2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLumping in Sanders with white privilege implies a belief that Jews are not an oppressed minority.
Sanders has been described as the "white male candidate" and some have gone as far as to invoke white supremacy. While Sanders has never made much of an issue of his Jewish roots during the campaign, they are not a secret either. This begs the question: Do Clinton supporters in general believe that discrimination of Jewish people is no longer an issue in the US?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And Im a Jewish woman.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)I've seen some disgusting posts on this forum as well. It sickens me.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Of course, some say that there's no sexism or misogyny here against Clinton. I've even seen her referred to as Mrs. Bill Clinton. FFS! No sexism there...
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)hereforthevoting
(241 posts)And no secret that discrimination extends to the polls.
Response to hereforthevoting (Reply #2)
PonyUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to redgreenandblue (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)It's pretty well documented. The rest of your post is equal parts shit, bullshit and bigotry.
Response to actslikeacarrot (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)A genuine holocaust denier! Wonders never fucking cease. Evidence is well documented. You just dismiss it because you don't want to believe it. Because you hate Jews.
yuiyoshida
(41,853 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:12 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Doesn't seem much of an issue to me
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1541268
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Anti-semite and please also alert MIRT.Get rid
of this asshole.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:18 AM, and the Jury voted 7-0 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Glad I didn't have to read long to find the racism.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alert.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: damn this best get a 7-0 for this AntiSemite!
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Chosen ones? What the German's allegedly did? Are you fucking serious? 'Hide' and notify MIRT, we have a live one.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Completely unacceptable.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Paging MIRT.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Response to Jefferson23 (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...that you hate Jews. Have fun voting for trump!
Response to actslikeacarrot (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)an·ti-Sem·i·tism
noun: hostility to or prejudice against Jews.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)More of what I'm starting to see as DU Classic Antisemitism.
yuiyoshida
(41,853 posts)Thank You Mirt!!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)but even after the first PPR that clearly said so, his critics have affected great offense that anyone would even suggest such a thing. But the parade of vile anti Jewish verbiage has continued. It has not been opposed and it seems to be nurtured by DU itself.
I'm not very comfortable on DU these days, with the Reagans as heroes and antisemitic verbiage being treated as some cute personal quirk.
kcr
(15,318 posts)Who are overwhelmingly white and and a majority of whom are not poor. Class is a defining characteristic of white privilege. I'm a Bernie supporter, myself. I fit right in with that demographic. I am, however, not male. I will say that it distresses me that too many of my fellow supporters react to this with defense rather than introspection. It's a shame and only reinforces the impression that the movement is about white privilege. Your OP will do no one any favors.
randome
(34,845 posts)He doesn't make it an issue and so I don't think the voters would have, either. But he has numerous other problems that prevent him from being the front-runner: a lack of coalition-building, being a Democratic Party-come lately, his over-reliance on income inequality (an important issue but not the only one.)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)was the target of one of the ugliest hit pieces imaginable on DU.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)It's a missed opportunity, in my opinion.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)of privilege doesn't imply that you automatically don't have other kinds of privilege.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Yes we are a minority, yes pockets of discrimination still exist. But in America of 2016 we are hardly "oppressed."
I was taught about my white privilege way back in the early 1960s, when the rabbi of our congregation returned from Selma (he was one of the clergy selected to surround Dr. King during the march). He spoke to us kids about racism, and told us that no matter what kinds of discrimination we still faced as Jews (there was still some redlining of housing and job discrimination in our city), that we were still privileged because our faces were white. He asked us to imagine what it was like to have a black face, where people judged you before they even began to know who you were. I've never forgotten that little talk.
If I had to measure the discrimination I've felt during my life, I'd definitely say that being a woman has had far more repercussions than being a Jew ... by a long shot.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)I mean, Hillary supporters wouldn't be bigots would they?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)In that you have to have a certain amount of privilege to say you won't vote for whoever the Demcratic candidate is, because women and people of color are at greater risk of bad Supreme Court nominees. But that would be true for supporters of either candidate who would refuse to vote for the other one in the general election.