forth, which really comes down to—you know, anybody who ever took donations or speaking fees from any interest group has to be bought,” Clinton said. “But you will not find that I ever changed a view or a vote because of any donation that I ever received.”

But, we are all familiar with the philanthropic practices of Monsanto and Ex on Mobil.



People, are you paying any attention at all?


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Reminder: Lobbyists for M...