2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOhio: Romney's Allies Just Bought the Election
Late last month, Gerry Bello and Bob Fitrakis at FreePress.org broke the story of the Mitt Romney/Bain Capital investment team involved in H.I.G. Capital which, in July of 2011, completed a "strategic investment" to take over a fair share of the Austin-based e-voting machine company Hart Intercivic.
"Several tanker trucks full of political ink have been spilled on Mitt Romney's tenure as a vulture capitalist at Bain Capital," Bello and Fitrakis wrote. "A more important story, however, is the fact that Bain alumni, now raising big money as Romney bundlers are also in the electronic voting machine business. This appears to be a repeat of the infamous former CEO of Diebold Wally O'Dell, who raised money for Bush while his company supplied voting machines and election management software in the 2004 election."
Lee Fang at The Nation recently confirmed the FreePress reporting in a story of his own on the "crony capitalism" of Tagg Romney, whose father's money and high-profile connections present a number of troubling corporate conflicts of interest should Mitt Romney become President. The Daily Dolt also followed up with a very well-documented article on the H.I.G. group, their connections to Bain, and their takeover of Hart Intercivic...
Also this week, in a video that has gone a bit viral, The David Pakman Show expressed understandable concerns about Romney's close business partners having this type of corporate control over a large e-voting company whose, extremely vulnerable and insecure [PDF] --- and often 100% unverifiable --- voting and tabulation systems are now used, according to VerifiedVoting.org's database, in all or parts of California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington. [Pakman's video is embedded below.]
http://www.bradblog.com/?cat=38
--------------------
Fun huh. Romney's supporters buy Ohio's e-voting machine company. You know. Unprovable e-voting. No paper trail. No proof.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I don't know what every county in the state uses, but our machines print out a paper trail in real time.
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)The machine I used printed a paper that said President: Barack Obama right there on the right hand side inside a little window. My voter number was 4A. When the clerk gave me my plastic card to put in the machine he told me to look at the top of the screen and make sure 4A was located on the top center of the page. It was. So yeah, there is a paper trail.
lebkuchen
(10,716 posts)Do people still use bumper stickers, yard signs, etc?
we can do it
(12,189 posts)I've been out canvassing nearly every and that's what I see. I also see Obama supporters pretty excited and rMoney's pretty nasty and rude.
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)for a long time. Now, they seem to be everywhere. I would say it's about even Obama/Robme. Like the other poster said, the Robme supporters are mean, nasty, and rude. You can pretty much tell who they are just by listening to them.
My personal impression is that the major cities in Ohio will give the election to President Obama.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)Also, most of the yards for him have several signs here in central Ohio vs one sign (or maybe two) per yard Obama.
And I agree on how the vote will go.
nobunnyclue
(103 posts)and we used to have machines like that for one election. There was a receipt that printed and stayed in the machine, but there was a window where you could watch it print your choice. However, if I understand, it was only for auditing the accuracy of the electronic software. I remember the supervisors had to keep going over and using their administrator pass-cards to get the machines to work. They were touchscreen and it took people a long time to vote -- I think because it was much slower to read all the ballot initiatives on the screen, and because there were only half-dozen machines.
Those machines were only here for one election, then they replaced them with a "fill the bubble" and scan system. It digests the ballot and then gives you an alert if you under voted or over voted (picked too many candidates, not voted too many times.) I think it may make a paper trail internally, in case something happens to the software and the electronic records are lost, but that's just something I heard once and don't know if it's true or b.s.
In the last couple of elections with those scanner machines, there was virtually no wait at my polling place. They set up about 30 stalls for people to fill the bubbles in, and then the scanning takes about 10 seconds.
No matter how rich these Bain guys are, they are money men, not loyal lieutenants like the people who were attached to "dubbya's" good-ol-boy network. IMHO they are not the threat. The "send Obama back to Africa" zealots who have joined the Romney throng, and many of whom are polling volunteers, those are the folks who need to be watched like hawks, because their ends-justify-the-means mentality is far more short sighted than the Bain guys who have a lot to lose personally if they get caught.
msongs
(67,420 posts)tblue37
(65,408 posts)not to squawk about the electronic cheating as long as they are protected by those machines from facing viable primary challenges.
elleng
(130,974 posts)that keeps us from ever seriously challenging repug misbehavior. I suspect it is widespread, and we are too lazy or something to go after it.
If it happens agan, I'll leave for Canada.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)It's very strange that no one wants to cover this, talk about this or apparently change this.
They either have made a pact like you suggest or there is something else being held over their heads to keep them silent.
elleng
(130,974 posts)Rover: Just flip the switch.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)Its strictly optical scanning machines on paper ballots. The ballot has a tear off tab that you take with you that has a number corresponding to the ballot you voted with.
In that respect the author is wrong. I can't speak for other states, however.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)You don't see the sleight-of-hand trickery that shows you the winner. Do you trust your programmer? By the way, who is your programmer?
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)A system that allows the voter to take a record with them that has the number of the ballot they used is a pretty secure system and would be easily to challenge and verify if I thought there was an issue. This is the definition of a paper trail.
Now I'm not sure what exactly would satisfy your particular standard, but I'm satisfied with our system. It's ancient technology but we like it. I'm glad the state is too cheap to pay for the whiz bang machines that seem to be the cause of much of the problems.
And I'll say it again: the author is wrong. We don't use e-voting machines here.
And that fact begs the question, what else is the author wrong about?
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)If you insist on using the scanners, hand-count first. Use the scanner as a cross-check. Discrepancies would trigger a hand-recount.
Machines are not trustworthy.
If you carry off a stub that is traceable to your ballot, you do not have a secret ballot. That is, your ballot is traceable to you.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)Other than indulging your paranoid fantasies. Counting votes the way you would have it takes us back to the 1700s and leaves room for plenty of potential for problems.
Either participate in the process or don't, but you are in no way helping Obama with this garbage.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)Your insults are noted.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)left on green only
(1,484 posts)....complete with hanging chads and all. But that doesn't eliminate the problem of election fraud for me. The thing that I contend with here is not having my ballot counted at all, like the ballots of everyone else are.
People here can tell by looking at me that I am one of the few people living here who are not right wing, red neck, nazis. It's easy for them to tell that my father and mother were not related to each other before marriage, and because of that, my ballot is usually subject to a slight of hand, whereby instead of putting it directly into the box, the election worker will lay it along side of the box. It is not until I stand there and refuse to leave that they will actually deposit my ballot into the box.
But it is easier for me to make them act with honesty in a social setting like a polling place, where their behavior can be called out so that everyone else who is present in the room can see it, than it is for me to mail in an absentee ballot. The reason for that is because there is no telling what will happen to my ballot if it is contained inside of an envelope that some "unknown" person who is probably of a different political persuasion than I, opens in secret while they are alone in an enclosed room. In that case, there is no telling what will happen to anyone's ballot, irregardless of where in the USA they live.
edit to eliminate extra word.
nebenaube
(3,496 posts)Will tell you that the optical scans did not validate on the recount of the Walker recall.
tonya_okla
(7 posts)I live in Oklahoma and have never been given a ballot that has a tear off tab.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)which is a paper trail.
The last election I worked on was a city wide election in 2011. In that election about 35% of the people requested an absentee ballot.
tblue37
(65,408 posts)--or the Republicans who control them. Certainly the absentee vote numbers have skyrocketed this year.
ReasonableToo
(505 posts)...Rove's illegal caging tactics can render absentee ballots useless.
A soldier who was proud to vote for Candidate Obama was shocked to discover that his absentee ballot was protested and not counted in '08.
Rove sends mail to the military with "do not forward" stamped on it. When the mail is returned, he uses it to protest absentee ballot.
He targets the military and students.
Make sure you are still registered!
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)The late absentee military votes that shouldn't have been counted were the story, not the caged military votes that should have been counted.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Or just drop out.
Look, people have been doing nasty stuff to people ever since we found the ability to organize and in to governable population groups.
The best way to combat this stuff is to get involved, like a lot of people on this board have done...
Grown2Hate
(2,013 posts)demgrrrll
(3,590 posts)in Ohio. Can someone check this out. I remember a similar hair on fire thread at another site with similar information which was supplemented by the information about there being only two counties in Ohio with the suspect machines.
Maraya1969
(22,483 posts)and the second page, Gravis Marketing has Romney up by 1 and ARG has him up by 1. All others in the presidential poll go to Obama. It is deep blue in Nate Silver's blog under the presidential forecast. If it flips it is going to be too apparent. If Romney wins Ohio there will be hell to pay.
nebenaube
(3,496 posts)And Bush won Ohio... despite the evidence.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)IMHO, there's no way in hell Romney could be ahead in Virginia.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)No politician will look at it. They seem to want it rigged. Figure that.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)CitizenLeft
(2,791 posts)I early voted on Wed, had to go to downtown Cleveland at the Board of Elections to do it, only place you can early vote here. We used the old-fashioned paper ballot that requires a pen to black out an oval. Put it in an envelope, and into a blue ballot box. I was surprised, had no idea this would be the method, since we used e-voting machines in both 2008 and 2010 (in 2004, it was those punch-out chads with a stylus). I think tabulating machines count the ballots?
There's another tool people may not be aware of. In 2010, I went to the election board's website and I was able to see exactly how I voted in that election. That was reassuring, but I'm not sure how relevant that is in insuring that every vote is counted and included in the totals.
Bottom line, having Kasich as our gov'r and Husted SoS makes me freakin' nervous, especially in light of what happened here in 2004.
Kteachums
(331 posts)Maraya1969
(22,483 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)All ballots are paper. In addition, we have a D SOS.
http://verifiedvoting.org/
This site says Curry County has machines from that company, but the number of voters would not be significant enough to change the outcome of presidential election:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/searched.php?ec=allall&state=OR
Frankly I'm worried about Ohio, Florida, PA, and Virginia most.
KarenElissa
(5 posts)A song for the cause -- it's called "See Mitt Run"
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)except for Ted Strickland (2006), Sherrod Brown (2006), Zack Space (2006, 2008), Steve Driehaus (2008), Charlie Wilson (2006, 2008)....