2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumReminder: Lobbyists for Monsanto, Exxon Raise Money for Hillary Clinton
By BenBrody - July 17, 2015 3:50 AM CDT
The former secretary of state raised more than $2 million from 40 "bundlers"fundraisers who get their contacts to give to campaignswho were also lobbyists, according to financial forms released Wednesday by the Federal Election Commission. In all, the Clinton campaign raised $46.7 million between the beginning of April and the end of June.
Bundlers, who are often wealthy or well-connected individuals, do more than donate to campaigns. They put their social networks to work for favorite candidates, persuading (often equally wealthy and well-connected) family members, friends, colleagues, and other contacts to donate as well, effectively bringing in far more money than they could under the current legal donation limits. Individuals can contribute $2,700 to candidate committees (as opposed to super PACS) for the primary election and the same amount for the general election, for a total of $5,400 in a campaign cycle. Campaigns don't have to disclose their bundlersunless those bundlers are also lobbyists.
Clinton's bundlers include some familiar names: Jerry Crawford, an outside lobbyist to Monsanto and Iowa kingmaker, put together another $35,000 or so. Tony Podesta, a mega-lobbyist who co-founded the Podesta Group and is the brother of Clinton's campaign chair John, bundled almost $75,000.
John Podesta himself previewed the open-for-lobbying-donations strategy back in April, telling PBS' Charlie Rose show, "I think that our judgment was we will take money if it's legal, obviously" because of how much opponents were raising. "So, we're going to raise the resources that are necessary," he said....
Read more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-17/lobbyists-for-monsanto-exxon-mobile-raise-money-for-hillary-clinton
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)I don't get it, is it like some kind of religious devotion to Hillary-bashing? Do you expect these smears to accomplish anything?
think
(11,641 posts)huge corporations that spend millions upon millions of dollars to influence our govt are actively working to raise money for your candidate?
And these corporations are among the most corrupt corporations out there.....
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/05/exxon-chevron-oil-fixers-silverstein
http://www.salon.com/2015/03/13/politics_are_so_sick_jon_stewart_blasts_chris_christie_bob_menendez_and_corruption_in_politics/
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/10/20/3713761/exxon-climate-denial/
etc etc etc.....
DanTex
(20,709 posts)it's accurate. Claiming that corporationsare raising money for her is dishonest. Corporations, as I'm sure you know, can't donate to campaigns.
think
(11,641 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)to get clicks.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)they are either lying to themselves or they are neo-cons 'third way' democrats
think
(11,641 posts)H2O Man
(73,577 posts)bother them. At all.
think
(11,641 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)think
(11,641 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)"Time and time again, by innuendo, by insinuation, there is this attack that he is putting forth, which really comes down toyou know, anybody who ever took donations or speaking fees from any interest group has to be bought, Clinton said. But you will not find that I ever changed a view or a vote because of any donation that I ever received.
But, we are all familiar with the philanthropic practices of Monsanto and Ex on Mobil.
People, are you paying any attention at all?