Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Until a candidate has 2383 delegates, nobody has "already lost" (Original Post) phantom power Mar 2016 OP
Very true Duckhunter935 Mar 2016 #1
Okay. At what point do you think his victory is so unlikely, as to be effectively lost? NT Adrahil Mar 2016 #2
If Clinton gets 2383 delegates, then he will have effectively lost. phantom power Mar 2016 #3
Simple? More like simplistic. Adrahil Mar 2016 #13
I think that point will be reached after the April 26th primaries. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #23
Great question Stuckinthebush Mar 2016 #8
I don't think I would say it's "over" yet.... Adrahil Mar 2016 #16
Wouldn't that be nice if we applied that standard to our futile wars in the Middle East? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #19
Most of the time, the winning candidate does not hit the magic number before... MohRokTah Mar 2016 #4
It appears the Sanders isn't going to concede. So this must be one of those exceptions. phantom power Mar 2016 #9
That happens too. MohRokTah Mar 2016 #14
Sanders can't hold a Senate seat simultaneously with the Presidency shawn703 Mar 2016 #25
Sanders will never be president. MohRokTah Mar 2016 #27
Whistling past the graveyard... kristopher Mar 2016 #34
Yep, that's exactly what the entire Sanders campaign is doing... MohRokTah Mar 2016 #35
Rubber, glue and all the rest of the schoolyard bullshit... kristopher Mar 2016 #37
That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard, a 10 year old might believe that but I doubt it Autumn Mar 2016 #5
That is interesting. What is "stupid" about it? phantom power Mar 2016 #10
That Bernie has already lost because he has less delegates than her. Autumn Mar 2016 #15
When Bernie wins, it will be MONUMENTAL! immoderate Mar 2016 #6
He has lost itsrobert Mar 2016 #7
lol Hiraeth Mar 2016 #17
I can declare myself eligible for the NFL Draft. firebrand80 Mar 2016 #11
Correction: Until a candidate has that number at the CONVENTION. JackRiddler Mar 2016 #12
Actually it's 2,382. Chichiri Mar 2016 #18
I've seen 2383 on numerous sites. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #24
If that's the case rock Mar 2016 #20
Face it, either one could have their plane go down, suffer a stroke or heart attack, or meet with shraby Mar 2016 #21
Many candidates have already dropped out this primary season. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #26
What about a basketball team losing 69-57 with 39 seconds left? cyberswede Mar 2016 #29
If Bernie wins I am going to address those Hillary supporters who have constantly bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #28
Looks like April 19 might be the final meaningful contest. LonePirate Mar 2016 #30
Let the west have it's turn to vote. snowy owl Mar 2016 #31
As I've stated before... shanti Mar 2016 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author snowy owl Mar 2016 #33
I wouldnt be so sure. reddread Mar 2016 #36
Somehow, Dennis Kucinich never bought into that theory. brooklynite Mar 2016 #38
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
13. Simple? More like simplistic.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

At some point, his required share of the delegates will get SO high, that it will be EXTREMELY unlikely he could win.

This reminds me of climate change deniers. They always emphasize how it's not 100% certain.

Okay.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
23. I think that point will be reached after the April 26th primaries.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:09 PM
Mar 2016

Many candidates have already dropped out this primary season and it's not at all uncommon for candidates to drop out before they're mathematically eliminated.

If Clinton is ahead by ~400 delegates at the end of April, as I suspect she will be, Sanders needs to consider the potential repercussions of continuing to run.

Stuckinthebush

(10,847 posts)
8. Great question
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:55 PM
Mar 2016

At what point is the math so unrealistic that he has essentially or effectively lost?

An average of 55% of all delegates going forward? 60%?

Given polling, super delegates, and money - at what point can we say that it is effectively over?

I say right now. But, I understand his supporters wanting to wait a bit before giving in to the mathematics.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
16. I don't think I would say it's "over" yet....
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 02:01 PM
Mar 2016

But if Sanders doesn't rack up BIG victories over the next few weeks, it will be. If he can't win big in New York (which seems unlikely, but there hasn't been a ton of polling) then I don't see how anyone can plausibly assert that he is still viable.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
19. Wouldn't that be nice if we applied that standard to our futile wars in the Middle East?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 02:03 PM
Mar 2016

You know, the one's Hillary voted for.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
4. Most of the time, the winning candidate does not hit the magic number before...
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

being declared the winner.

2008 was a notable exception, but Kerry never hit the magic number before being declared the winner. Gore had not hit it before the primaries were essentially over.

Bill Clinton was considered the presumptive nominee before hitting he magic number in 1992.

It rarely goes to the magic number, let alone the convention.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
14. That happens too.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:59 PM
Mar 2016

Usually the candidate who fails to realize they have lost becomes a pariah. There are usually consequences for them politically. For a Senator or Congressman doing something so stupid, they can usually count on crappy committee assignments. Kucinich suffered politically for that sort of bullshit.

Candidates who stay in but attack the Republicans rather than the presumed Democratic nominee, on the other hand, are usually rewarded politically.

We'll see which category of loser Sanders falls into.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
25. Sanders can't hold a Senate seat simultaneously with the Presidency
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:31 PM
Mar 2016

But even if he did lose, Sanders will still have more power than he did before he ran. After all, once the nominee is decided, someone's going to need to motivate the legions of his independent and far left supporters to fall in line. Clinton's not going to be able to do it by herself. I bet that's going to be worth a pretty penny politically.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
27. Sanders will never be president.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:34 PM
Mar 2016

It's over.

Now we see what sort of loser the man is.

I have not trusted him since the last time I heard him on "Brunch with Bernie" several years ago. He always rubed me the wrong way, much like John Edwards always rubbed me the wrong way.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
5. That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard, a 10 year old might believe that but I doubt it
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

since kids at 10 years old are pretty smart.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
6. When Bernie wins, it will be MONUMENTAL!
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

Consider what there is to overcome. The Democratic Party is aligned with the ruling class.

--imm

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
11. I can declare myself eligible for the NFL Draft.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

While I'm technically "in the Draft" until the last pick is made, I'm not really in the draft, because there's no realistic scenario where a team would draft me.

Bernie remains in the race, but there's not much of a race left.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
12. Correction: Until a candidate has that number at the CONVENTION.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

Or in pledged delegates.

Supers don't count until they vote, regardless of their stated preference.

If Clinton goes over that number before the convention on the strength of adding supers, that is not yet a "win."

Only if someone has gone over that number in PLEDGED delegates can it ever be said to be mathematically over prior to an actual floor vote of the convention.

Here is the current math without the supers, from earlier thread:
www.democraticunderground.com/12511521532

Total delegates (pledged and super) = 4763.

Super delegates = 717.

Of these, 493 are currently given in media counts as having expressed a preference. According to the media counts, in other words, 224 supers have not yet expressed a preference.

Pledged delegates = 4046.
Majority (half of pledged delegates plus 1) = 2024.

Total of pledged delegates won in primaries and caucuses so far = 1964.

Total pledged delegates remaining = 2082!

Clinton pledged delegates won = 1139.
Needs for majority of pledged delegates: 885.
To gain majority of pledged delegates, Clinton must win 42% of the delegates in the remaining contests.

Sanders pledged delegates won = 825.
Needs for majority of pledged delegates: 1199.
To gain majority of pledged delegates, Sanders must win 58% of the delegates in the remaining contests.

With the supers currently committed to Clinton (467) it is near-certain that during the primary season she will surpass a majority of the total delegates (2382 out of 4763) before anyone reaches a majority of the pledged delegates (2024 out of 4046). At that point the claim will be made that she has "clinched." This will be untrue, because supers can switch and should not be considered counted before the actual convention ballot.

If a candidate wins the majority of pledged delegates, the pressure will be on the supers to respect the decision of the primary elections and caucuses. They would reverse that decision at the risk of destroying the party's chances.

In a close race, the force of this moral argument can be further complicated by the eventuality that the winner of the pledged delegates is not the same as the winner of the (countable) total of individual votes cast.

Basically, Clinton wins cleanly in any scenario where she has the majority of pledged delegates, or is very close. Except that for Sanders to get ahead even by a little bit would require a series of blow-outs that would change the narrative with regard to momentum and electability.

Chichiri

(4,667 posts)
18. Actually it's 2,382.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

I'm not exactly sure why the total numbers are in a minor state of flux, but they are.

And I'm glad that you acknowledge that superdelegates count.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
24. I've seen 2383 on numerous sites.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:22 PM
Mar 2016

I'd think it needs to be an odd number to prevent a potential tie.

I'm not a fan of superdelegates, but they won't be the determining factor this year anyway. Clinton will accumulate way more than 2026 pledged delegates.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
21. Face it, either one could have their plane go down, suffer a stroke or heart attack, or meet with
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 03:04 PM
Mar 2016

some sort of accident and become incapacitated.
No one wins until they are the convention with the required number of delegates.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
22. Many candidates have already dropped out this primary season.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 04:22 PM
Mar 2016

And it's not uncommon for candidates to drop out when the writing's on the wall. Even when they haven't been mathematically eliminated.

Response to phantom power (Original post)

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
28. If Bernie wins I am going to address those Hillary supporters who have constantly
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:34 PM
Mar 2016

put Bernie down saying it's over, put a fork in him, he's done, ain't gonna happen etc.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
30. Looks like April 19 might be the final meaningful contest.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:49 PM
Mar 2016

If Bernie loses New York, there will be no way for him to catch up, except in theoretical terms.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
31. Let the west have it's turn to vote.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:51 PM
Mar 2016

She gets the nomination, then trump becomes her target. It is pretty simple folks. Unless you don't think she's a very strong candidate? In which case, maybe you anointed the wrong candidate.

Response to phantom power (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Until a candidate has 238...