Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,290 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:11 PM Mar 2016

Newtown Alliance slams Sanders for gun-maker liability stance.


TWEET
Dan Malloy ‏@DanMalloyCT Mar 9

Newtown Alliance slams Sanders for gun-maker liability stance. On issue of gun safety, choice is clear. #ImWithHer


http://ctmirror.org/2016/03/09/newtown-alliance-slams-sanders-for-stance-on-gun-maker-liability/
View summary
36 retweets 29 likes






Newtown Alliance slams Sanders for stance on gun-maker liability

By: Ana Radelat | March 9, 2016


Washington – The Newtown Alliance, a group created after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings to promote gun control, said it is “outraged” that Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders doesn't think gun manufacturers should be liable for all the harm caused by their firearms.

During a debate in Flint, Mich., Saturday evening, Sanders said making gun makers liable for the damage caused by guns that are purchased legally would amount to a ban on the manufacture of guns.

Sanders said the issue is, “If somebody wh o is crazy or a criminal or a horrible person goes around shooting people, the manufacturer of that gun should be held liable.... What you're really talking about is people saying , 'let's end gun manufacturing in America.' That's the implications of that, and I don't agree with that."

On Monday, the National Rifle Association praised Sanders for his stance in a tweet that said, "Sen. Sanders was spot-on in his comments about gun manufacturer liability...".........






NRA Verified account
‏@NRA

Sen. Sanders was spot-on in his comments about gun manufacturer liability/PLCAA http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/sanders-what-youre-really-talking-about-ending-gun-manufacturing-america-I … #DemDebate








43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newtown Alliance slams Sanders for gun-maker liability stance. (Original Post) riversedge Mar 2016 OP
They are, of course, dead wrong. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #1
It's great that team NRA is here to stand up for the rights of the poor gun industry. DanTex Mar 2016 #12
I really admire Clinton for speaking out against gunz. Takes guts. Hoyt Mar 2016 #2
I've noticed Sanders' supporters say little about his stance on guns radical noodle Mar 2016 #3
They repeat D MINUS when they're not praising him for protecting the gun manufacturer trash alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #5
I'll be happy to speak out. Logically Bernie is right. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #8
Keep in mind how dishonest your opponents are. Vattel Mar 2016 #15
They should be held liable for keeping a dangerous product more dangerous instead of coming up uponit7771 Mar 2016 #18
Manufacturers advertise that their gunz make you "manly," their sniper rifle killed lots of people a Hoyt Mar 2016 #26
Razor blades advertise razors for women. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #38
They don't advertise that Gillett razors are the best for suicide, and that suicide will Hoyt Mar 2016 #39
Show me one advertisement that tells me which gun is best for murdering someone bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #41
When I'm not on my phone, I'll show you one about sniper rifle that killed more folks in Iraq Hoyt Mar 2016 #42
Sanders rates a D- from the NRA. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #20
Wrong vote. You are a gunner and believe gunz, stand your ground, etc., are good for society. Hoyt Mar 2016 #40
Gun manufacturers are aware that part of their profit derives from the legal-to-illegal pipeline alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #4
Bernie doesn't want to protect them from paying damages when they are actually at fault. Vattel Mar 2016 #19
I wonder how they feel about arms proliferation doubling while she was Secretary of State. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #6
with all respect to the victims of this horrific massacre, bullshit restorefreedom Mar 2016 #7
Yes they should. He backed NRA, gunz are sold as manly thing to have, push the gun culture and Hoyt Mar 2016 #27
Allow the gun manufactures and dealers to be subject to the same rules the other industries, no Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #9
If you drink 24 beers then go driving, you cant sue budweiser Travis_0004 Mar 2016 #16
Does budweiser have protection from lawsuits? No, it is only the gun industry. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #23
They don't get special treatment... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #17
What other industy has protection like PLCAA? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #24
Fast food industry Travis_0004 Mar 2016 #25
I think possession of a gun should be illegal renate Mar 2016 #10
We saw Bernie the day before the Iowa Caucus. He failed to even mention guns. stone space Mar 2016 #11
Should FORD be held liable for drunk driving fatalities? So fucking desperate to attack Bernie... AzDar Mar 2016 #13
Hillary will drop this issue like a hot rock in the GE. frylock Mar 2016 #14
I'm a Hillary supporter, and I acknowledge that. Kang Colby Mar 2016 #22
I think Hillary will do some hard pushing. Can't see her riversedge Mar 2016 #43
Gun control is a party plank. Read the platform. joshcryer Mar 2016 #29
That Hillary will abandon if she wins the nomination frylock Mar 2016 #31
The nominee does not create the platform. joshcryer Mar 2016 #32
We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition hack89 Mar 2016 #33
Absolutely. joshcryer Mar 2016 #34
Bottomline is either candidate will be good for gun owners. hack89 Mar 2016 #36
I think we'll be seeing more pressing issues. joshcryer Mar 2016 #37
She already has ibegurpard Mar 2016 #35
K&R! hrmjustin Mar 2016 #21
Bull... nobody's talking about.. hyperbole much. Cha Mar 2016 #28
Things like this reveal much about Bernie ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #30
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
1. They are, of course, dead wrong.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016

Protecting manufacturers for baseless, nuisance lawsuits was and is the right thing to do.

radical noodle

(8,013 posts)
3. I've noticed Sanders' supporters say little about his stance on guns
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:16 PM
Mar 2016

This is one of many reasons I support Hillary.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
5. They repeat D MINUS when they're not praising him for protecting the gun manufacturer trash
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:20 PM
Mar 2016

It's telling: the only big, corrupt industry Bernie doesn't want to break up is the gun manufacturers! Suddenly he's all, well, that's an imposition on commerce! They murder our children with impunity, raking in the bucks.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
8. I'll be happy to speak out. Logically Bernie is right.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

A manufacturer shouldn't be held liable for improper use of its product. Some guy got his face eaten off by a man high on Bath Salts, do you think the manufacturer should be held liable?

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
15. Keep in mind how dishonest your opponents are.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

They don't want a sensible discussion of the issue. They just want to paint Sanders as some sort of NRA tool.

uponit7771

(90,359 posts)
18. They should be held liable for keeping a dangerous product more dangerous instead of coming up
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:21 PM
Mar 2016

... with solutions.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
26. Manufacturers advertise that their gunz make you "manly," their sniper rifle killed lots of people a
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:36 PM
Mar 2016

can help you too. Then they funded the NRA to push lax gun legislation, stand you ground hogwash, and more. By God that is similar to what the tobacco industry did and had to pay billions. Sanders is a tool for gunz, as are his supporters.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
38. Razor blades advertise razors for women.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:05 PM
Mar 2016

If a woman commits suicide or slashes someone with one, Gillette shouldn't get sued.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
39. They don't advertise that Gillett razors are the best for suicide, and that suicide will
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:51 PM
Mar 2016

solve your problems, so buy enough razors for the lonely weekend. Jeeez, some of you guys are really obtuse.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
42. When I'm not on my phone, I'll show you one about sniper rifle that killed more folks in Iraq
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:53 AM
Mar 2016

and why it's a good deal. Gunners will either oil theirs up, or run out and buy one.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
20. Sanders rates a D- from the NRA.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:27 PM
Mar 2016

The only "pro gun" (which, of course, it isn't) stance of his is his vote on the law protecting manufacturers from nuisance lawsuits. That was the right vote.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
4. Gun manufacturers are aware that part of their profit derives from the legal-to-illegal pipeline
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:18 PM
Mar 2016

It's why they resist all efforts to strengthen enforcement. The only things that will stop them is civil suits, just like the tobacco companies. The only big, destructive industry Bernie wants to protect is that gun manufacturer trash, that gleefully protect the legal-to-illegal pipelines that murder our children? Man of principle my royal Irish ass.

Good on Newtown.

Every illegal gun begins as a legal gun. Every single one.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
19. Bernie doesn't want to protect them from paying damages when they are actually at fault.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:22 PM
Mar 2016

That being said, I disagree with his vote on the PLCAA. I think the courts should assess the merits of claims against gun manufacturers using common law principles that are much more sophisticated than a statute like PLCAA. Trying to define the limits of the liability of gun manufacturers by means of PLCAA is a bad idea for the same reason that most tort reform is a bad idea: it results in arbitrary lines being drawn that will in some cases prevent the courts from ensuring a just resolution of lawsuits.

However, I see no reason to think that Sanders is not a man of principle just because he disagrees with me about this.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
6. I wonder how they feel about arms proliferation doubling while she was Secretary of State.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:22 PM
Mar 2016
Further research done by Sirota and Perez of International Business Times and based on US government and Clinton Foundation data shows that during her term the State Department authorized $165 billion in commercial arms sales to twenty nations that had given money to the Clinton Foundation. These include the governments of Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Algeria, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, all of whose records on human rights had been criticized by the State Department itself.

During Hillary Clinton’s years as secretary of state,
arms sales to the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation ran at nearly double the value of sales to the same nations during George W. Bush’s second term. There was also an additional $151 billion worth of armaments sold to sixteen nations that had donated funds to the Clinton Foundation; these were deals organized by the Pentagon but which could only be completed with Hillary Clinton’s authorization as secretary of state. They were worth nearly one and a half times the value of equivalent sales during Bush’s second term.

http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/01/30/clinton-system-donor-machine-2016-election/

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
7. with all respect to the victims of this horrific massacre, bullshit
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:26 PM
Mar 2016

if guns are a legally manufactured and sellable product, the makers should not be held liable for their abuse any more than ginsu should be held liable when someone is stabbed to death.

if they want to go after the legality of guns, then that is a completely separate and worthy conversation.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
27. Yes they should. He backed NRA, gunz are sold as manly thing to have, push the gun culture and
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:38 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:06 PM - Edit history (2)

racism, and worse.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. Allow the gun manufactures and dealers to be subject to the same rules the other industries, no
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:28 PM
Mar 2016

special treatment for this industry.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
16. If you drink 24 beers then go driving, you cant sue budweiser
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:15 PM
Mar 2016

Other industries dont need those protections because they already have them. Its only because judges with an agenda allowed the lawsuits so the law was written.

Same reason the fast food industry has legal protection against fat people suing, it became a problem.

If a bunch of people start suing budweiser after a DUI I thibk we should write a law to protect them. Or hell, write the law now if it makes you happy.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
17. They don't get special treatment...
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

...and the way the PLCAA (link here) is painted as some sort of blanket immunity is just wrong. There are still plenty of ways gun manufacturers and dealers can be held liable for criminal activity. People should really do some reading about this stuff before just accepting it. This is one of the most egregious distortions Clinton has used against Bernie as it's just flat out wrong what she says about it.

renate

(13,776 posts)
10. I think possession of a gun should be illegal
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

But it's not. Someone doing something stupid with an object that it is legal to produce and/or own isn't the manufacturer's fault. So I think he's intellectually right to take the position he does.

That doesn't mean I'd do the same if I were a senator. I'd do anything I could to end the production and ownership and profitability of guns--at least, of guns more powerful than those available in 1776 that are designed to kill anything with fewer than four legs. (And in an ideal world, since I'm a vegetarian, I'd like to see hunting ended too, but that's a different story.) But if I made gun manufacturers, who were operating legally, responsible for what happened with those guns, I wouldn't have a principle to stand on... I'd just be an anti-gun activist.

I wish Bernie's position were different, because I hate guns and everything about them. But I understand it.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
11. We saw Bernie the day before the Iowa Caucus. He failed to even mention guns.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

The day before that, we heard Gabby Giffords at a Hillary event.





Gabby was very persuasive.

I couldn't believe that Bernie didn't think the topic even worth mentioning the very next day at a venue just 30 miles away.

I don't want to hear about the woes of Mom and Pop Gun Manufacturers.







 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
13. Should FORD be held liable for drunk driving fatalities? So fucking desperate to attack Bernie...
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:50 PM
Mar 2016

you've lost your WAY.

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
22. I'm a Hillary supporter, and I acknowledge that.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:36 PM
Mar 2016

There is nothing wrong with pragmatic politics. I'm looking forward to hearing a few more stories about Hillary Oakley learning to shoot on pawpaw's farm.

With respect to guns, I see no difference between Clinton and Sanders as POTUS. If a gun control bill makes it through Congress, either of them would sign.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
32. The nominee does not create the platform.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

The delegates to the convention create the platform.

It's likely she'll walk back the rhetoric and try not to mention it.

But it will come up in debates.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
33. We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016
We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms


This is the part that always seems to be forgotten.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
34. Absolutely.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:23 AM
Mar 2016

Democrats never have been nor are they "gun grabbers." I'm just saying Clinton's rhetoric is already part of the platform. The only thing surprising is that a presidential candidate is talking that way, when 8 short years ago the same person was talking about hunting with daddy. Just goes to show how far we've progressed that that kind of talk, talking about regulations as opposed to talking about being pro gun, is acceptable rhetoric to the voting population.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
37. I think we'll be seeing more pressing issues.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:31 AM
Mar 2016

Like building walls, banning muslims, or deporting undocumented.

And I'll bet before it's over Trump says he's a Sandy Hook Truther.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Newtown Alliance slams Sa...